It’s a strategy to provoke whites, incentivize non-whites to provoke whites, immunize non-whites from basically any legal or social consequences for anything from verbal provocations to outright physical assaults (including murder), and cripple any abilities whites have for legal self-defense against such attacks, under any circumstances.Did someone on this forum coin the term "post-truth world"? I'm not sure but anyway it appears to be a crime to even criticise non-whites now as a means of hurting whites.
The first time some light skinned/white guy is caught on video harassing or hitting an asian its national news and rolled out all week as a crisis of race relations. ignoring the very obvious crimes committed by blacks.
Just the last week people criticising Meghan (you know who) were losing their jobs or attacked for merely pointing out flaws in her story. You dont even have to say anything racist now and its a social crime.
All this is going to do is empower more non-whites to do more to gain attention and carry out crimes. Similar to South Africa.
The Alinsky tactics “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it,” as well as “Keep the pressure on” come to mind.
Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic RadicalsLest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.