New posts

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CERN" data-source="post: 1456816" data-attributes="member: 21974">"According to Gartner, more than 50% of enterprises will begin to adopt remote browsers in order to reduce the impact of cyber attacks over the next three years [...]"Enterprises. Keyword here; i.e. buisnesses. That's what they care about ultimately.This is the cyberbully half-truth,"Cybersecurity best practice dictates that you should not expose your local PC or laptop to the public internet, it's the easiest way to have it become infected." - This is a half-truth more or less. When's the last time you or anyone you know actually ever got their computer infected? It's a serious question, because unless directly downloading from torrents a standard firewall is going to block many potential problems. It's not to say you can't ever get malware, but the odds don't justify the cyber security threat going on here. Essentially because computers are complex and easily misunderstood the vast majority of public consensus on them is to defer to the 'authority' on the topic; i.e. the public will gladly use 'Amazon Remote Browser" if it's 'safe and secure' because like covid things which can't be seen people are afriad of. What they can't see and don't understand makes people self protective, all the more in the cybersecurity world.The actual possible security threat is in fact the 'security' vendors themselves. In other words by buying into cloud based remote 'security' you're in effect buying into government oversight and the guise of security is enough to lure most buisnesses into the web. It's a kind of odd problem with no solution because it's entirely baked into the cybersecurity hivemind. Essentially by being in their remote cloud (their clouds are most assuredly connected) you are giving up your buisnesses privacy 100%. Most people who aren't buisness owners could care less and on the surface it looks legal, but like I tried to demonstrate, connect a few dots and you can see rather quickly how cybersecurity is playing a game with the federal gov and silicon valley, they are most likely one in the same, yet undermining the public and the general infrastructure. It's essentially illusionary security all going directly to the hivemind of silicon valley and those in charge of the federal security operations.What you're left with is a gov who knows exactly what you think and how your buisness operates. In short, their isn't a security threat where your buisness needs 'government level security protection' which is tied to silicion valley whose tied to the gov hivemind. I would have to actually go through and individually check but almost every one of these cybersecurity vendors is, as far as I can tell, has 24/7 access.If you know the problems with Cloudflare than this is similar to what I'm saying though more complex because many of these cyber security vendors appear to be directly and explcitly aligned with the federal governement. So, you end up with buisnesses being pushed into 'needing online security' and the gov literally viewing everything on them concurrently. It allows the gov to control individual actors and mobilize them if need be in a large way.</blockquote>

Verification