A little peak behind the curtain of the decline of a functioning society.
It's resentment again.
Let's have some banter and dissect this.
''Misogynyst'' comes from Misos and Güne, or in other words, Greek terms for Hate and Women. If you extrapolate this you see 2 perspectives:
- 1. The first perspective is the mainstream perspective, that wants to turn women into men, by making them have masculine traits such as dominance, aggression, competitiveness, go getter, assertiveness, while putting them on a masculine life path, with education and career. What has this achieved? Women's happiness has gone down precipitously since the 70s. Especially, we see a dip since 2012, the advent of social media. The least happy demographics? Professional women, who followed the programming and the masculine lifepath, without families, having professional careers. 20 to 25% (!!!!!!!!!!!!!) of US women is on antidepressants. Women's happiness comes from people: serving a family and a man they love, admire and respect. That's been all taken away from them, so misery is what remains, with the typical Netflix nihilism, whine addictions, antidepressants, pets etc. There's no typical female lifecycle involved with kids, taking care of them, following their lifepath, being taken care of when you're old, all the appreciation, love and respect that comes with it.
- 2. The second perspective is let's simply say, that of in this example Peterson and Tate, let's summarize that as the traditional view on female - male relationships. In this perspective a woman marries in her early 20s with a man a few years older than her, she gets children, the is fully in her feminine energy and can truly be who she is, as the man takes all the responsibility for her and her children, and the authority that comes with it. And the latter is very important, for women long for especially 1 thing in men first and foremost: leadership! He has to be a leader. A general who has the responsibility and authority over his troops (his family) to guide them succesfully through battle. A trainer who trains them to be the best athletes they can be. In this situation the woman gets what she wants: a man she can look up to, children and family to take care of, she can be who she is namely fully feminine, all the stress of the world is taken away for the man takes the responsibility and leadership aka authority, and she is appreciated by the people alongside her, going through a normal female life, namely getting children, then taking care of them, then taking care of the grandchildren, and her old parents, and so on.
In our clown world, scenario 2 is deemed HATING WOMEN, while scenario 1 is PRO WOMEN. Is there anyone after reading these 2 scenarios who can still not see that this is the number one Satanic inversion that has been ever made in history? It's truly a perspective level of inversion that Satan pulled off through all the -isms he invented.
Let's continue.
So Peterson and Tate are ''unhappy'' people. Here first of all we see the secular myth of happiness: everything is about happiness! And what is this happiness? It's a childish, inane, giddy, feeling like you're an 8 year old for your entire life. Everything to escape the fact that you're now an adult with responsibilities who faces a top to bottom difficult, challenging, competitive, often unreasable and unfair world where pain, misery, malintention, suffering, things not going your way, life questions, among other things, are common place. As Peterson said, and he truly hit the nail on its head there, life is malevolence and suffering. Pretty good summing up of the world.
So we can say Peterson and Tate acknowledge these facts about the world, and warn against perceiving the main goal in life as to being ''happy'' which once again is an extremely childish, feminine, new age perspective on how to view the world. Especially for men, you're supposed to face the world head on and take all the storms that will inevitably come your way. As a child or woman you can get a pass to some extent, but even then, the meaning of life and the realities of this world are 1000 fold heavier and more serious as outlined.
Now Peterson and Tate, who don't even acknowledge ''happiness'', are the unhappy people. But what do we see in reality? The people on the side of the writer, the -ism-ists, who want to destroy everything, they are utterly miserable to the bone, which is evidently clear from their actions, their literal hate against everything of the traditional old order, their breakdowns, their triggering. They live in a perpetual state of confusion, self hate, hate of the world, total lack of knowledge and understanding and insight about why they're here and how the world works, and they hopelessly try to gain some stability by aligning themselves with the -isms of today, so they can feel some sense of meaning and belonging, which obviously is merely short termed, followed by the need of a new hit of consumerism, entertainment, demonstrating, protesting against whatever, writing new Twitter messages to get that hit of dopamine and energy, and so it continues.
So bottom line THEY are unhappy, not Tate and Peterson.
Next point, it is a dead end ideology. As outlined, if anything is a dead end ideology it is the mainstream ideology. At least Tate and Peterson are on their quest looking for truth, and are touching the final Truth sphere, namely the religious sphere. Once they truly hit that, the path towards traditionalism by no means is a dead end way. Saying that ''even if you get everything you want you'll remain bitter, insecure and hateful'' depends on what that everything you want is, eventually finding truth in God shouldn't leave you with any of these traits, while they're inevitable to have in the mainstream paradigm. Also I've literally never heard Peterson and Tate speak anything that resembles being ''bitter'', that's just a complete joke and false statement, furthermore ''being insecure'' that's a typical feminine shaming tactic to make you cower as women try to psychologically shame you or guilt you into doing what they want since they don't have the capability of physical, masculine violence. Once again total nonsense statement. And lastly, I think we've addressed the ''hate'', I've never heard Peterson nor Tate speak ''hateful'' things, but surely they're critical on the mainstream system, but as addressed we know who the real people with abundant hate are, and it's not the traditional side.
Bottom line of all this stuff is that the mainstream normies, who vehemently try to destroy everything in order to gain to the happiness that they've been promised at the end of the rainbow, have a worldview that is so easily dissected, assaulted and broken, that it's truly a laughing stock, and tremendously sad at the same time. These people cannot write literally 3 sentences without giving enough ammunition to write an essay about the inconsistencies and delusion in their world view.
Time for a beer
.
