There is NO WAY the mainstream media would allow someone like Joe Rogan to host a political debate, and it has NOTHING to do with Trump. Rogan is one of the most intellectually curious, fair minded, intelligent interviewers with a platform. He would ask intelligent questions, follow up when candidates gave misleading answers, zingers, or confusing political speech, and would cut through the bullshit. He will never ever be given an opportunity to ask probing questions to politicians. I learned more in his sit down interview with Bernie Sanders about Bernie and his beliefs than a did in a lifetime of hearing about Bernie in magazines, newspapers, and tv.
I've read a variety of your posts here. More negativity recently than before.There are about 5000 pages in this thread discussing "opposing variables." Hardly anyone is avoiding them.
Some of the bullshit variables you mentioned are just that now: bullshit and largely irrelevant when looking at the big picture.
This election is the end of the line.
Well, something sure as hell kicked in at the 2016 Election! Not the same factors but more suburban and rural support. So, why wouldn't different factors kick in at 2020? Lots of stuff people are sick and tired of. I mentioned them already in this thread. Boils down to Law & Order and Economy really.This certainly sounds nice, but it may be wishful thinking. Why would all those factors suddenly kick in now, when they haven't kicked in anytime during the last 50 years?
Anyway, I'm probably preaching to the choir...
I just want to touch on something anecdotal for those who may read this that truly believe "The Science is Settled" because predictive models suggest things like Miami will be flooded out by rising sea levels in the next few years.
Many people espouse the ironclad credibility of 'climate models.' I have done a lot of work in petroleum reservoir simulation, which isn't exactly the best analogy for comparison to climate models, but it gives a good idea on how data can be manipulated in a model to fit a narrative. Basically, in order to predict the future value of an oil field, we will utilize predictive methods based on past history using production volumes, rock properties (porosity, permeability, fluid saturations), pressure and aquifer influence gleaned from the other wells drilled in the area. Say a production field was kicked off in 2005, and at the current time, we want to predict how much oil we will produce by 2025. Or you want to test the viability of drilling more wells. So we will fuck around with inputs using geostatistical methods such as Kriging and try to match the past decade of production with the software, and once we have a close 'history match,' we will forecast the future using this 'accurate' model using a complex conjugate gradient linear algebra-based timestepping method. Surprise surprise, the results are usually pretty poor, and it is assumed that at most 15% of reservoir models are accurate. Despite having all sorts of data points (core, drill cutting samples, well logs, production volumes, high-resolution 3D seismic imaging), it is really hard to predict future behavior for these models -- it is just hard to model all of these moving parts, even in a relatively small closed system like an oil reservoir.
Picture of a reservoir model, with well data indicated by the vertical sticks
So how the hell can a climactic model be any different? In a reservoir model, I am 'only' dealing with a couple dozen variables, meanwhile these complex open-system climate models can have up to 200 variables, a testament to all of the moving parts in our Earth such as atmospheric composition, solar activity, geological activity, oceanic variability, etc. They use the same method we use in the oil industry when making models, wherein a 'history match' of old climate data is emulated by the model, then use that model to forecast the future. Although they use the word 'Hindcasting' instead of 'History Matching.' I just don't see how all of the scientific and technological research into creating accurate models in the oil industry can be so inaccurate (where a company's ass is on the line with real money and investors), but these models pumped out by government scientists and University Professors (funded by Pro-Global Warming entities) with NO financial ramifications if they are wrong are treated as gospel. I am not trying to say that I am an authority on climate models but as an experienced petroleum reservoir simulation engineer, I have SERIOUS doubts on the validity of any history-matched climate model. In the words of Richard Feynman, Science is the organized skepticism in the reliability of expert opinion. And there is PLENTY of reason to be skeptical of the 97% of scientists who claim that the 'science is settled,' I have not even discussed The Pause wherein global climate hasn't risen in the last 20 years. It is fair to question Big Global Warming!
Rogan has a massive audience of politically uncommitted viewers, and if Joseph Robinette Biden truly is the man most qualified to lead the nation, then a stunning performance could quite easily win him the election.There is NO WAY the mainstream media would allow someone like Joe Rogan to host a political debate, and it has NOTHING to do with Trump. Rogan is one of the most intellectually curious, fair minded, intelligent interviewers with a platform. He would ask intelligent questions, follow up when candidates gave misleading answers, zingers, or confusing political speech, and would cut through the bullshit. He will never ever be given an opportunity to ask probing questions to politicians. I learned more in his sit down interview with Bernie Sanders about Bernie and his beliefs than a did in a lifetime of hearing about Bernie in magazines, newspapers, and tv.
The most important thing to the media is controlling the narrative. Rogan would ask too many questions that the real media will never touch.
This is one huge clue that tells you neither political party really cares about winning, or about the supposed beliefs they espouse.Rogan has a massive audience of politically uncommitted viewers, and if Joseph Robinette Biden truly is the man most qualified to lead the nation, then a stunning performance could quite easily win him the election.
But for some reason, he would prefer to hide away.
Great News. But by "International Planned Parenthood" do they mean "American taxpayer overseas funded hitman's office?" Rhetorical question.Good news, if it gets past the Obama judges.
President Donald Trump took another step to defund the abortion industry Monday through a new proposed rule to expand the Mexico City Policy. The pro-life powww.lifenews.com
The 13-week series is called "Naming, Measuring, and Addressing the Impacts of Racism on the Health and Well-Being of the Nation and the World." I have obtained the internal emails (in white) and an APHA presentation by the series instructor that follows same structure (in blue).
The first three training sessions are focused on "racism, sexism, and other systems of structured inequality," then teaching CDC employees that they must "address institutionalized racism" to "really set things right in the garden" of a racist nation.
In sessions 6 through 9, the CDC claims that "racism is a public health crisis" and that "systemic racism" leads to "police killings of unarmed Black and Brown men and women" and leads to "the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on communities of color."
In sessions 10 and 11, the trainers will teach CDC employees that they must "target" and destroy the values of "focus on the individual," the "myth of meritocracy," the "myth of American exceptionalism," and "White supremacist ideology." This is textbook critical race theory.
The final session teaches CDC employees how to become activists. They will be encouraged to join an "Anti-Racism Collaborative with eight Collective Action Teams," focused on "communications," making scientific publications "anti-racist," and influencing "policy and legislation."
My whistleblower is outraged: "I thought maybe they would wisely cancel this training series. Instead we got a message this morning confirming ... The pressure to participate is palpable and if you don't you will have to explain why you aren't a racist."
We are in the midst of a pandemic and the CDC is prioritizing a critical race theory training program that is in direct violation of a presidential order. @CDCDirector Robert Redfield must immediately terminate this program—and focus on COVID-19, where CDC has been disastrous.
Finally, I want to issue a warning to every federal department in the United States: if you violate the president's order on critical race theory, I will find you, expose you, and shut you down.
P.S. I've posted the source documents here.
Rogan would be "cancelled" so fast by whatever shill media group he is working for now if he gave a voice to Trump alone.I know Biden wont do the Rogan thing
What if Trump does a podcast with Rogan