The Donald Trump thread

Deepdiver

Crow
Gold Member
PA statistical evidence of vote stuffing for Biden...

The total number of suspicious votes in these counties is 300,000± — which greatly exceeds the reported margin of Biden votes over Trump. (We don’t know how many of these are artificial Biden votes, or votes switched from Trump to Biden.
 

estraudi

Pelican
Gold Member

Trump cleaning out more deep state filth - wish he'd done more of this years ago but better late than never I guess.
He needed plausible deniability in order to not face backlash or lawsuits of any kind for a federal employee to be unceremoniously fired due to discrimination of any kind. Now is the perfect time to strike while the firing iron is hot what with all the deep state showing their ass when speaking about fraud being non-existent. Like playing Whack-A-Mole.
 

jarlo

Robin

Report: Lara Trump Considering 2022 Senate Run

Lara Trump, 38, the president’s daughter-in-law, is reportedly weighing a run for Senate in the 2022 midterm elections, when the North Carolina seat currently held by three-term retiring U.S. Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) will become vacant.

The New York Times, citing “three allies,” reports that Lara Trump has told “associates” that she is considering running for the North Carolina Senate seat. Politico, citing “two people familiar with her plans,” also reports that Trump is considering the bid.

A former television producer and professional pastry chef, Lara Trump currently lives in New York with her husband Eric Trump, but was raised in North Carolina. She also attended college at North Carolina State University, and named her daughter Carolina.

In the 2020 presidential election, Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) beat his Democratic challenger by less than two points. As such, the Republican who wins the primary fight for the seat would also need to prepare to continue campaigning into the general election season.
I would be opposed to this, simply on the grounds that I'm opposed to political dynasties: Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, and perhaps in the future Obama. Curious what you all think - is de facto opposition to political dynasties a worthwhile principle?
 

eradicator

Peacock
Gold Member

Report: Lara Trump Considering 2022 Senate Run


I would be opposed to this, simply on the grounds that I'm opposed to political dynasties: Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, and perhaps in the future Obama. Curious what you all think - is de facto opposition to political dynasties a worthwhile principle?
It’s a little different as she married into the dynasty and isn’t a Trump by blood. But I get your point
 

PillBoxer

Sparrow

Report: Lara Trump Considering 2022 Senate Run


I would be opposed to this, simply on the grounds that I'm opposed to political dynasties: Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, and perhaps in the future Obama. Curious what you all think - is de facto opposition to political dynasties a worthwhile principle?
I always oppose too many politicians from one family, as we were founded as a country to not have titles or distinctions. This constant hero worship of politicians and families has to stop.

Tell me how much of a celebrity the Clintons, Obamas, and Kennedys were before politics. It's a tactic of the left to goad you into worshipping men over ideas. They will make every candidate for high office into Joe Cool because they worship their politicians. That's not as much of a tactic on the right, at least not until Trump.

I lived in Chicago around the time Obama gave his 2004 speech at the DNC. They immediately started making more of the man than he ever was. He went from rat Illinois politician to prime meat celebrity in a couple of years with a couple of shit books. Even Kamala Harris has a book out there talking about her "struggle".

I don't worship men because men die. And men are fallible. Men in power are even more fallible. That includes Trump. It also implies that the quiver of America is so empty that we have to keep dipping our buckets into the well to pull the same stale buckets for leadership.

I know there's another leader out there in the making that could be Trump-like while still courting the ladies who vote with their hearts. While I think this election was manipulated and stolen, it would have been easier to win if Trump didn't turn off ladies' sensibilities. Several conservative women I know voted for Biden even though they oppose illegal immigration, higher taxes, abortion, and socialism.
 

Mr Gibbs

Robin
Im going to be 100% honest when I saw the "legailize gay butt s*x in botswana" meme floating around the wignat circles I thought it was a joke.



Edit: should add I was gonna put this in the complaints of Donald Trump thread but I guess its closes
 
Last edited:

El Chinito loco

Crow
Gold Member
Im going to be 100% honest when I saw the "legailize gay butt s*x in botswana" meme floating around the wignat circles I thought it was a joke.



Edit: should add I was gonna put this in the complaints of Donald Trump thread but I guess its closes

It's worse than that. Charlie Kirk (turning point USA) was outright promoting a black faggot (Rob Smith) as one of their spokespeople as well. So many conservative organizations are subverted big time by neocon/neoliberal interests. The whole TPUSA vs Groyper saga last year exposed a lot of the shilling and high level grifting that goes on.

I have to kind of correct myself here about TPUSA..there was nothing conservative about it from the beginning. These groups are formed to gaslight and misdirect people who lean right.

The fact of the matter is that U.S. nationalism is not compatible with zionism, neoconservatism, or neoliberalism. Any group that claims to be "nationalist" but has policies that lean heavily toward the aforementioned incompatible ideologies then you know that it is a bullshit org. Ben Shapiro's daily wire bullshit is another example of that..
 
Last edited:
All this talk of "statistical significance" really puts into perspective the leftists attempts to discredit/retire the concept for the last couple years....Click Me

To abandon statistical significance, would be akin to a chemist abandoning the atom.

When this retarded proposition arose I thought the intent was to hid quantifiable racial differences, or to just merely destroy the work of white men, the only ones capable of such a discovery.

You can see the depths of the globalist preparation in this conquest. The USA graduates less statisticians in 2019/2020 than it did in 1970. Even this niche profession must be reinvented to the "new normal".

If you look at all the pet projects of the globalist elite, you can understand their desire to eradicate statistical methods:

1) Financial & Election Fraud (ex. Benfords law and the underlying non parametric tests that "prove" fraud)
2) Globohomo (ex. odds ratios on std/sti, suicide, etc. )
3) Feminism (ex. statistical testing of female effectiveness and efficiency in the military)
4) BLM (ex. racial discrepancies in crime, whites/asians being punished in admissions)
etc...

Not only do they want absolute control, they don't even want someone like me to be able to mathematically demonstrate just how bad I'm being f*cked over.
 
Top