The E. Michael Jones thread

Chains of Peter

Woodpecker
The reason for the recent slander directed at E. Michael Jones is that his Logos Theory threatens a particular narrative and likely CIA PSYOP within the Catholic Church. This narrative concerns the geopolitical theology that (1) the Soviet Union still exists and the KGB is still in power; (2) all major worldly and churchly problems are the result of this predicament, and (3) the only way to resolve these problems is by (once again) consecrating Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. E. Michael Jones himself calls this geopolitical theology "Fátima Fundamentalism", although others have called it "Fatimism". This Fatimist narrative resonates strongly with many Traditionalist Catholics, especially American ones.

For those unknown to the Fatimist narrative: it is founded upon a heterodox interpretation of the Marian apparitions of Our Lady of Fátima in 1916-1917. During these Marian apparitions, three shepherd children, among others (later Sister) Lucia dos Santos, received Three Secrets from the Blessed Mother. The Blessed Mother's Second Secret concerned the need for a consecration of Russia (i.e. the Soviet Union, which did not yet exist by name in 1917), because otherwise this nation would spread its "errors throughout the world", thereby "causing wars and persecutions of the Church". And indeed, shorty after, Communism became a desecrating blight to the Church.

Initially, I believed the heterodox interpretation, even though I strongly disagreed with the Neoconservative geopolitics of those advocating the narrative. However, my belief in the Fatimist narrative changed when I visited Fátima myself and spoke to a Portugese priest who was specialized in this topic. He explained to me that it is the official position of the Church that Russia has been successfully consecrated by Pope John Paul II on 25 March 1984 (after two unsuccessful ones by Pius XII, as these consecrations were not in communion with all the bishops). I did not know this at the time, but it indeed happened to be true. (evidence)

Why does the Church hold this position? Well, among others, because Sister Lucia herself affirmed that the consecration of 25 March 1984 "has been accomplished" and "accepted in Heaven", and that "God will keep His word". And how do we know that, besides Sister Lucia's affirmation, God kept His word? Because the God of Logos works through history. Thus, not long after John Paul II's consecration, long-suppressed Nations rose up against Communism, the Berlin wall fell, Russia entered a --still ongoing-- process of re-Christianization, and the Soviet Union collapsed. This collapse was eventually formalized in the Belovezha Accords, on 8 December 1991 (the Feast of the Immaculate Conception). The Soviet Union finally ceased to be on 25 December 1991 (Christmas Day). All "coincidentally" following the 1984 consecration. (evidence)

The Fatimists would object that the Church teaching in this regard is false, that Sister Lucia was lucid at old age, that her letters and autographs have been forged, that Pope John Paul II's consecration was one of the World and not of Russia (as if Russia is not part of this world), that Russians are not truly converting to Christianity, that "the KGB" (by which they mean the FSB) is misleading us in believing that the Soviet Union no longer exists etcetera. The objections are manifold, and that is because the narrative has all the hallmarks of a successful PSYOP.

That brings us to the heart of the matter: CIA involvement. There are several groups campaigning for the Fatimist geopolitical theology, such as the "Fatima Crusader" (founded by Father Gruner), "LifeSiteNews.com", the "Fitzpatrick Informer", and several more. I don't know that much about them, except that they are rather successful at suggesting that they have the last word in the matter, rather than the Church (or Heaven, for that matter). Be as it may, perhaps the most influential group advocating the Fatimist narrative is the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property (TFP), which I have encountered several times. This American TFP chapter launched its "America Needs Fatima" campaign in 1985, thus a year after the Consecration of Russia by John Paul II. The campaign was founded by C. Preston Noell III, a man who still sees a KGB agent in every Russian that he meets (which I know for a fact, having met him).

TFP did not start in the United States. Rather, in 1960, Professor Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira started the first chapter of this counterrevolutionary movement in 1960. Soon afterwards, chapters in other South American nations were founded, as Communism was on the rise and threatened the Church from without (by Communist revolutionary movements) and within (by heretical Liberation Theologians). I know that many members of the old TFP guard even risked their lives in protecting Catholicism. Be as it may, TFP's old opponents, including some members of the past South American Church hierarchy, often claimed that the organization cooperated with the CIA. While this cooperation would be logical given the Communist threat at the time, these claims remained largely unsubstantiated. (evidence)

Recently, however, with the declassification of many documents by the CIA, the validity of these claims has been vindicated. Thus, one document dated back in 1969 tells us that the CIA was aware of the support they could receive from TFP. (evidence) Most interestingly, TFP became a member of a CIA working group as well as an informant to the Bureau in exactly the same timeframe as their launch of the "America Needs Fatima" campaign (to recall, in 1985). (evidence and more evidence) Hence, their past cooperation with the CIA is an undeniable fact. And if this cooperation still exists, then it is also highly problematic, for the CIA is no longer fighting against Communism, but fighting for Globalism, which is the new desecrating blight to the Church.

Sadly, ever since NATO reinitiated its Cold War against Russia, the Fatimist narrative suddenly gained traction in Traditionalist Catholic circles, initially in America, but increasingly in Europe as well. Indeed, one of the groups that once again became very vocal against the "Errors of Russia" happened to be TFP America. (evidence and more evidence) As such, the people at TFP and other Fatimist organizations now function as useful idiots to the Globalists, for Russia is one of the remaining bulwarks against the Great Reset, now that the Church has been incapacitated on many fronts. It is therefore imperative that TFP is called out on whether they still cooperate with the CIA. And most importantly, they should drop the Fátimist heterodoxy.

That leaves us to the question why so many Fatimists such as Fitzpatrick Informer and others slander E. Michael Jones. Well, for starters, he is an orthodox Catholic who supports the official position of the Church with regard to Fátima, and thus not the heterodox interpretation (as said, which he calls Fátima Fundamentalism and correctly relates to the Neoconservative agenda). But I believe that is not the main reason.

The main reason is that his Logos Theory provides a wholly different explanation and solution to many of the World's and the Church's problems than this false PSYOP narrative, as it does not require a geopolitical conflict between fellow Christians (the Orthodox vs. the Catholics) nor another consecration of Russia, but rather a conversion of those who oppose God as Logos (of course including Those We Don't Speak Of). As such, E. Michael Jones' theory fundamentally undermines a narrative that only prevents a rapprochement between the Eastern Orthodox churches and a Roman Catholic Church reinvigorated by Traditionalist Catholics, and thereby an end of the New Cold War and possibly the entire Globalist agenda.

Instead, the Globalists want to keep Traditionalist Catholics navel gazing into perpetuity, waiting and praying for a consecration of Russia that will never happen, simply because it already happened. It is therefore my sincere hope that my post will be read and shared. Many people expounding the "Errors of Russia" mantra are devout Catholics who do tremendous good works in Evangelization and within the Pro-Life movement. I just pray that my message reaches them.

Except the biggest proofset against Russia's consecration is the fact that Russia hasn't converted.

Orthodoxy doesn't count.
 

Dismas

Chicken

E. Michael Jones a Kremlin tool, wittingly or unwittingly​

Posted on April 8, 2021
https://i1.wp.com/banneddomain.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Screen-Shot-2021-04-08-at-19.26.36.png?resize=518%2C330&ssl=1By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 8, 2021 Anno Domini
Author-turned Eurasian guest of honour E. Michael Jones completely failed at trying to dismiss last month the claim that he is a KGB asset aiding the demise of the West.
Jones attempted to dismiss the claim (made by researcher Andy Sloan on this site) using a strawman argument during a live chat on Restoring the Faith, March 6, 2021.
“Someone is now spreading this ridiculous, preposterous claim that I am a KGB agent because I was in a room with Aleksandr Dugin,” Jones declared. He went on, “I am in the unfortunate position of being unable to prove a negative. I cannot prove that I am not a KGB agent, so the burden of proof lies on these people, these character assassinations (sic) who are launching this in the first place. I was at a conference in Tehran with Dugin…he gave a speech about multi-polarity. I offered an objection to that that speech saying we lived in some sense a uni-polar world, even if it’s not the United States of America that’s head of it. That was the extent of our discussion. This Internet breeds character assassination and this is one example of it.”
First off, Sloan’s article in no way based his claim merely on the fact that Jones was in the same room with Dugin (on multiple occasions, by the way). Jones then follows his strawman argument with a challenge of burden of proof, which Sloan did thoroughly provide. Jones addressed none of the many, many pieces of evidence written by Sloan. Did he even read it or is he deceiving his audience about the breadth of evidence?
Jones then claims he offered an objection to Dugin’s speech about multi-polarity. But he didn’t really offer an objection, though. He merely stated what he perceives as the current world geopolitical reality—that it is unipolar. Furthermore, Jones completely fails to discern (deliberately?) Dugin’s meaning of multi-polarity, which is really just jargonous deception to distract from the fact that Dugin wants his Eurasian union to rule the world as a unipolar, neo-Bolshevik empire (world government). To achieve this, the Eurasianists have to break the West’s seemingly unipolar rule using an appeal to the West’s enemies to engage in multi-polarism (divesting from the West) and embracing the East (Eurasianism, Belt and Road initiative). If Jones genuinely can’t understand this, then he is unfit to be a geopolitical analyst, especially as a self-appointed representative of the Catholic Church and the United States of America. Even Glenn Beck’s audience have a better understanding of Dugin’s deceptive language than does Jones, and Beck’s audience could be classified as “normies”.
At worst, Sloan is correct and Jones is a KGB asset wittingly distorting the evidence. Either way, Jones is carrying out the neo-Soviet Eurasianists’ objective of distorting the East’s true intentions as well as blaming the West for what is really Eastern subversion of it. While Jones does seem free, in his apparent KGB mission, to criticize world Jewry, he flat out denies Jewry’s subdivisions: subversion by freemasonry and Soviet communist threat.
“…communism was never a threat, in general.” —Jones
This is in addition to Jones being a race denialist(except when non-whites are he subject), denial of communism as a still-present threat, soft on Vatican II and its “popes”, outright heretical statements concerning Islam, propping up of Putin as an anti-globalist renegade, and associations with numerous Eurasianists and socialists, like Israel Shamir and Dugin—all Soviet-friendly narratives.
Jones has become so blatant with his agenda, I have had to create a dossier just to catalogue it all. The guy smacks of shill. It’s becoming more and more plain.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Except the biggest proofset against Russia's consecration is the fact that Russia hasn't converted.

Orthodoxy doesn't count.

Of course it does, in my book Russian Orthodoxy is far more valid as a true manifestation of Christianity than say, the kind of modern Catholicism that is practiced in most of Mexico that integrates elements of pre-Columbian paganism.

The-Days-of-the-Dead-Chloe-Sayer.jpg


...Or the kind of corrupt post-V2 globohomo dogma that has permeated the moderm Catholic Church in the West, for that matter.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member

E. Michael Jones a Kremlin tool, wittingly or unwittingly​

Posted on April 8, 2021
By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 8, 2021 Anno Domini
Author-turned Eurasian guest of honour E. Michael Jones completely failed at trying to dismiss last month the claim that he is a KGB asset aiding the demise of the West.
Jones attempted to dismiss the claim (made by researcher Andy Sloan on this site) using a strawman argument during a live chat on Restoring the Faith, March 6, 2021.

First off, Sloan’s article in no way based his claim merely on the fact that Jones was in the same room with Dugin (on multiple occasions, by the way). Jones then follows his strawman argument with a challenge of burden of proof, which Sloan did thoroughly provide. Jones addressed none of the many, many pieces of evidence written by Sloan. Did he even read it or is he deceiving his audience about the breadth of evidence?
Jones then claims he offered an objection to Dugin’s speech about multi-polarity. But he didn’t really offer an objection, though. He merely stated what he perceives as the current world geopolitical reality—that it is unipolar. Furthermore, Jones completely fails to discern (deliberately?) Dugin’s meaning of multi-polarity, which is really just jargonous deception to distract from the fact that Dugin wants his Eurasian union to rule the world as a unipolar, neo-Bolshevik empire (world government). To achieve this, the Eurasianists have to break the West’s seemingly unipolar rule using an appeal to the West’s enemies to engage in multi-polarism (divesting from the West) and embracing the East (Eurasianism, Belt and Road initiative). If Jones genuinely can’t understand this, then he is unfit to be a geopolitical analyst, especially as a self-appointed representative of the Catholic Church and the United States of America. Even Glenn Beck’s audience have a better understanding of Dugin’s deceptive language than does Jones, and Beck’s audience could be classified as “normies”.
At worst, Sloan is correct and Jones is a KGB asset wittingly distorting the evidence. Either way, Jones is carrying out the neo-Soviet Eurasianists’ objective of distorting the East’s true intentions as well as blaming the West for what is really Eastern subversion of it. While Jones does seem free, in his apparent KGB mission, to criticize world Jewry, he flat out denies Jewry’s subdivisions: subversion by freemasonry and Soviet communist threat.

This is in addition to Jones being a race denialist(except when non-whites are he subject), denial of communism as a still-present threat, soft on Vatican II and its “popes”, outright heretical statements concerning Islam, propping up of Putin as an anti-globalist renegade, and associations with numerous Eurasianists and socialists, like Israel Shamir and Dugin—all Soviet-friendly narratives.
Jones has become so blatant with his agenda, I have had to create a dossier just to catalogue it all. The guy smacks of shill. It’s becoming more and more plain.

Cass Sunstein would be proud of your repeated attempt at cognitive infiltration and character assassination on E. Michael Jones, arguably the least corrupt, most courageous and sharpest Catholic intellectual in modern times.

At some point though Tim, you have to take your glowie not so subtle ZOG-compatible carpetbagging elsewhere, it's not going to work on this board.
 

NoMoreTO

Ostrich
Of course it does, in my book Russian Orthodoxy is far more valid as a true manifestation of Christianity than say, the kind of modern Catholicism that is practiced in most of Mexico that integrates elements of pre-Columbian paganism.

The-Days-of-the-Dead-Chloe-Sayer.jpg


...Or the kind of corrupt post-V2 globohomo dogma that has permeated the moderm Catholic Church in the West, for that matter.

Your book doesn't matter.

Fist - There is no post "Vatican 2 globo homo Dogma". No dogma in Vatican 2, and no dogma since Vatican 2.

You're equating some bad culture in Mexico with latent/re emerging paganism to what is true and pure in the Catholic Church dogma. While Catholicism may have problems today in it's practice on the ground level, the Dogma is in very good shape, and the tradition. Rome seems to have lots of corruption, but it is still God's Church founded on the rock of St. Peter.

I'm sure many orthodox dress their kids in the west up for Halloween, so what you have above is something similar.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
"Vatican II dogma", with a lowercase D. We all wish that dogma didn't exist, but that is unfortunately not the case.
 

NoMoreTO

Ostrich
"Vatican II dogma", with a lowercase D. We all wish that dogma didn't exist, but that is unfortunately not the case.
Vatican 2 was specifically set out as a "pastoral council". No anathemas and no dogma. Some disagree.

I am thankful and happy for Dogma. The faith must be defined to clarify things for the faithful through Mother Church. The issue is our pastors are not following the dogma well in their teaching.

Dogma is necessary, I came across it today. heard Owen Benjamin talk of the trinity being "made up" a few months ago fake based on his reading of the Bible, its a short step to today when I listened in for the first time and hearing he believes Christ is created, an essentially Aryan Belief. He really needs to talk to EMJ about this stuff, or EMJ should be pushing back against him pretty hard if they do another interview, rather than discussing historical topics they can agree on. These aren't fringe topics by any means.
 

Athanasius

Pelican
One thing I don't get with Jones is his insistence that "white" is a category of the mind and that the real distinction in the country is between Protestant, Catholic, and Jew. Sure, the word "white" is weaponized against whites, but they could just as easily do the same with the phrase "people of European descent." Religion is very important, but does Jones really not believe there is a genetic component that factors into making people what they are and forming their preferences? You look at how Europeans live and how Africans live and it is much different.

Another way of putting it: If you're a white protestant, would you rather live in a 75% white Catholic community or a 75% black Protestant community?
 

NoMoreTO

Ostrich
Ekhm...

(timestamp)

Thanks for the timestamp, I need to know how to do that.

The point of the Rock of St. Peter is well explained with respect to the Church Fathers. But the Truth isn't based on Church Fathers' consensus. Michael didn't read any of the Saints who taught or viewed Peter as the Rock. Still whether Faith or Peter himself, or Peter's faith, or Jesus Christ our Lord and saviour, we are still left with ambiguity among the Church Fathers.

With respect to Peter, yes Peter err'd, but when he made a judgement or a ruling, it was then settled. This is supported in scripture. Paul didn't rebuke Peter on the basis of "the other apostles agree with me", he rebuked him theologically. So why is it that suddenly we are looking at Church Fathers as a survey to determine infallible truth? It's a leap.

As an aside: Someone will have to explain to me the Orthodox teaching on allowing 3 divorces. It's not a religious debate forum, but the Catholic teaching on this is much stronger, and more consistent with scripture when looking at "putting away your wife". I am open to PMs.

PS EMJ is the man.
 

NoMoreTO

Ostrich
They shouldn't. I've encountered multiple Orthodox clergy who spoke out against it.

Traditional Latin Mass Kids dress up as Saints on November 1st, All Saints day - a day of holy obligation. I'm pretty sure their parents don't take them out for Halloween the night before as devils. This is the point about the Mexico parade, not all in the Church are fully aware or vigilant enough in their attitudes.
 
Last edited:

NickK

Woodpecker
As an aside: Someone will have to explain to me the Orthodox teaching on allowing 3 divorces. It's not a religious debate forum, but the Catholic teaching on this is much stronger, and more consistent with scripture when looking at "putting away your wife". I am open to PMs.
There is no such teaching. And there is no 2nd marriage.
What happens is a small ritual, an economia to prevent the divorced person to fornicate with many partners.
The ceremony even has passages read outloud that call the couple "fornicators". It's definitely not a marriage.
 

Augustine

Chicken

E. Michael Jones a Kremlin tool, wittingly or unwittingly​

Posted on April 8, 2021
By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 8, 2021 Anno Domini
Author-turned Eurasian guest of honour E. Michael Jones completely failed at trying to dismiss last month the claim that he is a KGB asset aiding the demise of the West.
Jones attempted to dismiss the claim (made by researcher Andy Sloan on this site) using a strawman argument during a live chat on Restoring the Faith, March 6, 2021.

First off, Sloan’s article in no way based his claim merely on the fact that Jones was in the same room with Dugin (on multiple occasions, by the way). Jones then follows his strawman argument with a challenge of burden of proof, which Sloan did thoroughly provide. Jones addressed none of the many, many pieces of evidence written by Sloan. Did he even read it or is he deceiving his audience about the breadth of evidence?
Jones then claims he offered an objection to Dugin’s speech about multi-polarity. But he didn’t really offer an objection, though. He merely stated what he perceives as the current world geopolitical reality—that it is unipolar. Furthermore, Jones completely fails to discern (deliberately?) Dugin’s meaning of multi-polarity, which is really just jargonous deception to distract from the fact that Dugin wants his Eurasian union to rule the world as a unipolar, neo-Bolshevik empire (world government). To achieve this, the Eurasianists have to break the West’s seemingly unipolar rule using an appeal to the West’s enemies to engage in multi-polarism (divesting from the West) and embracing the East (Eurasianism, Belt and Road initiative). If Jones genuinely can’t understand this, then he is unfit to be a geopolitical analyst, especially as a self-appointed representative of the Catholic Church and the United States of America. Even Glenn Beck’s audience have a better understanding of Dugin’s deceptive language than does Jones, and Beck’s audience could be classified as “normies”.
At worst, Sloan is correct and Jones is a KGB asset wittingly distorting the evidence. Either way, Jones is carrying out the neo-Soviet Eurasianists’ objective of distorting the East’s true intentions as well as blaming the West for what is really Eastern subversion of it. While Jones does seem free, in his apparent KGB mission, to criticize world Jewry, he flat out denies Jewry’s subdivisions: subversion by freemasonry and Soviet communist threat.

This is in addition to Jones being a race denialist(except when non-whites are he subject), denial of communism as a still-present threat, soft on Vatican II and its “popes”, outright heretical statements concerning Islam, propping up of Putin as an anti-globalist renegade, and associations with numerous Eurasianists and socialists, like Israel Shamir and Dugin—all Soviet-friendly narratives.
Jones has become so blatant with his agenda, I have had to create a dossier just to catalogue it all. The guy smacks of shill. It’s becoming more and more plain.
Lol. Who are you trying to fool you cia clown. Jones is worth listening to for the simple fact that he doesn't put forward his own view in contradiction of the Church, rather it is within and in line with the Church. He promotes unity while advancing Christ. You sow division.
Jones is so dangerous to the Narrative because all sides respect him. The black leaders in his community like him. He doesn't encourage attacks on the Protestants. He is not antagonistic of our Orthodox brothers. He is the enemy of our common enemy, the enemy of all mankind of all peoples: the Pharisees/Talmudic jews and judaisers.
Jones' Logos theory is truly unitive. It is a universal meta-theory which describes a reality experienced by all men, although many men have not yet discovered it. It is something which can unite us all with all men everywhere in the world; that is, men who seek the good.
The tendency of those who seek Logos, i.e. vast majority of men, is towards peace, nation and unity. The others are the sons of the devil, and they are dangerously exposed in the light of Logos. This is the sole reason why Jones is under such attack.
 

Sitting Bull

Woodpecker
Around 46:18 in the "Fascifist" online meeting 04/13/2021 video, "Handsome Truth" acts like a commissar by asking EMJ if he believes in the Holocaust. With very good reason, EMJ explains that he declines to answer because that might get him arrested when he travels to Europe.

This is certainly true for France.

Étienne Chouard, a naive, unsophisticated idealist who was sincerely unaware of the Jewish question, learned this the hard way when he was asked solemnly on a TV show about his opinion on the Holocaust. He signed his death warrant by replying that he had none as he hadn't researched the subject. When reality sank in he groveled and begged the Jewish community for forgiveness as much as he could, but it was too late. All his mainstream media contracts were terminated, and the Jews were in such a hurry to punish him that even a last show that was part of an ongoing contract was cancelled.
 
Around 46:18 in the "Fascifist" online meeting 04/13/2021 video, "Handsome Truth" acts like a commissar by asking EMJ if he believes in the Holocaust. With very good reason, EMJ explains that he declines to answer because that might get him arrested when he travels to Europe.

This is certainly true for France.

Étienne Chouard, a naive, unsophisticated idealist who was sincerely unaware of the Jewish question, learned this the hard way when he was asked solemnly on a TV show about his opinion on the Holocaust. He signed his death warrant by replying that he had none as he hadn't researched the subject. When reality sank in he groveled and begged the Jewish community for forgiveness as much as he could, but it was too late. All his mainstream media contracts were terminated, and the Jews were in such a hurry to punish him that even a last show that was part of an ongoing contract was cancelled.
I just watched this video. It is excellent.

 

E. Michael Jones a Kremlin tool, wittingly or unwittingly​

Posted on April 8, 2021
By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 8, 2021 Anno Domini
Author-turned Eurasian guest of honour E. Michael Jones completely failed at trying to dismiss last month the claim that he is a KGB asset aiding the demise of the West.
Jones attempted to dismiss the claim (made by researcher Andy Sloan on this site) using a strawman argument during a live chat on Restoring the Faith, March 6, 2021.

First off, Sloan’s article in no way based his claim merely on the fact that Jones was in the same room with Dugin (on multiple occasions, by the way). Jones then follows his strawman argument with a challenge of burden of proof, which Sloan did thoroughly provide. Jones addressed none of the many, many pieces of evidence written by Sloan. Did he even read it or is he deceiving his audience about the breadth of evidence?
Jones then claims he offered an objection to Dugin’s speech about multi-polarity. But he didn’t really offer an objection, though. He merely stated what he perceives as the current world geopolitical reality—that it is unipolar. Furthermore, Jones completely fails to discern (deliberately?) Dugin’s meaning of multi-polarity, which is really just jargonous deception to distract from the fact that Dugin wants his Eurasian union to rule the world as a unipolar, neo-Bolshevik empire (world government). To achieve this, the Eurasianists have to break the West’s seemingly unipolar rule using an appeal to the West’s enemies to engage in multi-polarism (divesting from the West) and embracing the East (Eurasianism, Belt and Road initiative). If Jones genuinely can’t understand this, then he is unfit to be a geopolitical analyst, especially as a self-appointed representative of the Catholic Church and the United States of America. Even Glenn Beck’s audience have a better understanding of Dugin’s deceptive language than does Jones, and Beck’s audience could be classified as “normies”.
At worst, Sloan is correct and Jones is a KGB asset wittingly distorting the evidence. Either way, Jones is carrying out the neo-Soviet Eurasianists’ objective of distorting the East’s true intentions as well as blaming the West for what is really Eastern subversion of it. While Jones does seem free, in his apparent KGB mission, to criticize world Jewry, he flat out denies Jewry’s subdivisions: subversion by freemasonry and Soviet communist threat.

This is in addition to Jones being a race denialist(except when non-whites are he subject), denial of communism as a still-present threat, soft on Vatican II and its “popes”, outright heretical statements concerning Islam, propping up of Putin as an anti-globalist renegade, and associations with numerous Eurasianists and socialists, like Israel Shamir and Dugin—all Soviet-friendly narratives.
Jones has become so blatant with his agenda, I have had to create a dossier just to catalogue it all. The guy smacks of shill. It’s becoming more and more plain.
This why we can't have nice things. Waiting for the article which connects EMJ to a 5G mind-control plot
 
Top