The Great Reset considered in the light of Dostoevsky's The Grand Inquisitor

EuropeanCanon

Woodpecker
Trad Catholic
Dostoevksy's masterpiece The Brothers Karamazov includes a story called The Grand Inquisitor that one of the characters relates. Its an astounding piece of work, outside of holy scripture there is literally nothing I have come across that compares to it.

In the story Christ returns to earth at the time of the spanish inquisition and performs a miracle, raising a dead girl back to life, and is promptly arrested by the inquisition. The Grand Inquisitor comes to his cell at night and the rest of the story is his monologue to Christ justifying the actions of the church in "correcting" the errors Christ has made. According to the inquisitor Christ's primary error is offering mankind freedom, as he says "there has never been anything more insupportable in a human society than freedom" for men are "impotent rebels."

Dostoevksy rails against the Roman Catholic church, who he sees as having succumbed to the devil's temptation of temporal power (Dostoevksy was Russian Orthodox) but it can be read as an analysis of any power that thinks it can create a utopian paradise on earth. (Just for the record, I am a catholic, but I am well aware that The Father of all Lies seeks to subvert the church from within as well as from without)

The Inquisitors monologue proceeds using the temptation of Christ by Satan in the desert as the foundation of his ideas.

Dostoevsky sums up the three temptations of Satan as appealing to Christ to base his kingdom on:

  1. MATERIALISM. Turn the stones to bread - provide the material needs of men – feed them and they will follow you.
  2. MYSTERY. Throw yourself from the temple and his angels will save you – build his kingdom upon his command of the miraculous
  3. POWER. Rule over the kingdoms of the world – base his kingdom on the authority of raw power.

The idea is that Christ, by rejecting these temptations wanted men to be free, if he had accepted any of these temptations men would have been compelled to follow Christ, rather than choosing to follow him by their own free will based on love.

Materialism. Mystery. Power.

All earthly powers whether secular or religious appeal to one or more of these as the basis of their right to rule.

As the Grand Inquisitor says to Christ:

'The wise and dread spirit, the spirit of self-destruction and non-existence, the great spirit talked with Thee in the wilderness, and we are told in the books that he "tempted" Thee. Is that so? And could anything truer be said than what he revealed to Thee in three questions and what Thou didst reject, and what in the books is called "the temptation"? And yet if there has ever been on earth a real stupendous miracle, it took place on that day, on the day of the three temptations. The statement of those three questions was itself the miracle. If it were possible to imagine simply for the sake of argument that those three questions of the dread spirit had perished utterly from the books, and that we had to restore them and to invent them anew, and to do so had gathered together all the wise men of the earth- rulers, chief priests, learned men, philosophers, poets- and had set them the task to invent three questions, such as would not only fit the occasion, but express in three words, three human phrases, the whole future history of the world and of humanity- dost Thou believe that all the wisdom of the earth united could have invented anything in depth and force equal to the three questions which were actually put to Thee then by the wise and mighty spirit in the wilderness? From those questions alone, from the miracle of their statement, we can see that we have here to do not with the fleeting human intelligence, but with the absolute and eternal. For in those three questions the whole subsequent history of mankind is, as it were, brought together into one whole, and foretold, and in them are united all the unsolved historical contradictions of human nature. At the time it could not be so clear, since the future was unknown; but now that fifteen hundred years have passed, we see that everything in those three questions was so justly divined and foretold, and has been so truly fulfilled, that nothing can be added to them or taken from them.

Materialism.

Thou wouldst go into the world, and art going with empty hands, with some promise of freedom which men in their simplicity and theirnatural unruliness cannot even understand, which they fear and dread- for nothing has ever been more insupportable for a man and a human society than freedom. But seest Thou these stones in this parched and barren wilderness? Turn them into bread, and mankind will run after Thee like a flock of sheep, grateful and obedient, though for ever trembling, lest Thou withdraw Thy hand and deny them Thy bread. But Thou wouldst not deprive man of freedom and didst reject the offer, thinking, what is that freedom worth if obedience is bought with bread? Thou didst reply that man lives not by bread alone.

And again:

No science will give them bread so long as they remain free. In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet, and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us." They will understand themselves, at last, that freedom and bread enough for all are inconceivable together, for never, never will they be able to share between them!

They will marvel at us and look on us as gods, because we are ready to endure the freedom which they have found so dreadful and to rule over them - so awful it will seem to them to be free. But we shall tell them that we are Thy servants and rule them in Thy name. We shall deceive them again, for we will not let Thee come to us again. That deception will be our suffering, for we shall be forced to lie.



Mystery.

When the wise and dread spirit set Thee on the pinnacle of the temple and said to Thee, "If Thou wouldst know whether Thou art the Son of God then cast Thyself down, for it is written: the angels shall hold him up lest he fall and bruise himself, and Thou shalt know then whether Thou art the Son of God and shalt prove then how great is Thy faith in Thy Father." But Thou didst refuse and wouldst not cast Thyself down. Oh, of course, Thou didst proudly and well, like God; but the weak, unruly race of men, are they gods? Oh,Thou didst know then that in taking one step, in making one movement to cast Thyself down, Thou wouldst be tempting God and have lost all Thy faith in Him, and wouldst have been dashed to pieces against that earth which Thou didst come to save. And the wise spirit that tempted Thee would have rejoiced. But I ask again, are there many like Thee? And couldst Thou believe for one moment that men, too, could face such a temptation? Is the nature of men such, that they can reject miracle, and at the great moments of their life, the moments of their deepest, most agonising spiritual difficulties, cling only to the free verdict of the heart? Oh, Thou didst know that Thy deed would be recorded in books, would be handed down to remote times and the utmost ends of the earth, and Thou didst hope that man, following Thee, would cling to God and not ask for a miracle. But Thou didst not know that when man rejects miracle he rejects God too; for man seeks not so much God as the miraculous. And as man cannot bear to be without the miraculous, he will create new miracles of his own for himself, and will worship deeds of sorcery and witchcraft, though he might be a hundred times over a rebel, heretic and infidel. Thou didst not come down from the Cross when they shouted to Thee, mocking and reviling Thee, "Come down from the cross and we will believe that Thou art He." Thou didst not come down, for again Thou wouldst not enslave man by a miracle, and didst crave faith given freely, not based on miracle. Thou didst crave for free love and not the base raptures of the slave before the might that has overawed him for ever. But Thou didst think too highly of men therein, for they are slaves, of course, though rebellious by nature.


Power.

They are little children rioting and barring out the teacher at school. But their childish delight will end; it will cost them dear. Mankind as a whole has always striven to organise a universal state. There have been many great nations with great histories, but the more highly they were developed the more unhappy they were, for they felt more acutely than other people the craving for world-wide union. The great conquerors, Timours and Ghenghis-Khans, whirled like hurricanes over the face of the earth striving to subdue its people, and they too were but the unconscious expression of the same craving for universal unity. Hadst Thou taken the world and Caesar's purple, Thou wouldst have founded the universal state and have given universal peace. For who can rule men if not he who holds their conscience and their bread in his hands? We have taken the sword of Caesar, and in taking it, of course, have rejected Thee and followed him. Oh, ages are yet to come of the confusion of free thought, of their science and cannibalism. For having begun to build their tower of Babel without us, they will end, of course, with cannibalism. But then the beast will crawl to us and lick our feet and spatter them with tears of blood. And we shall sit upon the beast and raise the cup, and on it will be written, "Mystery." But then, and only then, the reign of peace and happiness will come for men. Thou art proud of Thine elect, but Thou hast only the elect, while we give rest to all. And besides, how many of those elect, those mighty ones who could become elect, have grown weary waiting for Thee, and have transferred and will transfer the powers of their spirit and the warmth of their heart to the other camp, and end by raising their free banner against Thee. Thou didst Thyself lift up that banner. But with us all will be happy and will no more rebel nor destroy one another as under Thy freedom.

Note: YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY

Oh, we shall persuade them that they will only become free when they renounce their freedom to us and submit to us. And shall we be right or shall we be lying? They will be convinced that we are right, for they will remember the horrors of slavery and confusion to which Thy freedom brought them. Freedom, free thought, and science will lead them into such straits and will bring them face to face with such marvels and insoluble mysteries, that some of them, the fierce and rebellious, will destroy themselves, others, rebellious but weak, will destroy one another, while the rest, weak and unhappy, will crawl fawning to our feet and whine to us: "Yes, you were right, you alone possess His mystery, and we come back to you, save us from ourselves!


---

I have quoted liberally from the text but definitely check it out yourselves.

Finally, I will note that Malcolm Muggeridge, when interviewing Solzhenitsyn found that the Russian dissidents comments contained an undertone of Christianity. He asked Solzhenitsyn how this could be as presumably the bible was banned in the communist state. Solzhenitsyn replied that yes, that is true, but the communist rulers had made a tactical error by not also banning the works of Dostoevsky, and also Tolstoy. He said that in particular Dostoevsky was revered as more than just a writer but also as a prophet, and his writings, often passed around in the form of samizdat had preserved the gospel in the heart of the russian people.

At a time when once again the spirit of antichrist plunges us into another darkest hour, when the enemies power seems overwhelming - his words return to us with renewed power and have much to reveal to us.
 
Top