"The Great Reset" plan by the World Economic Forum

RexImperator

Crow
Gold Member
I’ve been hearing more and more references to a need for a “great reset” in the media due to the pandemic’s disruption. It’s actually a thing:

At a virtual meeting earlier in June hosted by the World Economic Forum, some of the planet’s most powerful business leaders, government officials and activists announced a proposal to “reset” the global economy. Instead of traditional capitalism, the high-profile group said the world should adopt more socialistic policies, such as wealth taxes, additional regulations and massive Green New Deal-like government programs.

“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed,” wrote Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, in an article published on WEF’s website. “In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Sounds like the last great push towards their ZOG NWO.

“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed,” wrote Klaus Schwab...
In one fell swoop they are looking to financially deplatform every nation and business entity that does not come to heel. Will China and Russia cuck out? That is the only relevant question.
 
Sounds like the last great push towards their ZOG NWO.



In one fell swoop they are looking to financially deplatform every nation and business entity that does not come to heel. Will China and Russia cuck out? That is the only relevant question.
They are first in line to sign up for the totalitarian technocratic tyranny package...obscene amounts of 5G proliferation+ facial recognition gear being put up in those places. We're rapidly approaching a point of no return, once the western world gets their constitutions/bills of rights / charters of freedoms etc ripped up and burnt (with a demoralized mouth-breathing public cheering it on), then we're in a downward free fall. That's when the real games begin..... And i haven't even gotten into the collusion of big tech censorship, which is a big key to all of this! what fun.
 

gework

Ostrich
Gold Member
I've just been reading about this on the site:

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/archive/the-great-reset

@budoslavic posted in another thread they are looking to set up an advanced biometric system to use to allow people to fly again. This for something that is only up there with other top communicable diseases that hit every year.

Everything they call for is all more left-wing. The documents relating to it are full of references to white privilege, environmental racism etc. etc. They want to use to inequalities of throwing a bunch of third world people into your country as an excuse to take even more control, push you down lower and most importantly, take you out of the breeding pool.

@RexImperator quotes above that we are living in traditional capitalism. We are not. We have the highest global rates of taxation ever. Taxes were far smaller and there is now massive regulation. We are in social democracy and are roughly half way between communism and capitalism.

They are all over every 'problem' they can - and all the solutions are complete global harmonisation under obscure global planning groups and giant corporations, which seem to all mysteriously be signing on to socialism. It's a power grab, which will be used to take away your freedoms and stop you breeding.
 

Sandstorm

Kingfisher
Covid-19 was released to usher in this "Great Reset" - don't forget, the US stock market may have appeared to be doing well prior to March 2020, and the job numbers supposedly great, but in reality, the US financial system was totally fucked already (Repo markets, national debt, pension obligations) 2008 was never fixed, in fact, it started earlier with the dotcom bubble bursting and Greenspan's response.

I believe Covid was released as the "great elites" looked at the US financial numbers and determined it was basically over for the system. This has been on the cards for decades but now the rubber-meets-the-road. They know they can't pull the wool over our eyes any longer.

So, for the 99% normies, they needed to create a great crisis (and never let a good crisis got to waste) - end the US dollar as dominant world currency (and the US dominance), end it's status as the world reserve currency, and a few other things they've been scheming; no more physical paper money, end that. Go full digital. Identification - no more paper passports, driving license and ID cards - instead, a tattoo under our skin that holds all our ID information. Disguise this as a "bio" necessity due to the Covid "pandemic".

At the same time, they can test these new mRNA "vaccines" on us. They haven't been through trial as they would probably fail safety checks (as would 5G) so first, they must get global government indemnification, as they KNOW a large proportion of the global population will suffer adverse effects - from lifelong headaches and migraines all the way through to sterility and in many cases total paralysis or death.

Well, who's pushing that aspect the hardest? Gates. Massive eugenicist and has spoken publicly often about wanting to reduce the worlds population - well, this is how they do it. Note they are waiting to get indemnification first, "in case anything goes wrong" which they already know it will on purpose. They are attempting to turn humans into GMOs themselves. mRNA "vaccines" literally change the structure of our DNA and this is a hereditary change, meaning, it will be passed on to all branches of all future descendants. (assuming you are one of those who are actually still able to have children)

Klaus Schwab who founded the World Economic Forum (formerly the meeting at Davos in Switzerland) is the man pushing this, just as Jean Monnet was the man who really got the entire European Union movement going. (funny how these individuals can rise from somewhat modest means to have such influence over so many - almost as if, there is an invisible hidden hand behind them, guiding them all the way)

These people (since WW2 and I'm sure since the days of Rome and probably even earlier) have hated the constraints of government telling them what they can and can't do - look at the arrogance of Google, Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Gates... these billionaires feel that THEY should be controlling the world, not some jumped-up little President or Prime Minister who will only be in power for 4-8 years, whereas their companies and families have been ruling for hundreds of years sometimes.

In a way, they are right - most politicians ARE bought off with billionaire money anyway, even Trump - yes he's a billionaire himself, but look at who bankrolled his campaign.

They look at the masses and think - "why are they calling the shots via their governments? They are stupid, unthinking, lazy and underachieving." In many ways I sympathize with the elites on that one! Look at how the masses have reacted to the Covid scamdemic. Totally bought it, hook, line and sinker. It IS quite pathetic.

Perhaps the vaccine is a test from the elites - those who reject it are worthy of living into the next phase, and those who accept are truly stupid and deserve to be "eliminated from the gene-pool."

I think at one point, the plan was to save the European races, but eradicate the Africa, Indian and lower-Asian races. I still think this is the plan, but now they have decided to included the majority of the European races too, as it is actually they, with their irritating "democracy", "protests" and "legal processes" who continually get in the way and thwart the plans of the elites. Hence, mass migration into Europe and America.

Anyway - not entirely sure where I was going with this post, but something triggered it! "T R I G G E R E D !"
 

budoslavic

Peacock
Gold Member
On top of the "Great Reset" by WEF (World Economic Forum), keep an eye on and after November 3. Something big is going down, according to Webb.



The People Behind Cybereason
Cybereason was created in 2012 by three Israelis, all of whom served together as officers in the Israel Defense Force’s elite technological and signals intelligence unit, which is most often referred to as Unit 8200. Unit 8200 has been the subject of several MintPress investigative reports over the past year focusing on its ties to the tech industry.

Unit 8200 is an elite unit of the Israeli Intelligence corps that is part of the IDF’s Directorate of Military Intelligence and is involved mainly in signal intelligence, surveillance, cyberwarfare and code decryption. It is also well-known for its surveillance of Palestinian civilians and for using intercepted communications as blackmail in order to procure informants among Palestinians living under occupation in the West Bank.

The unit is frequently described as the Israeli equivalent of the NSA and Peter Roberts, a senior research fellow at Britain’s Royal United Services Institute, characterized the unit in an interview with the Financial Times as “probably the foremost technical intelligence agency in the world and stand[ing] on a par with the NSA in everything except scale.” Notably, the NSA and Unit 8200 have collaborated on numerous projects, most infamously on the Stuxnet virus as well as the Duqu malware.

Given the secrecy of the work conducted by Unit 8200, it is hard to know exactly what Cybereason’s co-founders did while serving in the controversial unit, however, a brief biography of the company’s current CEO and co-founder Lior Div states that “Div served as a commander [in Unit 8200] and carried out some of the world’s largest cyber offensive campaigns against nations and cybercrime groups. For his achievements, he received the Medal of Honor, the highest honor bestowed upon Unit 8200 members (emphasis added).”

After having served in leadership positions within Unit 8200, all three Cybereason co-founders went on to work for private Israel-based tech or telecom companies with a history of aggressive espionage against the U.S. government.

Cybereason co-founders Yonathan Striem Amit (Cybereason’s Chief Technology Officer) and Yossi Naar (Cybereason Chief Visionary Officer) both worked for Gita Technologies shortly before founding Cybereason with fellow Unit 8200 alumnus Lior Div. Gita, according to public records, is a subsidiary of Verint Systems, formerly known as Comverse Infosys.

Verint/Comverse was initially funded by the Israeli government and was founded by Jacob “Kobi” Alexander, a former Israeli intelligence officer who was wanted by the FBI on nearly three dozen charges of fraud, theft, lying, bribery, money laundering and other crimes for over a decade until he was finally extradited to the United States and pled guilty to some of those charges in 2016.

Despite its history of corruption and foreign intelligence connections, Verint/Comverse was hired by the National Security Agency (NSA) to create backdoors into all the major U.S. telecommunications systems and major tech companies, including Facebook, Microsoft and Google. An article on Verint’s access to U.S. tech infrastructure in Wired noted the following about Verint:

In a rare and candid admission to Forbes, Retired Brig. Gen. Hanan Gefen, a former commander of the highly secret Unit 8200, Israel’s NSA, noted his former organization’s influence on Comverse, which owns Verint, as well as other Israeli companies that dominate the U.S. eavesdropping and surveillance market. ‘Take NICE, Comverse and Check Point for example, three of the largest high-tech companies, which were all directly influenced by 8200 technology,’ said Gefen.”
 

Blade Runner

Kingfisher
These scenarios are more about disrupting or the list of "disrupters" to an election, NOT hacking the election. I've always found it weird that influencing people is conflated with hacking or suggesting that these are therefore "illegitimate" elections. For fuck sake, our own media is propaganda influencing voters. If they aren't forcing people to pull a lever they don't want to, or changing the vote/counting it differently, it's all the same flavor of BS. Infowars, indeed.
 

Hypno

Crow
I read a lot of financial blogs and have seen references to a reset, but folks are very imprecise about what is meant, and I still struggle to discen what they expect.

Davos seems to be pushing for more socialism, not a reset.

In ancient times, and as recent as about 500 years ago, a reset was a debt jubilee. I think the pre-Christ Greeks or Jews did it every 50 years. But its unclear if this was an actual forgiveness of debts or a just a moral concept. Wikipedia has an article on jubilees but is very non-specific on the details. Another author suggests that there was not actually a forgiveness of debts. https://theconversation.com/the-deb...t-solution-to-a-modern-financial-crisis-11816

Not surprisingly, the ancient idea of a jubilee has been resurrected by the hate-America crowd. What they are really calling for is the abrogation of contracts, which would be a giant monkey wrench to commerce. Also, realize that people are far more interconnected in todays' econcomy and debt was the exception rather than the rule up until about 100 years ago with the development of mortgages and consummer credit.

Liz Warren has called for forgiveness of student loan debt, but what does that do for folks who already repaid their debt, or younger people about to incur such debt?

While the lefties have a point that debt can be an anchor on an individual and a clog on the economy, there already exists an orderly bankruptcy mechanism in the U.S. for most debts, other than alimony, most student loans, certain taxes, fraud, certain luxury goods, and debts relating to malicious or willful injury.

So I'm not really sure what people mean by a great reset.

In the U.S., FDR devalued the dollar about 50% versus gold in 1933 and made the dollar no longer exchangeable for gold for U.S. citizens., and then Nixon in 1971 said no one - not even foreign governments - could exchange dollars for gold. This is effectively a breach, although in the U.S. no one calls it that. Gold in 1933 reset from $20 to $35 an ounce, and the market reset it from $35 to $800 an ounce between 1971 and 1980.

The most likely scenario is that we will likely see the acceleratin of money printing and handouts, whether Yang type checks for nothing or the Fed pumping up the stock market. This will cause inflation which means that when those debts are repaid they are repaid with dollars that buy less. I guess you can call that a partial, indirect reset. I don't really see how anything else is practical.
 

andy dufresne

Woodpecker
Seriously do all fiduciary contacts become null and void? Do we erase the bond market? I mean we're talking complete pandemonium here.

If Warrens plan becomes a reality and we do erase all student then we have just made higher education free for everyone. Which kills any work ethic whatsoever....which is the socialistic plan in a nutshell. Turn us all into fat lazy blobs and then stick a knife in our backs.
 

EndlessGravity

Woodpecker
Not surprisingly, the ancient idea of a jubilee has been resurrected by the hate-America crowd. What they are really calling for is the abrogation of contracts, which would be a giant monkey wrench to commerce.
A jubilee really is the only choice, sooner or later. We're going to be forced into one either way and that's partially what you're witnessing now.

This will cause inflation
Probably not. The current global depression is deflationary and nothing can change that now. We might get 5 or 10 more years with zero growth, similar to the post-2008 crisis.
 

stilldt

Sparrow
The most likely scenario is that we will likely see the acceleratin of money printing and handouts, whether Yang type checks for nothing or the Fed pumping up the stock market. This will cause inflation which means that when those debts are repaid they are repaid with dollars that buy less. I guess you can call that a partial, indirect reset. I don't really see how anything else is practical.
The only way inflation seems likely is if the feds actively pursue a policy to limit the amount of goods produced. Simply printing an appropriate amont money wont do it if we're still producing a similar amount of supply (though asset prices would still likely inflate depending on the amount of capex required to produce these goods with less labor). This isn't meant to dismiss the inflation idea, though, because all of the climate stuff is exactly about the government purposely pursuing such a policy. It's just that the indicator wont be an increase in sovereign debt.

As to the idea of a great reset, I think were already witnessing much of what they are referring to: the identification of essential jobs and elimination of redundancy and bullshit jobs. This can only be done through experimentation.
 

budoslavic

Peacock
Gold Member
Video description:
Jun 3, 2020

There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset.

The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. We believe that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive change.

There are more negative comments & dislikes on the video page. These WEF people are the faces of evil.

Also, WEF is hosting some kind of summit in January 2021.

Video description:
Jun 5, 2020
“The Great Reset” will be the theme of a unique twin summit to be convened by the World Economic Forum in January 2021. In-person and virtual dialogues will address the need for a more fair, sustainable and resilient future, and a new social contract centered on human dignity, social justice and where societal progress does not fall behind economic development.
 

gework

Ostrich
Gold Member
From what I read on The WEF website this has nothing to do with a debt jubilee or debt.

It centers on the words BudoSlavic has highlighted above - a new social contract.

It seems their plans will encompass what we are now seeing in The US in particular. The vast corporations will become the standard-bearers for social justice.

The premise is that we need global governance to fix imbalances in life outcomes, particularly cross-border and climate change. They say that major corporations need to shift from making profits to essentially merging with governments, NGOs etc. and using their profits for social justice.

I suspect that as a result we will see the disemboweling of small businesses and hyper-regulation. In exchange major corporations will stump up some of their profits to pay for social and environmental justice, which is a ruse for global governance.

I believe another cornerstone of this game is UBI, which I feel is one of the most sinister schemes being pushed by oligarchs etc. I find it somewhat unusual that the likes of Jeff Bezos are obsessed with replacing as many people as possible with technology. It would not be where I would start helping the little guy, if I was a self-professed humanitarian. From what I have seen, people may be miserable in low-end job, but the misery is far greater among those who have no job and no purpose in life. UBI proponents keep telling us we need to try it out, to see how it goes. Ignoring the fact that we've had people living on welfare with no need to work for decades.

WEF say that UBI will be paid for by a wealth tax and capital gains taxes.

The need for UBI is also a great lie. They've been hammering us for year telling us 50% of jobs will be lost to automation by 2030. Yet most Western countries have been at full employment for years.

They are using humanitarianism (with lashings of guilt) to try and section off a small part of the economy for themselves, while sticking the useless eaters on the dole.
 

mubs100

Pigeon
I don't know if the Davos people (global elites) know this as I havent seen it written about anywhere, but this is all related to something I mentioned in an earlier post about the transitions of Humans from Hunter Gatherers to Nomadic Animal Husbandry, to The Neolithic, and now, in a post-scarcity world the Neolithic System is not longer applicable, so we seem to be transitioning away from that to something else, more like an earlier system.

The Neolithic started 10,000 years in Anatolia to give an idea of the scale of these cycles. Every social change in last 100 years, that we talked about here, can be explained by this transition away from Neolithic values.

The simplest way to understand this is to know that The Neolithic is based on a system of Elitism, Inequality and Individualism all due to the need for increased output, at any social cost.

These are big, top-level trends that no one has ever had the power to resist. It's scary to see the world change in such a drastic way, but better to go with it and find a new stable order faster, than to prolongue our suffering just to attempt to resist the inevitable.

Personally, I am interested in getting any possible advantage I can from knowing this....
 

mubs100

Pigeon
The establishment/elites would always want you to work harder, so I am surprised at Davos pushing these more egalitarian/environmental values, rather than everyone needs to work harder (so we have more taxes to pay for armies, castles etc) and compete with each other for better cars, expensive clothes, better schooling, status etc.

I am somewhat surprise at the Davos 'elites' taking this line. Maybe they know the game is up...

The real elites were always the ones controlling land, people and politics, not necessarily business. In that sense the Davos people may be different to those with more Protestant Work Ethics (old money Wasps), who seem to be most against the change, for they have the most invested in the system.

You cant really diss the old way, because the pre-Neolithic Herding Culture was Culturally, Spiritually, Physically and Technologically superior to the Neolithic, it just had fewer people, hence less economic and military power. From the Nomadic Economy to The Neolithic it was a move from Quality to Quantity in almost all things.

The important point is to work for yourself, not for the establishment, which means you work the amount of hours you feel comfortable with, and balance your needs/wants with the cost of working. The establishment want to inflate your needs and wants to make you work harder than is optimal for your physical/emotional/psychological well-being, because they always needs more money, and they dont have to work for you money.

The Eurasian IE Cow-Herders literally were the Ubermenshen. They simply could not withstand the larger food production, and larger population capacity of The Neolithic.

But the existing Neolithic System coupled with modern technology is causing a fast population boom in many countries that I think is not ideal. It could lead to a crash or conflict, and greater migration into Europe and West.
 
Last edited:

gework

Ostrich
Gold Member
The establishment/elites would always want you to work harder, so I am surprised at Davos pushing these more egalitarian/environmental values, rather than everyone needs to work harder (so we have more taxes to pay for armies, castles etc) and compete with each other for better cars, expensive clothes, better schooling, status etc.
A few decades ago elites did want hard work. They promoted some level of traditionalism and competitiveness as it was a boost to the economy and themselves. But they have abandoned that. What I have read leads me to believe they are now primarily interested in shutting down much of the economy and having a society something like The Hunger Games, where there is a gated-off elite who get access to the fruits of this world and a mass of useless eaters outside. What those books got wrong is the elite would wrap themselves in humanitarianism, rather than overt elitism and hierarchy.
 

mubs100

Pigeon
I think the elites still do want the hard work and productivity from the masses, as they are always going on about GDP. But politically it's difficult for them to maintain in the face of Leftist opposition so I think they've had to shift to maintain their power. I think the elites (old money) still want that but they also have to give something to the left to stay in power, so they have taken on SJW talking points, so the working class man gets shafted both ways, has to work harder for the elites, which they then give to the voters and push liberal culture.

The old money (Eton boys) really care about these values, because that is what they're about, but the business community can have more outsiders who end up making money through luck or timing, who may not be as invested in these 'Conservative Work Ethic' values, so maybe thats why Davos is more open to this.

The Old Money culture is still running the show politically in America and Britain atleast, so I would consider them the elites, in alliance with certain business groups they've been close to for a long time.
 

gework

Ostrich
Gold Member
The left and the elite agree on most things, but it seems for different reasons. Read the Great Reset, Agenda 21 and other such documents. The elites believe in dramatically limiting economic activity, as do the left. For the lefts it is to assuage their guilt, for the elites it is to cull the population while they remain in a high-tech bubble.

From what I have read The Great Reset will not affect major corporations and elites. They will have to pay more taxes, but they will gain more market share via globalisation 2.0 and hyper-regulation. They will also take on further quasi-governmental roles, which they can use for their own ends.

They are simply reshuffling the deck in a way that will placate the lefties to globalisation 2.0 by making it seem corporations are now at the forefront of fighting for the political causes. However, that will be paid for in enforced reductions in standards of living for the environment and oppressed immigrants. No evidence should be needed that leftists are prepared to dismantle themselves for social justice, whether though guilt or fear of the mob.

Following their prescription will also make social problems worse. It seems they see this as a way to keep their game running. But they loose nothing.

In my estimation, most people make their political deductions based on rhetoric and appearances. The actions - they don't know about or understand. This will feel good for lefties and they will buy it hook line and sinker. When it all starts to go wrong for them, as it does it their liberal cities they will find some way to blame conservatives, who by that point will have completely bailed from their midst, living terrified under a rock. But this is the old system with a new face. Much in the same way liberals are stary-eyed for Obama, despite the fact there was almost no discernible change from George Walker Bush. Obama makes them feel good. That's all they understand.
 
Last edited:

stilldt

Sparrow
From what I have read The Great Reset will not affect major corporations and elites. They will have to pay more taxes, but they will gain more market share via globalisation 2.0 and hyper-regulation. They will also take on further quasi-governmental roles, which they can use for their own
Meh, a lot of these conceptions (taxation, market share, regulation) would become more or less obsolete if they're able to pull off this crap.
 
Top