This may have been posted before.
I could see this as potentially happening, but not in 18 months. Maybe 5 years. Maybe.Corroborates my theory that after the 2024 elections is when everything goes down:
Oxford 2024: Climate lockdowns start — You will be tracked and trapped in your suburb and happy about it.
A lot of people sense that they are being left behind and left out of the story, even if their material conditions are still relatively good. In the 20th century, what was common to all the stories — the liberal, the fascist, the communist — is that the big heroes of the story were the common people, not necessarily all people, but if you lived, say, in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, life was very grim, but when you looked at the propaganda posters on the walls that depicted the glorious future, you were there. You looked at the posters which showed steel workers and farmers in heroic poses, and it was obvious that this is the future.
Now, when people look at the posters on the walls, or listen to TED talks, they hear a lot of these these big ideas and big words about machine learning and genetic engineering and blockchain and globalization, and they are not there. They are no longer part of the story of the future, and I think that — again, this is a hypothesis — if I try to understand and to connect to the deep resentment of people, in many places around the world, part of what might be going there is people realize — and they’re correct in thinking that — that, ‘The future doesn’t need me. You have all these smart people in California and in New York and in Beijing, and they are planning this amazing future with artificial intelligence and bio-engineering and in global connectivity and whatnot, and they don’t need me. Maybe if they are nice, they will throw some crumbs my way like universal basic income,’ but it’s much worse psychologically to feel that you are useless than to feel that you are exploited.
If you go back to the middle of the 20th century — and it doesn’t matter if you’re in the United States with Roosevelt, or if you’re in Germany with Hitler, or even in the USSR with Stalin — and you think about building the future, then your building materials are those millions of people who are working hard in the factories, in the farms, the soldiers. You need them. You don’t have any kind of future without them.
If I try to understand and to connect to the deep resentment of people, in many places around the world, part of what might be going there is people realize — and they’re correct in thinking that — that, ‘The future doesn’t need me. You have all these smart people in California and in New York and in Beijing, and they are planning this amazing future with artificial intelligence and bio-engineering and in global connectivity and whatnot, and they don’t need me
I thought this guy was supposed to be smart? If this is his genuine take, he's missed by a mile.
I look at "all these smart people in California and in New York and in Beijing" and think - you idiots! They need me more than ever, to ensure their unbridled idiocy doesnt lead to extinction. Thats where we'd end up if we were all as "smart" as these jabbie midwits.
All the hype around these things is just that - hype. I don't think I've ever heard anything even mildly interesting or exciting about any of these fields. Im still more excited about getting the flying cars we were promised 30 or more years ago, than I am about AI or the internet of things, or any of this other nonsense. What is there to be excited about? Did they ever even bother to tell us how these things are supposed to make our lives better?
All of those are crazy. Ukraine, global world order, climate "crisis", food crisis, outlook of the recession (they admit it, lol) ... and the next pandemic.
Taking guesses now, how dangerous will that next one be. A real one, but affecting less people, like the hemorrhagic fever viruses?
It could happen sooner than 2024.I could see this as potentially happening, but not in 18 months. Maybe 5 years. Maybe.
I agree with this, which points to the fact that the real disease is the willingly taken injection, far better since you get everyone to agree to worse health, increasing mortality, and greater "profits." All the while, the elites aren't subject to an actually deadly virus. Genius.I still don't think they'll ever intentionally release a disease with real mortality risk. Too much chance of losing critical personnel in short supply/hard to replace specialties and seeing their own lavish standard of living damaged. Above all, they will never risk one instant of discomfort for themselves. It's far easier to cause a panic, control the narrative, and direct good or bad lots of the next jab to where they can or can not afford critical losses.