"The Great Reset" plan by the World Economic Forum

aynrus

Kingfisher
Some things WEF is up to now.

They're open about Big Tech controlling politics at this point and want this to be total, global and want to centralize it.

They seem to have uncanny focus on anything that involves "health" data, calling China bio-surveillance state a good example to follow.
China has developed the technological prowess as well as economic scale to accelerate its rise relative to its Western counterparts through the course of the pandemic. If democracies are to avoid further erosion of their relative geopolitical power, they need to break down barriers to sharing data about their citizens’ health, develop common standards on vaccine development and testing, and invest together in the technological infrastructure on which their future prosperity as well as security will depend.
Pictures of contact tracing apps, vaxx passports, pedestrian and car surveillance all over the article, pretty clear what "global coordination" they're talking about, total tracking and, in their own words, "surveillance capitalism". It's telling how their "investment in 5G" message comes with street surveillance photo - they're not even hiding their goals.


Some of their plans to use personal data (some of which will be forcefully collected via medical surveillance they want):
They want to install "respoinsible" lifestyle choices via brainwash - let me guess, this will involve a lot of "science-backed" Big Pharma injections and GMO foods (I guess enforceable via social credits system, how else):
What is the future we want to create together: Imagine a world where every nutrition, exercise, beauty or health product or service for consumers is tailored to their unique biology, lifestyle and behaviors. A world where individuals receive personalized and trusted insights that empower them to live the heathiest lives possible through responsible, science-backed lifestyle and consumption recommendations that are tailored to their unique mental and physical health needs. A world where consumers own and control their own data and use it to inform their personal decisions to improve their overall wellbeing.

“The Precision Consumer 2030 initiative aspires to establish the first ever precision consumer ecosystem and public-private data collaborative that will gain learnings to inform and advance innovation, research, governance and consumer adoption of precision solutions in a way that is equitable, trusted and consumer-centric.” Andrew Moose, Head of Retail, Consumer and Lifestyle Industries, World Economic Forum.

They want global data sharing, including with governments (and social credits system is a natural derivative of that), so that someone can be spied upon everywhere in the world and not be able to escape by changing countries.
 
Last edited:

ilostabet

Pelican
You should not fear death, even if you don't believe in an afterlife.

It's not so much death atheists fear, but suffering, because a meaningless life cannot conceive of any purpose to suffering. So most would do whatever to avoid it, having no higher principle to cling to other than the here and now and the sensible. If you don't, you are an anomaly and in contradiction (though a good one I suppose).
 

Oberrheiner

Pelican
Suffering is just a part of life - just like death is just the end of life.
If life has no purpose, why should suffering need one ? It just is.
I don't see a contradiction here :)

Regarding fear, well, pain will come, and death will come.
There is nothing you can do, just accept it.

Adding fear to the mix seems to have more negatives than positives - I find it shameful to try and run away from the inevitable like a child, instead of facing adversity like a man.
 

Sitting Bull

Woodpecker
If life has no purpose, why should suffering need one ? It just is.

You're speaking against common human sense and experience here. If suffering "just is", why do human beings everywhere and in any historical period invest so much time and energy avoiding it ?
Also, last time I checked you didn't deny that your life had a purpose, you merely said that you got it without much effort or soul-searching (you mentioned your happy marriage).
 

budoslavic

Owl
Gold Member

Pope Francis calls for ‘global governance’ and ‘universal vaccines’ in letter to globalist financial summit​

'There remains an urgent need for a global plan that can create new or regenerate existing institutions, particularly those of global governance, and help to build a new network of international relations for advancing the integral human development of all peoples.'

Pope Francis has addressed the World Bank and International Monetary Fund at their spring meeting, calling for “global governance” in light of COVID-19, strongly advocating for universal vaccines, and bemoaning the “ecological debt” which is owed to “nature itself.”

His letter is the latest in a series of recent acts in which Francis has aligned himself with global corporations committed to anti-Catholic agendas.

The letter was delivered via Peter Cardinal Turkson, Prefect of the Holy See’s Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, to the spring 2021 meeting between the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which is currently being held online from April 5 - 11.

Dated April 4, the letter mentioned God just once, in the final line.

Instead, Francis focussed on calling for a system of global government which would implement a new societal order upon the world, based upon climate change policies and universal vaccination.


‘Global governance’​

Referencing “the Covid-19 pandemic,” Francis declared that the world had been forced to “confront a series of grave and interrelated socio-economic, ecological, and political crises.”

Such inter-connected crises, he placed before the World Bank and IMF, hoping that their meetings would provide the basis for a re-ordering of world affairs: “It is my hope that your discussions will contribute to a model of ‘recovery’ capable of generating new, more inclusive and sustainable solutions to support the real economy, assisting individuals and communities to achieve their deepest aspirations and the universal common good.”

Francis repeated the claim that COVID has shown how “no one is saved alone,” and hence “new and creative forms of social, political and economic participation” must be drawn up.

Quoting from his recent encyclical Fratelli Tutti, which has been described as “blasphemous” by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, Francis mentioned “trust” as the “cornerstone of all relationships,” a point which he believed the World Bank and IMF would “know well” due to being “experts in finance and economics.”

He urged that the two financial giants foster such relationships, and engage in “building bridges, and envisioning long-term inclusive projects.”

Francis also renewed his frequent call for a paradigm shift in global politics, saying: “there remains an urgent need for a global plan that can create new or regenerate existing institutions, particularly those of global governance, and help to build a new network of international relations for advancing the integral human development of all peoples.”

A principal effect of the desired global government, would be the reduction of debt in order to enable easy access primarily to “vaccines,” followed by “health, education and jobs.”


An ‘ecological debt’ to ‘nature itself’​

However, Pope Francis did not miss the opportunity to instruct the IMF and World Bank on another of his regular areas of concern issues, namely “climate change.” He warned about overlooking “ecological debt,” a phenomena which he described as affecting the whole world, and pitting the “global north” against the “south.”

“We are, in fact, in debt to nature itself, as well as the people and countries affected by human-induced ecological degradation and biodiversity loss,” wrote Francis.

“In this regard, I believe that the financial industry, which is distinguished by its great creativity, will prove capable of developing agile mechanisms for calculating this ecological debt, so that developed countries can pay it, not only by significantly limiting their consumption of non-renewable energy or by assisting poorer countries to enact policies and programmes of sustainable development, but also by covering the costs of the innovation required for that purpose.”

These lines seem to echo the sentiments expressed by key globalist and founder of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, whose proposed anti-Catholic “Great Reset,” is underpinned by a focus on a green financial agenda, as he mentions the “withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies,” and a new financial system based on “investments” which advance “equality and sustainability,” and the building of a “‘green’ urban infrastructure.”

Schwab, the IMF, and scores of the world’s most influential banks (including the World Bank), have in fact already committed themselves to enforcing the green agenda of the Great Reset, and look set to make adherence to such green policies a criteria for access to finance in the future.

Francis has already signalled his intimacy with Schwab, by sending an address to the WEF four times in his eight-year pontificate, and allowing an annual Vatican roundtable at Davos, the WEF’s annual conference site in Switzerland.


A secular society pointed to a new ‘common good’​

Francis also made reference to the “common good,” several times in his letter, which he linked intimately to finance and a form of secular fraternity of the kind described in Fratelli Tutti.

“It follows that public money may never be disjoined from the public good, and financial markets should be underpinned by laws and regulations aimed at ensuring that they truly work for the common good. A commitment to economic, financial and social solidarity thus entails much more than engaging in sporadic acts of generosity.”

Such goals, for Francis, include “a justly financed vaccine solidarity,” which he said was part of the “the law of love and the health of all.”

“Here, I reiterate my call to government leaders, businesses and international organizations to work together in providing vaccines for all, especially for the most vulnerable and needy.”

Closing his letter, Francis repeated his wish for a world focussed on a new style of fraternity, underpinned by a focus on green policies, urging the World Bank and IMF to develop solutions for “a more inclusive and sustainable future.”

It would be a future “where finance is at the service of the common good, where the vulnerable and the marginalized are placed at the centre, and where the earth, our common home, is well cared for.”

There was no mention in the letter of Christ, the Catholic Church or the Catholic teaching on the common good.


Subservience to globalist agenda​

Pope Francis’s letter comes as no great surprise, since the 84-year-old Argentine has been significantly increasing his long-standing ties with globalist groups and organisations, such as the United Nations (UN) and the WEF.

Francis has recently called for a “new world order,” saying that the “drama of wasting” the COVID-19 “crisis” would be worse than the disruption caused by COVID measures across the globe.

On that occasion too, he dealt with the topic of salvation, once again viewing it with a purely earthly understanding, and linking salvation to the new world order and a focus of green policies: “The path to humanity’s salvation passes through the creation of a new model of development, which unquestionably focuses on coexistence among peoples in harmony with Creation.”

To this end, Pope Francis has launched his own initiative with the U.N. and with globalist corporations, in order to promote a new “economic system” of capitalism, and ensure the achievement of the U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Amongst other aspects, the partnerships promote “sustainable lifestyles,” “gender equality,” and “global citizenship,” while the SDGs themselves promote “sexual and reproductive health services.”




Edit.

 
Last edited:

Oberrheiner

Pelican
If suffering "just is", why do human beings everywhere and in any historical period invest so much time and energy avoiding it ?
Because people are mostly useless cowards :)

Seriously, I'm not saying we should submit ourselves to unnecessary suffering of course, we're not masochists.
For instance this whole covid farce (or any other tyranny) must be opposed with all our strength and conviction.

But life is permanent struggle, and that involves pain and suffering, that's its very nature, and that's also how you reveal your own true nature.
So not only is it stupid to try to avoid it, it's also objectively bad for you.
Also, last time I checked you didn't deny that your life had a purpose, you merely said that you got it without much effort or soul-searching (you mentioned your happy marriage).
Not sure what you mean here, there's nothing I have in my life which did not involve much effort, it's just that meaning is something I quit looking for at some point.
I know what I have to do, and I know why (best long-term outcome for the bloodline), but how it all makes sense .. on first approach, it does not :)
And I'm ok with that.
 

aynrus

Kingfisher
UN Agenda 21 (adopted in the 1992) in action - Yosemite National Park (and other big national parks, looks like) will, again, require reservations to simply enter the park in summer - and these reservations will be very hard to get. These huge territories (size of a small country) should not require any kind of "reservation" to enjoy the nature and zero risk of someone spreading fake hoax flu there. This is literally stealing access to nature and public lands happening in front of one's eyes.

Just part of the overall agenda that started before Great Reset was named; this is not a new thing, just something that is a culmination of decades-long process of herding people back into feudal slavery. 2 important parts of peasants control: 1) small agriculture squashed and/or banned (already seen all over the US, it's a done deal pretty much) - to remove food independence 2) access to nature will be reduced and controlled
 
Last edited:

Oberrheiner

Pelican
I've had a near-death experience when I was young, and saw nothing, only darkness.
Thus I don't believe in an afterlife, heaven or hell.
It's also the reason why I can't believe in any doctrine which tells you to not focus on this life but on the next one - the scam it just too obvious for me.
Now if you're one of those who "drifted towards a warm light" or whatever, then I can understand how christianity makes sense to you.

Regarding fear sure it's a feeling which can be easily exploited in most people - same as guilt.
And many people do not refrain themselves from doing just that.
 

hervens

Sparrow
I've had a near-death experience when I was young, and saw nothing, only darkness.
Thus I don't believe in an afterlife, heaven or hell.
It's also the reason why I can't believe in any doctrine which tells you to not focus on this life but on the next one - the scam it just too obvious for me.
Now if you're one of those who "drifted towards a warm light" or whatever, then I can understand how christianity makes sense to you.

Regarding fear sure it's a feeling which can be easily exploited in most people - same as guilt.
And many people do not refrain themselves from doing just that.
The darkness you experienced was the transition from this earth unto hell.
A few years ago in my search for Christ I remembered coming across dozens upon dozens of different videos and testimonials of people who had NDEs and after leaving their bodies would very often describe a very heavy darkness and void, before eventually starting to hear voices of demons and screams. You obviously did not reach that point, but if I were you I would keep searching, you do not want to make a mistake here.

You can simply type "NDE hell" in youtube
 

SpyofMoses

Sparrow
I've had a near-death experience when I was young, and saw nothing, only darkness.
Thus I don't believe in an afterlife, heaven or hell.

I've had a couple near death experiences as well, and they definitely reinvigorated my faith. I didn't come close enough to have an out of body experience; just walked away from very close calls unscathed. If that's not luck, I don't know what is. And what is sheer, dumb luck if not miraculous?

Also, my first memory is actually a bright, all encompassing light. I've often wondered, 'when I die, will I just go back there?' That's why Christianity makes sense to me. I don't know much about the afterlife so I won't invest in a strong opinion about it. But I do have to wonder why some live and some don't, even though death visits us all eventually. Sometimes I suspect I have a guardian angel who is willing to work overtime.
 
The darkness you experienced was the transition from this earth unto hell.
A few years ago in my search for Christ I remembered coming across dozens upon dozens of different videos and testimonials of people who had NDEs and after leaving their bodies would very often describe a very heavy darkness and void, before eventually starting to hear voices of demons and screams. You obviously did not reach that point, but if I were you I would keep searching, you do not want to make a mistake here.

You can simply type "NDE hell" in youtube

My Grandfather clinically died, and when he was resuscitated he said he saw nothing. One moment he was in his own bed, the next moment he was in hospital. There are inconsistencies in nde testimonies, and experiences are influenced by personal experience and culture. This suggests they are likely within the person's head. Mainly due to the release of certain hallucinogenic chemicals within the brain before death such as DMT. Surely someone must be judged by God, before they are sent to hell? I say this as someone with some degree of Christian faith. I might be wrong.
 

Oberrheiner

Pelican
The darkness you experienced was the transition from this earth unto hell.
A few years ago in my search for Christ I remembered coming across dozens upon dozens of different videos and testimonials of people who had NDEs and after leaving their bodies would very often describe a very heavy darkness and void, before eventually starting to hear voices of demons and screams. You obviously did not reach that point, but if I were you I would keep searching, you do not want to make a mistake here.

You can simply type "NDE hell" in youtube
Once jehowa's witnesses rang here, once they were out of arguments after a while they just asked "but don't you want to save your soul ?"
Honest answer : I don't care. I have children, this is not about me anymore.
I gladly go to hell if it means they don't, no problem :)

Maybe I'll write about it someday, but it's much simpler that what most people make out to be.
 

Sitting Bull

Woodpecker
I've had a near-death experience when I was young, and saw nothing, only darkness.
Thus I don't believe in an afterlife, heaven or hell.

Empiricist fallacy (and the fallacy is especially wrong if the experience is isolated, whether that be in terms of number of occurrences, number of witnesses etc ; that's just basic scientific methodology).

I can't believe in any doctrine which tells you to not focus on this life but on the next one - the scam it just too obvious for me.

I can't believe in any doctrine (or "social consensus") which demands that I focus on the here and now to the exclusion of everything else - the scam and "carrot and stick" of it is just too obvious for me.

Now if you're one of those who "drifted towards a warm light" or whatever, then I can understand how christianity makes sense to you.
That's a poor attempt to explain away Christianity, as the overwhelming majority of Christians have had no NDE or indeed any "special" experience whatsoever.

they just asked "but don't you want to save your soul ?"
Honest answer : I don't care. I have children, this is not about me anymore.
I gladly go to hell if it means they don't, no problem :)

Generally, I find what you write rather reasonable, but sometimes, as now, you strike me as very naive.
You're so presumptuously offhand about the afterlife ...

If you learned you had some disease, would you say "I don't care. I have children, this is not about me anymore. I gladly die of this disease if it means they don't, no problem". Wouldn't you rather ask doctors what is known about this disease instead of making random guesses about it?

And by the way, from a Christian viewpoint it is a bizarre idea to suggest your going to hell may save others ; rather, salvation (or damnation) is usually contagious ... There's a passage by St. Paul mentioning something like this, but it's an obvious case of rhetorical exaggeration.
 
Top