"The Great Reset" plan by the World Economic Forum

gework

Ostrich
Gold Member
I remember one video that was widely circulated in which he said something like,

"We want to lower the world's population ... and one of the ways we will achieve that is through vaccines."

It's not this one, but this was also widely circulated:


I've never heard a legitimate explanation for why vaccines would lower population.

It could be that they are seen as a way to reduce infant mortality and thus stop people having children due to the fear some may die. And in Africa where there is a lot of disease that makes some sense. But why there is an increasing tyranny with no nuance in The West to take vaccines has no apparent legitimate explanation. That vaccines sometimes cause severe issues, that Gate's experimental vaccines sometimes cause people to drop dead and there is a long history of vaccines being contaminated with everything you wouldn't want to put in your body is well established. MSM and normies will not hear it, just like they won't hear any contrary arguments to climate change.
 

Serie A1

Robin
Germany has practically free education.. I think they also have a abnormally high work ethic.

That's correct, but they are not the only ones in Europe (or even Asia). Lots of European countries have higher education systems that are either free or extremely cheap – and not just to domestic students, but international ones, too.

But many Americans have no idea just how poorly they are being treated in this regard.
 

Blade Runner

Kingfisher
I'd like to get y'all's take on this, and in good faith I'll tell you my answer first, though do your best not to be biased by my primary input. To the question, "What do these people gain from being depopulationists?" I always wondered it being a strange position to have for "globalists". On the one hand, they need peons to do their bidding or cheer them, or have people on whom to lord things over. On the other, the depopulation objective contradicts this, largely. I think it's insight into their link to the demonic/destructive part of humans that do the bidding of the evil spirits, who are envious of procreation. It's one of the only explanations. What does Bill Gates care about millions of people half way around the world when he can manipulate here, is protected by his own bodyguards, eat steak and eggs every day, and fly in planes with no concern for fossil fuels either? I find it odd to think of any other explanation, it is so hypocritical and unnecessary.

They love power and manipulation; these require underlings. The depopulation thing doesn't make sense. I do see how if you link all these weird ideas you could say that oddly the future is better with climate if there are fewer people, in their warped thinking world, but do they really think the weather is also more important than money, fame, power, virtue signalling, etc? No way.
 

Mountaineer

Kingfisher
Gold Member
You forget one thing. They are not steering this whole agenda. Satan is. And for Satan the ultimate goal is to kill, mutilate, completely disfigure and dehumanize God's creation that is man.
 

Blade Runner

Kingfisher
I don't forget that at all. They aren't total zombies, though. Like us, they have free will. They can repent too - they aren't dead. So even if the prince of this world is steering you there still have to be "incentives" ... the deception is sophisticated even though the demons may be licking their lips and loving the obedience to their chaotic ways.
 

Louis IX

Pelican
You forget one thing. They are not steering this whole agenda. Satan is. And for Satan the ultimate goal is to kill, mutilate, completely disfigure and dehumanize God's creation that is man.

A friend actually gave me a good definition of this
The agenda is to offer Satan a Holocaust.
 

Dr Mantis Toboggan

Kingfisher
Gold Member
I'd like to get y'all's take on this, and in good faith I'll tell you my answer first, though do your best not to be biased by my primary input. To the question, "What do these people gain from being depopulationists?" I always wondered it being a strange position to have for "globalists". On the one hand, they need peons to do their bidding or cheer them, or have people on whom to lord things over. On the other, the depopulation objective contradicts this, largely. I think it's insight into their link to the demonic/destructive part of humans that do the bidding of the evil spirits, who are envious of procreation. It's one of the only explanations. What does Bill Gates care about millions of people half way around the world when he can manipulate here, is protected by his own bodyguards, eat steak and eggs every day, and fly in planes with no concern for fossil fuels either? I find it odd to think of any other explanation, it is so hypocritical and unnecessary.

They love power and manipulation; these require underlings. The depopulation thing doesn't make sense. I do see how if you link all these weird ideas you could say that oddly the future is better with climate if there are fewer people, in their warped thinking world, but do they really think the weather is also more important than money, fame, power, virtue signalling, etc? No way.

The Georgia Guidestones call for a global population of 500m. That's still plenty of people to enslave.
 

Laner

Hummingbird
Gold Member
The Georgia Guidestones call for a global population of 500m. That's still plenty of people to enslave.

I feel that most of these depopulation champions would not like the world too much if it was just 500m people. Things would decay faster than they realize. Nature would hammer their favorite spots. Beaches in their exclusive enclaves would be stinky messes within a season. Forest fires would rage for a decade all over the American and Asian north.

500m people seems like a lot but its not enough to keep the world as they enjoy it now. I feel they would rather 'pause' it in the 1980's then set it back to 2000 years ago.
 

Blade Runner

Kingfisher
Yes, telling us that they are doing it as a sacrifice to Satan is fine, but you still are avoiding the question that I have asked, and that Laner desires the answer to as well. In their supposed "deal with the devil" how does that much of a depopulation effort benefit them? I guess you could say that they are mindless in being possessed, but usually the Devil still has to offer a sweet part of the deal first before he throws you under the bus, in the end.
 

Mountaineer

Kingfisher
Gold Member
Use your imagination. How difficult to them is to select different places around the world and maintain, stock, and fuel for usage. Plenty of islands in the Caribbean...
 

Laner

Hummingbird
Gold Member
Don't forget these elites would have teenagers. And teenagers rebel.

"I don't want to go to bloody Positano again! I want to go to (uninhabited) Portofino!" Or they start undermining their family and start to explore the ruins of abandoned once great places, with a nostalgia for a time when the streets of Heidelberg were buzzing with pretty, rosy cheeked girls.

I can agree with Satan knowing only gas and no brake. Its the likely end game, but I know it will not happen for a very, very long time. In the mean time, we just keep fighting like we always have. All the beauty that we are protecting has always been fought for, and will always be worth it.
 

SpyofMoses

Pigeon
I think the globalists want to depopulate the world so they can keep their advanced tech and quality of life for themselves. 500 million is a low number, and probably not enough to keep things going the way they want, as Laner said. But a population of ~2 or 3 billion should be enough to keep things modern while having enough peasants around to do the dirty work. I think that was the population in Brave New World. It was the global population back when we went to the moon, so I think it's enough; at least in their minds. To loosely quote Bill Burr, the way we live now isn't a big deal if there aren't too many people doing it. If the population was low enough we could all drive our own tanks and shoot bald eagles from the sky as a pass-time. Why shoot them? "Because they were shittin' on my tank!" Not a very detailed explanation, but does that answer your question?

Edit: As far as Bill Gates is concerned, I haven't looked too deeply into him and his works, but I do recall a scene from 'Pirates of Silicon Valley'. He asked someone "how do you survive? You make people need you." He has said that that movie portrayed him pretty accurately.
 
Last edited:

MRAll134

Kingfisher
I feel that most of these depopulation champions would not like the world too much if it was just 500m people. Things would decay faster than they realize. Nature would hammer their favorite spots. Beaches in their exclusive enclaves would be stinky messes within a season. Forest fires would rage for a decade all over the American and Asian north.

500m people seems like a lot but its not enough to keep the world as they enjoy it now. I feel they would rather 'pause' it in the 1980's then set it back to 2000 years ago.

The fourth industrial revolution does not require people. It is all about automation. So, 500 million people would be more than enough for the remaining service economy, which is also being slowly automated.
 

andy dufresne

Kingfisher
The center of the web is being revealed.


This guy is crazy. Know thy enemy....I've got my copy of his 2017 book.
 
Top