"The Great Reset" plan by the World Economic Forum

MRAll134

Pelican
At one point stuff like this was unthinkable. But now, with centralization of power and with their operatives in every major position of government and industry, these crazy plans may actually be possible.
Especially with the Digital surveillance system in place and almost everyone heavily reliant on the interwebs.
 

Seadog

Kingfisher
They're still targeting Europe and USA so hard because whitey is the only who can form resistance if they can form a group to do so. Historically we've seen that all initiative to conquer the world came from whitey. Also innovations, dreaded ''science'' and cultural innovations usually came from whitey. So they got us already very tight but are still hammering us down. Also the US/EU have the infrastructure digitally, politically, economically to be the core of their technological advancement program. So it's essential for them that we are controlled to the max, not so much if someonefrom Zimbabwe takes his shot or not. Something with choosing your battles.

With regard to the overpopulation thing I've stated before that you can give every human being 100m2 and you'll fill half of the state of Alaska. If you give everyone 1 m2 you'll fill the Dutch provinces of Noord-Brabant and Zeeland. (if you calculate this take care of how many 0s you calculate ;) ). So the idea over overpopulation an sich is just a complete scam propagated by the Club of Rome in the 70s when they came up with reports like limits to growth which attacked man is man's own biggest enemy. It's all predictive programming to soften up the coming depopulation efforts that are coming on bigger scales than just the cultural depop that we have now (womeh in the West having less than 2 children because of career). I do agree though that our lifestyle harms the planet and ourselves and that big cities with 5 mil plus inhabitants are unhealthy. But the solution than would be to limit our consumerism and move back to the countryside.

While that's an interesting mathematical triviality, what does that have to do with anything? Are you going to grow a years worth of food on your 10m x 10m plot? Are you going to drill a well? Where will your sewage and garbage go?

The bottom line is that actual habitable land, ie not mountains or desert, with access to fresh water, services such as garbage and sewage disposal, proximity to arable land, and manufacturing, is not in abundance. That is why people live in cities. Because flushing a toilet is nicer when you don't have to clean out a septic tank every few years.

Anyways, a quick goggling says it requires about 7000 m^2 of arable land to feed a person for a year. That's just taking amount of arable land divided by population. It gets more complicated that that's only thanks to genetically modified super producing foods, industrial agriculture, and massive support networks like irrigation. Were it a person or family going it alone, your choice of land would be far more restricted, your yields way lower, and you'd be working like a madman. On marginal land in a marginal climate, one site I visited said up to 100 acres (ie ~400,000 m^2). Now add in your share of the garbage dumps, the car factory, the water plant et al; then a fractional portion of each of their support industries like the garbage truck factory, and you can see it requires quite a bit more land per person.

So while the 100 m^2 factoid is neat, if you want to eat it's not realistic.
 
They are going to take down the power grid during the peak of summer to kill off countless people. This really is a grand culling we are witnessing. It's all about depopulation now.

If that were their intention, they would do it in the middle of winter of the northern Hemisphere to ensure maximum chaos and fatalities. Just the of utilities, especially power would bring about a breakdown of heating and lights and if the magical shots really do their work, most of the western world would be at the peak of hospital occupation. Moreover, a shutdown in the middle of the northern winter would bring about a complete breakdown of global economy since many exporters in the southern hemisphere, that rely on agricultural exports to the North, would find themselves with no takers if a cyber "pandemic" and a blackout occurrs.

No. I don't think the cyber-pandemic will be the mass killing event especially if it happens in Summer. Those are just my 2 cts.
 

Don Quixote

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
While that's an interesting mathematical triviality, what does that have to do with anything? Are you going to grow a years worth of food on your 10m x 10m plot? Are you going to drill a well? Where will your sewage and garbage go?

The bottom line is that actual habitable land, ie not mountains or desert, with access to fresh water, services such as garbage and sewage disposal, proximity to arable land, and manufacturing, is not in abundance. That is why people live in cities. Because flushing a toilet is nicer when you don't have to clean out a septic tank every few years.

Anyways, a quick goggling says it requires about 7000 m^2 of arable land to feed a person for a year. That's just taking amount of arable land divided by population. It gets more complicated that that's only thanks to genetically modified super producing foods, industrial agriculture, and massive support networks like irrigation. Were it a person or family going it alone, your choice of land would be far more restricted, your yields way lower, and you'd be working like a madman. On marginal land in a marginal climate, one site I visited said up to 100 acres (ie ~400,000 m^2). Now add in your share of the garbage dumps, the car factory, the water plant et al; then a fractional portion of each of their support industries like the garbage truck factory, and you can see it requires quite a bit more land per person.

So while the 100 m^2 factoid is neat, if you want to eat it's not realistic.
Well Malthusian argument is that there are limited finite resources, and infinite population growth. I have to disagree with both. In reality population growth is not infinite; in fact, I would not be surprised if populations would naturally decline if resources became scarce. Either through basic economics, war, disease, etc. Also, the idea that there are limited resources is dumb. Almost zero of the oceans have been tapped. None have been used for energy, farming and aquaculture, or deep sea mining. Antarctica, while not a place with arable land, has an insane amount of natural resources, oil and minerals. Not to mention, we have the capability of using other planets as well. Basically, I think if Malthus is right, we are very far from any kind of catastrophe, if human creativity and ingenuity is able to be set to work.

The problem is that the global elite have decided that it is best to avoid the potential calamities that will ensue if population outstrips resources, by quite literally pulling the same things that they warn would happen – they cause climate crises, wars, famine, and disease through their actions. Isn't that ironic? I don't believe they are acting with the desire to prevent the consequences of Malthusianism. That's only pretense. They know the resources could last longer, and Earth could likely support billions more people. The reality is they want control because they fear something else is coming. What is it? A geophysical, cyclical event that they are concerned about? They want to avoid this catastrophe they think is coming, and they need to be in complete control to do so – this is what I think they believe.
 

NoFunInAus

Kingfisher
While that's an interesting mathematical triviality, what does that have to do with anything? Are you going to grow a years worth of food on your 10m x 10m plot? Are you going to drill a well? Where will your sewage and garbage go?

The bottom line is that actual habitable land, ie not mountains or desert, with access to fresh water, services such as garbage and sewage disposal, proximity to arable land, and manufacturing, is not in abundance. That is why people live in cities. Because flushing a toilet is nicer when you don't have to clean out a septic tank every few years.

Anyways, a quick goggling says it requires about 7000 m^2 of arable land to feed a person for a year. That's just taking amount of arable land divided by population. It gets more complicated that that's only thanks to genetically modified super producing foods, industrial agriculture, and massive support networks like irrigation. Were it a person or family going it alone, your choice of land would be far more restricted, your yields way lower, and you'd be working like a madman. On marginal land in a marginal climate, one site I visited said up to 100 acres (ie ~400,000 m^2). Now add in your share of the garbage dumps, the car factory, the water plant et al; then a fractional portion of each of their support industries like the garbage truck factory, and you can see it requires quite a bit more land per person.

So while the 100 m^2 factoid is neat, if you want to eat it's not realistic.
400,000 m^2 to feed one man!?LMAO!

Is this from Klaus's book or from Santa himself? Get a grip man.
 

r3d

Woodpecker
I wanted to write down a few more passages from this book I am reading -"Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300." These passages are all about what the "elite" are planning, according to the author - Dr. John Coleman:

a) - "a One World Gov' and one unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchs who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system...in this One World entity population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population (pg. 161)."

b) - "a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist (pg. 161)."

c) - "only one religion will be allowed and that will be in the form of a One World Gov' Church (pg 161)."

d) - "marriage shall be outlawed and there shall be no family life as we know it. Children will be removed from the parents at an early age and brought up by wards as state property (pg. 162)."

e) - "porno' shall be promoted and be compulsory showing in every theatre [or on every comp'] of cinema, incl. homo' and lesbian porn' (pg 163)."

f) - "euthanasia for the terminally ill and aged shall be compulsory (pg. 164)."

g) - "at least 4 billion 'useless eaters [now more]' shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal rapid-acting diseases and starvation (pg. 165)."

h) - "the United States will be flooded by peoples of alien cultures who will eventually overwhelm White America...(pg. 165)."

i) - "there shall be no cash or coinage in the hands of the non-elite. All transactions shall be carried out by means of a debit card which shall bear the id' # of the holder. Any person who in any way infringes the rules and regulations...shall have the use of his/her card suspended for varying times according to the nature and severity of the infringement (pg. 165)."

I saw some examples of (f) late last year, in which gov' funding was being removed from hospice centers. It came across as very un-Canadian. Anyways, I will leave this here as it is very blackpilling. But, I highly recommend this book, to those interested in: globalism, globalist agendas, politics etc.

Finally: “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle" -Sun Tzu.

I read that one as well, or skimmed through at least.

Back when I read it, that book was hosted on the official CIA dot gov page. That should really make one pause and reflect. Why would the CIA host this book on their website, for everyone to download freely?


edit: I asked that question on another forum once and someone said these people have to 'reveal their method'. By their satanic religion or whatever it is, our compliance means consent if they told us what they're gonna do before.

The most benign explanation for why the CIA would host this, would be to warn about misinformation. But if that were true a direct link to the downloadable .pdf would be a terrible way to go about it, because people will just share the link and not the landing page about it being disinformation. Also why would they host the entire thing and not just excerpts with commentary.

I think one way or another it's bad news for us, that the central intelligence agency would bother with this book on their homepage.


edit: it's still there:

'see eye a'.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf
 
Last edited:

M3B

Ostrich
Gold Member
This is July 5th - 10th; Overlapping with cyberpolygon. I wonder if there is high level planning of the cyber attack during this week, or if in fact this week is the cyber attack, and the elites want to sit in their bunker in Idaho and watch everything burn.
Did anyone take up Biden's suggestion and buy an F15? :laugh:
 

typtre

Robin
Yeah you're probably right about them wanting to eliminate those annoying, rebelious white people (although even most whites are sheep as we have seen in the last year and a half) But the Zimbabwan is the one thats doing the breeding which they dont want. You'd think they would target africa as much as white people. Maybe africa will be the next target in the coming years. If not too many whitey's die, they might accept the poison too, especially with a bit of tyranny and blackmail like they do in our countries.

The second Whitey West stops sending aid to Africa their population will crumble. The current breeding ground of Africa is just an excellent way to keep stealing tax money and stupid altruistic white donations. I do not know how it is in other countries, but in Sweden the amount of black faces and black children on various aid-begging ads in the daily news papers are staggering.
Jews send Africans to us, while they also tell our "conservative" politicians to tell us "No more immigration! We have to help them in their country. We propse this aid to this and that". Kill off Whitey, and all the pieces will eventually fall into place.

I read that one as well, or skimmed through at least.

Back when I read it, that book was hosted on the official CIA dot gov page. That should really make one pause and reflect. Why would the CIA host this book on their website, for everyone to download freely?


edit: I asked that question on another forum once and someone said these people have to 'reveal their method'. By their satanic religion or whatever it is, our compliance means consent if they told us what they're gonna do before.

The most benign explanation for why the CIA would host this, would be to warn about misinformation. But if that were true a direct link to the downloadable .pdf would be a terrible way to go about it, because people will just share the link and not the landing page about it being disinformation. Also why would they host the entire thing and not just excerpts with commentary.

I think one way or another it's bad news for us, that the central intelligence agency would bother with this book on their homepage.


edit: it's still there:

'see eye a'.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf

bRo YoU'rE sUcH a CoNsPiRaCy NuT aNd ThAt DoCuMeNt Is HiLaRiOuS!

They put in out in plain sight and the majority is too ignorant to notice and too arrogant to listen.
No normie will ever decide to read the Committee of 300 or the Protocols of the Elders.
 

berenmsc

Sparrow
Bitcoin is just another hoax to get you conditioned towards the idea of digital currencies. They can shut it down in day if they wanted to. So many people are fooled by that scheme because when people make good money they forget reason.

Bitcoin is not freedom it's stepping stone towards digital enslavement.
This is false.

Bitcoin is a decentralised, distributed network that uses cryptography making it impossible to seize by governments.

If you wanted to shut down bitcoin you would have to shut down the entire internet worldwide, and even if you did that you still couldn't destroy bitcoin because it would still exist on the blockchain.
 

Seadog

Kingfisher
400,000 m^2 to feed one man!?LMAO!

Is this from Klaus's book or from Santa himself? Get a grip man.

I think you missed the key qualifier "marginal land in marginal climate" How much high altitude Afghanistan scrubland do you think it would take to feed you yourself with?
 

NoFunInAus

Kingfisher
I think you missed the key qualifier "marginal land in marginal climate" How much high altitude Afghanistan scrubland do you think it would take to feed you yourself with?

How many RVF'ers live on "high altitude Afghanistan scrubland" my friend?

Even if they did, they wouldn't need 400K m2 of land, total nonsense. Most of that would be freehold grazing.

You can do a lot with just 1000m2 as many on this forum can attest, sure you won't have a choice between "KFC or Maccas" and you will need a willing community but it CAN work.
 

Very interesting video.

"In the video, he breaks down
- How the attack on the food supply is here now
- What's going on
- What the real motivations behind this are
- Who the players involved are
- What the implications of this are, for our own health, and the future of the country, and the world"
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Pelican
Orthodox Inquirer
Yeah you're probably right about them wanting to eliminate those annoying, rebelious white people (although even most whites are sheep as we have seen in the last year and a half) But the Zimbabwan is the one thats doing the breeding which they dont want. You'd think they would target africa as much as white people. Maybe africa will be the next target in the coming years. If not too many whitey's die, they might accept the poison too, especially with a bit of tyranny and blackmail like they do in our countries.

As for overpopulation, i know there is sufficient space to fit all the people in the world in a province. But i'm talking about a healthy balance in relation with natural resources like crude oil, gas, lytium, rare earth and a healthy future for children.
Without rare earth, no laptop or phone. Without oil/lythium, no cars, no plastics, no rubber, no industry. I want high quality food, not the garbage we eat now because industrial agriculture is the only way to feed so many people. I want sufficient nature and wildlife. We have to be carefull with our natural resources or we will be heading for disaster. Our ancesters knew how to survive with very little, most of us dont, we are weak compared to our ancesters. And we are not ready to live without acces to natural resourses and the supermarket.
I would like to live somewhere in the forrest and be self sufficient, away from this sick society and not needing these natural resources or supermarkets, but at my age and having lived in the city my whole life, that would be extremely difficult. But maybe i'll give it a try some day.
That tells something about how serious they take overpopulation themselves.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Pelican
Orthodox Inquirer

Very interesting video.

"In the video, he breaks down
- How the attack on the food supply is here now
- What's going on
- What the real motivations behind this are
- Who the players involved are
- What the implications of this are, for our own health, and the future of the country, and the world"
And let's not forget the implicit attack on food with the soy juice, the GMO, the beyond burgers, the bugs, the vegan agenda.
 

RKS

Sparrow
This is false.

Bitcoin is a decentralised, distributed network that uses cryptography making it impossible to seize by governments.

If you wanted to shut down bitcoin you would have to shut down the entire internet worldwide, and even if you did that you still couldn't destroy bitcoin because it would still exist on the blockchain.
Decentralized means that components that allow it to function are distributed. Lets see if BTC meets this definition:

1. To buy crypto you need fiat (they can control fiat with CBDC's) = Centralized Control
2. Requires the internet to create and validate transactions with the Nodes (can be blocked on the ISP level or with a digital ID required to go online) and requires fiat to buy = Centralized Control
3. Requires power to mine and to send/receive transactions (Mining can be blocked by Governments as recently seen in China, and most people do not independently create their own electricity) and the electricity must be bought with fiat. = Centralized Control

I like BTC but it is not decentralized. To be decentralized people would need a liquid non digital currency to buy/sell into, internet that is not provided by an ISP, and your own electricity storage and generation.

Also you said that even if they shut down the internet they still could not destroy it because it existed on the Blockchain, however the Blockchain is not functional without the internet. The internet is required to validate the transactions on the Blockchain.
 

Edin

Robin
Decentralized means that components that allow it to function are distributed. Lets see if BTC meets this definition:

1. To buy crypto you need fiat (they can control fiat with CBDC's) = Centralized Control
2. Requires the internet to create and validate transactions with the Nodes (can be blocked on the ISP level or with a digital ID required to go online) and requires fiat to buy = Centralized Control
3. Requires power to mine and to send/receive transactions (Mining can be blocked by Governments as recently seen in China, and most people do not independently create their own electricity) and the electricity must be bought with fiat. = Centralized Control

I like BTC but it is not decentralized. To be decentralized people would need a liquid non digital currency to buy/sell into, internet that is not provided by an ISP, and your own electricity storage and generation.

Also you said that even if they shut down the internet they still could not destroy it because it existed on the Blockchain, however the Blockchain is not functional without the internet. The internet is required to validate the transactions on the Blockchain.

Excellent reply. Like I said they can shut it down at will. Now, ask yourself why don't they?
 

Pointy Elbows

Robin
Orthodox
If that were their intention, they would do it in the middle of winter of the northern Hemisphere to ensure maximum chaos and fatalities. Just the of utilities, especially power would bring about a breakdown of heating and lights and if the magical shots really do their work, most of the western world would be at the peak of hospital occupation. Moreover, a shutdown in the middle of the northern winter would bring about a complete breakdown of global economy since many exporters in the southern hemisphere, that rely on agricultural exports to the North, would find themselves with no takers if a cyber "pandemic" and a blackout occurrs.

No. I don't think the cyber-pandemic will be the mass killing event especially if it happens in Summer. Those are just my 2 cts.
A summer shutdown would be terrible for the elderly populations of the southern parts of the US. Imagine no air conditioning in Phoenix or Atlanta. There's a reason the South didn't have its population boom until after modern AC came along.
 
Top