Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Current Events
Coronavirus
"The Great Reset" plan by the World Economic Forum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Viktor Zeegelaar" data-source="post: 1544937" data-attributes="member: 22108"><p>I was triggered to research the piece of the puzzle about the central banks and the banking system in general. I found a very interesting article that gives a relevant summary of Carroll's Quigley Tragedy and hope, a 1300 page tome about a CFR historian writing about the first half of the 20th century and who was behind it. For that last question, a more accessible book is the Anglo American establishment. Tragedy and hope is pretty hardcore and extremely detailed, so not for everybody (I did some internet research and watched Jay Dyer's lecture series on the book).</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/tragedy_hope_banking_money_history[/URL]</p><p></p><p>So the picture that starts to emerge is that of a supremely powerful banking elite that has operated, at least from the 19th century onwards, through central banks but also other bank types such as investment banks. They print the money, loan money to governments through bonds, advice governments on financial policy thus in essence monitor and steer the entire financial life of a country. If the government doesn't do what they want, they just stop the presses and stop loaning them money. According to Quigley, these interests were especially strong in the 19th century and first half of the 20th century, where these central banks were in private hands and were led by famous people like Norman and J.P. Morgan. Today, officially many of these central banks are owned by the state, although there are some private/public and private constructions, such as the federal reserve, where the US government appoints the board but underneath is a range of private banks, which of course are steered by wealthy/influential individuals. And after all, does it matter who officially is the owner of the central banks? We know ''they'' control the government, so even if the government officially owns the central bank, they own it through the government. Anyway, it is crucial to understand that someone like Nathan Rotschild could say ''I (not the British government) rule the world as I supply and control the money'' to understand who's really to a tremendous extent in charge of global affairs.</p><p></p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p><strong>"The powers of financial capitalism had [a] far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences."</strong></p><p> -- Quote from Caroll Quigley's <em>Tragedy and Hope</em>, <a href="https://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/quigley_carroll.tragedy_hope_banking_money_history.shtml#quote2" target="_blank">Chapter 20</a></p><p></p><p>Remember this guy is an insider, he delved through the official archives of the CFR and lectured as a professor people like Bill Clinton. He isn't against the above mentioned idea per se, but states it is important that it is publicly known and he critizises somewhat its methods.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Viktor Zeegelaar, post: 1544937, member: 22108"] I was triggered to research the piece of the puzzle about the central banks and the banking system in general. I found a very interesting article that gives a relevant summary of Carroll's Quigley Tragedy and hope, a 1300 page tome about a CFR historian writing about the first half of the 20th century and who was behind it. For that last question, a more accessible book is the Anglo American establishment. Tragedy and hope is pretty hardcore and extremely detailed, so not for everybody (I did some internet research and watched Jay Dyer's lecture series on the book). [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/tragedy_hope_banking_money_history[/URL] So the picture that starts to emerge is that of a supremely powerful banking elite that has operated, at least from the 19th century onwards, through central banks but also other bank types such as investment banks. They print the money, loan money to governments through bonds, advice governments on financial policy thus in essence monitor and steer the entire financial life of a country. If the government doesn't do what they want, they just stop the presses and stop loaning them money. According to Quigley, these interests were especially strong in the 19th century and first half of the 20th century, where these central banks were in private hands and were led by famous people like Norman and J.P. Morgan. Today, officially many of these central banks are owned by the state, although there are some private/public and private constructions, such as the federal reserve, where the US government appoints the board but underneath is a range of private banks, which of course are steered by wealthy/influential individuals. And after all, does it matter who officially is the owner of the central banks? We know ''they'' control the government, so even if the government officially owns the central bank, they own it through the government. Anyway, it is crucial to understand that someone like Nathan Rotschild could say ''I (not the British government) rule the world as I supply and control the money'' to understand who's really to a tremendous extent in charge of global affairs. Quote: [B]"The powers of financial capitalism had [a] far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences."[/B] -- Quote from Caroll Quigley's [I]Tragedy and Hope[/I], [URL='https://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/quigley_carroll.tragedy_hope_banking_money_history.shtml#quote2']Chapter 20[/URL] Remember this guy is an insider, he delved through the official archives of the CFR and lectured as a professor people like Bill Clinton. He isn't against the above mentioned idea per se, but states it is important that it is publicly known and he critizises somewhat its methods. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Current Events
Coronavirus
"The Great Reset" plan by the World Economic Forum
Top
