As H.R. 8 goes to the floor of the Senate, being ramrodded by (((Chuck Schumer))), and the "Biden" administration seems intent on strict gun control reforms that will no doubt be targeted especially at anyone they can label a "white supremacist", which is, at a minimum, all 300k people at the January 6 Trump speech, I thought it might be time to survey the Roosh V forum and find out where it stands.
All throughout history, populations that are perceived to be threats are neutralized by such tools as economic warfare, displacement, and disarmament. It can even lead to genocide. Economic sanctions come in forms which are dependent on whether the threatening population is external, internal or a mixture of both. Taxation, the making to pay tribute, trade wars or sanctions.The upcoming Reparations Bill is an economic attack on white people through tax or tribute.
Back to disarmament, i.e. gun "control". IMO, both sides are being dishonest. It's not about hunting and self-defense from carjackers as the GOP say. And it's not about gun safety and school shootings as the Democrats say. It's that the Democrats know in their hearts that by pushing the globohomo gayplex on normal Americans there is likely to be a reaction. This has been going on since WWII. Before WWII, you would be hard-pressed to say who was more pro-gun, Democrats or Republicans. Back then, one side of America wasnt giving the other side a dildo.
When conservatives argue that Hitler and Stalin were the original gun-grabbers, they're not wrong. For obvious reasons.
This is obviously a very sensitive issue and neither side wants to say what it's true fear is.
Meanwhile, the fact that blacks and other immigrant groups will always be able to get guns illegally, suits the Jews just fine. This is because blacks and immigrants are on their side. When you're fighting a war, you want all your allies and proxies to have guns, and your enemies to have none. I really think it's that simple. What are your thoughts?
All throughout history, populations that are perceived to be threats are neutralized by such tools as economic warfare, displacement, and disarmament. It can even lead to genocide. Economic sanctions come in forms which are dependent on whether the threatening population is external, internal or a mixture of both. Taxation, the making to pay tribute, trade wars or sanctions.The upcoming Reparations Bill is an economic attack on white people through tax or tribute.
Back to disarmament, i.e. gun "control". IMO, both sides are being dishonest. It's not about hunting and self-defense from carjackers as the GOP say. And it's not about gun safety and school shootings as the Democrats say. It's that the Democrats know in their hearts that by pushing the globohomo gayplex on normal Americans there is likely to be a reaction. This has been going on since WWII. Before WWII, you would be hard-pressed to say who was more pro-gun, Democrats or Republicans. Back then, one side of America wasnt giving the other side a dildo.
When conservatives argue that Hitler and Stalin were the original gun-grabbers, they're not wrong. For obvious reasons.
This is obviously a very sensitive issue and neither side wants to say what it's true fear is.
Meanwhile, the fact that blacks and other immigrant groups will always be able to get guns illegally, suits the Jews just fine. This is because blacks and immigrants are on their side. When you're fighting a war, you want all your allies and proxies to have guns, and your enemies to have none. I really think it's that simple. What are your thoughts?