The Haggening (Makeup removal app)

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
RE: The Haggening

Finally. A powerful tool to deobjectify women!

I for one am certain they'll be thrilled.

I do so hope it comes with a statistic outlining precisely how much the filter has deobjectifyed the woman in question.

"The 37 year old woman in this picture has been 73 percent objectified."

"The 18 year old woman in this picture has been 11 percent objectified."
 
RE: The Haggening

Leonard D Neubache said:
...this is going to be incredible.

The memes alone will make it all worth it. And it's already started.

DOpZkMYXUAAPENN.jpg:large


DOon5u_WsAAM0JO.jpg:large


DOpGh22WsAEWQri.jpg:large


DOpWERRUEAA4p44.jpg


DOpslV3XkAAtr1B.jpg
 

[email protected]

Pelican
Gold Member
RE: The Haggening

Now this is some Russian collusion I can stand behind!

App should be named "Objective objectification".

This is what happens when you take that lipstick off that pig.
 
RE: The Haggening

The irony is that feminists could, if they chose to, come up with all kinds of reasons why this app is actually a great idea. But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't.
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
RE: The Haggening

Vladimir Poontang said:
The irony is that feminists could, if they chose to, come up with all kinds of reasons why this app is actually a great idea. But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't.

"But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't."

"For some reason" = Typical feminist jealousy of male ingenuity.

Did you read that post you liked at The Mary Sue? It's headline "Sad Man Makes Sad App to Stop All Those Evil Women Trying to Trick Him With Makeup." If that doesn't reek of jealous resentment, what does? What kind of person editorializes to that degree unless they have some serious emotional issues?
 

questor70

 
Banned
RE: The Haggening

This is Vivian Kane (author of the Mary Sue article). I'd call her a post-wall 5 with the assistance of makeup and hairstyle. Lose the makeup and she no longer passes the boner test.

1ccf3b1.jpg


So that's why she's triggered by this app.
 
RE: The Haggening

Days of Broken Arrows said:
Vladimir Poontang said:
The irony is that feminists could, if they chose to, come up with all kinds of reasons why this app is actually a great idea. But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't.

"But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't."

"For some reason" = Typical feminist jealousy of male ingenuity.

Did you read that post you liked at The Mary Sue? It's headline "Sad Man Makes Sad App to Stop All Those Evil Women Trying to Trick Him With Makeup." If that doesn't reek of jealous resentment, what does? What kind of person editorializes to that degree unless they have some serious emotional issues?

Oh yes jealousy is part of it for sure, but what I had in mind was the fact that they don't like men being able to see what they're getting themselves into by knowing what a girl really looks like.

They could very easily make the point that because this app lets men know how a girl looks with and without make up, if he rejects her then that means he's superficial and to hell with him anyway because I know my worth and I want a man who will accept me as I really am so I want him to see how I really am.

It's like when they say that their n count doesn't matter and a man should accept them regardless, yet they don't want to say what the number is.

You'd think that strong independent feminists would want men to know everything about them that might reveal incompatibility so that they could move on to someone else who doesn't mind their n count or how they look without paint, but somehow they're not strong enough to do so.

"Hey I bet I can accept you just as you are. How many men have you had sex with and what do you look like without make up? I bet I don't mind, and let me prove it so you'll have no doubts whatsoever. I want you to have full peace of mind that I'm not one of those manospherians".

"NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"
 

MaceTyrell

Pelican
RE: The Haggening

Vladimir Poontang said:
Days of Broken Arrows said:
Vladimir Poontang said:
The irony is that feminists could, if they chose to, come up with all kinds of reasons why this app is actually a great idea. But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't.

"But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't."

"For some reason" = Typical feminist jealousy of male ingenuity.

Did you read that post you liked at The Mary Sue? It's headline "Sad Man Makes Sad App to Stop All Those Evil Women Trying to Trick Him With Makeup." If that doesn't reek of jealous resentment, what does? What kind of person editorializes to that degree unless they have some serious emotional issues?

Oh yes jealousy is part of it for sure, but what I had in mind was the fact that they don't like men being able to see what they're getting themselves into by knowing what a girl really looks like.

They could very easily make the point that because this app lets men know how a girl looks with and without make up, if he rejects her then that means he's superficial and to hell with him anyway because I know my worth and I want a man who will accept me as I really am so I want him to see how I really am.

It's like when they say that their n count doesn't matter and a man should accept them regardless, yet they don't want to say what the number is.

You'd think that strong independent feminists would want men to know everything about them that might reveal incompatibility so that they could move on to someone else who doesn't mind their n count or how they look without paint, but somehow they're not strong enough to do so.

"Hey I bet I can accept you just as you are. How many men have you had sex with and what do you look like without make up? I bet I don't mind, and let me prove it so you'll have no doubts whatsoever. I want you to have full peace of mind that I'm not one of those manospherians".

"NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"

Using that on the next girl who suggests exclusivity. Brilliant.
 
Top