Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Current Events
United States
The Hillary Clinton thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Chinito loco" data-source="post: 673198" data-attributes="member: 5462"><p><strong>RE: Apparently Hillary Clintion is running for President</strong></p><p></p><p>Good god almighty just look at this list of potential 2016 candidates.</p><p></p><p>This is the political version of dumpster diving.</p><p></p><p>Hillary Clinton - Not going to beat a dead horse here. Might as well elect one of those store mannequins.</p><p></p><p>Lindsey Graham - Ultra hawk and Israel super advocate. Enjoy more misguided military adventures. Obvious neo-con shill.</p><p></p><p>Scott Walker - Shady as hell and pretty hated in his own state. Had all sorts of policy blunders and I believe the mainstream disatisfaction with him comes from being inept at budgeting. Imagine him running the entire nation...into the ground.</p><p></p><p>Marco Rubio - Still not sure what this guy is all about. He seems to flip flop a lot on policies and tries to play up populism. Comes across as disengenuous even for modern day politics. Hispanic sounding last name might dupe some minority voters and white liberals though.</p><p></p><p>Jeb Bush - Bush family rep. Surely has neo-con loyalties. Don't care how different he or others claim he is. Not buying it.</p><p></p><p>Rand Paul - tea party affiliations and non establishment support makes him very unlikely. He would probably be the only risk worth taking.</p><p></p><p>Ted Cruz - Has very strong Bush-Cheney affiliations and was brought up in that environment. Very likely Neo-con shill. His whole platform seems to be based on anti-Obama and little substance. Hispanic last name to dupe some minority voters and white liberals.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Look at all the trash. Just look at it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Chinito loco, post: 673198, member: 5462"] [b]RE: Apparently Hillary Clintion is running for President[/b] Good god almighty just look at this list of potential 2016 candidates. This is the political version of dumpster diving. Hillary Clinton - Not going to beat a dead horse here. Might as well elect one of those store mannequins. Lindsey Graham - Ultra hawk and Israel super advocate. Enjoy more misguided military adventures. Obvious neo-con shill. Scott Walker - Shady as hell and pretty hated in his own state. Had all sorts of policy blunders and I believe the mainstream disatisfaction with him comes from being inept at budgeting. Imagine him running the entire nation...into the ground. Marco Rubio - Still not sure what this guy is all about. He seems to flip flop a lot on policies and tries to play up populism. Comes across as disengenuous even for modern day politics. Hispanic sounding last name might dupe some minority voters and white liberals though. Jeb Bush - Bush family rep. Surely has neo-con loyalties. Don't care how different he or others claim he is. Not buying it. Rand Paul - tea party affiliations and non establishment support makes him very unlikely. He would probably be the only risk worth taking. Ted Cruz - Has very strong Bush-Cheney affiliations and was brought up in that environment. Very likely Neo-con shill. His whole platform seems to be based on anti-Obama and little substance. Hispanic last name to dupe some minority voters and white liberals. Look at all the trash. Just look at it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Current Events
United States
The Hillary Clinton thread
Top