Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kosko" data-source="post: 673227" data-attributes="member: 2143">RE: Apparently Hillary Clintion is running for PresidentIn short Yes. I will of course provide you with reasons why also when I am back at a computer. You don't run for POTUS unless you work for Wall Street and other interests who run the show. It us just that simple. The idea of a stand alone candidate who potential.is a &quot;game changer&quot; does. It exsist anymore. The last legitimate candidates was Ralph Nadar and since then the contest has been propelled into sky high levels.of cost to prevent any type of Nadar type from every running. Ron Paul was the closest thing to that but he was never able RL break out due to his own inability to see that by not taking his transferable independent support out of the shackles of the GOP he would never be a viable POTUS candidate. To the stark point that as&nbsp; Independent he would of likley been able to have a legit share of the votes and some States.&nbsp; Rand Paul was a walking contradiction from his start. He is essentially in father in name only, and his father has to cut a bunch of district deals to give his son higher pecking order within the party. Where would Rand get one billion +? The Tea Party does have the largest money sources in the GOP via large diners such aa the Koch brothers but them simply.plopping that thatbammlunt is even out of thier ability.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="kosko, post: 673227, member: 2143"] [b]RE: Apparently Hillary Clintion is running for President[/b] In short Yes. I will of course provide you with reasons why also when I am back at a computer. You don't run for POTUS unless you work for Wall Street and other interests who run the show. It us just that simple. The idea of a stand alone candidate who potential.is a "game changer" does. It exsist anymore. The last legitimate candidates was Ralph Nadar and since then the contest has been propelled into sky high levels.of cost to prevent any type of Nadar type from every running. Ron Paul was the closest thing to that but he was never able RL break out due to his own inability to see that by not taking his transferable independent support out of the shackles of the GOP he would never be a viable POTUS candidate. To the stark point that as Independent he would of likley been able to have a legit share of the votes and some States. Rand Paul was a walking contradiction from his start. He is essentially in father in name only, and his father has to cut a bunch of district deals to give his son higher pecking order within the party. Where would Rand get one billion +? The Tea Party does have the largest money sources in the GOP via large diners such aa the Koch brothers but them simply.plopping that thatbammlunt is even out of thier ability. [/QUOTE]

Verification