This helps explain why the Left keeps winning. As I was saying in another thread, the right is full of back-stabbing egoists. Look at the treatment Roosh got from loser White Nationalists who spent their off hours screwing their dad's second wife in the trailer park - they regularly compared him to the migrant rapefugees "He's an Arab stealing all da white wimminz".ilostabet said:It's a strange situation but the left, while preaching equality, actually understands, promotes and respects inequality. Of course, it's in their deviant and distorted way, but they know that pedigree is not a random concept and has a real existence which determines lots of things. It's the mainstream right who, unfortunately, really believes in equality and fights, against reality, to make it true - which explains why they keep losing the battle. They are playing in a fantasy world.infowarrior1 said:Why do people have the notion that nobility of birth is so important and not the nobility of character and deeds?dicknixon72 said:Its not the stereotype they find offense; its that second-generation children of privilege are ashamed of their roots. Their egalitarian high-mindness and elevated worldview conceals their disdain of the fact that their parents were shop keepers, gas station owners, and taxi drivers who talked a little funny and drove third-hand Camries instead of Teslas.questor70 said:
This is like how white people were the ones most outraged about Looney Toons' Speedy Gonzalez when Mexicans actually love the character.
They still have the mindset of high-born and low-born and somehow there is inherent superiority and inferiority by such distinction.
Its like a form of Mary Sue where people are special for simply existing. Just like how High Born people are special for existing and coming of a distinguished Pedigree.
Everyone before the 19th century understood that aristocracy, while it can become (and by virtue of too easy a life does inevitably become) weak is not born out of nowhere: their origins lie in strength, honor, mercy and courage shown in times of disarray - this is how they are established, otherwise no other person would recognize their authority. Authority comes from strength, vision and service to the weak, which is what original aristocrats practice and represent.
The royal houses of Europe arose from the ashes of the Roman Empire, after it traded its monarchical structure for a semi-democractic system, which always means (as we see today) capture of the state by moneyed interests and degenerates quickly into vile corruption. These strong men, which ensured Europe wasn't conquered by foreign peoples, then established their bloodlines as dynasties - why wouldn't they? They understood the value of lineage and instinctively understood that nature (that is, blood) is equally important as nurture - so just as they set up their descendants to be reared in a way worthy of kings, they also sought to keep their bloodlines intact, and marry them to other strong bloodlines.
It really is a strange situation that the mainstream right has completely forgotten this - and now subscribes to the liberal dogma of equality (while pretending it doesn't). Whereas the left, pretending it does, actually puts forth a view of the world that recognizes inequality of birth as a fact. You can see this in the example given above, but also in the phenomenon people call 'DRR' - democrats are the real racists. By saying minorities need special privileges, they actually acknowledge they are at a disadvantage in a society their ancestors did not build. While the mainstream right pretends that an equal footing would generate equal results if only people were free and given a chance. Well, not a chance.
Inequality - including of inherited traits - is the reality, whether we would like it to be or not. And while the oligarchs promote miscegenation and free marriage for the masses, they really keep their bloodlines intact, arrange marriages and plan for the future. Just like, I might add, traditional cultures always did and still do.
Once this system collapses, a new aristocracy will rise and establish itself as it always does and the cycle will begin again.
By recognizing elites, the Left forms ranks and follows orders - you're able to arrange a half-dozen busses to pick them up to drive them to the protest, and explain the plan whereby you false-flag the right. But the 'equalists' on the right are threatened by the existence of leaders who are demonstrably more moral, more courageous, and more intelligent than they are - so they attack the actual leadership potential, and elect midwit NEETs like Sargon to be their generals.