The Honk pill (Clown World)

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
CynicalContrarian said:
I like redheads too, and don't mind women just calling to say hello. This is a lousy list.

Heartiste once had a better one. It singled out women who wear huge hoop earrings and carry massive bags as pocketbooks. His feeling was oversized accessories = oversized egos and a sense of entitlement.

Also, why are single mothers not on this list? From all I've seen over the years, this is the ticket to screwing up your life if you're a guy. Maybe the guy behind this list is young and hasn't seen the wreckage wrought by such things...
 

Oberrheiner

Kingfisher
Days of Broken Arrows said:
The only thing worse than this is those who preach this idiocy to others.
I'm not sure whether what they had before (the endless excuses) was better than what they have now (worship my fat !).

The funniest I had heard was I'm fat because of all the fruits I eat, you know they're high fructose right ?
Oh, right honey, that apple made you fat .. :tard:

Only in the anglosphere do you hear such bullshit, probably because they have no food culture ?
"Food's only fuel" yeah well enjoy your shit fuel then, and good luck with the clogged filters and injectors.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Redheads aren't bad if you're willing to play on hard difficulty. They have a reputation for a reason.

The list is partially garbage. If I'm late my wife will call simply because she's concerned I've pitched the car off the side of the road somewhere.
 

HermeticAlly

Kingfisher
Thanks Engaget, for encouraging me to navigate the web while observing Hijab! Yet I'm sure that if a Christian came up with something similar you'd mock them for how backwards they are, rather than give them a platform.

The fact this article is written by a woman is just hilarious. Just a hunch, but I wouldn't be surprised if the average Islamic guy is a more enthusiastic porn user than the general population.
 

joost

Kingfisher
budoslavic said:
On another episode of "Things that never happened"...

Edit.
Funny how they say things like that with pride and publicly.

Only Trump to describe such travesty with few words:

SAD!
 
Vladimir Poontang said:
A bit of hubris in their warzone hospitals eh?

Nurses and doctors in the communist countries were clearly underpaid for decades - deliberately due to ideological reasons getting paid less than factory workers. Many still chose the profession despite lousy pay and terrible standards. Those people were heroes - not well-paid individuals who are not even aware of the irony of what they are doing on social media. It's either a warzone or they have enough time to do ego-tripping stunts - pick one.
 

Garuda

Woodpecker
I doubt any kid knows could define "gender attitude."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/science...-children-inherently-sexist-study-claims.html

Five-year-old children are sexist and become less so as they grow up - but boys still display 'benevolent' sexism at the age of 11, study shows
By Jonathan Chadwick for Mail Online
Published: 00:15 EDT, 23 April 2020 | Updated: 02:44 EDT, 23 April 2020

Five-year-old children have inherent sexism that wears off as they grow up – but this process takes longer in little boys, according to a new study.

US researchers found that negative views of women held by children disappear with age – but 'benevolent' sexism diminishes only for girls.

'Hostile' sexist perceptions decline for both boys and girls as they get older – however, boys maintain benevolent or seemingly 'positive' sexist views aged 11.

Boys who think they are being chivalrous may actually view women as weak and helpless – attitudes that last throughout childhood and possibly into adulthood.

The study investigates the children's 'hostile' sexism and 'benevolent' sexism, which may seem inoffensive but still undermines women.

Most people understand sexism to refer to openly negative attitudes towards women, the researchers note, but benevolent sexism can be undermining, patronising and often overlooked.

'It might seem cute when a boy acts in chivalrous ways toward girls, or when a girl pretends to be a princess who's waiting for a prince to rescue her,' said study author Dr Andrei Cimpian from New York University.

'Many times, this is just play, with no deeper meaning.

'But other times, these behaviours – even though they may seem inoffensive – might signal that children view women in a negative light, as weak, incompetent and unable to survive or thrive without a man's help.'

Previous studies have shown adults who hold hostile sexist views also possess ones that are benevolent.

But psychologists had been unsure whether children also hold these perceptions – and whether or not these change through childhood.

To find out more, researchers studied the attitudes of more than 200 children aged five to 11 in New York City and Urbana-Champaign in Illinois, US.

The children were asked if a series of statements – classified as indicators of either benevolent or hostile sexist views – were right or wrong.

For example, 'men need to protect women from danger' was a benevolent statement and 'women get more upset than men about small things' was defined as a hostile statement.

The results showed that if a child agreed with a hostile statement they were more likely to agree with a benevolent one.

'This is something we did not know before about young children's gender attitudes,' said Dr Cimpian.

The findings also revealed children's hostile sexism decreased with age for both boys and girls, but benevolent sexism declined only for girls.

This may be due to being surrounded by these social norms through early childhood, said Dr Cimpian.

'Boys may be less likely to recognise that their benevolent attitudes toward women are, in fact, patronising,' he said.

'For instance, they may hold on to the belief that men ought to protect women because this view is in line with social norms and may be reinforced throughout their upbringing.'

To remedy this, the authors suggest the current coronavirus lockdown could be a good opportunity to outline the potentially harmful effects of benevolent sexism.

'Parents and kids are spending a lot of time together these days, so there are plenty of opportunities for conversation,' said study first author Dr Matthew Hammond at Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.

'It could be worthwhile to spend a few minutes discussing what they think men and women should be.'

The research has been published in the journal Sex Roles.
The article had this little sidebar:
Benevolent Sexism vs Hostile Sexism
Benevolent sexism (also classed as ambivalent or 'positive' sexism) describes attitudes and viewpoints that may appear positive, but are actually still undermining and patronising towards women.

Examples include women 'should be warm, caring, pure and deserve to be admired' or 'men need to protect women from danger'.

The theory of benevolent sexism has largely been developed by social psychologists Peter Glick and Susan Fiske.

Benevolent sexism contrasts with hostile sexism, which, as the name suggests, is less well-meaning or deliberately hurtful.

An example of hostile sexism is 'women get more upset than men about small things'.
I can agree that most women shouldn't be admired but who wouldn't want a warm and caring woman for a wife or mother?
 

Thersites

Kingfisher
renotime said:
budoslavic said:
She'll die from diabetes before she gets through a third of that list.
Bitch won't die from diabetes. More likely from heart attack with combination of atherosclerosis and heart damage after years of alcoholism for being lonely as the price of being a vapid bitch. Once menopause hits, her health will deteriorated fast.

Simeon_Strangelight said:
Vladimir Poontang said:
A bit of hubris in their warzone hospitals eh?

Nurses and doctors in the communist countries were clearly underpaid for decades - deliberately due to ideological reasons getting paid less than factory workers. Many still chose the profession despite lousy pay and terrible standards. Those people were heroes - not well-paid individuals who are not even aware of the irony of what they are doing on social media. It's either a warzone or they have enough time to do ego-tripping stunts - pick one.
For the record, the picture was from France. I know enough about US Hospital that doing that stunt in the current pandemic, will have combination of the admin and doctors asking when they have the fucking time to pose for a picture. This picture is pure narcissism.
 

budoslavic

Crow
Gold Member
^
WHO Guidelines Encourage Children Younger Than 4 be Taught “Masturbation” and “Gender Identity”
WHO guidelines for sex education recommend that children aged 0-4 be taught about “masturbation” and “gender identity.”

The World Health Organization’s ‘Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe: A framework for policymakers, educational and health authorities and specialists’, advises children be taught about sexually pleasuring themselves and transgenderism before they’ve even fully learned to talk.

The WHO advises that children aged 0-4 are given “information about enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s body… masturbation.”

Toddlers are also to be encouraged to “gain an awareness of gender identity” and given “the right to explore gender identities.”

In the ages 4-6 bracket, educators are urged to “give information about same-sex relationships” and “help children develop respect for different norms regarding sexuality.”



Of course, in any sane world, no child of this age should be exposed to any kind of information about sex whatsoever.

Despite them being complicit in China’s cover-up of the coronavirus outbreak, the media has held up the WHO as an organization beyond reproach which cannot be questioned.

Social media networks are removing material and banning people who criticize the World’s Health Organization’s guidelines.

Given that the global health body is pushing such sickness onto toddlers, the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw funding is looking better every day.
 
Lazuli Waves said:
Roosh said:
She was invited to speak at St. Olaf college. What a joke. She says fitness instructors are Nazis and children can't consent to being on a diet.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/fat-sex-therapist-fitness-instructors-nazis/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...mpus-who-says-children-cant-consent-to-a-diet
Nice, and 50 years ago we had this…

 
Top