The Honk pill (Clown World)

Scientists at war over reliability of Covid lateral flow tests as Government experts blast critics of the 15-minute check after they claimed they were too INACCURATE to be used



The wording of this article is a sign of things to come for those in medical professions that try to stand up to data inaccuracy. Should you present evidence that is counter narrative to the 'plan' then you are 'blasted' by senior scientists as you are a lowly academic.



This is the equivalent of an argument in which the woman says "well you've already made your mind up haven't YOU!"
Yeah, it's like should they not present some actual evidence and a solid counter-argument to refute the claims of scientists they are trying to "blast"?

What specifically are the "factual errors" and "several unsubstantiated allegations and assertions" in the article? I wonder whether they're just nitpicking - perhaps they've jumped on completely irrelevant minutiae and are telling half-truths to invalidate the article. Like, I could say there's a factual error in an article when all they did was get someone's name wrong; it doesn't say anything about the validity of the central claims found in the article.

"They appear to have made up their minds that LFDs (lateral flow device) are dangerous and of no value and therefore should never be used" - this is nothing but an attack on their characters. No substance whatsoever about exactly why they're wrong and what they are wrong about.
 

Jaszczurka

Robin
Catholic
If someone hasn't already posted this. Man, this is pretty bad. British woman conspired to beat a man nearly to death and got a suspended sentence.
 
If someone hasn't already posted this. Man, this is pretty bad. British woman conspired to beat a man nearly to death and got a suspended sentence.
Although the judge was slightly critical, it was almost like she was giving the girl compliments:

Judge Sarah Munro, said Culhane was a "determined, persuasive and manipulative liar" capable of conning professionals into sympathising with her.

[...]

"Through the evidence, the reports and my own observation of you throughout the trial, it is clear that you, Crystal Culhane are a complex young woman of 22.

"On the one hand you are an attractive, beautifully groomed and dressed young woman who is concerned at all times for your appearance.

"You are, as I have seen from your text messages, articulate and literate. You are nowhere near as stupid as you would, when it suits you, have people believe.

"Indeed, the evidence showed you to be a determined, persuasive and manipulative liar who is capable of deceiving others including professionals.

It seems ridiculous to make comments about her being a "complex young woman" and "an attractive, beautifully groomed and dressed young woman." Completely irrelevant hamstering that should have no bearing on something as serious as an attempted murder case. PTSD from a car crash leading to her deliberately scheming to have someone murdered? Can't quite see a valid causal connection there.
 
Last edited:

infowarrior1

Crow
Protestant
Although the judge was slightly critical, it was almost like she was giving the girl compliments:



It seems ridiculous to make comments about her being a "complex young woman" and "an attractive, beautifully groomed and dressed young woman." Completely irrelevant hamstering that should have no bearing on something as serious as an attempted murder case. PTSD from a car crash leading to her deliberately scheming to have someone murdered? Can't quite see a valid causal connection there.

They seem fine with wickedness as long as the perpetrator is female.
 

godfather dust

 
Banned
Gold Member
Although the judge was slightly critical, it was almost like she was giving the girl compliments:



It seems ridiculous to make comments about her being a "complex young woman" and "an attractive, beautifully groomed and dressed young woman." Completely irrelevant hamstering that should have no bearing on something as serious as an attempted murder case. PTSD from a car crash leading to her deliberately scheming to have someone murdered? Can't quite see a valid causal connection there.

In the last line the judge describes this girl as a sociopath without using the word.

If there is evidence of sociopathy it would call for the maximum sentence (I'm aware such things can an will be abused.)

They used to execute psychopaths.

Nowadays they release drug lords (who can not be in the position they are in without violence) as "non-violent drug offenders" because it's easier to convict someone for drugs than catch them in an act of violence.
 

budoslavic

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member
@PNN: "Watch how quick they react when you flip the narrative on them."

754ce581a6686a69.jpeg
 

Pelagius

Robin

£500 Covid handouts: Ministers eye 'astonishing' plan to give everyone who tests positive for virus a one-off payment to 'encourage more swabs'... at cost of HALF A BILLION POUNDS A WEEK!

  • The proposal is aimed at encouraging more people to undergo tests and isolate
  • It is said to be the 'preferred position' of Matt Hancock's Department of Health
  • Officials fear many with symptoms fail to take a test so they can keep working

So you have all of these people taking a test for a virus no one has isolated, in which a positive test wins these poor people a £500 prize.

Then you get to say "Oh no! Infections are through the roof, we need even tougher measures now!", all at the cost of half a Bil' a week.
 

Punchitchewie

 
Banned
As a non-american the faith people have that Donald Trump is going to do 'something' is fascinating, I can't work out if it's from genuine belief or fear of accepting the alternative.

In Europe we know our leaders are going to do something, and it will only be bad.
Putting all their faith in a false idol to save them is a form of seeking comfort. It’s easier to think someone else will do all the work and blame them when they don’t than it is to plan, prepare and make a difference themselves
 

fokker

 
Banned
Top