More like 2 years not 20 but I get your point
The internet censorship thread
- Thread starter Teutatis
- Start date
I noticed that Youtube deletes my comments outside of the Alt-Right Sphere of Channels. And that many of my words are censored since they just delete my comment when I use a wrong word.
The internet of things will be the internet of behavior.
www.bmc.com
www.makeuseof.com
What Is the Internet of Behaviors? IoB Explained
www.bmc.com
What Is the Internet of Behaviors and How Does It Affect You?
The Internet of Behaviors is an extension of the Internet of Things - but what does that really mean?
www.makeuseof.com
And I will not be a part of it. At this point I don't care what they come up with. I will not obey.The internet of things will be the internet of behavior.
What Is the Internet of Behaviors? IoB Explained
What Is the Internet of Behaviors and How Does It Affect You?
The Internet of Behaviors is an extension of the Internet of Things - but what does that really mean?
Last edited:
What's up on the ground in Polska? Polska is pretty based in my experience, how are people complying?
Now it's basically a free for all. You are supposed to wear a muzzle inside but apart from the government buildings there's no one to enforce it. Shops is a mixed bag, sometimes even the clerk doesn't have it. Cafe's open, city squares full of people drinking beer. Covid is a joke at this point, no one cares. Seems fine but I know that the proles are laid back mainly because the government let's them. It should be the other way round.
Last edited:
I remember in the 90's when I liked a girl I had to pick up the phone (landline), call her landline, parents picked up, ask to speak to Alexis or whoever it was, then got her on the phone.
Not directly related but if the pansies of today had to do the same the world would be different.
It's like a entire generation's balls haven't dropped yet and they can't tell A from Z.
We literally, and this is from direct experience, have 22 yr olds who can't boil an egg and 18 yr olds who can't order a pizza over the phone. Meanwhile our grandparents stormed Normandy at 18. My grandfather was cracking enemy Nazi safes behind enemy lines at age 20 in North Africa.
Not directly related but if the pansies of today had to do the same the world would be different.
It's like a entire generation's balls haven't dropped yet and they can't tell A from Z.
We literally, and this is from direct experience, have 22 yr olds who can't boil an egg and 18 yr olds who can't order a pizza over the phone. Meanwhile our grandparents stormed Normandy at 18. My grandfather was cracking enemy Nazi safes behind enemy lines at age 20 in North Africa.
Almost all girls and young women today don't know how to use a sewing machine. How pathetic is this? Even I know how to sew.
I can underline this from my own experience. I was never thought how to be a man, how to grow up, how to become mature, how to do the basic things in life. My parents loved me dearly and I'm very grateful for that, but there was no process of gaining maturity, life knowledge and life skills at all that was the norm in older times. The sad part is that this is sold as part of freedom, you're free to do whatever you want and that's what's valued the highest in the latter and current generations, also from parents. They were misled too and the children have to bear the consequences of not having any foundation when they enter life, basically guaranteeing that they're devoured by the destructive culture that the elite has set up since the 60s. They don't do this on purpose, but the effects have been disastrous for many men and women alike and I highly fear for how the generation of now is raising, with tictoc, smartphones from single digit age, internet all at hand, pornography, more destructive trans/climate ideology etc in school, less tradition (at least we had our grandparents to see a glimpse of the old world). Man, that's gonna be disastrous crashes incoming.
They're even censoring fr. Spyridon now. They truly have no limits and come after everyone who speaks an inch of truth. They deleted his comments beneath his video.
The Web Archives browser extension is an easy way to archive and check for archived versions of a page
Increasingly needed in today's censorship-driven world.
There are many times when you may want to view archived or cached versions of webpages that are temporarily inaccessible or have been deleted or censored.
And while there are lots of different archiving services out there, using the Web Archives browser extension allows you to quickly check if there’s an archived version of the URL you’re on across a variety of the main archives.
It also lets you quickly archive pages that you want to keep a reference of or to quickly archive something you think is soon to be deleted.
Webpages and even entire websites, especially in this era of “cancel culture” and censorship, come and go, or their content gets changed. Other times, the content of a page is temporarily unavailable, for reasons like server issues.
Thanks to caching and archiving services such as Wayback Machine and Archive.is, web pages can be preserved, meaning you can still view the content of a since-deleted webpage.
Web Archives, is a functional open-source extension that brings together the multiple archiving and caching services.
After installing the extension, which is available on Edge, Chrome, Firefox, and all other Chromium-based and Firefox-based browsers, you can view previous archived and cached versions of a webpage by activating the extension on the browser’s toolbar.
The extension will display a list of services that have archived or cached the page you are looking for.
There’s also an option to search for the page on all services simultaneously.
The Web Archives browser extension is an easy way to archive and check for archived versions of a page
Increasingly needed in today's censorship-driven world.
reclaimthenet.org
I'd just installed the above mentioned Web Archives browser extension this morning. It helps to search for censored or deleted pages, tweets, etc.
I had a discussion with my mom about this the other day. I wasn’t blaming her, but I lamented how I wasted my 20s on largely pointless pursuits such as travel, eating out with friends, nightlife, and just general pleasure seeking. She of course defended it, because as boomers that’s exactly the freedom they wanted to offer their offspring, the opportunities for fun and exploration they didn’t exactly have. It’s ultimately a feminine worldview, because a woman in her 20s doing those things is largely maximizing her opportunities for mate selection and gathering benefits and access via her prime looks. But as a man, you are wasting your formative years, and setting yourself up to be a stunted loser into your prime (27-50).
Why don't they replace "hate" for "truth" in their articles, ey...
By now we're all aware of the massive amounts of censorship occurring within our country and the West. It's important to underscore the fact that resorting to censorship effectively means the one censoring cannot win the argument, which also means the one being censored did. Otherwise, there would be no need to censor in the first place.
For many years I espoused a belief that the new internet society we're living in would engender a highly decentralized existence. Since individuals could customize their own social media, music, movies, tv shows etc, that would allow them to highly customize the prism through which they see reality. Importantly, they had a substitute to the mainstream media, which had become overly centralized and full of propaganda. Matter of fact, the mainstream media was responsible for the rise of sjwism and liberalism. Here was the antidote.
Centralized media keeps everyone on the same page, which is imperative for propaganda. This is especially true for false propaganda, such as the kind being driven by feminists - men and women are exactly the same in every conceivable way, except women are better. That's why you see the incessant portrayal of women in only a certain way in ALL contemporary mainstream productions. A simply cursory observation debunks this idea entirely, ergo, the need for centralized media to offset this effect. This keeps the illusion going.
Repeat the lie over and over and people will believe it. But what happens when the repetition is broken?
Reality comes back into focus and quite quickly. That's the beauty of decentralized media. It's virtually impossible to be centralized. At that time, this is when ROK was still in existence, it gave me a lot of optimism for the future. Conventional media, i.e. cable TV and Hollywood, were infested with sjwism. When compared apples to apples to the web, you could see the distinction more clearly. Cable et al, was a lot more confined. The viewer had fewer choices even with the obligatory 1000-plus channels many TV and cable providers boasted about. Oddly, you always seemed to be tuning into "Teen Mom" or "will and grace". The web gave users millions of choices. It was the superior option.
So, I contemplated the impact of seeing conventional media nullified and this new freer media take its place. I realized this was going to be an incredibly significant development. There are stages of development that are important. For instance, at that time the News had been thoroughly disrupted. Alex Jones helped Donald Trump become president, which to this day remains to be a remarkable thing. The next stage after the news is entertainment/culture. This is the prize. I thought it was only a matter of time until that would be resolved and then the culture would be transformed or, better yet, taken back.
This is why they censor. Right there...boom. A free web is advantageous to our side in a huge way. "They" can't have that. Nobody wants to see homosexuals or cross-dressers or "female lead" content. Under decentralized conditions, such content would never be seen by most because they could filter it out. The propaganda is moot.
Such a condition interrupts the left's political power, but, I believe it would obliterate their cultural power and perverse influence. Decentralized conditions not only make propaganda impossible it equally makes it impossible to obscure or conceal the truth. Apropos, it would be impossible to convince people that men and women are exactly the same, among many other things "they" push.
The web is a peculiar thing. On one hand, it's composed of billions of individual nodes, people, who can customize their experience and optimize their freedom. On the other hand, each node is connected and generates data plus it must go through a series of intermediaries (Youtube, Google, Yahoo). If there are only a few of these internet intermediaries who effectively control the web then they can control content and effectively centralize it. We know this by observing the consolidation of analog media when all of a sudden 5 major corporate conglomerates controlled 95% of all content and they were all ideologically aligned. Worse still, the internet can be centralized in a way that analog media could have never dreamed of. Plus, for any aspiring 1984-big brother types it captures everything about the billions of users out there.
It really can go either way. One is a literal renaissance and the other is a dystopian nightmare. Unfortunately, the latter is on the rise.
There is hope. I think its very dark right now, but, as much as the web can be used against us it can be used to free us. I often think that the GOP should adopt a very vocal "free web" position. Andrew Torba of Gab is spot on in this regard. He knows that its only a matter of creating alternatives. It truly is a "if you build it they will come". I will say this, once more, when we can start to create our own cultural content we'll win this war.
For many years I espoused a belief that the new internet society we're living in would engender a highly decentralized existence. Since individuals could customize their own social media, music, movies, tv shows etc, that would allow them to highly customize the prism through which they see reality. Importantly, they had a substitute to the mainstream media, which had become overly centralized and full of propaganda. Matter of fact, the mainstream media was responsible for the rise of sjwism and liberalism. Here was the antidote.
Centralized media keeps everyone on the same page, which is imperative for propaganda. This is especially true for false propaganda, such as the kind being driven by feminists - men and women are exactly the same in every conceivable way, except women are better. That's why you see the incessant portrayal of women in only a certain way in ALL contemporary mainstream productions. A simply cursory observation debunks this idea entirely, ergo, the need for centralized media to offset this effect. This keeps the illusion going.
Repeat the lie over and over and people will believe it. But what happens when the repetition is broken?
Reality comes back into focus and quite quickly. That's the beauty of decentralized media. It's virtually impossible to be centralized. At that time, this is when ROK was still in existence, it gave me a lot of optimism for the future. Conventional media, i.e. cable TV and Hollywood, were infested with sjwism. When compared apples to apples to the web, you could see the distinction more clearly. Cable et al, was a lot more confined. The viewer had fewer choices even with the obligatory 1000-plus channels many TV and cable providers boasted about. Oddly, you always seemed to be tuning into "Teen Mom" or "will and grace". The web gave users millions of choices. It was the superior option.
So, I contemplated the impact of seeing conventional media nullified and this new freer media take its place. I realized this was going to be an incredibly significant development. There are stages of development that are important. For instance, at that time the News had been thoroughly disrupted. Alex Jones helped Donald Trump become president, which to this day remains to be a remarkable thing. The next stage after the news is entertainment/culture. This is the prize. I thought it was only a matter of time until that would be resolved and then the culture would be transformed or, better yet, taken back.
This is why they censor. Right there...boom. A free web is advantageous to our side in a huge way. "They" can't have that. Nobody wants to see homosexuals or cross-dressers or "female lead" content. Under decentralized conditions, such content would never be seen by most because they could filter it out. The propaganda is moot.
Such a condition interrupts the left's political power, but, I believe it would obliterate their cultural power and perverse influence. Decentralized conditions not only make propaganda impossible it equally makes it impossible to obscure or conceal the truth. Apropos, it would be impossible to convince people that men and women are exactly the same, among many other things "they" push.
The web is a peculiar thing. On one hand, it's composed of billions of individual nodes, people, who can customize their experience and optimize their freedom. On the other hand, each node is connected and generates data plus it must go through a series of intermediaries (Youtube, Google, Yahoo). If there are only a few of these internet intermediaries who effectively control the web then they can control content and effectively centralize it. We know this by observing the consolidation of analog media when all of a sudden 5 major corporate conglomerates controlled 95% of all content and they were all ideologically aligned. Worse still, the internet can be centralized in a way that analog media could have never dreamed of. Plus, for any aspiring 1984-big brother types it captures everything about the billions of users out there.
It really can go either way. One is a literal renaissance and the other is a dystopian nightmare. Unfortunately, the latter is on the rise.
There is hope. I think its very dark right now, but, as much as the web can be used against us it can be used to free us. I often think that the GOP should adopt a very vocal "free web" position. Andrew Torba of Gab is spot on in this regard. He knows that its only a matter of creating alternatives. It truly is a "if you build it they will come". I will say this, once more, when we can start to create our own cultural content we'll win this war.
I'm not getting that. Maybe they are testing that feature.
Seems fine on Nitter - https://twitter.censors.us/ggreenwald
You can have your browser use Nitter by default with the PrivacyRedirect add-on.