The Jewish Question (JQ) thread

Oberrheiner

Pelican
It sounds like he completely misread the situation in Britain, which had been a Rothschild colony since they cornered the London stock market through insider trading after Waterloo. 120 years later their grip on the British system was complete, Churchill for example was totally under their control.
Waterloo - couldn't escape if I wanted to :)
 

Goni

Robin
It sounds like he completely misread the situation in Britain, which had been a Rothschild colony since they cornered the London stock market through insider trading after Waterloo. 120 years later their grip on the British system was complete, Churchill for example was totally under their control.
The so called " British Empire " was basically a Jewish empire.

Jews were probably at the head of the control of Britain since 1700s when Cohens controlled the Bank of London.
 

pitbullowner

Kingfisher
The so called " British Empire " was basically a Jewish empire.

Jews were probably at the head of the control of Britain since 1700s when Cohens controlled the Bank of London.

so maybe we as white colonial Americans have been doing our best to get away from jews since kicking them out hasn't worked for the longest ?!




Man those dudes just don't quit do they !


I mean I like to look at things simplistically and I'm sure there's a little more nuance than that
 

Easy_C

Crow
The so called " British Empire " was basically a Jewish empire.

Jews were probably at the head of the control of Britain since 1700s when Cohens controlled the Bank of London.
A good place to look into is the British Royal Society. You'll be amazed how many leftist forefathers (e.g. Cotton Maher and Darwin) were members of the various royal societies.
 

Goni

Robin
so maybe we as white colonial Americans have been doing our best to get away from jews since kicking them out hasn't worked for the longest ?!




Man those dudes just don't quit do they !


I mean I like to look at things simplistically and I'm sure there's a little more nuance than that
I am not pretty sure that white colonials managed by brute force to defeat the Empire.

I think some hidden agreement must have taken place

Mayve 911 can give a better hint about this.

What we know is that after the Civil War the USA became one of the centres of Jewish Power with the likes of Rockefeller and Morgans, Carnegie maybe too, who took over the economy.

This was entirely defined with Wilson creating the Federal Reserves in 1913.
 

pitbullowner

Kingfisher
What we know is that after the Civil War the USA became one of the centres of Jewish Power with the likes of Rockefeller and Morgans, Carnegie maybe too, who took over the economy.

That's when good ole Teddy Roosevelt came in busting up trusts towards the end of the 19th Century. Man, that dude was awesome
 
While I haven't studied, in depth, the history of the Freemasons, I have at times wondered whether that was essentially a club for non-Jews to be initiated into and accepted by the oligarchy (one step below marriage to one of their daughters), in an effort to do their bidding while not exposing themselves to the general, Christian-majority public.
 

ilostabet

Pelican
I just came back from a trip to the thrift store where I was looking into some old books they have. I found one from the 80s, in French, about sexual education for children 7-9 (it was part of a whole series from newborn to adult). As expected, and from what I could understand from my poor French and the pics, absolutely inappropriate for children under 14 (at least). But I just had to go and look up the authors and to no one's surprise It was Cohens and Kahns and so on.

Every time.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Jan Hyman Binyamin, aka Robert Maxwell, Mossad kingpin agent and father of Ghislaine Maxwell of the Epstein pedo blackmail operation, was one of the main publishers of UK and US academic textbooks (McGraw Hill-Macmillan), encyclopedias and academic reports (Pergamon publishing) as well as newspapers like The Mirror. Robert Maxwell was a Rothschild front, like his main Oz-British rival Rupert Murdoch.

In France as well, Fernand Cohen aka Fernand Nathan publishers have had a near-monopoly on academic publishing for decades. They know that this is a very strategic industry that shapes the public mind.
 

Oberrheiner

Pelican
France had may 68, the main (or at least most memorable) slogan of the movement being "it is forbidden to forbid", pedophilia was one of the things which was pushed pretty hard at that time, and it never really stopped since unfortunately.

A shame that SS was suicided, he could have told us more about how it seems to be the exact same in germany, with the ecologists and the socialists at the forefront - just like in france (or is it just everywhere like this ?).
 

Mr Gibbs

Robin
I've been thinking about this and how one would go about breaking down Jewish hegemony and vast over-representation in the West. I believe and this is my opinion, that the first and biggest hurdle is that, just like what E. Michael Jones said about subverting the morals of a people, that you'd have to convince them first to reshape their beliefs to something more akin to traditionalist morality. Let me explain.

Before you argue about the Jewish role in immigration, for example, you'd have to convince someone immigration is now a problem in the first place. The founding narrative is that the US is a nation of immigrants founded to take care of the world's problems and that it was just racist at first. If you talk to someone and say that nonwhites were not allowed in the country until the Jewish led legislation of the Hart-Cellar act of 1965 the response they've been beaten into giving is to label you and the history of US racist. In their head all immigrants are qualitatively the same, a german engineer or a french poet (and no i'm not making the claim that everyone from europe is a bastion of holiness and morality its' just for argument's sake) is the same as an el salvadorian or sub saharan African, it's just skin color that's different. Or any number of arguments such as overpopulation or exotic diseases, they would think that turning people away from emigrating to the West is nasty and cruel and it would take a huge effort to explain what's going on and where we're headed, never mind who's orchestrating it.

With foreign wars the cognitive dissidence is astounding. I've been thinking of ways to prove to people who benefits the most from us being in Afghan or Iraq and one simple logic i've noticed is that these people that are supposedly our enemies that we've been fighting for 15 years or so with no end in sight are freely allowed to move and live in the West! I mean for goodness sake Trump was labeled all sorts of things when he implemented the so called muslim ban, islamophobe or racist or bigot or xenophobic. I mean does that make any sense? We've been fighting ISIS and islamic extremist because supposedly they're a threat to America and yet they are freely allowed to move here. Actually they are encouraged to move here and if you dissent in any way you're the bad guy. Never mind rotherham, cologne and all the other mass rapes going on in Europe where we have numerous US bases. One argument that I know would come up is "well they're not all like that" and while that may be true couldn't they just...ya know... lie about it? I mean if someone from ISIS wanted to enlist in the military the only thing that's stopping them is a questionnaire that will ask "Have you associated with any extremist or radical organizations in the past?" (YES/NO) and they can just mark NO lmao.

Same with gay marriage or trans kids or what have you. If the prevailing narrative is that these things are okay, their liberal or "progressive" i.e. leading to a brighter future where in their mind "everybody can be anybody and that's just dandy" perspective, who cares who's doing it as long as it's getting done.

This would be for your typical liberal but for a conservative/neocon it's a different story.
 

KingDavid

Sparrow
"They killed Jesus and they're glad they did it to this day" is about as brutal as you can make it.
Even if the practice of Judaism is forbidden and Israel is returned to Palestine evil will still exist and find a different way to organize. Change would have to come with a sweep of all secret societies and a grand anti-corruption campaign.

We would have to get wealthy enough to where no one cares about money and to where the leaders are the most moral people, a class above the merchants and bankers. It's possible but the change needs to be wanted.

Any other measures will not solve the problem and will set us back.
 

Yatagan

Pelican
Gold Member
One thing makes Neocon's heads explode but they won't argue with is when you point out that Jews vote overwhelmingly leftist and a large majority of those polled are hostile to Christianity.
IIRC there was a poll that said American Jews have a higher opinion of Muslims than they do Christian evangelicals.
 

Zep

Kingfisher
The so called " British Empire " was basically a Jewish empire.

Jews were probably at the head of the control of Britain since 1700s when Cohens controlled the Bank of London.
This is very interesting, what would be a good source to explore this further in your opinion?
 
Top