The Jewish Question (JQ) thread

[davidjones]

If an actor’s religion makes you dislike a movie then you’ve got bigger things to worry about than said actor’s religion.

It's not that I dislike the movies. I still like them and always will, but cannot help but view them in a different light now. It's like dropping in on your mom and dad doing it. Their your parents you still love them, but things will never be the same in light of the unexpected and unfortunate revelation that befell upon you, your parents do it too.

 

[DeFide]

Well, his mother was Slovakian, so you can always think of Newman as a Slovak, if it makes you feel better about him
If you want to dislike him, here's a better reason (according to Wikipedia): Newman was an ordained minister of the Universal Life Church.
What is this so called church?

The Universal Life Church has only one belief. They believe in that which is right and in every person's right to interpret what is right. The Universal Life Church has no creed or authoritative book such as a Bible. No specific ethical guidelines except to do "what is right". The Universal Life Church is open and accepting of people of all religions. It is opposed only to those religions that attempt to deny religious freedom. Any minister in the ULC can ordain new members.

So, pretty much Satanism, isn't it?

Haven’t you heard? That’s that thing where you can simply send them a request online and they will automatically “ordain” you in their fake church and they will mail you a certificate of ordination.

Voilà!

You are now a legally ordained minister of the Universal Life Church with full legal power to officiate your friend’s wedding or whatever.

It’s an ordination mill.

 

[Scrapper]

Reading through this thread, I am seeing a lot of stress and confusion surrounding the american music and movie industry.
I also went through this same phase, prayed for understanding about it and thought about it heavily.
A little enjoyment to pass the time, here and there, is possibly alright.

Remember though, anything you falsely idolize, whether it’s a band, musician, song, movie, tv series or an actor, is a sin.

Do not spend too much time in fascination and wonderment, of all the small details of these worldly entertainments.

Listen to your favorite band an hour a day? Probably not a big deal.
Obsessively knowing every detail about this band, to the point where you could place top 5 in even a “local” trivia contest?
You are playing with fire, do not worship false idols.

Also, hopefully a bit of comforting words to the struggling new Christians.
This gets so much easier, as your faith strengthens.
God has always been calling us.

As a 5 year member of this forum, I have seen many of us:
Conquer the sin of masturbation with no-fap.
Conquer the sin of gluttony with intermittent fasting.
Conquer the sin of watching pornography by realizing it is degenerate satanic ploy to turn us all into cuckolds, transvestites, push us towards repulsive fetishes and desensitize us to the real beauty of an all natural God fearing women.
We have questioned those who claim to call themselves Jews but are actually of the Synagogue of Satan.

The longer you go on this journey, the less entertaining the american music and movie industry becomes.
It will be frustrating at first and for awhile, still.
The difficulty of accepting that we’ve all been raised on anti-God music and movies, is easily on display in this very thread, for those willing to see.

 

[TheMoralLaw]

No "Question" ... debauching the shiksa is a game they play.
http://www.jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=1680

 

[TheMoralLaw]

On the subject of celebrities Jewishness/ non-Jewishness I do have a problem with Jewish people sending up Italian Americans and being told by the media that this is !!incredible!! and !!so funny!! -

cases in point Henry Winkler as The Fonz/ Fonzarelli and Andrew Silverstein as Andrew Dice Clay (who I have to admit I never found particularly funny in the first place).

Check this out:
https://www.broadway.com/shows/my-mothers-italian-my-fathers-jewish-im-in-therapy/

I have never met a single Jew married to an Italian woman fwiw.

 

[fokker]

If an actor’s religion makes you dislike a movie then you’ve got bigger things to worry about than said actor’s religion.

A lot of music I listen to has jews involved in it. Michael Gudinski, who basically invented the modern Aussie music industry (and who passed away today), was a jew. Still doesn't stop me from listening to stuff released on his Mushroom label.

 

[TheMoralLaw]

MichaelWitcoff said:
If an actor’s religion makes you dislike a movie then you’ve got bigger things to worry about than said actor’s religion.

A lot of music I listen to has jews involved in it. Michael Gudinski, who basically invented the modern Aussie music industry (and who passed away today), was a jew. Still doesn't stop me from listening to stuff released on his Mushroom label.

Jews can't do art (it was forbidden in the OT), philosophy (they opposed Greek philosophy and their "system" is merely tablets plus disputation of them and has no logos) and science (see Michael Jones' work on "Jewish Science").

But they can do music (in the Bible they were constantly praising God with harp and timbrel) and comedy (the best comedians always see life from the outside looking in). But these two of course have to be constantly monitored because the Jew will inevitably get tired of entertaining the gentile whom he sees as inferior or "cattle" and will want to use music and comedy to make revolution on the Christian Order.

 

[MichaelWitcoff]

There’s a large group of people who claim
Jews can do no wrong, and obviously they are not correct. But the growing group of those claiming Jews can do no right is equally incorrect, and for the same reason: lack of discernment, common sense, and ability to analyze situations critically. It’s easier on the brain to believe that entire groups of people are a certain way, ie “all white people are racist” or “all Jews are evil,” but in reality that’s a cope for intellectual laziness.

The Church Fathers studied, and often cited, the philosophy and theology of Jews like Philo. And it was a Jews For Jesus article, ironically, that first convinced me of the Christian Trinity.

There is a JQ, and I believe it should be addressed openly and honestly, but it doesn’t help anyone to take an extreme stance on either side of the equation.

 

[TheMoralLaw]

There’s a large group of people who claim
Jews can do no wrong, and obviously they are not correct. But the growing group of those claiming Jews can do no right is equally incorrect, and for the same reason: lack of discernment, common sense, and ability to analyze situations critically. It’s easier on the brain to believe that entire groups of people are a certain way, ie “all white people are racist” or “all Jews are evil,” but in reality that’s a cope for intellectual laziness.

The Church Fathers studied, and often cited, the philosophy and theology of Jews like Philo. And it was a Jews For Jesus article, ironically, that first convinced me of the Christian Trinity.

There is a JQ, and I believe it should be addressed openly and honestly, but it doesn’t help anyone to take an extreme stance on either side of the equation.

With all due respect, that is a straw man. Can I ask if you are Jewish?

 

[MichaelWitcoff]

Ethnically yes, religiously no. I talk about this stuff constantly on YouTube, and had EMJ on for a show about how to convert more Jews to Christianity. I knew someone in this thread was going to ask as soon as I suggested critical thinking.

Also no, I don’t think it is a strawman. When someone gets to the point that learning an actor is Jewish changes his perception of a movie he’s in, that person is not engaging with the topic in a discerning or meaningful way. It’s like those black people who flip out on YouTube when they learn that the BeeGees are white. Same mindset.

 

[TheMoralLaw]

deleted

 

[Troller]

https://archive.ph/obQrk

Liberation french extreme leftist newspaper owned by a jew will now have an ex israeli spy as director.

 

[911]

It's not quite extreme left, it's a leftist neoliberal newspaper, owned by the Rothschilds. Liberation and the Rothschilds also work tightly with Charlie Hebdo, the neocon anti-clerical pro-degeneracy lampoon rag.

 

[El Chinito loco]

It's not quite extreme left, it's a leftist neoliberal newspaper, owned by the Rothschilds. Liberation and the Rothschilds also work tightly with Charlie Hebdo, the neocon anti-clerical pro-degeneracy lampoon rag.

Yes, both sides are controlled by Jews in typical Finkelstein manner but some rather interesting new posters are pushing awfully hard for people to believe it's only the political "left" or "right" depending on which is convenient according to which specific narrative they are pushing. Some even claim to be Christian when convenient and just happen to be "concerned" world citizens when it comes to U.S. politics.

 

[911]

There is a hidden deeper ideological reason driving the process, both in North America and in Europe it's about replacing White Europeans with a rootless mixed race. Big business also likes open borders because it means lower wages, but not just this, they know that diversity means a weaker, easier to control labor population. Gatekeepers won't mention that aspect, and leftists don't/can't understand it, they will stick with the "capitalism bad" lower wages aspect and leave the driving ideology untouched.

Amazon tracks the diversity index in their Whole Foods stores, because they know that the more ethnically diverse a store is, they less likely its staff is to unionize:

Store-risk metrics include average store compensation, average total store sales, and a “diversity index” that represents the racial and ethnic diversity of every store. Stores at higher risk of unionizing have lower diversity and lower employee compensation, as well as higher total store sales and higher rates of workers’ compensation claims, according to the documents.

 

[911]

This is not a case of dual loyalty, the guy is clearly only loyal to one country.

 

[fokm]

Streamable Embedded Video

Watch this embedded Streamable video.

streamable.com

 

[TorontoSucks!]

Ethnically yes, religiously no. I talk about this stuff constantly on YouTube, and had EMJ on for a show about how to convert more Jews to Christianity. I knew someone in this thread was going to ask as soon as I suggested critical thinking.

Also no, I don’t think it is a strawman. When someone gets to the point that learning an actor is Jewish changes his perception of a movie he’s in, that person is not engaging with the topic in a discerning or meaningful way. It’s like those black people who flip out on YouTube when they learn that the BeeGees are white. Same minds

I think the issue that this person (and many others) have with these actors is that they are so often found a.) playing non-Jewish, generally Christian, characters and b.) hiding their Jewishness, even going so far as to change their names to do so in many cases.

Also, you yourself are sort of doing this in a way, are you not? Because if you are "ethnically Jewish" then you are Jewish, regardless of what you talk about on YouTube. I could be wrong but I do know that one of us can go to Israel whenever they want and become a citizen, so doesn't that make Judaism a hereditary, genetic state rather than an issue of creed?

Given that Jews have been behind every degradation and degeneracy that has befallen our culture over the last hundred years or so (pornography, open borders and gay marriage are just a few) I think it is completely acceptable to decide to not support Jewish entertainers. I also think that it is completely acceptable to ask for full disclosure when discussing the JQ issue, given that Jews have a long history of in-group preference and also a history of hiding their identities as Jews when convenient, as already discussed. I don't think it was just because you were suggesting that we use critical thinking.

 

[Punchitchewie]

I think the issue that this person (and many others) have with these actors is that they are so often found a.) playing non-Jewish, generally Christian, characters and b.) hiding their Jewishness, even going so far as to change their names to do so in many cases.

Also, you yourself are sort of doing this in a way, are you not? Because if you are "ethnically Jewish" then you are Jewish, regardless of what you talk about on YouTube. I could be wrong but I do know that one of us can go to Israel whenever they want and become a citizen, so doesn't that make Judaism a hereditary, genetic state rather than an issue of creed?

Given that Jews have been behind every degradation and degeneracy that has befallen our culture over the last hundred years or so (pornography, open borders and gay marriage are just a few) I think it is completely acceptable to decide to not support Jewish entertainers. I also think that it is completely acceptable to ask for full disclosure when discussing the JQ issue, given that Jews have a long history of in-group preference and also a history of hiding their identities as Jews when convenient, as already discussed. I don't think it was just because you were suggesting that we use critical thinking.

Jews were also behind removing the Catholic decency act in Hollywood

 

[MichaelWitcoff]

You’re welcome to consume, or not consume, whatever entertainment you want for whatever reason you want. But it is notable that certain people place 100% of the blame on Jews when there are numerically (if not proportionally) many more non-Jews involved in most such things, and those same people also completely ignore their own corruptibility in terms of what affects them or not. Demonic energy cannot enslave people who are sanctified in Christ, and that spiritual principle plays out on the physical plane as well.

For example, gay “marriage” - which, yes, was largely pushed by Jews - would never have become a thing here if the population - majority White and supposedly Christian - hadn’t already made normal, heterosexual marriage into such a meaningless institution that women could divorce men for no reason (“no-fault divorce”). This is a point Stephen Baskerville makes in “The New Politics Of Sex,” though without the religious/spiritual angle.

For another example, the Mossad couldn’t control so many of the gentile “elite” if they didn’t want to fly to a private island to have sex with underage women. They weren’t forced to do that, they gladly accepted the offer. Point being it’s fruitless to whine about people trying to corrupt you if you aren’t striving to become less corruptible - because if it wasn’t Jews offering you porn, but someone else for example, people enslaved by lust would go for it just the same.

I understand the issue and the disproportionate number of Jews involved in all this, and I’m not claiming that isn’t there. I am simply saying that at some point you also have to take responsibility for yourself and decide which influences you won’t allow to affect you. A nation that says “no” to degeneracy in general isn’t going to become corrupted just because someone tries to corrupt them.

Like Codreanu wrote in his main book, “Mosquitos can only settle and thrive in swamps.”

The ideal formula to fix this country (and all others) is to Christianize education/entertainment and attach criminal penalties to the promotion of degeneracy.