The Jewish Question (JQ) thread

budoslavic

Owl
Gold Member
f5dce85c8e7914ce.jpg
 

Goni

Woodpecker
I disagree, I thought EMJ won the "Know More News" debate with Bjerknes. Bjerknes made little sense, and I'm not sure why Adam Green is such a fan. Although I think Green is good at exposing the Zionist angle of Infowars, Trump & GOP - atheists like Green seem to have difficulty fully understanding the JQ, and the different groups involved. I'm guessing this is because they haven't read the Bible, and/or do not fully understand world history.

For Example, I've seen Green confusing Zionist Jews and Marxist/Secular Jews on several occasions. While both groups seek to subvert the gentile, they do so in different ways - Zionist and Marxist Jews are also generally opposed to one another (See current Israel-Palestine conflict) - but I reiterate, they are unified in their subversion of gentiles, they just use different forms of subversion.

There is also an argument to be made that the Jews of today are not technically the Jews of the Bible, they are instead Talmudic Jews, a religion formed several hundred years after Christ, and after the Romans destroyed the Temple in 70 AD. Unfortunately, Christian Zionists have misinterpreted the scripture, and history, to believe otherwise, which further confuses the issue-and especially confuses the pagans/atheists observing this mess we have today.
Agree very much with what you are saying.

Also, please do a brief explanation of the difference between Zionist Jews and marxist Jews.

Just to have your point of view.
 

BlueMark

Woodpecker
Gold Member
Unrelated video about living in Texas, where the real estate agent contrasts the friendliness of Texas with her personal experience of visiting Israel:
I love the friendliness of Texans. And after going to Israel, I realized this is a very friendly state, because when we were in Israel, it wasn't very friendly. There were some friendly people but the majority did not like Americans.

This is what America gets in return for bending the knee to Israel's bidding.
 

Goni

Woodpecker
Unrelated video about living in Texas, where the real estate agent contrasts the friendliness of Texas with her personal experience of visiting Israel:


This is what America gets in return for bending the knee to Israel's bidding.
Because they are the rules of America and see everyone there ( besides their own) as pets and slaves.

The owner never liked or connected emotionally to his slaves.
 
Agree very much with what you are saying.

Also, please do a brief explanation of the difference between Zionist Jews and marxist Jews.

Just to have your point of view.
Don't wanna answer for someone else, but personally I see the Zionist Jews as the more conservative Jews who actually believe in some God, however are (as Jews do) very much concerned with the material world. Hence via Israel they look for more and more power, mosty economically and politically. Now the marxist Jews (or liberals/reformed/atheist Jews) are the ones who since at least the 19th century have been propagating all the cultural and social evil. They want power too (they're the CEO's in the companies and institutions, banks etc) but a big part of their agenda is to just subvert, invert, destroy, annihilate everything culturally and traditionally ''good'' or ''religious'', especially Christianity. Hence the trannies, the individualism, the gayness, the weakness of men, the soyboys, the confusion of genders, the fighting between groups, the division amongst classes/races/ages/gender, the masculine women, the women in careers, the nuking of the family, the constant surge for more ''pleasure and enjoyment'' in this world, the focus on materialism, pornography. Especially the latter group has been very visible from the 19th century onwards, hence they were expelled everything (people don't like it when you come in and destroy everything they have), world war II etc. I don't at all advocate Hitler or whatever (goes against Christianity at all levels) but I've read quotes in mein kampf that I honestly thought they were an news article anno 2021.... he described exactly what we're seeing now.
 
Don't wanna answer for someone else, but personally I see the Zionist Jews as the more conservative Jews who actually believe in some God, however are (as Jews do) very much concerned with the material world. Hence via Israel they look for more and more power, mosty economically and politically. Now the marxist Jews (or liberals/reformed/atheist Jews) are the ones who since at least the 19th century have been propagating all the cultural and social evil. They want power too (they're the CEO's in the companies and institutions, banks etc) but a big part of their agenda is to just subvert, invert, destroy, annihilate everything culturally and traditionally ''good'' or ''religious'', especially Christianity. Hence the trannies, the individualism, the gayness, the weakness of men, the soyboys, the confusion of genders, the fighting between groups, the division amongst classes/races/ages/gender, the masculine women, the women in careers, the nuking of the family, the constant surge for more ''pleasure and enjoyment'' in this world, the focus on materialism, pornography. Especially the latter group has been very visible from the 19th century onwards, hence they were expelled everything (people don't like it when you come in and destroy everything they have), world war II etc. I don't at all advocate Hitler or whatever (goes against Christianity at all levels) but I've read quotes in mein kampf that I honestly thought they were an news article anno 2021.... he described exactly what we're seeing now.
I have severe doubts about what Hitler supposedly did to Jews in occupied territories vs what actually happened in occupied territories.

Just read (((Wikipedia))) about the supposed death camp Sobibor:

"After the end of the German occupation, the camp's remaining barracks were briefly used to house Ukrainian civilians waiting to be resettled. These deportees dismantled several remaining buildings for use as firewood.[268][281] Parts of the Vorlager were subsequently sold to private individuals, though most of the camp site was returned to the Polish forestry administration.[281]

A September 1945 report by Polish authorities noted that locals had dismantled most of the remaining camp buildings, reusing parts of them in their own houses. This report was corroborated in 2010 when a resident of nearby Żłobek Duży discovered unusual woodwork during a renovation project. Knowing that the previous owner of the house had worked near the camp, they alerted researchers from the Sobibor Museum who concluded that the woodwork was taken from the exterior of a camp barracks.[268] The site was also a target for grave-diggers, who scoured the site for valuables left by the camp's victims.[267][283] When the Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation studied the site in 1945, they found trenches dug by treasure-seekers, who had left the surface strewn with ashes and human remains.[281] Grave-digging continued in the area, despite several prosecutions in the 1960s.[284]

In the first twenty years after the war, the site of the camp was practically deserted.[285] A journalist visiting the site in the early 1950s reported "there is nothing left in Sobibor".[286] When Gitta Sereny visited the site in March 1972, she initially drove past it without realizing.[287] She later commented that she was struck by "the quiet, the loneliness, above all the vastness of the place, which left everything to the imagination"[288]

In the immediate aftermath of the war, several investigations were carried out. Starting in 1945, the Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation and Central Committee of Polish Jews investigated Sobibor, interviewing witnesses and surveying the site.[268] In 1946, Nachman Blumental published a study entitled "The Death Camp - Sobibór" in 1946 which drew on work by the other investigations, and information about Sobibor was gathered for The Black Book of Polish Jewry.[268]

Until the 1990s, little was known about the physical site of the camp beyond what survivors and perpetrators could recall. Archaeological investigations at Sobibor began in the 1990s.[270]

In 2007, two archaeologists named Wojciech Mazurek and Yoram Haimi began to conduct small-scale investigations. Since 2013, the camp has been excavated by a joint team of Polish, Israeli, Slovak, and Dutch archeologists led by Mazurek, Haimi, and Ivar Schute. In accordance with Jewish law, these excavations avoided mass graves and were supervised by Polish rabbis. Their discovery of the foundations of the gas chambers, in 2014, attracted worldwide media attention. Between 2011 and 2015, thousands of personal items belonging to victims were uncovered by the teams.

In 2020, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum acquired a collection of photographs and documents from the descendants of Johann Niemann. These photos show daily life amongst the camp staff. Many show the perpetrators drinking, playing music, and playing chess with one another. These photos are significant because there had previously only been two known photographs of Sobibor during its operation."


Probably belongs in another thread but.. Given all that we now know about climate change, Weapons of Mass Destruction, about white supremacy, about Russia interference, gas attacks carried out by Assad the day the weapons inspectors arrive.. the fact that there was no physical evidence for Sobibor until the 1990s.. then BIG DISCOVERY! in 2014.. BIG FIND! in 2020.. should not ring alarm bells at all.
 
Anyone familiar with Douglas Reed's work?

Heard it's very good .



Controversy of Zion


"This is a fascinating insight into a parallel history of the world, written by a very successful journalist of the London Times. Douglas Reed, who couldn't find work for any newspaper after the publication of Far and Wide in 1951. Reed an very open minded journalist and truth seeker had stumbled upon the mystery of never ending conflict and took it upon himself to write a book of world history from the wars of Persia and Babylonia to the Suez crisis. He may only have written up to the halfway point of the 20th century but after reading this you have the key to the Vietnam and Korean wars, the end of the USSR, the never ending war on terror and the current wars in Syria and Ukraine.

In the opening chapters Reed links the death of Belshazzar (as prophesied by the prophet Daniel) and the massacre of the Romanovs in the basement of the Ipatiev House in Ekaterinburg. Having access to the Internet, something Douglas Reed never had, you can fact check most of the book and you will find nothing there that is incorrect. There are a couple of claims by Reed for which I have not found any source and many some commenters can help me. He says that Judas was canonised in the Soviet Union and that the Book of Deuteronomy was doctored by adding words that Moses never pronounced.

No book covering such a vast subject can ever claim to be complete and I encourage people to read the fascinating 'The Mystical Body of Christ and the Reorganization of Society' by the Reverend Denis Fahey. Denis Fahey fills in many of the gaps where Reed stumbles, especially where it concerns banks. Fahey explains for example that when William and Mary came over from Holland in 1688, he bought with him the Amsterdam bankers that in 1694 established the Bank of England in the city. This is important to understand how the tandem of Anglo-Saxon Protestantism and messianic Judaism work together even today to destabilise the world.

The Controversy of Zion accurately describes the paradox of the same group of people establishing the communist international and the racially pure state at exactly the same time. The Bolshevik Revolution and the Balfour Declaration took place in the same week and no one noticed that the same people were behind both. Reed accurately shows how the mass of people of Jewish origin are oblivious to these forces and are driven to support the Zionist world view out of fear of antisemitism. They don't understand that antisemitism is backlash against Zionist messianic activities. In other words, the Zionists are using the mass of Jews as human shields.

Chapter 10 - The Man from Galilee, shows how Jesus Christ successfully verbally tackled the Jews and this is certainly what led to his crucifixion. If Reed was a Christian, it certainly isn't evident from the text and the book concentrates on a factual history. However, in the concluding chapter Reed says that in researching and writing this book, he has brushed an evil force that has continued throughout history in creating disorder. Modern day Zionists are the spiritual descendants of the Pharisees, who haven’t changed one iota of their world view in thousands of years."
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Don't wanna answer for someone else, but personally I see the Zionist Jews as the more conservative Jews who actually believe in some God, however are (as Jews do) very much concerned with the material world. Hence via Israel they look for more and more power, mosty economically and politically. Now the marxist Jews (or liberals/reformed/atheist Jews) are the ones who since at least the 19th century have been propagating all the cultural and social evil. They want power too (they're the CEO's in the companies and institutions, banks etc) but a big part of their agenda is to just subvert, invert, destroy, annihilate everything culturally and traditionally ''good'' or ''religious'', especially Christianity. Hence the trannies, the individualism, the gayness, the weakness of men, the soyboys, the confusion of genders, the fighting between groups, the division amongst classes/races/ages/gender, the masculine women, the women in careers, the nuking of the family, the constant surge for more ''pleasure and enjoyment'' in this world, the focus on materialism, pornography. Especially the latter group has been very visible from the 19th century onwards, hence they were expelled everything (people don't like it when you come in and destroy everything they have), world war II etc. I don't at all advocate Hitler or whatever (goes against Christianity at all levels) but I've read quotes in mein kampf that I honestly thought they were an news article anno 2021.... he described exactly what we're seeing now.

Examples of "more conservative Jews who actually believe in some God":


"Tikun Olam" liberal Jews, warts and all, are actually more benign, relatively speaking, in that they won't spit on bishops that they walk by in the Holy Land, it's the religious Jews that do it.


Spitting on clergy members, bishops or priesthood students alike, is also a mitzvah or religious duty for talmudists, and is a common practice in Israel that rarely gets prosecuted:

Ultra-Orthodox Spitting Attacks on Old City Clergymen Becoming Daily

Clergymen in the Armenian Church in Jerusalem say they are victims of harassment, from senior cardinals to priesthood students; when they do complain, the police don't usually find the perpetrators.

When Narek Garabedian came to Israel to study in the Armenian Seminary in Jerusalem half a year ago, he did not expect the insults, curses and spitting he would be subjected to daily by ultra-Orthodox Jews in the streets of the Old City.

"When I see an ultra-Orthodox man coming toward me in the street, I always ask myself if he will spit at me," says Narek, a Canadian Armenian.

The Greek Patriarchy's clergymen have been cursed and spat on by ultra-Orthodox men in the street for many years. "They walk past me and spit," says Father Gabriel Bador, 78, a senior priest in the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate. "Mostly I ignore it, but it's difficult.

Sometimes I stop and ask the spitter 'why are you doing this? What have I done to you?' Once I even shouted at a few of them who spat at my feet together. They ran away," he says.

"It happens a lot," says Archbishop Aristarchos, the chief secretary of the patriarchate. "You walk down the street and suddenly they spit at you for no reason. I admit sometimes it makes me furious, but we have been taught to restrain ourselves, so I do so."

Father Goosan and other Patriarchy members are trying to walk as little as possible in the Old City streets. "Once we walked from the [Armenian] church to the Jaffa Gate and on that short section four different people spat at us," he says.


https://www.haaretz.com/1.5206449
 
Last edited:

Invocato

Sparrow
Agree very much with what you are saying.

Also, please do a brief explanation of the difference between Zionist Jews and marxist Jews.

Just to have your point of view.

Yes, the following lists are terms/characteristics that can generally be applied to each side. I think this may be the easiest way to lay out some of the differences. There are exceptions, and not all terms apply to each person on the left or right:

Left-Wing:
-Marxist
-International
-Globalist
-Democrat
-Communist
-Often Secular/Atheist (Thus, Zionism is generally not as important to them).
-Open Borders
-Promotion of Social Liberalism (Drag Queen Story Hour, Pornography, Gay Agenda, Abortion).
-Greater restrictions on Free Speech for Gentiles.
-Fiercely Anti-Christian

Examples: Trotsky, Marx, Soros, Zuckerberg, Susan Wojciki, RBG, Bloomberg


Right-Wing:
-Zionist
-Nationalist (For Israel^)
-"Capitalist"(Some overlap with globalist here). Supports and encourages Usury/Debt.
-Republican
-Often Religious / Not Secular
-Greater support for USA involvement in foreign wars, especially in the Middle East - if it benefits Israel.
-General support for Federal Reserve money printing / debasement/ corporate welfare/ transfer payments from Gentiles to Jews (although some Jewish libertarians claim to oppose).
-Can also be libertarian (i.e. Dave Rubin) / "Con-Inc"
-Subtly Anti-Christian. However maintain support of Christian Zionists.
-Fiercely Anti-Muslim
-Still support abortion/pro-choice at higher rate than Christians, although not as high as left-wing.


Examples: Sheldon Adelson, Kushner, Netanyahu, Laura Loomer, Bernanke, Dershowitz
 
can someone explain what a crypto jew is?

"
Crypto-Judaism is the secret adherence to Judaism while publicly professing to be of another faith; practitioners are referred to as "crypto-Jews" (origin from Greek kryptos – κρυπτός, 'hidden'). The term is especially applied historically to Spanish Jews who outwardly professed Catholicism,[1][2][3][4][5] also known as Converso, Anusim, or Marranos. The phenomenon is especially associated with renaissance Spain, following the Massacre of 1391 and the expulsion of the Jews in 1492"

 

Max Roscoe

Pelican
Yes, the following lists are terms/characteristics that can generally be applied to each side. I think this may be the easiest way to lay out some of the differences. There are exceptions, and not all terms apply to each person on the left or right:
Yes, there are different sides to Judaism. They like to infiltrate everywhere, which is why they don't *JUST* dominate Hollywood, but Hollywood, our elite education system, our court system, our government, etc.

They also like having only 2 sides so that if someone doesn't like one thing they are doing, let's say, tranny children, then the ONLY political option they have is to vote for a Republican. The ONLY other party offering a candidate. Or if someone doesn't want 60% of descrectionary tax money going to bomb enemies around the world, then their only option is to vote for a Democrat.

This is called THE KOSHER SANDWICH.
Because there are only two sides, and it doesn't matter which one you pick, they control both.
They don't have "a tranny agenda" and a "war agenda". They have a single, Jewish agenda.

There is, in actuality, no "right wing Jew" or "left wing Jew". The left and right wing are social constructs that they themselves created.

You can see this in a variety of examples, because they will easily move back and forth between the two sides when it suits their agenda.

David Frum was a George W Bush neocon. He even invented the phrase "axis of evil" for the Regime Spokesman W Bush to go spout out a bunch of rhetoric about how anyone not taking the globohomo line was an enemy along the "axis of evil." Remember, "You are either with us, or you against us?". He worked at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute, and a bunch of other far right groups, but then one day, after W became exceedingly unpopular, he decided he's now a leftie, and is a MSNBC talking head.

Or what about "Based Breitbart"?
It's based in Tel Aviv and run by a far left communist named Joel B Pollak who is the son of orthodox Jews and has a masters degree in Jewish studies. He was told at some point, or perhaps just figured it out, that he could be of better use attacking America from the far right than the far left, and so he dropped his communist positions and became a right wing neocon.

But none of this is shocking from their perspective. They are not changing anything. They are just doing whatever they must to uphold their TRUE allegiance, which is to the Jewish people, not to communism or capitalism or any of the tools they use to infiltrate and confuse us.

It's why they can be both censors, and pornographers. Both warmongers and obstructionists. Their principles are not based upon a moral imperative, but simply on whether something benefits Jews or not. Just imagine if we took this mindset in regards to white people...
 
Yes, there are different sides to Judaism. They like to infiltrate everywhere, which is why they don't *JUST* dominate Hollywood, but Hollywood, our elite education system, our court system, our government, etc.

They also like having only 2 sides so that if someone doesn't like one thing they are doing, let's say, tranny children, then the ONLY political option they have is to vote for a Republican. The ONLY other party offering a candidate. Or if someone doesn't want 60% of descrectionary tax money going to bomb enemies around the world, then their only option is to vote for a Democrat.

This is called THE KOSHER SANDWICH.
Because there are only two sides, and it doesn't matter which one you pick, they control both.
They don't have "a tranny agenda" and a "war agenda". They have a single, Jewish agenda.

There is, in actuality, no "right wing Jew" or "left wing Jew". The left and right wing are social constructs that they themselves created.

You can see this in a variety of examples, because they will easily move back and forth between the two sides when it suits their agenda.

David Frum was a George W Bush neocon. He even invented the phrase "axis of evil" for the Regime Spokesman W Bush to go spout out a bunch of rhetoric about how anyone not taking the globohomo line was an enemy along the "axis of evil." Remember, "You are either with us, or you against us?". He worked at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute, and a bunch of other far right groups, but then one day, after W became exceedingly unpopular, he decided he's now a leftie, and is a MSNBC talking head.

Or what about "Based Breitbart"?
It's based in Tel Aviv and run by a far left communist named Joel B Pollak who is the son of orthodox Jews and has a masters degree in Jewish studies. He was told at some point, or perhaps just figured it out, that he could be of better use attacking America from the far right than the far left, and so he dropped his communist positions and became a right wing neocon.

But none of this is shocking from their perspective. They are not changing anything. They are just doing whatever they must to uphold their TRUE allegiance, which is to the Jewish people, not to communism or capitalism or any of the tools they use to infiltrate and confuse us.

It's why they can be both censors, and pornographers. Both warmongers and obstructionists. Their principles are not based upon a moral imperative, but simply on whether something benefits Jews or not. Just imagine if we took this mindset in regards to white people...

A good example is Nathan Rothschild the banker who was high up in British MI5 but was also the head of a Soviet Spy ring passing British and Allied nuclear secrets to the communists.

Did he like red ants or white ants? That would have been a more compelling question for him than the question "capitalism or communism?"
 

Invocato

Sparrow
Yes, there are different sides to Judaism. They like to infiltrate everywhere, which is why they don't *JUST* dominate Hollywood, but Hollywood, our elite education system, our court system, our government, etc.

They also like having only 2 sides so that if someone doesn't like one thing they are doing, let's say, tranny children, then the ONLY political option they have is to vote for a Republican. The ONLY other party offering a candidate. Or if someone doesn't want 60% of descrectionary tax money going to bomb enemies around the world, then their only option is to vote for a Democrat.

This is called THE KOSHER SANDWICH.
Because there are only two sides, and it doesn't matter which one you pick, they control both.
They don't have "a tranny agenda" and a "war agenda". They have a single, Jewish agenda.

There is, in actuality, no "right wing Jew" or "left wing Jew". The left and right wing are social constructs that they themselves created.
"Kosher Sandwich" Lol 'd when I read that. :squintlol:

I'm not one to believe there is little difference between the two groups, because left-wing jews and right-wing Jews are actually at odds with each other from time to time, and I think this confuses a lot of people on the right, preventing them from understanding what is really happening. For Example, Left-wing promote Atheism, and Right wing promote religion, wars, mainly to use it to support Israeli nationalist movements. Also some share traits of both right and the left. The muddied waters are part of the subversion.

I agree though that the common thread between the two groups, however, is subversion of the Gentile.

This subversion happens in several primary ways, the main one is the promotion of Socially Liberal anti-Christian values in society.
We see this on both the left and the right. Outright promotion of gay agenda, feminism, pro-choice on the left; and the promotion of the same via libertarianism, and "Con-Inc" on the right. Social liberalism/Cultural Marxism/Open Borders is the main way they subvert on both sides. On the right it's two fold subversion because they also subvert Christianity with Christian Zionism, getting Christians to worship and be controlled by Jews, and involved in foreign wars for Israel.
 
Last edited:
"Kosher Sandwich" Lol 'd when I read that. :squintlol:

I'm not one to believe there is little difference between the two groups, because left-wing jews and right-wing Jews are actually at odds with each other from time to time, and I think this confuses a lot of people on the right, preventing them from understanding what is really happening. For Example, Left-wing promote Atheism, and Right wing promote religion, wars, mainly to use it to support Israeli nationalist movements. Also some share traits of both right and the left. The muddied waters are part of the subversion.

I agree though that the common thread between the two groups, however, is subversion of the Gentile.

This subversion happens in several primary ways, the main one is the promotion of Socially Liberal anti-Christian values in society.
We see this on both the left and the right. Outright promotion of gay agenda, feminism, pro-choice on the left; and the promotion of the same via libertarianism, and "Con-Inc" on the right. Social liberalism/Cultural Marxism/Open Borders is the main way they subvert on both sides. On the right it's two fold subversion because they also subvert Christianity with Christian Zionism, getting Christians to worship and be controlled by Jews, and involved in foreign wars for Israel.
I think that you and Max Roscoe are essentially saying the same thing.

At the ground level it looks as though these sides are implacably opposed to each other and these people then say "but look!! The Left is against Israel! Jews can't even agree on anything! How can they be running things? They are hopelessly divided against each other."

But viewed from above...

The Zionist right ensures ethnosupremacy and ethnic cleansing for Israel. They also mould the right to their liking (ie: ensure that the right is toothless) Crucially they do nothing substantial to counter the Jewish Reform Left, their right wing leaders just monetise the craziness for more likes and clicks... and they NEVER call out the J in their counterparts - the J influence on the other side.

The Jewish Reform Left ensure that the white countries or just countries everywhere are totally subverted with insanity, the Zionist right does nothing to challenge them and crucially all the Reform Left does in its condemnation of the Zionists is give the cucked Republicans and the Zionists an excuse to say "OMG! Its anudda Shoah!" "Stand with Israel!" and contribute to tense family reunions at Hannukah and Barmitszahs: but secretly I think a lot of Jewish relatives relish these arguments whilst they finance each others projects.

Red Ice reports that the Jewish crazy-left ADL and the Zionist ethno-crazies LeHava have the same AIPAC sponsors.

So.. two arms of the same pincers working in perfect harmony or.. two slices of bread with the goyim in the middle.

I have a suspicion that the demographic replacement of the European peoples is a joint financed project of the Jewish Left and Right.
 

Invocato

Sparrow
Case in point:
Marxist, left-wing Bernie Sanders condems the actions of the Zionist right-wing in Senate speech yesterday. Not only does this demonstrate the differences between the two groups, events like these likely push more unsuspecting Gentiles towards the Zionist position, due to the right-wing opposition to Bernie Sanders alone. Well played.


 
Top