Is there a good chance Suella Braverman will be the UK's third female, and first BME (discounting Disraeli) PM?
Speaking at the Asian-Jewish Business Network’s flagship event at Lord's, the Attorney General said the two communities will be at the 'forefront' of the post-pandemic rebuild
www.jewishnews.co.uk
“When in trouble, head for Auschwitz” Part 1.
(this is quite a lengthy examination I cobbled together, hence its in two parts. feel free to skip it entirely if forum members wish)
On Suella Braverman and the Scientology style cult of the FWBO/Triratna.
We know that one candidate to replace the British Prime minister Suella Braverman who is married into an observant jewish family.
https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/suella...r-one-fan-of-my-in-laws-friday-night-dinners/
(And that this is nothing new in British elite circles ie: Jewish heritage David Cameron was married to “Sam Cam”, the daughter of Boss Jew Lord Sheffield.
His opposite number was Jewish on both sides Ed Miliband.
Jewish on both sides Boris Johnson until now faced across the floor his opposite number Keir Starmer who is married to a jewish wife.
Starmer is “observant” we are told of his wifes religion and his children are being raised orthodox Jewish)
But what of Suella Braverman’s own religion?
Well, she’s a right on “Buddhist”. But not so fast, hers is a very peculiar brand of Buddhism.
Now what follows is a fairly lengthy dissection of jewish influence and its role in capturing (and possibly covering up perversion in) one of the UK’s more successful New Age religious movements. Some of the developments might seem quite petty but its certainly instructive in how people like (((Alan Yentob))) at the BBC can be attached to similar scandal after scandal and yet somehow still skate free.
“
One of the UK’s largest Buddhist orders has been forced to report allegations of sexual abuse after a former follower claimed he was coerced into sex with one of its elders. In a separate development, the group’s founder has apologised for having relationships with its members – some of which, he has previously acknowledged, may have been against their will.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/19/buddhist-sexual-abuse-triratna-dennis-lingwood
“
Lingwood encouraged his heterosexual male followers to experiment with homosexuality as a form of self development. A former member, Mark Dunlop, told the BBC last autumn he had been persuaded to engage in sexual activity with Lingwood at an FWBO retreat near Norwich in the 1970s. “I told him I hated it. He said, well, you need to keep persevering, you mustn’t give up.”
“He [Lingwood] thought that it might be a good thing for them to get over their fixed self-view, and one of the things they might try doing [to achieve this] is having sex with other men,” explained Triratna’s safeguarding officer, who goes by the single Buddhist name of Munisha.”
“A document produced by the order suggesting that relationships between students and teachers could be beneficial was until recently still available online. “We took it out of public circulation, not as a way of covering it up but because we agreed it was unsuitable,” Munisha explained. “In the early days, in the context of the 1970s, it was all very weird. He did for a while explore ideas based on Greek ideas of relationships between younger and older men. But I’ve been around since ’91, and I’ve not heard a tracing of that teaching, and we would not permit that now.”
Now here, Munisha, the jewish flak for the FWBO/Triratna* is lying. Many have come forward saying that they were ‘groomed’ and abused latterly, in the 1990s and 2000s.
(*They changed their name from FWBO to Triratna after these scandals broke..)
The Guardian first broke this story in 1997 and so when Suella Braverman became a “mitra” (there are two levels to the FWBO/Triratna number 1) Mitra and then number 2) Order Member) in recent years and she started “mitra study” the Guardian was straight onto it.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ella-braverman-in-controversial-buddhist-sect
The guardian is run by zionist jews but for them the Conservative party are their mortal enemies and so they will go after Braverman with her jewish in-laws for any little tit-bit that comes their way.
But what are they missing out?
Well, jewish “safe guarding” officer Munisha claimed that all abuse stopped in 1991. Thats not true.
As has been said, many have come forward saying that they were ‘groomed’ and abused latterly, in the 1990s and 2000s.
Well what happened in the 90s and 2000’s? How were the revelations in the Guardian dealt with?
Well they were explained away and suppressed by its “Communications Office” who were under the leadership of
“Vishvapani” Blomfeld.
Step forward
Mr (((Blomfeld))).
The Guardian tells us that
“Vishvapani Blomfield is the Buddhist contributor to BBC Radio 4’s Thought for the Day and leads meditation on the RoundGlass app”
Where do they tell us that?
Under his .. Guardian by-line ha ha ha.
Yes, the guy who suppressed any truth being told within the FWBO/Triratna quasi-buddhist-sex-abuse-cult is
now the Guardian’s go-to Buddhist correspondent!
Not only that but he is the “Buddhist” commentator for the Zionist BBC and their pre-eminent multi-faith programme “Thought for the Day”.
Vishvapani
www.bbc.co.uk
“
Some years ago I spent a week with a Buddhist-led interfaith group at Auschwitz Concentration Camp. Members of my family died in the Holocaust and I wanted to participate, though I didn’t know why.
Images of that visit are still vivid. A pile of spectacles taken from the dead heaped up like a mound of insects; the constriction of the punishment cells; the unutterable bleakness of the Execution wall. When we visited nearby Berkenau I was unprepared for the camp’s orderliness; its barbarous symmetry; the implacable barbed wire fences; and the wretchedness of the barracks.”
A newcomer experiences a strange change of tone when starting meditation classes with Triratna's Cardiff Buddhist Centre:
“
I did some drop in meditation and an intro course in Cardiff Buddhism Centre in 2014/15. I found the members and mitras I met very sincere, kind and welcoming. I was starry eyed at Vishvapani the Radio 4 Buddhist at first but became frustrated by the way he often avoided discussion on his own writing, which he said was “”written for Buddhists”.
Then I read about the history online after googling to find out more and I found it very shocking and confusing. I tried to ask more about it once or twice but did not feel that the response was very open. I was brushed off once because of “time constraints”, another time, I was asked if I had been reading the FWBO files – the way it was said felt hostile and contrasted very sharply with the usual kindness",
More about the FWBO/Triratna sex-disciple-cult
http”://www.ex-cult.org/fwbo/fwbofiles.htm#doctrines
“
Families, according to (FWBO leader) Sangharakshita, are breeding grounds for child sexual abuse, which, he claims, is "a feature of the nuclear family" [37]. He therefore recommends that FWBO followers create a 'new society' by setting up single sex communities as a direct antidote to the canker of the nuclear family since, "the single sex community is probably our most powerful means of assault on the existing social set up" [38][see full quote] for, "If you set up such communities, you abolish the family at a stroke" [39] [see full quote]. Thus, whereas traditional Buddhist societies have always been inclusive of the family lifestyle, the goal of FWBO Buddhism would appear to be the destruction of society as we know it.”
“
Having alienated followers from their families, women and heterosexual relationships, Order members are encouraged to engage in homosexual relationships since, within the FWBO, such relationships are considered to be part of the path to enlightenment. Persons involved at a more superficial level might find it genuinely difficult to accept what goes on within the inner circle of the organization, but the fact is that once a person becomes an Order member (and in certain cases, even before), efforts may be made to convert the said person from heterosexuality to homosexuality.”
“
Why? FWBO 'Buddhist' theory runs in accord with the following argument:
1. One is separated from the experience of enlightenment by conditioning.
2) Heterosexuality is conditioning.
3) If heterosexuals engage in homosexual acts they will break down their conditioning.
4) Homosexuality is therefore a means to achieving enlightenment since it causes one to abandon conditioning.”
Homosexuality and highly-pressurised Homosexual experiences for otherwise heterosexual disciples was rampant for decades in the FWBO."
When it came out it was Vishvapani Blomfeld who was the “troubleshooter” dealing with the Guardian and any stray voices in the FWBO camp.
For a while all was rosy for him and he was even able to run an article in the FWBOs in-house magazine that he edited (around 2000) saying that the Guardian columnist Madeleine Bunting had not been "playing straight with us” and depicting himself as some kind of heroic protagonist dealing with media lies.
But then in 2003, another FWBO member called Yashomitra came forward talking about his experiences.
“
The evening I arrived I ate dinner with the (retreat centre) Padmaloka community. Someone mentioned that there would be a puja later in the evening and as I was keen to attend I asked where the shrine room was.
One of the order members who lived there was being very friendly and kindly offered to show me and so we walked through the house together. On reaching the then shrine room - a room at the front of the house - the order member told me that this was where it was.
Then he kissed me. I was stunned,
it was entirely unexpected as I knew nothing of the homosexual culture thriving in the fwbo at the time. I simply froze.
He led me up to his room, locked the door behind us and proceed to have sex with me.
I was horrified. It wasn't rape, I didn't resist, but the reasons for that were not entirely straightforward.
It just so happened that only the day before I had, on the strong recommendation of order members at Aryatara, read Chintamani's article 'Leaving Mother and Initiation into Manhood'.
In it he had suggested it could be helpful for men to have sex with other men - younger men with older men especially as I remember - along the lines of the (subsequently in my experience) oft quoted 'Greek Love'.
Helpful in terms of breaking one's dependency on women and becoming a man.
An order member, a Buddhist teacher, had recommended it and here now another order member was helping me breakthrough by doing it to me.
After some time he let me go, unlocked the door and I went to my room in a daze. It would be true to say I felt traumatised. I felt confused and dirty. I was convinced that if I said anything people would simply think it was my own fault and they would think I was disgusting.”
The next day I went for a walk with Sangharakshita. I said nothing about the experience of the previous night, and probably very little about anything at all.
He didn't seem to notice. At the end of our walk he patted me on the bum and said he would see me again soon.
My immediate thought was that the fwbo was a front to procure young men, boys for this old man - I had no idea before then of Sangharakshita's homosexual tastes.
My room mate back at Aryatara (now Satyaraja) eventually managed to get me to tell him about what had happened to cause me to exist in a daze unable to talk very much about anything for two weeks. Padmaraja, to his credit though his motives may well have been mixed, complained to Sangharakshita.
The upshot was a planned apology from the order member at padmaloka on my next visit - a men's event. Sangharakshita seemed disbelieving of there being a problem, saying that he thought I wouldn't have sex with anyone I didn't regard as a friend.
The order member concerned invited me into a room, possibly his though different from the previous one, and smilingly apologised. He then immediately propositioned me and made to kiss me. This time I didn't respond and instead walked out.” |
This letter from “Yashomitra” seriously scuppered the version of events that Vishvapani Blomfeld had been putting out.
Then later Sangharakshita ruined the astro turfed version of events that Vishvapani (then of the BBC and part of the globalist media class) had signed his name to.
“
In an interview with a Buddhist follower in 2009, Lingwood said of the sex between him and students: “Perhaps in a very few cases they were not as willing as I had supposed at the time – that is possible.” When pressed about whether he considered he had breached the student-teacher relationship,
Lingwood said: “I did not regard myself as a teacher with a capital T.”
He added: “I have had many, many human encounters, the great majority non-sexual, and most of those encounters, including the sexual ones, have been satisfactory for both parties. If there were any encounters that were not satisfactory for the other person, whether at the time or in retrospect, then that is a pity and I am truly sorry that that should be the case.”
(Of course, in true Cult leader fashion he subsequently threw a strop and withdrew his apology - like a 12 year old.)
Well, what was the prime-original-scandal attached to “Bhante” Sangharakshita, the FWBO founder, the sycophantic veneration of whom and the reputation of whom was viciously defended by Vishvapani?
It happened in the 1950s before early British Buddhist leader and high court judge Christmas Humphreys was involved in the genteel and bookish "Buddhist Society" based in Hampstead, North London.
“
According to F.W., a close friend of Christmas Humphreys whom he had confided in just before his death, Humphreys was at the same time colluding with one of India's seniormost political figures, in a plan to get Sangharakshita out of India before a scandal erupted which would scar the face of both Buddhism and Britain in Indian eyes irretrievably.
The senior official, a pro-Buddhist and confirmed Anglophile, had had to intervene personally in the case of a wealthy Indian family whose underage son had been seduced into engaging in homosexual acts by a British Buddhist bhikkhu.
The family claimed their son had been coerced into said acts by the monk and that his actions were an abuse of his privileged position. They were determinedly pressing for charges to be brought against the bhikkhu.
The bhikkhu in question was Sangharakshita.
Recognising the potential disaster for Anglo-Indian relations, the official contacted Humphreys, and a deal was made to get Sangharakshita out of the country and back into Britain before the story was brought to prominence through the courts.
The family agreed not to press charges if he left India immediately.
Humphreys kept quiet and allowed the English Sangha Trust to believe that Sangharakshita's credentials were impeccable, a perfect candidate to fill their vacant post of resident teacher.
On the basis of this, Sangharakshita was given the job. Shortly before his death in 1983, Humphreys spoke of his intense guilt and personal dismay over what he had done.”
Sangharakshita/ Denis Lingwood had done a Lord Mountbatten and used his position to sexually abuse children in 3rd world India.
