The Jewish Question (JQ) thread

get2choppaaa

Hummingbird
Orthodox
It's a convenient tool to keep everyone in perpetual fear, so it makes me sceptical of this constant nuclear threat. Nuclear war seems so futile and meaningless too, would God really allow it to happen? I don't believe so. Only a Jew could be the inventor of the A-bomb as well (J. Robert Oppenheimer - who has an upcoming biopic from Christopher Nolan next year), take from that what you will. Either way I don't subject myself to the fear of nuclear weapons and the terror they want to create with them. It's just like the biogenic oil theory, scarcity of resources, global warming etc. there are elements of truth there but largely it is propaganda to terrify the masses into submission towards false leadership.
It's likelyhood of use and it's existence are two different things.

Saying it is a hoax is just simply incorrect.

There are however, entire libraries and theories about nuclear brinkmanship. So... There's some Merritt to the control factor.

But nukes are real. don't fall fall into the silly mess. Also flat earth is fake. We can prove mathematically the earth is round.
 

Akaky Akakievitch

Woodpecker
Orthodox Catechumen
It's likelyhood of use and it's existence are two different things.

Saying it is a hoax is just simply incorrect.

There are however, entire libraries and theories about nuclear brinkmanship. So... There's some Merritt to the control factor.

But nukes are real. don't fall fall into the silly mess. Also flat earth is fake. We can prove mathematically the earth is round.

Well, I still remain a little sceptical. What happened at Hiroshima/Nagasaki in 1945 especially looks more and more like Holocaust-style lies the more you inspect it. I also can't quite believe (perhaps im naive) we possess that much power to destroy ourselves, and that no one has set one off by accident yet... nothing short of a miracle.

As for Flat earth..... let's not go there. ;)
 

Easy_C

Peacock
Well, I still remain a little sceptical. What happened at Hiroshima/Nagasaki in 1945 especially looks more and more like Holocaust-style lies the more you inspect it. I also can't quite believe (perhaps im naive) we possess that much power to destroy ourselves, and that no one has set one off by accident yet... nothing short of a miracle.

As for Flat earth..... let's not go there. ;)

That or the effects of those weapons aren't really what was advertised. Our understanding of them is based mostly on more recent Hydrogen bombs and not the 1940's tech.

One note: I've been told by a fairly well connected gentleman (rather interesting character I've mentioned a few times before) that the reason people stopped talking about nukes so much is that they've been displaced by climate altering weapons.
 

DanielH

Ostrich
Moderator
Orthodox
One note: I've been told by a fairly well connected gentleman (rather interesting character I've mentioned a few times before) that the reason people stopped talking about nukes so much is that they've been displaced by climate altering weapons.
Climate weapons are great for "them" because not only can they deny any culpability, they can blame their peasants.
 

BarrontheTigercat

Kingfisher
Other Christian
Cross Post from the "Israel Folau/Homophobia" thread.

The Australian Player who quoted the bible and was fired for it was Australian-Tongan Israel Folau.

Rugby League and Rugby Union are now becoming insufferably woke and also are being ruined by increasingly mollycoddling and petty refereeing.
Now, who is behind this we wonder?

Rugby Union WAS Israel Folau's sport until they fired him for quoting the New Testament passage saying that ALL sinners (all) are destined for hell unless they are saved by Jesus Christ.
It was the fact that the New Testament listed homosexuality as a sin that got Israel Folau in trouble.

If anyone is interested here is how the (((woke rugby media))) addressed this at the time.
Just listen to well known presenter Alex Payne, famous England player James Haskell and .. er,.. unheard of homosexual "rugby" journalist James Heath lose their minds over Izzy's tweets.
Listen to the outrage.. and the scorn.
James Heath, unheard-of-bloke/Professional-Homosexual: "Thats what I said to Izzy the first time he posted (on Twitter). Why are you voluntarily volunteering information that could cause people harm?" (eh?)



Homosexual journalist Heath tackles weighty theological issues - "He's also got so many followers that he is ultimately encouraging idolatry so.. by his very existence he is causing sin"
His co-panellists weigh in: "yeah"
"yeah we follow the wrong people.. if you're in America you probably VOTE for the wrong people!" (Trump ..geddit?)
"we vote for the wrong people here in the UK as well.. !"(ie: conservative): ha ha ha ha.. ... etc.

Interestingly homosexual journalist James Heath revealed here that he knows nothing about Rugby.
The panel were obediently asking him what about famous players and controversies to which he gave them suitably emotive and dramatic answers. He also tried to explain technical ideas and got himself lost. "um well.. Im probably not explaining it very well"
Revealingly he said that the support of blue-pilled famous Rugby players was important as "If Israel Folau says Im going to hell then I can call up my mate James here who is probably twice the size of him/Folau (there is an awkward second as he has just revealed he has no idea how big Folau actually is - he is the same size as Haskell) and er you know that (adjusting as he was about to suggest that Haskell could easily beat up Christian Folau).. he's on my side but anyway.." Moving swiftly on... The professional homosexual rugby journalist doesn't even know what Folau looks like.

AT one point the panel get so gay and rainbow coloured that they start picking their best looking Men XV and catty homosexual journalist speculates that "Dan Carter must be like a Fish in bed, you know, Im so pretty you'll have to do all the work! ha ha!"
Great rugby analysis.. woke Rugby media.

Folding Pocket productions pretty much manages the media career of this James Haskell with Jewish producer Simon Clancy (nice Irish name there) banning words from their website comments that he thought were "associated with American Right".
He tries to make himself an NFL pundit and has been relentlessly promoting American-Jewish race-baiter RocNation promoter Michael Yormark.
Their big dream is to "find our LeBron" and develop a POC star with which to signal boost CRT BLM issues etc etc and with which to indoctrinate white and black kids.
Folding Pocket? "The group is led by (((Matthew Sherry))) as Chief Executive Officer; (((Gaby Khalastchy))) as Chief Operating Officer; and (((Matt Sayward))) as Chief Strategy Officer."

Israel Folau was fired by Rugby Union in Australia and went to rival code Rugby League in Euope.
Cue working class Lancashire town Wigan Warriors going full woke and arranging a Pride Day festival at their stadium to upset Folau when he came to play them.
Who said its just Rugby Union that has gone woke, eh?


As for this Manly Situation.. Folau's wife Marie Folau was very upset at the soft response of NRL boss Peter V'Landys toward the Seven Manly Players in contrast to how they treated Folau (the NRL told Folau he was "not welcome" when his scandal blew up) and she called both Vlandys and the NRL hypocrites.


"V'Landys said “But at the same time, you have to respect the player’s religious and cultural beliefs. Those players are taking a stance, and they have every right to.”
In response she wrote above the comments: “We’re all human beings at the end of the day ...Umm so what’s Izzy??....A donkey?”
“The hypocrisy (sic) from this man and this organisation @nrl #PeterVlandys What a joke!!!”
Now, the Australian media class are going full Ghost of Kiev with this. They keep posting articles saying that there is a "Fan Backlash" against the Manly Seven.

This is just Lies. They keep saying this. That the fans condemn the players... but actually its the other way around. Read the comments section on any social media, the Rugby League fans are sick of the NRL and sick of this woke garbage.
However this is not the first time that the champagne swilling Aussie Media have proclaimed a spontaneous public movement that didn't exist.
I give you. #IllRideWithYou ..

After a Jihadi Nutter (already known to police) held Cafe Lindt premises hostage and shot someone the (((Aussie media))) already had a campaign ready in case of a likely Terrorist Attack.
But they had presumed that it would be a suicide bombing of a transport hub.
So they had their own pre-made campaign ready to go the moment the inevitable terrorist attack happened saying that Aussies were not scared to travel next to Muslim passengers.
From The Atlantic:


"Little is known about the motives of (Islamic Terrorist) Man Monis.." ha ha ha really?
"On a train, one passenger reportedly spotted a Muslim woman removing her hijab, ostensibly out of fear of being targeted. The passenger told her to put it back on and offered to walk with her in solidarity. And so began #IllRideWithYou." Is this supposed to be a believable scenario? What a load of Lies.
"Tessa Kum, who was credited with turning #IllRideWithYou into a hashtag, echoed that sentiment:" Now, who is operative Tessa Kum?


"I’m learning about hate because I am coming to hate you, white person. You have all the control, all the power, all the privilege, and there is nothing holding you accountable. I hate the double standards and hypocrisy you display, the rank dishonesty of your conduct. I hatethat you can harm us, when we cannot harm you." She seems a nice person..


Kum says:
"It was very much a sort of breaking point for me.
I sort of saw another tweet online indicating another woman’s act of kindness [[[Rachael Jacobs]]] and I simply felt that there needed to be more of that in the world.
"
Ahh, zee made up story came from zee jews.. didn't see that one coming!

As one of my Aussie Vet friends called it at the time (when Aussies were very angered by this bogus narrative) #IllGiveYouSexualFavoursCosImTooScaredOfYou ..

Now..
@Rush87 You say that Rugby Union mess of cards and penalties for petty offences but then, so is Rugby league these days.
Last season commentator Andrew Johns felt it was too much and walked out of a game.
Here ex-player and pundit Gus Gould kicks off



His co-host Paul Gallen agrees with him. Ridiculous rules and penalties. Its left to the media operative to explain that he spoke to NRL head V'Landys "and he said if we don't do this then the Government will take Rugby league away and ban it!" Eh? What?
Now who is V'Landys?



He likes to make a lot out of his rough tough Greek Orthodox background but he is a Globalist Shill.
He even brought in cashless kiosks at stadia such that parents can't give kids cash to go and get refreshments.
And can we get an early life check?
Because he is reminiscent of supposed True Blue Aussie Digger (((Rupert Murdoch)))

This is just an attack on Australian masculine values by (((The Usual Suspects))).
Gus Gould asks "where did that come from? We were told it was because Mum wouldn't let Little Johnny play, it was about youth participation, then it was about health, then it was about future litigation, now the government is going to ban our sport - 5 reasons in one week.. why? what's the real reason here? This is like the "The Bunker"... the sin bin the attack on referees that happened with Greenberg.

Hmm (((Greenberg))) you say?


"A bleak winter Saturday evening, four minutes into a rugby league match at a suburban Sydney ground, and nothing is happening. The few disgruntled spectators who have come so they can yell at real people, not their television sets, are yelling at a giant scoreboard screen. "Get on with it!" "It's a try, you muppet!"
"Mostly there is silence. The 26 players are also standing around waiting for this decision on whether a try has been scored.
For a century, such rulings came from the referee on the field. Now, it is adjudicated by a team of officials in a multi-screen room in faraway Redfern, Sydney City Centre..
When the decision finally arrives on screen, accompanied by a fried-chicken advertisement, not even the beneficiaries at the ground seem happy. They just want to restart the game and get warm."
"This is the National Rugby League, on its good days the most popular TV sporting spectacle in Australia. On its bad days?
"Greenberg's killing this game," the man next to me says, unasked.
Todd Greenberg, NRL chief executive since 2016, did not invent video refereeing, but he doubled down on it, plunging $2 million into the state-of-the-art Bunker, which commenced operations in 2017.
For many spectators, and league luminaries from Andrew Johns to Phil Gould who have pronounced the innovation a failure, the villain is the "Bunker guy".
"People bag the Bunker," he says, "but this time three years ago you had a single referee with a tiny screen sitting behind us, and this guy [the one with the beer] would have been banging on his window." The decision comes down quickly and accurately. "That was under 40 seconds," Greenberg says, soothed by the warm embrace of good data.
He's a talented cricketer (he played twice at the Maccabiah Games in Israel?) whose life is in football (ie; he's never played Rugby League to any standard), a Jewish boy who cut his teeth at the Canterbury Bulldogs club, in the heart of Sydney's Lebanese community.
This insider-outsider hybrid is where the modern sporting executive has arrived after decades of evolution."
See the change?
"The chief of rugby league has always been the face of the game, though it used to be a craggy, beaten-up one.
Harry "Jersey" Flegg and Bill Buckley were, in journalist and historian Ian Heads's words, "hard-edged, working-class, ex-first graders with a good feel for the game".
At the NSW Rugby League's fiery Monday night meetings at its headquarters in Sydney's Phillip Street, notes Heads, "there were beers beforehand, and when they went into the committee stage, they'd say, 'pens down' but let the media stay in the room."

Now its moisturiser and facial care, perma-tanned Jews.. :/

Oh, and jewish Lobby Groups.
Whats going on in Rugby Union?
James Haskell (owned by jews) mentioned once that he is part of a "lobby group" called "Progressive Rugby."


You can see some top name players of yesteryear on this website and concerned doctors but given the Zionist links of Haskell et al. I'd love to see the organisational staff and donors involved with this.

The extent of Jewish politicisation of Rugby media is getting silly.

Now you might of heard about UK gold medallist Mo Farah and his travails.
Previously living in the US under the training of jailed drugs cheat Nike-coach Alberto Salazar who has been jailed and who says Farah was in on his plans, Farah is facing down the fact that he is a suspected drugs cheat who cheated his taxes and whose brother is a violent thug who beat up an elderly couple, got jailed and was deported.



^Now, above the controlled-opposition mainstream conservatives pretend that this is a saga of real life slavery and a reason to control immigration.
No it isn't.

I don't like Israeli Simon Webb but he did some good detective work here. The Farah foster story is a Pack of Lies.
The whole fostering situation is a scam in which families send their kids to be raised by other families which ensures much better free housing and benefit money. They then divide up the government subsidies amongst themselves. Its a Benefit Scam.
Remember Ilhan Omar? It turned out that she married her brother in a visa scam. then it turned out that her father had a different last name as she had been fostered out to a different family as a visa and benefit fraud. then it turned out that the State Dept had made DNA tests mandatory for Somali refugees as more than 90% who claimed to be related actually weren't.



Christopher Bollyn describes terrorist Israeli power as encompassing the Zionist British establishment.
Here (((Simon Clancy))) has arranged an interview with British stars from the American NFL. Clancy is desperate to find his LeBron, his Colin Kaeprenick and to racialise UK Rugby.
Here the Scots player has fun ridiculing the American Rednecks he met at US high school before we meet the centre piece..
We meet Efe Obada who tells us his tale of woe that he grew up in the UK having been "trafficked' as a child. Apparently he was illegal and lived a life of hiding .. much like Anne Frank.
Former England player Mike Tindall has married in to the British Royal Family.
When Obada says that he lived over 20 years "outside the system" Tindall says "my Royal cousin in law has a charity podcast called Floodlight and she has used it to highlight modern day slavery."
So Britis Royals have podcasts buying into the "oppressed migrant" koolaid. The Jews are fostering rugby media and its being used to push this nonsense.
And look at that Princess Eugenie works with her good friend de Boinville on their "Anti-slavery collective".
Just what we need .. Royal airheads lecturing us about slavery.
Interestingly the De Boinville family were blue bloods who somehow survived the Frankist Sabbatean French Revolution, whose family patriarch even escorted shackled King Louis to the scaffold under guard and who joined with the new Revolutionary administration and then profited under Napoleon.




And yes NFL player Efe Obada is now the poster child of "trafficked oppressed migrants."


I know plenty of Nigerians in London. Nigerians (like the vikings) have a tradition of fostering their kids out to other families in Nigeria and when they came to England they combined it with Fraud. Even as far back as the 60s rich Nigerian families would even foster their kids out to white foster parents if they had to as they couldn't find Nigerian foster families.
They now foster out all the time from Nigeria as a sound immigration/benefit scam.
Listen to this guy, he couldn't get a job because he was 'undocumented' but he did lots of cruddy jobs like Bingo Halls?
So he could get jobs but .. maybe he wasn't very good at them, maybe he was quite stupid in fact?
He failed the Bookie William Hill's maths test? Seriously, I went with a friend to a William Hill jobs fair when he was on benefits in South London.
Its a simple test with easy maths problems. My friend who was not exactly bright aced it and was told in a cockney accent "You made one stupid mistake there Jack but otherwise well done." Fun Fact: you needed to present your National Insurance ID to even get in that jobs centre.
He claims he did rubbish jobs because he didn't have documents? "I was illegal" ha ha sure, babe.
Translation he couldn't hold down a job.
He was a criminal with a criminal record who got big muscles in jail. What was his crime? He got sent to jail on his first offence? Must have been serious and I can't find details of it anywhere. This guy lived his entire youth on other people's tax money and paid Britons back by committing crime. here he is complaining "I'm not being rewarded properly, Im not being recognised.."
Child-Slave Obada..
He just wants more gibs.
Give me strength.

The rabbit hole of Hebrew control over our media/propaganda-centres extends a long way it seems.
 
Last edited:

911

Peacock
Catholic
Gold Member
Appreciate your rebuttal. Although I still remain a little sceptical. It's possible there are some fake stories mixed into the real nuclear threat, much like with NASA lying about many missions but still discussing real science.

And I tend to favour the flat earth model myself, but let's not go there... ;)

I'd put nothing past the Jews and masons who pull the strings, their lies are many.

They are pulling your strings here, psyops like flat earth and nukes are fakes have been thought out and promoted by people like Cass Sunstein, who was Obama's Information Czar back in the 00s when YT was uncensored and a critical mass of people were on high speed internet.

1659061392178.png


EIA4SxtUYAANlHH


Around 10-12 years ago you suddenly had a proliferation of very well-produced pro-flat earth video with a whole squad of people and pundits pushing that cause, shady types like glowie Eric Dubay or David Weiss.

Nukes/dinosaurs are fake followed flat earth a few years later. People who fell for these psyops are victims of that man's evil machination to poison the truther well and keep the goyim in their plantation.


“President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban “conspiracy theorizing.”

Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.

Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate “extremists who supply conspiracy theories” to disrupt the efforts of the “extremists” to propagate their theories.

In a 2008 Harvard law paper, “Conspiracy Theories,” Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, “What can government do about conspiracy theories?”

“We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.”

In the 30-page paper – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein argues the best government response to “conspiracy theories” is “cognitive infiltration of extremist groups.”

Continued Sunstein: “We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.”

Sunstein said government agents “might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”

 

Akaky Akakievitch

Woodpecker
Orthodox Catechumen
They are pulling your strings here, psyops like flat earth and nukes are fakes have been thought out and promoted by people like Cass Sunstein, who was Obama's Information Czar back in the 00s when YT was uncensored and a critical mass of people were on high speed internet.

View attachment 45858


EIA4SxtUYAANlHH


Around 10-12 years ago you suddenly had a proliferation of very well-produced pro-flat earth video with a whole squad of people and pundits pushing that cause, shady types like glowie Eric Dubay or David Weiss.

Nukes/dinosaurs are fake followed flat earth a few years later. People who fell for these psyops are victims of that man's evil machination to poison the truther well and keep the goyim in their plantation.


“President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban “conspiracy theorizing.”

Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.

Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate “extremists who supply conspiracy theories” to disrupt the efforts of the “extremists” to propagate their theories.

In a 2008 Harvard law paper, “Conspiracy Theories,” Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, “What can government do about conspiracy theories?”

“We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.”

In the 30-page paper – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein argues the best government response to “conspiracy theories” is “cognitive infiltration of extremist groups.”

Continued Sunstein: “We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.”

Sunstein said government agents “might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”


That is fascinating, I knew this kind of thing was going on, but seeing it so clearly spelled out is pretty crazy.

Since I started attending liturgy, praying and reading the Bible more this year, I calmed down a lot on things like Flat earth and nukes/dinos are fake etc., as I concluded that they're either dead ends or possible deceptions. But there is still a part of me that holds onto it I suppose.

I was aware that things like Qanon, mudflood, aliens, tartaria etc. were controlled narratives in the same way these articles explain, of infiltrating online communities and muddying the water, but I didn't know the specifics. The article from the Intercept is pretty revealing, seeing just how much they try and game our behaviour and as you say, pull my strings.

It's a minefield because we know MK Ultra was real, that the moon landings were faked, 9/11 of course being a massive fib, so it's difficult to discern where the lies stop and the truth begins.

I will definitely go back and re-assess my views on things. RVF is probably the first online community i've really participated in significantly and i respect what people say here. It's more likely i've been gamed to be honest.

Also definitely got suspicious about Eric Dubay when taking Christianity more seriously, something very off with his character. He is very New Age and off-kilter. Now i look back, David Weiss seemed on a mission of sorts to spread this flat earth message, he featured on a tonne of podcasts, even really obscure ones, which would support your view he was one of these disinformation agents sent out to sow dissent among truthers. Flat earth is among the most divisive topics as well, which again supports the evidence of breaking up communities by spreading this stuff. Also "Weiss" sounds pretty Jewish to me on second thought.

I'm willing to change my mind, i'm not hard-nosed about it, just need to spend time going over it again.
 

anti-science

Sparrow
Gnostic or New Age
It's likelyhood of use and it's existence are two different things.

Saying it is a hoax is just simply incorrect.

There are however, entire libraries and theories about nuclear brinkmanship. So... There's some Merritt to the control factor.

But nukes are real. don't fall fall into the silly mess. Also flat earth is fake. We can prove mathematically the earth is round.

You cannot. Eratosthenes' supposed measurements are based on assumptions.
 

Kev

Pigeon
Orthodox
Sounds pretty accurate to me. Logically there would be showers of debris falling down, as they mention, but of course Iron Dome is so impressive, it just pulverises everything into fairy dust... sure.

This reminds me of the "Nuclear Weapons" hoax conspiracy:



It actually makes more sense that Nukes are a hoax as well and runs well along the lines of the scarcity-terror-fear-porn paradigm the Jews like to keep everyone submerged in. Also, it seems to say, 'Don't fear God, fear the bomb!'

The footage of nuclear bombs, much like that of NASA and space exploration, also looks fake when critically inspected. Humans are gullible by nature it seems.

If the footage is not convincing enough (enormous mushroom clouds extending into the upper atmo) take a look at the residual radiation and isotope analysis at the test sites in the Pacific, or, if you've got the chance, visit the Trinity site in New Mexico where the first test was done. Or, dig into "project plowshare" where low yield atomic weapons were detonated in one (or more) natural gas wells to try to improve the gas production (it worked but the gas is unusably radioactive).

I agree that it's useful to be skeptical about things the government says - however applied science / engineering helps to understand that most of the claims about nuclear weapons, flat earth, etc are the things that deserve a healthy dose of skepticism.
 

inthefade

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
Guys, nukes have their own thread. No one is arguing that nuclear reactors don't exist.

 

get2choppaaa

Hummingbird
Orthodox
You cannot. Eratosthenes' supposed measurements are based on assumptions.
Well I'm a simple artilleryman... But rotation of the earth is one of the factors accounted for in the 5 requirements for accurate predictive fire.

So Mr. Anti science riddle me this?

How did i Put a 115 lb artillery round with in 50 meters of a target from 20000 feet away when factoring that in, and then lose that ability to get within 50 meters when not accounting for that?
 

get2choppaaa

Hummingbird
Orthodox
Guys, nukes have their own thread. No one is arguing that nuclear reactors don't exist.

How dare you try and get us back on track about talking about the Jews.... Clearly we've all bought into the distraction.
 

anti-science

Sparrow
Gnostic or New Age
Do not discuss flat earth
Well I'm a simple artilleryman... But rotation of the earth is one of the factors accounted for in the 5 requirements for accurate predictive fire.

So Mr. Anti science riddle me this?

How did i Put a 115 lb artillery round with in 50 meters of a target from 20000 feet away when factoring that in, and then lose that ability to get within 50 meters when not accounting for that?

You account for barometric pressure, humidity, spin drift of the bullet, wind changes and some other factors when shooting extreme distances.

I believe you think you are accounting for Coriolis but you are just adjusting for what is known as minute of angle

gun.jpg


The yellow line is the line of sight if not for the drop rate. The actual trajectory is shown in the red line. The blue line is your baseline which you would shoot for short distances, you don’t need to shoot to use minute of angle as there won't be a bullet drop like for long distances.

Check out the records for longest sniper shots from wikipedia

Some of them taken in the late 1800s. Are you telling me they accounted for coriolis back then too? Also, check the distances and see if you find problems with the supposed earth's curvature not blocking them.

 

get2choppaaa

Hummingbird
Orthodox
You account for barometric pressure, humidity, spin drift of the bullet, wind changes and some other factors when shooting extreme distances.

I believe you think you are accounting for Coriolis but you are just adjusting for what is known as minute of angle

View attachment 46033


The yellow line is the line of sight if not for the drop rate. The actual trajectory is shown in the red line. The blue line is your baseline which you would shoot for short distances, you don’t need to shoot to use minute of angle as there won't be a bullet drop like for long distances.

Check out the records for longest sniper shots from wikipedia

Some of them taken in the late 1800s. Are you telling me they accounted for coriolis back then too? Also, check the distances and see if you find problems with the supposed earth's curvature not blocking them.


Negative ghost rider....there more to it than. Line of site and MOA. I'm not a retard and you showing a picture about line of sight doesnt work for indirect fire over distances of 20 or 30 km. That's just an oversimplification of something I think you either have a tenuous grasp of or are being disingenuous about.

What are those other factors you mentioned? Oh wait, one of them is the curvature of the earth... Imagine that....

I apologize for the snark... But i think you're shilling stupidity and just discrediting yourself.

If you want to argue about the moon landing fine.

Want to argue about who killed jfk fine.

Feel free to buy into a psyop and discredit yourself...but I've yet to see anything convincing.

Edited to add: i don't pretend to be an expert on all things... But in this I am.

I have experience with data that discredits this flat earth garbage, including things on computers in locked rooms which I can't talk about openly. It includes satellites, GIS, cartography,
and target mensuration.

Let the flat earth stupidity go. Or.... Be wrong and get made fun of in every argument you get in to...because you're buying into a psyop.

I am all for being anti "Science" but I'm not for being anti "science" if you catch my drift.
 
Last edited:
Top