The Jewish Question (JQ) thread

inthefade

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
How do the Jews know what they have to do? I mean they all tend to follow the same playbook. Gain control of influential positions then uses those positions to subvert the host country's populace while making a lot of money in the process. Are there instructions for this in the Torah or some other scripture? Also, what is their end goal? World domination?
The talmud contains a lot of their playbook.
 

The Penitent Man

Pelican
Protestant
I caught the tail end of AF's election coverage last night and Nick brought on a guy named Wendell to talk about the results. Anyway, he was dropping a lot of redpills, including about how Jews and their kept goys were passing legislation like this:

This happened months ago and I had no idea.



It kind of puts into perspective that no matter who wins or loses an election, they win.

“It kind of puts into perspective that no matter who wins or loses an election, they win.”

 

budoslavic

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member
02de905e51f96b70.png
 

Max Roscoe

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
Thanks for writing that. This is what is was after when I wrote my post. I think this should be stickied somewhere. I will do my own research on these individual points. Cheers.
Different people have different buttons that make them angry.

Some are very upset at hypocrisy, and will be upset at those who contradict themselves and whose actions don't match their words.
These people might be upset at how Israel runs their government versus how diaspora Jews tell western nations we should run ours.

Some people strongly dislike drugs and alcohol, and would be upset to learn about the Sackler family, the Jewish mafia, and the vast designer drug trade based in Israel.

Other people dislike elitism, and will be most upset by the vast examples of Jewish supremacy, from special Jewish-only ambulance and police services that run in NYC to exemptions during Prohibition that allowed "Jewish wine" to be produced.

Others are upset by sexual perversion or other immoralities, and should look into the history of Jews in pornography, as a friend of mine has done, and told all sorts of sordid tales about what he saw Jews doing with crucifixes and Gentile girls' private parts.

One of my biggest issues from the ROK days was transsexuality, which is essentially entirely Jewish.

My advice is focus on whatever issues are of greatest concern to you, and dig deep into that issue, and see how much of it is also Jewish history. You can even share some topics that are of strong importance to you, and the forum can point you in the right direction.

I learn more and more about them every day. For example, did you know according to the Talmud, Adam had sex with the animals in the garden of Eden?




Yebamoth 63a states that Adam had intercourse with animals:
א"ר אלעזר מאי דכתיב (בראשית ב, כג) זאת הפעם עצם מעצמי ובשר מבשרי מלמד שבא אדם על כל בהמה וחיה ולא נתקררה דעתו עד שבא על חוה
And Rabbi Elazar said: What is the meaning of that which is written: “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh” (Genesis 2:23)? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with each animal and beast in his search for his mate, and his mind was not at ease, in accordance with the verse: “And for Adam, there was not found a helpmate for him” (Genesis 2:20), until he had intercourse with Eve.
 

Gimlet

Pelican
I caught the tail end of AF's election coverage last night and Nick brought on a guy named Wendell to talk about the results. Anyway, he was dropping a lot of redpills, including about how Jews and their kept goys were passing legislation like this:

This happened months ago and I had no idea.



It kind of puts into perspective that no matter who wins or loses an election, they win.

 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
The talmud contains a lot of their playbook.
Yes, the Jews who were the Jews back in the day of Christ had vastly different sources that determined their worldview. In Babylonian captivity the Talmud became the go to source, not so much the Torah. It's a very different approach but few people even know that the Talmud the leading source of modern Judaism.

,,

The Talmud (/ˈtɑːlmʊd, -məd, ˈtæl-/; Hebrew: תַּלְמוּד‎, romanized: Talmūḏ) is the central text of Rabbinic Judaism and the primary source of Jewish religious law (halakha) and Jewish theology.[1][2] Until the advent of modernity, in nearly all Jewish communities, the Talmud was the centerpiece of Jewish cultural life and was foundational to "all Jewish thought and aspirations", serving also as "the guide for the daily life" of Jews.[3]

Originally, Jewish scholarship was oral and transferred from one generation to the next. Rabbis expounded and debated the Torah (the written Torah expressed in the Hebrew Bible) and discussed the Tanakh without the benefit of written works (other than the Biblical books themselves), though some may have made private notes (megillot setarim), for example, of court decisions. This situation changed drastically due to the Roman destruction of the Jewish commonwealth and the Second Temple in the year 70 and the consequent upheaval of Jewish social and legal norms. As the rabbis were required to face a new reality—mainly Judaism without a Temple (to serve as the center of teaching and study) and total Roman control over Judaea, without at least partial autonomy—there was a flurry of legal discourse and the old system of oral scholarship could not be maintained. It is during this period that rabbinic discourse began to be recorded in writing.[a]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmud#cite_note-8

The oldest full manuscript of the Talmud, known as the Munich Talmud (Codex Hebraicus 95), dates from 1342 and is available online.

The process of "Gemara" proceeded in what were then the two major centers of Jewish scholarship, Galilee and Babylonia. Correspondingly, two bodies of analysis developed, and two works of Talmud were created. The older compilation is called the Jerusalem Talmud or the Talmud Yerushalmi. It was compiled in the 4th century in Galilee. The Babylonian Talmud was compiled about the year 500, although it continued to be edited later. The word "Talmud", when used without qualification, usually refers to the Babylonian Talmud.
 
Last edited:

budoslavic

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member
tw-13.png


Edit. Trying to figure out the above "coincidence". This is what I gathered so far for those who are curious.

IRS 1913 (IRS created in July 1862)
When the 16th Amendment was passed in 1913, granting the federal government authority to tax PERSONAL income just MONTHS before the unConstitutional Federal Reserve Act was passed—only a few patriots like Charles Lindbergh Sr. and Congressman Louis McFadden saw the writing on the wall...

...that the Bureau of Internal Revenue was about to ENSLAVE the American people to the Jewish banksters, extorting an ever-expanding percentage of true production from American workers to pay off the interest accrued by the US government on fake money loaned to it by the Federal Reserve.

And we’ve been paying off these Jewish banksters ever since.

FED 1913
1913-Current: Federal Reserve Act effects a consortium of privately held Jewish & associated banks called the Federal Reserve Bank. The largest shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank are the Rothschilds of London holding 57% of the stock which is not available for public trading.

HOW THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK WORKS

ZIONIST BANKERS PRINT MONEY at heavily-armed & guarded Federal Reserve Bank buildings throughout the US. Then these Jewish bankers of the Federal Reserve Bank *loan* the money to the US government at *interest.*

Since the Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (and all the others) is listed in Dun & Bradstreet. But according to Article I, Section 8 of the U. S. Constitution, only Congress has the right to issue money and regulate its value.

Thus it is *illegal* for private interests to issue US money. But because influential Jews like Paul Warburg and Jacob Schiff bribed into enactment the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the stockholders of the Federal Reserve Bank were to be kept a secret. Only recently have the Jewish stockholders of the Federal Reserve Bank come to light.

ADL 1913
Two months after (Leo) Frank’s conviction, on October 20, 1913, the ADL was formed. To this day, the ADL and its allies promote the fiction that Frank’s conviction was a result of “anti-Semitism” and use the case a rallying cry to garner support and funding.

The ADL itself was organized in the United States as a subdivision of B'nai B'rith in 1913, and its ostensible purpose was to counter the "defamation" of Jews, whose public image was even worse then than now. The ADL went about its work in characteristically heavy-handed fashion, bullying and intimidating those who said or published anything the organization considered incompatible with Jewish interests, and lobbying legislators and other public officials to obtain legislation or rulings which would advance Jewish aims. If a prominent businessman, educator, or politician made a public statement the Jews did not like, the ADL would attempt to persuade him to retract it, hinting at economic or political reprisals if he refused. If intimidation failed, the ADL often would turn to defamation, feeding derogatory statements about the target to newspapers under Jewish control or friendly to Jewish interests until he was thoroughly discredited in the eyes of the public.

1913 ADL Federal Reserve System and the Anti-Defamation League were founded in the same year — 1913. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, ruled that The Federal Reserve (U.S.' central bank) was privately owned in 680 F.2d 1239, LEWIS v. UNITED STATES of America, No. 80-5905].

1913 Thrive Movement Elite banking families – including the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and Morgans – have gained control of the global economy through the central banking system. They set up the Federal Reserve in the US in 1913 and have been manipulating the market to benefit themselves ever since. This timeline shows the pattern of American Presidents being assassinated after challenging central bankers and their monopoly on money, and the Federal Reserve’s artificial creation of booms and busts that causes people to lose their jobs, homes, and retirements, while the bankers further consolidate wealth and control.

1913 Antony Sutton American financiers associated with these groups were involved in financing revolution even before 1917. Intervention by the Wall Street law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell into the Panama Canal controversy is recorded in 1913 congressional hearings. The episode is summarized by Congressman Rainey: It is my contention that the representatives of this Government United States] made possible the revolution on the isthmus of Panama. That had it not been for the interference of this Government a successful revolution could not possibly have occurred, and I contend that this Government violated the treaty of 1846. I will be able to produce evidence to show that the declaration of independence which was promulgated in Panama on the 3rd day of November, 1903, was prepared right here in New York City and carried down there — prepared in the office of Wilson (sic) Nelson Cromwell.

1913 History of the Money Changers With Congress nearing a vote on the Glass-Owen Bill, they called Ohio Attorney, Alfred Crozier, to testify. However, Crozier noticed the similarities between the Aldrich Bill and the Glass-Owen Bill, and subsequently stated, "The...bill grants just what Wall Street and the big banks for twenty-five years have been striving for - private instead of public control of currency. It (the Glass-Owen bill) does this as completely as the Aldrich bill. Both measures rob the government and the people of all effective control over the public's money, and vest in the banks exclusively the dangerous power to make money among the people scarce or plenty."

The debate on this bill was not going well for the banks, with many Senators intimating the bill was corrupt and deceitful, however the bill was approved through the Senate on December 22nd. How did this happen? Because most of the Senators had left town to return home for the Christmas holidays. Furthermore, these Senators had been assured by the leadership, that nothing would be done regarding this bill until long after the Christmas recess. Representative Charles A Lindbergh Sr. stated, "This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed...The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill."

Interestingly, only a few weeks earlier, in October, Congress finally passed a bill legalizing direct income tax of the people. This was in the form of a bill pushed through by Senator Aldrich, which is now commonly known as the 16th amendment. The income tax law was fundamental to the Federal Reserve. This is because the Federal Reserve was a system which would run up, essentially, an unlimited Federal debt. The only way to guarantee the payment of interest on this debt was to directly tax the people, as they had done with the Bank Of England. If the Federal Reserve had to rely on contributions from the States, they would be dealing with bigger entities, who could revolt and refuse to pay the interest on their own money, or at least bring political pressure to bear in order to keep the debt small.

Actually, this 16th amendment was never ratified, and therefore many American citizens do not pay their income tax and there is nothing the United States Government can do about it. For further information on this go to thelawthatneverwas.com . Also, back in 1895, the Supreme Court had also found an income tax law similar to the 16th amendment, as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court also found a Corporate Tax Law unconstitutional in 1909.

Another important amendment that was put through this year is the 17th amendment. This provided for the direct election by the people of two Senators from each state as oppose to the original system of having state legislatures elect United States Senators. More democratic, you would think, until you realize these bankers could now provide the funds for their hand picked people to run for the Senate, and thus avoid future problems like getting the Federal Reserve through the Senate.

Anyway, back to the Federal Reserve, if you are in any doubt as to whether the Federal Reserve is a private company, a basic check the public can carry out is in their phone book. Look under the government pages and it is not listed, but you will find it listed within the business pages.

Actually some recent evidence has come forward as to who really owns the Federal Reserve, and they are the following banks:
  • Rothschild Bank of London
  • Warburg Bank of Hamburg
  • Rothschild Bank of Berlin
  • Lehman Brothers of New York
  • Lazard Brothers of Paris
  • Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
  • Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
  • Goldman, Sachs of New York
  • Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
  • Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Also some argue that the Federal Reserve is a quasi-governmental agency, yet the President appoints only 2 of the 7 members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, every four years, and he appoints them to 14 year terms, which is far longer than any term he could possibly serve as President.

The Senate confirms these appointments, but as we have seen, that is the idea, because these are the very people hand picked by the bankers who also finance their campaigns, ensuring loyalty to them, not the people.

Let's summarize how the Federal Reserve creates money out of nothing. It is a four step process: The Federal Open Market Committee approves the purchase of United States Bonds*.

FBI 1913 (FBI created in July 1908)
Not able to figure out the "FBI 1913" coincidence. Thoughts?
 
Last edited:

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member
Seems to me that tipping point is when 3 influencers speak out on an issue. We now have Kanye, Kylie, and Chappelle taking a stand on it. Let's see if the dam breaks now.
This is actually brilliant. His low key statements of fact couched in comedy are nevertheless...statements of fact. In essence Chappelle's playing their game as well as they do and the same way...sneakily
 

Parmesan

Kingfisher
Other Christian
This is actually brilliant. His low key statements of fact couched in comedy are nevertheless...statements of fact. In essence Chappelle's playing their game as well as they do and the same way...sneakily
Chappelle is not our guy. He’s another JK Rawling. A lefty that got cancelled, that will still vote for and support the same people cancelling him. He is on board with BLM, and always supports black victimhood narratives. If anything, he defended Jews in this monologue. Even if he is Jew-pilled, it’s only because he wants blacks at the top of the victim grift.
 

Iacobus

Sparrow
Orthodox
Chappelle is not our guy. He’s another JK Rawling. A lefty that got cancelled, that will still vote for and support the same people cancelling him. He is on board with BLM, and always supports black victimhood narratives. If anything, he defended Jews in this monologue. Even if he is Jew-pilled, it’s only because he wants blacks at the top of the victim grift.

I noticed on the Reddit thread discussing the Chapelle monologue that the narrative is being spun in the direction of "Well duh Jews control Hollywood but that's normal because they're good businessmen and besides they're funding all this diversity which we love so it's actually a Good Thing"

I'm wondering a bit if Chapelle threw out the Trump & Ukraine bluepills to soften him lowkey agreeing with Ye on the Jews, seemed extremely lowhanging fruit & (political disagreement aside) not nearly as clever as his bits on the Jews.
 
Top