Oliver Stone is a rare hero today and one of the few not afraid to speak important truths that no one else will touch. But he is 1/2 Jewish ethnically. Hence the name, Stone. Notice he talks about having special connections to Netanyahu before he was the leader of Israel. He's not going to be perfect. I didn't sense that he was nervous talking about (them). I actually found it very revealing that he said their surveillance and spying is very advanced and you have to be very careful when fighting them. I think that was both a warning to us, and perhaps an example of Stone being careful himself.Oliver Stone was on the JRE podcast. In one segment, they talked about Edward Snowden, PLO, and ((())). Note how he looks nervous when talking about how ((())) are good at surveillance and recon.
In another segment, they talked about Jeffrey Epstein. Stone looked rather uncomfortable or not really interested in talking about the Epstein case. I sensed that anything that's tied to ((())), he gets nervous so he talked about something else.
The Epstein case, I'm just speculating but Stone is a very prominent filmmaker and probably knows a whole bunch of sick weirdos. Whatever the truth is about the Epstein case, the public info that he procured teenage girls for sex with powerful men, THAT part alone is very mild in comparison to what really goes on with powerful people, and particularly in Hollywood. Stone probably knows dozens of stories worse than 18 year old girls willingly taking trips with rich old men (they certainly look very willing and happy in the photos). Compare that to the rumored stories of forced gay sex that goes on with actors, or gay prostitution, or satanism, or a bunch of darker stuff, and Epstein doesn't seem that shocking.
My feeling is that Stone either isn't interested in this story, finds it kind of gross and weird and prefers to stay away from sexual stuff, or just knows so much worse from personal friends of his that he can't bother to look into it. But everyone seems to agree Epstein didn't kill himself. I can relate, as I purposefully have never read a single Epstein thread here. It's perverse and not healthy to focus on it. And I just find the whole story weird and bizarre, and there is something very odd in that the government and media are taking the side that Epstein was a bad guy who needed prosecuting. Well, compared to the homosexual underage prostitution ring that serviced people in the Bush White House, it is small potatoes. It makes me suspicious of the whole thing.
The Washington Times, June 29, 1989 (Front page story): Homosexual prositution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush
The June 29, 1989 issue of The Washington Times newspaper seen below was gathered up and collected from news stands and newspaper vendors in Washington D.C. within an hour of the paper hitting the street. I suspect that the White House, working through the Secret Service, played a leading roll...