This is amazing. This guy nails Peterson!
Jordan B. Peterson on the archetypal symbology behind the restaurant Burger King
The guy occupied the Timothy Leary chair at the Harvard psychology dept. Leary was a CIA-sponsored academic/pop cult figure who built a large following among young men in the 60s, aimed at dumbing down leftists and turning them into atomized individuals, steering them away from their Christian conservative roots with a program of fake self-enlightenment.
JP also is an academic/pop cult figure who built a large following among young men, and like Leary he received a lot of help from the establishment in building up his massive following. His message is aimed at right-leaning young men, and like Leary's it also leads them to become atomized indiviuals, as it is a message of generic self-help that de-emphasizes family, faith and nation, just as Leary's 1960s programming did.
I told you, repeatedly, that Jordan Peterson was steeped in the occult and was a servant of evil. I warned you, repeatedly, that he never was, and he never will be, on the side of the Good, the Beautiful, and the True. I pointed out, repeatedly, that excessively charitable Christians have been saying that Peterson has “been moving toward Christianity” for four years without ever getting anywhere that even remotely resembles the genuine faith.
A recent podcast discussion between Dr. Jordan Peterson and ‘married’ homosexual Dave Rubin titled “Gay Parenting: Promise and Pitfalls” further demonstrates that homosexuality and homosexual marriage have conquered nearly all conservative elites.
Just seven years and one week since the U.S. released its decision in the Obergefell same-sex ‘marriage’ case, the impulse among high profile conservative thinkers and opinionators is not to preserve the immutable definition of marriage, but to justify mutilating it to include two men or two women as “married.”
“This is a political issue. We’re trying to sketch out a pathway … I mean, our culture appears to have decided that gay marriage has become part of the structure of marriage itself,” Peterson stated at the outset of the hour and a half discussion, waving an enormous white flag of surrender. .. Peterson casually tossed the definition of marriage into the dustbin of history, claiming that “Marriage is the union of two people,” not the union of a man and a woman. He nonchalantly trashed civilization’s understanding of nature and biology and the understanding of every society and religion around the world for thousands of years.
Jordan Peterson failed as both a gatekeeper and an intellectual before his descent into depression and drug addiction. His second coming is as a neoconservative figurehead, featuring a shiny new leash held by Ben Shapiro’s master. Now he will bark and perform conservative tricks on command. This recent discussion is a useful reminder of two things: a) the total uselessness of “high profile conservative thinkers” and b) the fact that the devil cares nothing for those who serve him and is particularly cruel to those who fail him.
Those who fall from the devil’s high horse seldom fare well.
Jordan Peterson's teachings are based on Carl Jung which he freely admits. JPs "Bible" series was a Jungian interpretation of the Bible, and "Christians" lapped it up. But Carl Jung has always admitted that his primary fascination is with the occult. This is obvious information that people could have found years ago.
I feel that Carolus' post quoted above is a perfect summary of what we are seeing here. Where we have ended up.It's not a mistake. All this means is that the 'right' in the USA becomes more packed every day with 'disillusioned' liberals who are against the aggressive LGBTP agenda or perpetual lockdowns. None of these people are remotely conservative, let alone right wing. They then dominate the discourse in the conservative movement, police everyone's opinions, take over leadership positions, and then trash it — like all liberals do with everything they touch.
And we end up where we are now: normal people are stuck choosing between two liberal parties but one is gay and the other isn't. In five years when the left is even more gay and more 'disillusioned' liberals move to our side, it'll be a choice between two gay liberal parties, but one is extra gay.
It's a win-win for the left.
Unless republicans stop embracing with open arms every 'disillusioned' liberal and every minority who can parrot 'meh free marketz' talking points, this strategy is a guaranteed win for the left. And they won't, so it's somewhat of a moot point.
Look at the thread we're in: JBP is an NPC drone who supports nearly every tenant of the GAE from WW2 propaganda to the satanic monstrosity that is psychiatry. But he's against the aggressive trans agenda, so some people think he's somehow an ally or useful to our side in someway.
Lol I do not think he believes in "common sense". Well, I'm not so sure about the term common sense in the first place, because many people use it to describe widely different senses. But Dave Rubin strikes me as someone who primarily believes in Jewish things, and I have never heard him talk about anything that wasn't somehow in the Jewish tribal interest.Rubin's a homosexual (damaged) who happens to believe in logic and common sense on most social and policy issues.
The problem is "labels", such as conservative , altogether. The labels are the fake front
It really is a rollercoaster following this man's words. Though to be honest. I think this is more consistent with his REAL positions than the Dave Rubin thing. I had the feeling that he was extremely uncomfortable during the whole gay adoption thing, but I think he has sold his soul to his agents and is contractually bound to be nice to fellow clients.People are freaking out with Jordan Peterson's rant about the Ukraine war.
I watched parts of it and he basically says that Russia is disgusted by the degenerate West and that westerners have lost their moral high ground with the progressive non sense.
"The culture war is now truly part of why we have a war"
“Is it serious enough to increase the probability that Russia, say, will be motivated to invade and potentially incapacitate Ukraine merely to keep the pathological West out of that country, which is a key part of the historically Russian sphere of influence?” Peterson continued.
“To answer that question I’ll turn to the analysis of a recent sequence of significant events in the US with broader ramifications for the development of political thought in the West.”
"It is certainly the case that we do not therefore have all the moral high ground... In fact, how much of it we have at all is something rightly subject to the most serious debate."
It really is a rollercoaster following this man's words. Though to be honest. I think this is more consistent with his REAL positions than the Dave Rubin thing. I had the feeling that he was extremely uncomfortable during the whole gay adoption thing, but I think he has sold his soul to his agents and is contractually bound to be nice to fellow clients.
Maybe he's trying to get them to let him go?
Lol I do not think he believes in "common sense". Well, I'm not so sure about the term common sense in the first place, because many people use it to describe widely different senses. But Dave Rubin strikes me as someone who primarily believes in Jewish things, and I have never heard him talk about anything that wasn't somehow in the Jewish tribal interest.
I think this Afro-Latino Gentleman brings it to a good point:
Part 1. I have totally gone off Peterson - to me, he is such obvious controlled opposition .. flailing around for his Globalist masters.Maybe I'm naive but I don't believe he's the mouthpiece for the NWO (at least not intentionally), I think he's just trying to figure things out.