Gilad Atzmon, an Israeli saxophonist, argued that the Jews like to dominate both sides of the political divide so they can control the Overton window.
Here you have it, Jordan Peterson, preaching to Muslims about why Jews are good and Israel is wonderful. JP now works for a Jew (he probably always has).
The only reason the Jews are against 'cancel culture' and 'woke-ness' is because they're worried that the Left will find out that they're a privileged ethnic group.
And then the Left will turn against the Jews.
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves" Lenin.
I don't know how people can't see this (but I accept we all see things differently).
Peterson goes out of his way to condemn any form of ethnic pride or solidarity amongst his young white male followers.
He has constructed an entire intellectual rubric wherein any appeal about White gennocide is dismissed immediately as " Well, if you're going to go down the route of identifying as a White person you've got to think about the consequences because you're going to end up in the dead end that the Tyrannical left invented for you, man. That's .. that's like Identity Politics right there, man. And thats a pretty sad place to be.. "
^Almost perfectly in line withJewish intellectual Noel Ignatiev's war on "Whiteness". < This I believe was his intended genuine role and the inner-most plan all along.
Neither Peterson nor his handlers are stupid.
Look at the damage the Flower Power generation of Timothy Leary did. And here is Peterson inheriting the Timothy Leary chair at Harvard. No accident there.
I found this conversation in an old 2018 thread of the forum. The subject being discussed was that Blondes are a recessive gene and would they eventually die out?
A lot of people arguing it down and complaining about "so-called Western Beauty Standards" and how "White people aren't all that" which was a common refrain amongst non-white PUAs in previous iterations of the forum.
This exchange made me smile:
"Will the genes disappear? That's a very real possibility,
Does it matter? To me it does. I value diversity on this planet very much. I get just as upset over the thought of the Aboriginal's dying out as a separate and unique race of people as I do over the recessive genes of blue eyes, blonde and red hair dying out.
The end goal of "diversity" is actually absolute and unconditional homogeneity.
And quite frankly, that's sad."
The reply was:
"No one is killing off blondes and blue eyed people and redheads. Aboriginals also seem to be safe from that,
in recent history, anyhow.
You're spending too much time on the internet if you think someone's killing off blondes."
To which the response was:
"They're doing it through policies that are well documented on this forum. These factors put the blonde genes at risk for extinction.
The full blooded (not mixed) Aboriginals are around 500,000, if I'm not mistaken. Maybe even less. And yet Australia encourages the Aboriginal's to breed with the whites and Asians, both of which have dominant genes compared to the Aboriginals. It's become very hard for the Aboriginal's to maintain their traditional way of life, so they migrate to the cities where interracial marriages become more common.
So again, no people are not rounding up the Aboriginals and shooting them execution style, but its being done through policies that are well documented on this forum. These factors put Aboriginals one natural disaster away from extinction.
I just provided you a statistic on blue eyes in America... But after I showed you that statistic, you're response to me is get off the internet?
You're right Spaniard, I better ignore the statistics on what's happened to America in only 100 years in regards to a recessive gene and not apply that same logic to European places in which blondes originate from.
I'll get off the internet right now.
In fact, I'll go clean my room."
www.dailywire.com
