The June 26 and June 27, 2019 Democratic Debates Thread

[The Black Knight]

I missed the middle parts but Tulsi isn't in-line with the modern democrat party. She has been blacklisted by the media and her own party. She is seen as a flip-flopper (on the gay issue especially) by many democrats. She is damaged goods in the eyes of many DEMs.

In a just world, Tulsi would be a top 3 contender. In clown world 2019 Dem party, she is resented for not being completely pure to all the absurdity.

Tulsi is aiming for SoS, Hawaii governor/senator, or VP.

We need a new party in this country.

 

[The Black Knight]

Good lord, Beto is such a try hard faggot.

 

[CynicalContrarian]

Heh.

@JackPosobiec
1m

Tulsi should have pointed out that all the other people on the stage would risk LGBT troops’ lives overseas in pointless, unending wars

 

[LeeEnfield303]

He's pathetic. Even in this clown party.

 

[budoslavic]

Edit.


What a Clown World we are living in!

 

[eradicator]

Hey, did Gabbard serve in the Army? I haven't heard about that yet.

She served in the national guard and worked as a field medic in 2004 Iraq war.

She allegedly wants to bring home the troops from the mideast, therefore, cnn says 'orange woman bad.'

 

[LeeEnfield303]

Hey, did Gabbard serve in the Army? I haven't heard about that yet.

She served in the national guard and worked as a field medic in 2004 Iraq war.

She allegedly wants to bring home the troops from the mideast, therefore, cnn says 'orange woman bad.'

I'm sorry, that was a /sarc comment. She talked about her Army service at least 4/5ths of her total time on air.


We. Got. It.

You. Were. In. The.Fucking. Army.

 

[The Black Knight]

Hey, did Gabbard serve in the Army? I haven't heard about that yet.

She served in the national guard and worked as a field medic in 2004 Iraq war.

She allegedly wants to bring home the troops from the mideast, therefore, cnn says 'orange woman bad.'

I'm sorry, that was a /sarc comment. She talked about her Army service at least 4/5ths of her total time on air.


We. Got. It.

You. Were. In. The.Fucking. Army.

She needs to remind the dumb ass democrats dude. I think she is the only veteran democrat running aside from Buttgig and about the only democrat basically making any sense on foreign affairs.

She needs to remind guys like that Tim Ryan dumbass who spent 12 YEARS on the Armed Forces committee yet doesn't know frack all about the Taliban, 9/11, al qaeda, etc BUT STILL wants to continue warmongering in the Middle East nonetheless.

This is truly scary. Trump is bought off by the jews and the neo-cons damn near and the democrats are largely pro-war and ignorant about the basic facts. Ron Paul is right:

 

[LeeEnfield303]

Bud, being in the Army don't mean shit.


Plenty of fucktard vets.

If you think just being a vet makes you a savant, I got lots of counterfactuals.

Jimmy GD Carter.

David French.

etc.


Don't be dumb here.

 

[Knight of Malta]

Tulsi Gabbard is the most searched candidate on Google since the debates.

But her closing statement about a "New American Century" sounded odd to me. Sounded bizarre and out of place considering her other stances on foreign policy.

 

[MusicForThePiano]

Part of me thinks this is all kabuki theater on accident, another part of me thinks its kabuki theater on purpose.

 

[911]

Nah, it's more like the Kirov Ballet, because RUSSIA!

Elizabeth Warren is in the lead in Oklahoma, her Cherokee brethren must have approved of her performance.



Tulsi did do well, the Dilbert boomer cuck Adams is full of shit:

===================================
Drudge poll shock: Tulsi Gabbard runaway winner of first Democratic debate
by Ellie Bufkin
| June 26, 2019 10:30 PM
| Updated Jun 26, 2019, 11:13 PM

Sign up for News from Washington Examiner

The Drudge Report political website posted a surprising instant poll showing that its visitors believed Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii was the overwhelming victor of the first Democratic presidential debate, polling at almost 35% with 12,314 votes.

Her closest competitor was Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who was polling at just under 13.5% and 4,791 votes. Julián Castro of Texas and Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey were polling the lowest with less than 5% each.

https://mediadc.brightspotcdn.com/d...12d/screen-shot-2019-06-26-at-11.10.51 PM.png

 

[Belgrano]

Tulsi Gabbard is the most searched candidate on Google since the debates.

Red ones: "Is Cory Booker Black"

Blue one: "Is Elizabeth Warren Native American"

 

[Cumlluminates]

Just as we expected...

 

[EndsExpect]

"Yes we are supposed to break up big companies when they aren't serving our democracy" Mayor de Blasio
Slippery slope homie

Biggest greediest company in the nation that is failing our democracy is the Democratic Party. Let's start by breaking that fucker up!

 

[3stripedlakeshadow]

The rhetorical question I asked, as I watched these debates: what is the Democratic Party offering 'white' working-class people?

Answer: nothing but a lifetime of endless shaming, hatred and redistributing of them and their wealth.

A few quick points -

1. Pandering to the Hispanic vote by speaking Spanish and talking more about illegal immigrants; how to make the lives of illegal immigrants better, this is owning going to enrage the working-class 'whites' who voted for Trump

2. It's a shame Warren has to be the only one talking about the disgusting corporatism in America. I don't agree with any of these candidates, nor would I vote for any of them but its depressing to not see Trump have the same type of zeal and righteous rage against these corporatists.

Anyhow, it's the same bullshit game over and over again.

 

[El Chinito loco]

1. Pandering to the Hispanic vote by speaking Spanish and talking more about illegal immigrants; how to make the lives of illegal immigrants better, this is owning going to enrage the working-class 'whites' who voted for Trump

I predict a giant rift forming in the future between blacks and hispanics as the Democratic party and their overlords start switching to be more latino pandering. This won't be a gentle rift either it will most likely devolve into a hot war when it comes to social and political lines. We've already seen real life experiments where blacks and latinos can't share political or social space in a community. When it comes to national lines it will get real nasty at one point.

Right now the Democratic party gives all sorts of concessions to black political leaders but when that changes...oh boy it's going to get ugly.

 

[It_is_my_time]

1. Pandering to the Hispanic vote by speaking Spanish and talking more about illegal immigrants; how to make the lives of illegal immigrants better, this is owning going to enrage the working-class 'whites' who voted for Trump

I predict a giant rift forming in the future between blacks and hispanics as the Democratic party and their overlords start switching to be more latino pandering. This won't be a gentle rift either it will most likely devolve into a hot war when it comes to social and political lines. We've already seen real life experiments where blacks and latinos can't share political or social space in a community. When it comes to national lines it will get real nasty at one point.

Right now the Democratic party gives all sorts of concessions to black political leaders but when that changes...oh boy it's going to get ugly.

Listening to early 1990's west coast rap music you hear about Compton, the LBC, Crewshaw Blvd., etc.

From what I understand the Hispanics are taking these areas over and basically running the African American community out.

 

[It_is_my_time]

 

[El Chinito loco]

1. Pandering to the Hispanic vote by speaking Spanish and talking more about illegal immigrants; how to make the lives of illegal immigrants better, this is owning going to enrage the working-class 'whites' who voted for Trump

I predict a giant rift forming in the future between blacks and hispanics as the Democratic party and their overlords start switching to be more latino pandering. This won't be a gentle rift either it will most likely devolve into a hot war when it comes to social and political lines. We've already seen real life experiments where blacks and latinos can't share political or social space in a community. When it comes to national lines it will get real nasty at one point.

Right now the Democratic party gives all sorts of concessions to black political leaders but when that changes...oh boy it's going to get ugly.

Listening to early 1990's west coast rap music you hear about Compton, the LBC, Crewshaw Blvd., etc.

From what I understand the Hispanics are taking these areas over and basically running the African American community out.

Yes. I grew up in one of these areas (high school) and later my parents moved to an adjacent enclave away from the savagery. I wrote about it a bit in old posts. Southern CA was a social experiment in all of this and it failed spectacularly.

This is why you don't see many west coast black communities in the news anymore. They lost a great deal of their social and political power. They more or less got ethnically cleansed out of many parts of socal and many moved back to the south.

To some degree you have friction between lower income latino and asian communities to but the reason why it's not as big is because asians tend to move into wealthier enclaves and price out latinos. This will also likely change in the future as city councils become more pozzed and socialist while demanding more in the form of taxation and tribute from more upwardly mobile minority groups.