Sweden: Faggot “Priest” from the “Church” of Sweden Refuses to Marry Heterosexual Couples - Daily Stormer
This is him. No, I'm serious, this is an actual guy who calls himself a
The LGBT Thread / Agenda
- Thread starter Double Salad
- Start date
Spain: Judge Starts Investigating Faggot Who Lied About Getting Attacked - Daily Stormer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axm7L_2sFgU The protests are still continuing, even after the hoax w
Even their last acts in this life are a cry for attention
MusicForThePiano
Pelican
Where's a holy inquisitor when you need one?
I'm on LinkedIn a lot for my job. Here you can see how homosexualism's authoritarian/militant intentions unfold. Even though the unelected and arbitrarily assigned "pride" month has been over for many weeks there are still a disturbing amount of companies that have chosen to retain the homo-emoji on their corporate symbols. State Street Global comes to mind. A company's logo is meaningful. It distinguishes itself from other companies' competitors or non-competitors and is key to brand awareness. Its important.
What I realized is all these companies still keeping their virtue signaling going are taking their once unique logo and making it un-unique. So, it defeats the entire purpose. But what's really going on here? This is where homosexualism leads too. They want power, period. And, sadly, they're drunk with it right now. They have BODs eating out of their hand and its disturbing. But, it makes me wonder. Is everything going to be a "pride" flag going forward?
This should be a question and not rhetorical, but, I'm not sure what it is at present. Obviously, homosexuals want everything to be under their flag and their flag only. I've noticed this with the more fringe church denominations. The ones that fly their homo paraphernalia with zeal. I realized those "churches" are occupied territory and that flag is a flag of occupation. They do not worship God or Jesus here, rather, its quite obvious they worship homosexuals. Could it really be that pathetic? Note: how the homo's regard non-homo's that support them as "allies". You need allies for war, i.e. the militancy at work here. I mean all this fuss all this incessant campaigning, all the money, all the NGOs...all so a small group of people can, through hook or crook, make people worship them?
Answer: yes.
It also reminds me of real and fictitious totalitarian regimes. They plant their flag everywhere and at their height its nearly ubiquitous. Such a phenomenon seems to be unfolding here.
With all that said, they have over-played their hand, big time. That seems so colloquial when you say and it sort of reduces the severity of the situation they're making for themselves. After all, is everything from your company to your car to your frig going to sport the same exact symbol, a political one at that? Soon these people are going to be corrected. I believe that. They'll be among all the other militant groups too, such as, feminists and radical blacks etc.
My conviction comes from this undeniable fact - the left is authoritarian. They are tyranny. This is exactly what they so tirelessly said they were against. This tyranny, will not last and I think it will falter soon. When it does, the groups closest to it will suffer the most and that will be homosexuals.
For the moment, the most powerful person in corporate America is the chief diversity officer (not the CEO or the BOD). This dynamic alone is unsustainable for the agenda, which is substantial, for a diversity officer conflicts fundamentally with the CEO et al (even if they're woke). But then again, companies are literally on record saying they hate their customers.
What I realized is all these companies still keeping their virtue signaling going are taking their once unique logo and making it un-unique. So, it defeats the entire purpose. But what's really going on here? This is where homosexualism leads too. They want power, period. And, sadly, they're drunk with it right now. They have BODs eating out of their hand and its disturbing. But, it makes me wonder. Is everything going to be a "pride" flag going forward?
This should be a question and not rhetorical, but, I'm not sure what it is at present. Obviously, homosexuals want everything to be under their flag and their flag only. I've noticed this with the more fringe church denominations. The ones that fly their homo paraphernalia with zeal. I realized those "churches" are occupied territory and that flag is a flag of occupation. They do not worship God or Jesus here, rather, its quite obvious they worship homosexuals. Could it really be that pathetic? Note: how the homo's regard non-homo's that support them as "allies". You need allies for war, i.e. the militancy at work here. I mean all this fuss all this incessant campaigning, all the money, all the NGOs...all so a small group of people can, through hook or crook, make people worship them?
Answer: yes.
It also reminds me of real and fictitious totalitarian regimes. They plant their flag everywhere and at their height its nearly ubiquitous. Such a phenomenon seems to be unfolding here.
With all that said, they have over-played their hand, big time. That seems so colloquial when you say and it sort of reduces the severity of the situation they're making for themselves. After all, is everything from your company to your car to your frig going to sport the same exact symbol, a political one at that? Soon these people are going to be corrected. I believe that. They'll be among all the other militant groups too, such as, feminists and radical blacks etc.
My conviction comes from this undeniable fact - the left is authoritarian. They are tyranny. This is exactly what they so tirelessly said they were against. This tyranny, will not last and I think it will falter soon. When it does, the groups closest to it will suffer the most and that will be homosexuals.
For the moment, the most powerful person in corporate America is the chief diversity officer (not the CEO or the BOD). This dynamic alone is unsustainable for the agenda, which is substantial, for a diversity officer conflicts fundamentally with the CEO et al (even if they're woke). But then again, companies are literally on record saying they hate their customers.
The wife wanted to watch Cruella because movies made for kids are generally the only ones she finds entertaining. Made it maybe 5 minutes before it gets shut off. I thought a post would be appropriate.
I’m one of those guys who likes to read the full plot details of a movie before I decide to watch it, but especially because this is Disney, I want to read up on everything first because I assume it’s going to be some subversive garbage. I was not disappointed.
I was browsing the cast and one actor in particular looked quite suspect. When I clicked on the character’s name (“Artie”), I discovered that there was supposed to be some ground-breaking gayness in the film. When I read the headline of one of the top articles associated with the character, I mistakenly thought it may actually have been critical of Disney shoving sodomy down the throats of their intended audience (children). Naturally, I was wrong, as I was unfamiliar with the term “queerbaiting.” While the author was certainly critical of Disney, it was actually because the movie wasn’t gay enough.
www.google.com
I’m one of those guys who likes to read the full plot details of a movie before I decide to watch it, but especially because this is Disney, I want to read up on everything first because I assume it’s going to be some subversive garbage. I was not disappointed.
I was browsing the cast and one actor in particular looked quite suspect. When I clicked on the character’s name (“Artie”), I discovered that there was supposed to be some ground-breaking gayness in the film. When I read the headline of one of the top articles associated with the character, I mistakenly thought it may actually have been critical of Disney shoving sodomy down the throats of their intended audience (children). Naturally, I was wrong, as I was unfamiliar with the term “queerbaiting.” While the author was certainly critical of Disney, it was actually because the movie wasn’t gay enough.
Cruella: Another Example of Disney's Queerbaiting Problem
Cruella repeats Disney's queerbaiting problem.
Last edited:
Anyone familiar with David Lynn? He's a street preacher. In the past he would've triggered people to an extent that was quite epic in a sense, but a bit overly aggressive one could say. Now he's calmed down and it's interesting to see him having conversations with for example LGBT people in this case.
Be careful which church you attend:
I think this is a reaction to the slavish acceptance that our reprobate friends have been getting recently. A lot of them want to be disgusting, subversive and to offend us breeders: they get off on it.
Now that they have been shown in a positive light so much, at least a sizeable portion of them are looking for a new way to be considered monstrous by normal people. The babadook is ideal: it attacks a single mother and her a son in a fatherless home. The more you deny it, the stronger it becomes. It wants the mother to give her son to it. At the end of the story, the babadook is more or less tamed and becomes a sort of family pet in the basement, where it eats
And there is black goo in the film, how original
What's wrong with your son being happy oooooooh that's not what that means anymore, quick, someone tell the Indians
Lazuli Waves
Woodpecker
Fire and brimstone: Sodom and Gomorrah perhaps destroyed by 'cosmic fireball,' evidence shows
In the Bible, God was said to have been enraged by the wickedness of the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, raining "fire and brimstone" upon them.
www.studyfinds.org
Lazuli Waves
Woodpecker
BBC NEWS | Health | Plastic chemicals 'feminise boys'
This isn't the sole cause of transgenderism since people got confused about their gender plastic, but I think it's influencing the problem. It's probably more influencing heterosexual "soy boy" mindset and behavior because transgenderism (despite how much you see it in the media) is still really rare compared to how much plastic there is. But the "soy boy" thing seems really common. Of course other factors like feminism and men being raised by single mothers are huge.
Last edited:
I find it so sad to see that people who have souls that are made in the image of the incomprehensible God, with all the depth and beauty that this indicates, decide to make sexuality the entire core of their identity.
The flamboyance of it is a signifier of its emptiness. It's a terrible shame that countless people are caught up in it because it's the trendy thing to do.
It must be hard to live such a superficial existence. No wonder these people are often touting their mental illness too. Its tragic and sad that young impressionable people are caught in this devastating trend.
The flamboyance of it is a signifier of its emptiness. It's a terrible shame that countless people are caught up in it because it's the trendy thing to do.
It must be hard to live such a superficial existence. No wonder these people are often touting their mental illness too. Its tragic and sad that young impressionable people are caught in this devastating trend.
Deranged man in a dress is proud to be sworn in as first tranny and first female four star admiral of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. (Never mind how many people killed in PA nursing homes after moving his mother out, then moving in covid patients.)
What is the blue book he is swearing upon?
They use word "openly" because there could be thousands of trannies who are passing.
What is the blue book he is swearing upon?
They use word "openly" because there could be thousands of trannies who are passing.
Attachments
Last edited:
