The LGBT Thread / Agenda

Romans 1:31 KJV
Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:


They always claimed they just wanted privacy between adults in their bedrooms, but it was never about that. The word implacable means as soon as they get something, they will demand more, and that's exactly what they're doing. They are also clearly unmerciful in handing out severe punishments. If they had it their way, Christianity would be outlawed like in the soviet union.
The surrounding verses make it even clearer:

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
 
These people can see exactly where it's leading to.

Modern Western caucasian females overwhelmingly support, protect and nurture these sodomites, because these females see themselves as part of "the oppressed" alongside gays, and blacks. So if you attack LGBT or BLM you're attacking females (by their "logic"). The whole "Christianity has suppressed gays and women!"

This is, in my opinion, why these progressive/liberal/jewish policies have such a grapple hold on the west - they're feminine in nature and inextricably linked to female liberation and sexual liberation.

The fact that we allow women to roleplay as policemen, firemen and soldiers, vote on how society should be run, mutilate themselves with plastic surgery, and scoff birth control like its candy are all violations of nature that ultimately allow the proliferation of homosexuality.

This is why Arab/Muslim countries have such an easy time banning LGBT - because there is no female liberation to use as a conduit for this filth in their culture.

This is an aspect of our society that I wish more people understood, or had the willingness to point out if they are in fact aware of it.

Women, and especially college educated white women, are the vector that allows the ideology of wokeness to spread. Women, via feminism, essentially laid the ground work for a culture and legal system that incentivizes people to portray themselves as victims in order to accrue benefits. Weaponized victimhood is a fundamental part of female nature and if you look at the president day West it permeates nearly every aspect of our feminized culture.

Go look through the clown world or LGBT threads and you'll start to notice which gender is grossly overrepresented when it comes to supporting the most extreme aspects of Woke culture. It isn't the fathers who are most likely to virtue signal about transitioning their kids and pumping them full of hormones to change their gender.

Specifically, a study of adolescent and young adult transgenders found that the adults in the home who identify as “parents” were 91.4% white; 70.9% had a bachelor's degree or higher and 85.9% favored gay marriage. Parent respondents were 91.7% female.

This is a weirdly specific profile.

It's probably not going to be Dad who takes their kids to Pride parades or Drag Queen Story hour:


Go look in the business world and see who is over-represented in HR and who your DEI officer is- women. Look at who spearheaded the woke Bud Light tranny ad campaign- a woman, and the feminist Miller Light ad campaign- another woman. When Heckler & Koch started ranting on the company's official Twitter page about marketing departments using women in bikinis to sell guns, who was authoring those tweets? It was once again a woman:



The same holds true for academia, where women are now the majority of the student body. Look at their attitudes regarding free speech and open debate when it collides with women's feelings.


Women make up 47% of full-time faculty members, up from 32% in the fall of 1991, according to a 2020 analysis by the American Association of University Professors. According to the FIRE survey , female faculty are more comfortable with students shouting down a speaker, with 49% responding it was "never acceptable" compared to 61% of male faculty. And while 19% of female faculty preferred to protect against hate speech even if it restricts speech not intended to be hateful, only 8% of male faculty favored this.

When it comes to DEI trainings, female faculty were more supportive of them. A majority (53%) of male faculty responded that the administration should take no action when asked about professors who refused DEI training, compared to 33% of female faculty.

When you let women into an institution they'll influence the culture and norms of that institution:


- In a 2019 study, 59% of women said protecting free speech was less important than promoting an inclusive society, while 71% of men felt opposite.

- Two recent studies of online adults revealed that women were more censorious than men.

I could keep going on and on with examples from the military, government, etc. but this forum is already filled with plenty of examples of the woke nonsense that women promulgate and support.

Feminists have long speculated on what it would look like if women ran the world. Well, take a look around at modern society and you'll get an idea of what that would look like - it looks like Clown World, an irrational society intent on destroying itself in the name of liberation from any sort of individual constraints.
 
This is an aspect of our society that I wish more people understood, or had the willingness to point out if they are in fact aware of it.

Women, and especially college educated white women, are the vector that allows the ideology of wokeness to spread. Women, via feminism, essentially laid the ground work for a culture and legal system that incentivizes people to portray themselves as victims in order to accrue benefits. Weaponized victimhood is a fundamental part of female nature and if you look at the president day West it permeates nearly every aspect of our feminized culture.

Go look through the clown world or LGBT threads and you'll start to notice which gender is grossly overrepresented when it comes to supporting the most extreme aspects of Woke culture. It isn't the fathers who are most likely to virtue signal about transitioning their kids and pumping them full of hormones to change their gender.



It's probably not going to be Dad who takes their kids to Pride parades or Drag Queen Story hour:


Go look in the business world and see who is over-represented in HR and who your DEI officer is- women. Look at who spearheaded the woke Bud Light tranny ad campaign- a woman, and the feminist Miller Light ad campaign- another woman. When Heckler & Koch started ranting on the company's official Twitter page about marketing departments using women in bikinis to sell guns, who was authoring those tweets? It was once again a woman:



The same holds true for academia, where women are now the majority of the student body. Look at their attitudes regarding free speech and open debate when it collides with women's feelings.




When you let women into an institution they'll influence the culture and norms of that institution:




I could keep going on and on with examples from the military, government, etc. but this forum is already filled with plenty of examples of the woke nonsense that women promulgate and support.

Feminists have long speculated on what it would look like if women ran the world. Well, take a look around at modern society and you'll get an idea of what that would look like - it looks like Clown World, an irrational society intent on destroying itself in the name of liberation from any sort of individual constraints.

It´s even deeper than your analysis, though I presume that you already know that. Giving women the vote, which they are now forever the majority of voters until patriarchy is restored, led to the creation of the welfare state, as security is a woman´s prime directive (government security > male security), which has led to a perpetual decline in personal freedom, the mass scale derision of church-based culture, the diversity narrative, extinction yielding birth rates that fuel the open border hysteria, rampant promiscuity, single motherhood/breakdown of the family, degradation of men's rights, rampant inflation, mass scale dysgenics, etc. I never go for entirely singular causation, but if one wants to find the true root of the death of the West; it´s Feminism, and the associated weak men that let it happen. When a society "empowers" men it thrives, when a society "empowers" women it goes extinct.

Think of children, they'd vote for free candy and would conspire to make bedtime illegal, but would this benefit them? What kind of people would they grow up to be? This is effectively what women did to Western society.
 
Last edited:
This is an aspect of our society that I wish more people understood, or had the willingness to point out if they are in fact aware of it.

Women, and especially college educated white women, are the vector that allows the ideology of wokeness to spread. Women, via feminism, essentially laid the ground work for a culture and legal system that incentivizes people to portray themselves as victims in order to accrue benefits. Weaponized victimhood is a fundamental part of female nature and if you look at the president day West it permeates nearly every aspect of our feminized culture.

Go look through the clown world or LGBT threads and you'll start to notice which gender is grossly overrepresented when it comes to supporting the most extreme aspects of Woke culture. It isn't the fathers who are most likely to virtue signal about transitioning their kids and pumping them full of hormones to change their gender.



It's probably not going to be Dad who takes their kids to Pride parades or Drag Queen Story hour:


Go look in the business world and see who is over-represented in HR and who your DEI officer is- women. Look at who spearheaded the woke Bud Light tranny ad campaign- a woman, and the feminist Miller Light ad campaign- another woman. When Heckler & Koch started ranting on the company's official Twitter page about marketing departments using women in bikinis to sell guns, who was authoring those tweets? It was once again a woman:



The same holds true for academia, where women are now the majority of the student body. Look at their attitudes regarding free speech and open debate when it collides with women's feelings.




When you let women into an institution they'll influence the culture and norms of that institution:




I could keep going on and on with examples from the military, government, etc. but this forum is already filled with plenty of examples of the woke nonsense that women promulgate and support.

Feminists have long speculated on what it would look like if women ran the world. Well, take a look around at modern society and you'll get an idea of what that would look like - it looks like Clown World, an irrational society intent on destroying itself in the name of liberation from any sort of individual constraints.


Indeed, look at the world women have created. Its a hell on Earth. No, I'm not hyperbolic here, we're living through a period of evil akin to genocide with the deliberate systematic sexualization of kids i.e. mutilation, pornography in public schools, and outright pedophilia. All of this results from the "progressive" agenda, which is inextricably linked to feminism and, therefore, women. Elsewhere, our civilization is being ruined by unchecked immigration and we're about to lose the dollar reserve currency, which basically undergirds our aggregated economy and wealth. All of this is due directly to "liberals", or to be more concise - women.

Its complex, because, since men have been silenced politically in our society we have no choice but to rally around the women speaking out against this, such as, MTG. And MTG is great. But, we must look beyond the immediate situation and realize the compulsive "inclusion" of women into all things was ill advised, to say the least. And the damage it created must be accounted for.
 



Full text
The most disturbing thing that @PaulaYScanlan revealed is the psychological manipulation from the school that made the real girls on the team question their own common sense and judgment. They knew it was wrong to have a man on the team but the gaslighting campaign was extremely effective.
 
Oops teacher forgot the (((diversity training))) the trans stuff is only for the native kids. Muslim kids are protected as a minority. No trans stuff it is offensive to their religion and culture.

Expect teacher to lose their job and have reputation destroyed.
 
Among all of the oligarch agendas the gay stuff can really be kicked to the curb. The amount of homos in any society is so laughably small that it really is not even a thing. The 98% heterosexual part of society could walk over this agenda in a week.
 
Among all of the oligarch agendas the gay stuff can really be kicked to the curb. The amount of homos in any society is so laughably small that it really is not even a thing. The 98% heterosexual part of society could walk over this agenda in a week.
I wouldn't dismiss it so lightly. Among gen Z it's around 20% LGBTQ identification, and then there's a lot of supporters who are otherwise heterosexual. Sodom and Gomorrah is an example of where it became universal practice. There's no fundamental reason it couldn't end up like that here.
 
I wouldn't dismiss it so lightly. Among gen Z it's around 20% LGBTQ identification, and then there's a lot of supporters who are otherwise heterosexual. Sodom and Gomorrah is an example of where it became universal practice. There's no fundamental reason it couldn't end up like that here.
I bet that survey was done in some liberal inner city areas.

And of that 20%, most are going to be some form of bisexual, or have some kind of kink that they think adds them to the LGBTQHIVAIDS+ group. Most wont be full on fag or trans.
 
I bet that survey was done in some liberal inner city areas.

And of that 20%, most are going to be some form of bisexual, or have some kind of kink that they think adds them to the LGBTQHIVAIDS+ group. Most wont be full on fag or trans.
Apparently it was Gallup using telephone polling:

 


From that same feed, Mostly immigrant parents in Montgomery County, Md., face off against mostly white American-born woke women.



Even foreigners and immigrants can see that it's white women, specifically the AWFLs (Affluent White Female Liberals), who are buttressing the LGBTQ+ movement.

My theory is that "liberated" white women in this country are spending their 20s pursuing #girlboss careers and casual sex in lieu of having children and starting families the way they would have a couple of generations ago. However, their innate maternal instincts remain and can't be completely suppressed. In a healthy society that instinct would be directed into finding a stable husband and making babies. Instead, they are being redirected onto all sorts of social justice causes where these women can project the natural feminine instinct of empathy and Mama Bear protection for the vulnerable onto illegals, gays, BLM, etc.

When I look at open borders and the way it is portrayed in the media, I think of it as the "crazy cat lady" approach to immigration policy. The crazy cat lady will treat her cats as surrogate children, and attempt to house and rescue every stray she encounters, even until her home becomes a urine stained mess. She's driven by the sorrow she feels for each stray cat she encounters and the stereotype is generally of a spinster or woman who doesn't have actual children of her own.

Open borders is designed to appeal to this instinct - it's continually sold to the public using endless emotional appeals of how sad we should feel for the "migrants" pouring across our borders. There are of course all kinds of practical issues associated with a porous border (socio-economic, security, social cohesion), but for women I've noticed what really grabbed their attention was "kids in cages". They need to rescue them and so it goes that we end up with the crazy cat lady approach to border control:

D94JGEFW4AAsE70.jpg


I believe their support for the LGBTQ community stems from the same impulse- they see themselves as saviors, driven to protect these poor vulnerable misunderstood children who will commit suicide if we don't provide them with "gender affirming" therapy and read books to them validating their ideas about sexuality.

I think that women's natural empathy for the vulnerable is commendable, and it makes sense in the context of motherhood given how vulnerable an infant is. But without men's rationality directing this instinct towards sane ends, it is being repurposed by our society into a sort of pathological altruism towards whatever "out group" our media encourages women to feel sorry for.
 
I wouldn't dismiss it so lightly. Among gen Z it's around 20% LGBTQ identification, and then there's a lot of supporters who are otherwise heterosexual. Sodom and Gomorrah is an example of where it became universal practice. There's no fundamental reason it couldn't end up like that here.
It isn't just that.

It's a fairly central part of transhumanist ideology

The goal is to destroy gender and biological families entirely. They want a fully androgynous society where children are conceived via state-run surrogacy and raised by the state. Like livestock.

 
Childless, unmarried upper-middle class white women turned their back on the opportunity to raise children and parent them, so they are now redirecting those same biological impulses towards parenting society at large with their twisted beliefs.

By the way, contrast that video...all the immigrants - professionally or tidily-dressed men, women of generally attractive appearance or traditionally/conservatively-clad versus whatever obese degenerate freakshow that is across the street - all overweight, middle-aged plus WHITE WOMEN.

I would also wager the Muslims are either working class business owners or actual professionals of merit versus the clearly HR and other esoteric-heavy "employment" of the weirdos.
 

Women-only spa forced to allow trans customers with penises even though everyone is naked​

A Washington judge has ordered a women-only nude spa to accept transgender women who still have penises.

Seattle District Court Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein on Monday upheld a discrimination ruling against Olympus Spa filed by local trans activist Haven Wilvich, who gloats about being “more woman” than many feminists who’re “only incidental.”

The traditional Korean Spa had maintained that its “women-only rule … is essential for the safety, legal protection, and well-being of our customers.”

It willingly accepted transgender women — but “only if they have ‘gone through post-operative sex confirmation surgery,'” the ruling noted.

Wilvich, however, “‘identifies as a woman’ but ‘is biologically male and has not undergone sex reassignment surgery,’” the court papers said, noting that the activist never actually went to the spa.

Wilvich told The Post on Friday that the complaint came after a phone call to the spa — not a visit — and being told that “pre-op trans women were not allowed.”

“They were breaking Washington state law and I reported that violation,” the activist said.

On the company’s website, it notes that patrons are “required” to be nude “in the pool area” — but can wear a gown provided by the spa in other areas.

Wilvich first complained in February 2020, and the Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) later agreed that the Korean spa discriminated against Wilvich based on “sexual orientation.”

In her ruling, Rothstein noted how the WSHRC defines “sexual orientation” as including those whose “gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior, or expression is different from that traditionally associated with the sex assigned to that person at birth.”

NYPICHPDPICT000012404386.jpg

Judge (((Rothstein)))
 


NYPICHPDPICT000012180705.jpg
NYPICHPDPICT000012180848.jpg

Video captures historic church go up in flames, spire tumble after lightning strike​

Dramatic video captured flames destroying a historic Massachusetts church — including its iconic steeple as it came crashing down — after the house of worship was struck by lightning Friday.

The fiery footage shows fierce orange flames and thick black smoke consume the First Congregational Church in Spencer, Mass., about 50 miles outside of Boston, starting around 3 p.m.

Onlookers can be heard on the video screaming as the 1863 Protestant church’s spire tumbles, spewing more fire and smoke into the air.

The church was built in the 19th century, after fire previously destroyed the site’s former house of worship, which had been there since 1772, the Boston Globe reported.

Flames first burst out of the sides of the church’s steeple before quickly spreading throughout the structure.

No one was inside the church at the time, and there were no injuries, authorities said.

“As [firefighters] were advancing into the church itself, there was a fire in the attic and in the steeple itself,” Spencer Fire Chief Paul Normandin told WCVB.

Normandin said the steeple collapsed approximately 45 minutes after firefighters began battling the blaze.

The fire also knocked out cellphone signals in the area, since the steeple of the church acted as a cellphone tower, according to Normandin.

The Rev. Bruce MacLeod, the church’s interim pastor, said the building was constructed with wood and other older more-fire-prone materials, which could be why it burned to the ground so quickly.

He added that it’s too early to say whether the church, whose congregation is around 30 people, can be rebuilt.

“As is true in many New England communities, the Congregational Church was one of the first important buildings erected in the Town and served in both a religious and civic capacity,” Mary Baker-Wood, chair of the Spencer Historical Commission, told the Globe.

“The iconic white spire on the hill has been a beacon to generations who pass by it on Main Street.

“Many of Spencer’s most prominent families have belonged to the church, and most long-time residents have attended countless baptisms, weddings, funerals, and public events there,” Baker-Wood said.

Services were scheduled to be held at the church at 10 a.m. Sunday. Members of the congregation were invited to gather at the First Congregational Church of Leicester at the same time instead.

Other sources
 
Back
Top