The #MeToo thread

Number one bummer

Kingfisher
Gold Member
I still believe that Weinstein's lawyers should defend him from a standpoint that all this was just 'consensual solicitation.' Heck, I would spin it as female empowerment! These women used THEIR bodies to get paid via movie roles. Modern feminism has promoted this idea. Use their own sinful and morally bankrupt narratives against them.

In reality he will most likely still be convicted, which is probably for the best. If he gets off the left gets to restart the pound me too movement and believe all women trope. It would also reinforce the narrative that "101% of rapists don't go to jail" trope, which is becoming more prevalent than the 4 out of 5 fallacy.

Ideally he would have been charged with more appropriate crimes.
 

RWIsrael

Woodpecker
If he gets off (heh) it's either because white men patriarchy, or because the Jewish elite protect their own, or the judges were bought by Jews.

If he is convicted it's because of the feminist activist judges and media not caring about the truth , or the Jewish elite sacrificed their own to protect the real pedophiles. In any case it won't be enough for the leftists because so many rapists are still running free.

I think I covered all bases here...
 
Number one bummer said:
In reality he will most likely still be convicted, which is probably for the best.
This is a terrible idea. I get what you’re saying and why, but feeding the beast will help no one long-term, except fools who make money from false accusations (false accusers and their typist advocates in the media).

Waiting for witch hunts to fizzle out has done naught to help our society. The Duke Lacrosse case is a prime example of this. After Duke we had the UVA hoax, then Mattress Girl, now this. You can even lump in the Jussie Smollett case; the intersection of pseudoscience theories about gender/patriarchy, rape, race, mass migration and other calumnies are all eroding public critical thinking.

Only hard evidence should convict Weinstein. Anything short of that is rewarding mass hysteria where attention-seeking and a dearth of due process and reasoning masquerade as “justice”.
 

Papaya

Crow
Gold Member
^ Thats exactly right.


A man forcing sex on an unwilling woman is a crime and should be punished severely.

Conversely being a fat ugly douchebag with the power to exchange possible fame and fortune for consensual sex is not a crime. Women regretting their decision(s) is on them


Whats at stake in this type of case is the very last remnants of "criminal justice" in America. Steadily we are nearing the point where being disliked by the wrong people is a punishable offense
 
The Weinstein case is a hobbled crapfest.

He may have been a woeful Democratic donor canoodling with other politically terrible people, but what is happening in New York is a travesty. And such a travesty will be able to be applied/misapplied to you in your life, whether after an acrimonious non-marital split, during a divorce case, or in the midst of child custody battles.

The stupidity we are seeing can be summed up as follows:

1. Women who are not the accusers/alleged victims in court, like the Sopranos actress, are being brought in to “prove a pattern of behavior”. This is somehow fair game, but mentioning a woman’s sexual history (like the British girl in Cyprus who had non-Israeli sperm in her before being “raped” by the Israelis) is like beheading an infant in terms of how offensive the Left finds it/how inadmissible the courts find it.

2. Attention-seeking crowds of people, led by desperate and irrelevant “celebrities” like Rosanna Arquette, are milling around outside the court precinct in search of a media spotlight. What they say about Weinstein raping or blacklisting them is as verifiable as your standard tabloid conjecture about whether Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston are back together again (gossiped about for fifteen years, literally).

3. Everyone is acting as if countless women did not engage in sexual favors to get in Weinstein’s good graces. We have 80 accusers and no one admitting they had sex with him because of his money, fame, power, or to get roles.

4. Years of behavior after the “rape”, including dumping one’s boyfriend whilst maintaining a sexual relationship with Weinstein and emailing him regular romantic-themed greetings and praise, can be explained away as a “trauma response” courtesy of court “experts”. These individuals conveniently give such a label to any actions which seem to cast doubt on the accusers’ stories. If you remember the non-court case of Asia Argento, she bedded Weinstein for five years after the “rape”.

5. Testimony is the only thing that can be used against Weinstein as there is basically zero hard evidence. The case is otherwise so weak that, in line with point one, non-relevant “witnesses” are brought in to pile on Weinstein. If this were a robbery case, it would have been thrown out because the standard of proof could never be met. But because this is an allegation of rape, the requirements are watered down substantially.

6. “Surrogate justice” means that Weinstein is getting extra heat. He is the boogeyman and sacrificial lamb to make up for other men who supposedly got away with “abusing” women, whether the allegations involved Hitchcock decades ago or the climate of “misogyny” said to be still blanketing Hollywood today.

7. Everyone is acting dumb, somehow mystified that Weinstein “did” what he did and at a compete loss to explain how he did it. Where are all the people who would have known, if he is supposedly guilty, and refused to do anything in order to get more pay checks? Surely, anyone with a net worth of $500k had no excuse to keep going along with the charade? At the very least they could have quit the game quietly, to save their souls.
 

kel

Pelican
david.garrett84 said:
He may have been a woeful Democratic donor canoodling with other politically terrible people, but what is happening in New York is a travesty. And such a travesty will be able to be applied/misapplied to you in your life, whether after an acrimonious non-marital split, during a divorce case, or in the midst of child custody battles.
I wish more people would internalize this. Just because this guy is a scumbag Hollywood liberal doesn't mean I want him raked over the coals by oppression opportunists and yet another precedent set. It doesn't matter what his politics or race are, even, this has already been chalked up to "muh white patriarchy".
 
Again - I was defending Weinstein early on, because even if he traded sex for potential Hollywood parts, then this is no crime. There were certainly women who turned him down just as male actors did not suck dick and got nowhere in Hollyweird.

Women have been known to sleep up in the world - this is nothing new. Now they act as if no woman ever in human history would be willing to fuck for fame and money. Give me a break... The emails coming out should not come as a surprise. The tarts were happy about it and they offered friends and family to Weinstein. Now they are suddenly akin to rape victims who were jumped at some park and gang-raped.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
I can't imagine why anyone would bother going in to bat for a bunch of Jewish perverts running the studios that malign Western culture 24/7.

Weinstein is cut from the same cloth as all the other degenerate Hollywood Jews who find doe-eyed shiksas looking for fame and turn them into animals for the porn industry.

The difference is that as part of the greater European peoples I recognise said shiksas as my very distant relatives while Weinstein is a foreign degenerate predator like the rest of his kin who act in that manner.

Dudes shilling for poor, degenerate Weinstein because he's a "fellow man" are deluding themselves. To Weinstein you are nothing but a filthy goyim slave born to serve Jews like all the shiksas he's delighted in degrading. This pathetic jihad you're being led on against your own sisters, mothers and daughters is a joke. Weinstein and his kind would sell you for dog-meat and sleep like babies the same night.

Why do you care if a bunch of perverts and pedophiles are being put under the microscope? Because it will make it harder for you to procure sex with randoms and enjoy it without concerns for future legal issues?

That's a very noble stance to take.
 

Aurini

Ostrich
Leonard D Neubache said:
I can't imagine why anyone would bother going in to bat for a bunch of Jewish perverts running the studios that malign Western culture 24/7.

Weinstein is cut from the same cloth as all the other degenerate Hollywood Jews who find doe-eyed shiksas looking for fame and turn them into animals for the porn industry.

The difference is that as part of the greater European peoples I recognise said shiksas as my very distant relatives while Weinstein is a foreign degenerate predator like the rest of his kin who act in that manner.

Dudes shilling for poor, degenerate Weinstein because he's a "fellow man" are deluding themselves. To Weinstein you are nothing but a filthy goyim slave born to serve Jews like all the shiksas he's delighted in degrading. This pathetic jihad you're being led on against your own sisters, mothers and daughters is a joke. Weinstein and his kind would sell you for dog-meat and sleep like babies the same night.

Why do you care if a bunch of perverts and pedophiles are being put under the microscope? Because it will make it harder for you to procure sex with randoms and enjoy it without concerns for future legal issues?

That's a very noble stance to take.
Two reasons.

1. This is an abuse of the law. The same way the Left used the impeachment nonsense to create An Event, this is just another Event. The law is being usurped for petty vengeance; this puts all of us at risk.

2. He's the least bad of the degenerates in Hollywood; he only slept with adult women. I suspect he's being offered as a sacrifice to cover up the true depravity that's out there.

But, like it or not - this seems to be the new reality.
 

Papaya

Crow
Gold Member
Aurini said:
Leonard D Neubache said:
I can't imagine why anyone would bother going in to bat for a bunch of Jewish perverts running the studios that malign Western culture 24/7.

Weinstein is cut from the same cloth as all the other degenerate Hollywood Jews who find doe-eyed shiksas looking for fame and turn them into animals for the porn industry.

The difference is that as part of the greater European peoples I recognise said shiksas as my very distant relatives while Weinstein is a foreign degenerate predator like the rest of his kin who act in that manner.

Dudes shilling for poor, degenerate Weinstein because he's a "fellow man" are deluding themselves. To Weinstein you are nothing but a filthy goyim slave born to serve Jews like all the shiksas he's delighted in degrading. This pathetic jihad you're being led on against your own sisters, mothers and daughters is a joke. Weinstein and his kind would sell you for dog-meat and sleep like babies the same night.

Why do you care if a bunch of perverts and pedophiles are being put under the microscope? Because it will make it harder for you to procure sex with randoms and enjoy it without concerns for future legal issues?

That's a very noble stance to take.
Two reasons.

1. This is an abuse of the law. The same way the Left used the impeachment nonsense to create An Event, this is just another Event. The law is being usurped for petty vengeance; this puts all of us at risk.

2. He's the least bad of the degenerates in Hollywood; he only slept with adult women. I suspect he's being offered as a sacrifice to cover up the true depravity that's out there.

But, like it or not - this seems to be the new reality.
No one is shilling for Weinstein. The rule of law is whats at stake. If it is not to be applied as written, even to a slime ball like Weinstein, then we're all at risk because then its a question of whether we're a "good guy" or a slime ball.

If so who then gets to determine that distinction?
 
Cr33pin said:
The case is hilarious since the girl didn't get sex from the guy and then she took revenge by accusing him of rape.

Too bad for her that men are getting smart about it and are recording encounters.

They should be severely punished - in this case kicked out of college and slapped with a criminal investigation.

Columbia should also be sued for millions.
 

Belgrano

Ostrich
Gold Member
Weinstein Accuser Says He Has No Testicles

Jessica Mann testified in a Manhattan courtroom Friday that Harvey Weinstein engaged in forced oral sex and raped her in early 2013 and alleged that she was in a twisted relationship with him because of her sexual inexperience.

As Mann tearily described alleged incidents, she also made the bombshell claim that Weinstein doesn’t have testicles and appeared to have a vagina, saying she thought he was “intersex” the first time she saw him naked.

Weinstein faces charges in New York City for allegedly raping Mann, and for an alleged sexual assault on former actress Mimi Haleyi. Prosecutors have used Sopranos actress Annabella Sciorra’s allegation that Weinstein raped her around late 1993 to bolster their claim that Weinstein has a pattern of predatory behavior.

“He would talk very dirty to me about fantasies and things, and compare me to the other actresses that he said were doing kinky, dirty things with him,” Mann testified. “He always wanted to film me. I never gave him permission.”

“He would say, ‘Do you like my big, fat, Jewish dick?’” Mann claimed.

“The first time I saw him fully naked,” she said, “I thought he was deformed and intersex. He has an extreme scarring that I didn’t know, maybe [he] was a burn victim …”

“He does not have testicles, and it appears that he has a vagina,” she claimed, saying she had oral sex with Weinstein.

As Mann claimed that he had deformed genitals, Weinstein dropped his head.


“He also peed on me once,” she said.

Prosecutor Joan Illuzzi asked Mann to describe Weinstein’s hygiene.

“It was very bad,” she said. “He smelled like shit — excuse me, sorry, like poop. He just was dirty.”


Mann entered the courtroom at 10:06 a.m. Weinstein eyed her as she walked to the witness stand. Illuzzi’s initial questioning was clearly meant to establish both Mann’s naïveté and vulnerability.

Mann testified that she grew up in a Washington State dairy community, that she had a turbulent family life, and was raised in a strict Christian tradition.

“It was a lot of cows, it smelled like poop,” she said. “There wasn’t a lot of culture.”

Asked about her religious upbringing, Mann said, “I would describe how I grew up [as] a cult. It was extremely religious, Evangelical.”

Mann moved to Los Angeles with dreams of becoming an actress at age 25. She met Weinstein at a party around early 2013, introducing herself when she saw him talking to her roommate. Later that evening, Weinstein found Mann and got her phone number. Someone reached out and he took her to Book Soup, a bookstore on Sunset Boulevard.

“He had told me that it’s important for me to understand film history if I wanted to be an actress,” she said. “He wanted to give me some books on the film industry.”

They met there and he bought her four books and one was on Alfred Hitchcock, she said. She described him as normal and he was “very normal and very engaging.”

“There were a few moments where he made like a grunting sound, and he would look at me, but I didn’t know if it was a personality, or sort of an autistic-like trait,” she said.

At a subsequent meeting at a hotel bar, Weinstein claimed he was annoyed by people coming up to him, and asked the restaurant to bring their orders to his hotel suite. The staff brought everything upstairs, but “he was not interested in finishing our food.”

“I was hungry,” she said.

“He started to like, undress himself a little, but you know, I just thought he was just getting comfortable, but he continued, and he walked into his bedroom, and he wanted me to go in there, and I was hesitating and he said, ‘Let me give you a massage, take off your shirt … just relax.’”

“I was like no, that’s okay. I don’t want a massage and this went on for a good moment and um, he made me feel stupid, like, why did I think it was such a big deal, and he said, ‘Well if you’re not going to let me give you a massage, give me a massage,’” she alleged.

“At that point, he had his shirt off and he had lotion. I started putting the lotion on his back … just like very awkwardly … with flat palm, stiff fingers, and smeared it around,” she said.

“He had a lot of blackheads, and the texture of that was uncomfortable,” she also said.


While Mann didn’t have sexual interest in him, Weinstein reached out to her and she did see him socially after the massage incident.

At one party, Mann and Talita, an aspiring actress and her roommate, saw Weinstein; he asked to meet them in the hotel bar to talk about acting.

“It started with him saying I reminded him of his wife because I was clumsy, and she was clumsy, and he told me I was prettier than Natalie Portman,” she said. “He gave us criticism on both our images. He said that I needed to clear my skin up. He told Talita she needed to lose weight. He goes, ‘You guys are perfect for this film that I’m producing. It’s a vampire film, and you both made perfect leads.’”

The bar was closing and he urged them to join him upstairs.

“I said, ‘Ha, ha, ha, oh no, I know what that means,” she recalled, saying that Weinstein laughed at her and responded, “I am a harmless old man.”

Weinstein was pacing. Mann and her friend are sitting on the sofa and he walked back into his room, she said.

“He called my name,” she said, crying. Talita urged her to see what Weinstein wanted.

“I leaned in and I said, ‘What do you want?’” she said. “And then he grabbed my arm, and he pulls me around, and as he’s pulling me around, he closes the door and he says to Talita, ‘We’ll just be a minute.’”

“The more I fought, the angrier he got,” she alleged. Weinstein then said, “Let me do something for you. I’m not letting you leave until I do something for you.”

“He wouldn’t tell me,” she claimed. “He told me to sit on the bed, and that’s when he went down on me.”

“I started to fake an orgasm to get out of it,” she said. “He asked me how it was, if I liked it. And uhm, I was nervous, so I told him, ‘Oh, it was the best I ever had.’”

“I got out of there as fast as I could,” she testified, saying Talita was asking, “What happened? I said, ‘We just gotta go’ and um, we left.”

“I made the decision to be in a relationship with him,” she later said. “And part of that was because I was sexual with very few people. I entered into what I thought was going to be a real relationship with him — and it was extremely degrading from that point on.”

Mann said she was worried about breaking off a relationship with him.

“I thought he was gonna hurt my father,” she said, explaining, “he said to me that he has guys with bats …”


Mann was in New York with a friend who was on a business trip not long after these alleged encounters. Mann, her friend, and Talita were going to meet with Weinstein at the Doubletree Hotel on 51st Street and Lexington Avenue for a breakfast meeting. Mann was staying with her friend at this hotel. When Mann got downstairs, Weinstein was checking into the hotel. She confronted him to ask what he was doing.

“He pulled me aside, to the corner, and he told me not to embarrass him,” she said. After Weinstein was checked in, he put his arm on her and started leading her upstairs. They started to argue in his room. He demanded that Mann get undressed. Mann tried to leave twice but he blocked the door, she alleged.

Left without options, Mann said, “I gave up at that point, and I undressed, and he stood over me until I was completely naked, and then he told me to lay on the bed, and once he was naked and laying on the bed, he walked into the bathroom and sort of closed the door behind him,” she said. “And then he came out naked and he was … he got on top of me, and that’s when he put himself inside of me, his penis inside of me.”

After the alleged rape, Mann said she went to the bathroom.

“I’m just trying to collect myself for a minute, and I see a needle in the trash can, and I flip out, and I grab it, and I look at it, and I remember the name, because I wanted to Google it, and I was …” Mann started to weep at this point. “It was the realization that he stabbed himself with a needle, and there has to be blood because he was inside of me … I was in shock over that.”

Asked whether Weinstein used a condom, Mann said, “No.”

She was asked about the needle.

“I do not remember the medical term, but when I Googled it, it basically implied dead-penis-type thing,” she said.


They walked downstairs shortly thereafter. She did not tell her friend or Talita what allegedly had happened. At breakfast, Weinstein mentioned a movie premiere; Talita and her friend urged Mann to stay another day.

They went to the premiere.

“He wanted me to have tea with him and his daughter right after,” she said. “I did not do that. He was mad.”

As Mann testified, several people in the courtroom rows reserved for Weinstein’s team laughed.

Mann returns to the witness stand this afternoon.

That's some crazy claims she made there, yet his response in the courtroom was to just "drop his head"?

It's time to revive the Satanic Hollywood and Satanic Inversion threads.
 

DarkTriad

Ostrich
Gold Member
Belgrano said:
Weinstein Accuser Says He Has No Testicles

Jessica Mann testified in a Manhattan courtroom Friday that Harvey Weinstein engaged in forced oral sex and raped her in early 2013 and alleged that she was in a twisted relationship with him because of her sexual inexperience.

As Mann tearily described alleged incidents, she also made the bombshell claim that Weinstein doesn’t have testicles and appeared to have a vagina, saying she thought he was “intersex” the first time she saw him naked.

Weinstein faces charges in New York City for allegedly raping Mann, and for an alleged sexual assault on former actress Mimi Haleyi. Prosecutors have used Sopranos actress Annabella Sciorra’s allegation that Weinstein raped her around late 1993 to bolster their claim that Weinstein has a pattern of predatory behavior.

“He would talk very dirty to me about fantasies and things, and compare me to the other actresses that he said were doing kinky, dirty things with him,” Mann testified. “He always wanted to film me. I never gave him permission.”

“He would say, ‘Do you like my big, fat, Jewish dick?’” Mann claimed.

“The first time I saw him fully naked,” she said, “I thought he was deformed and intersex. He has an extreme scarring that I didn’t know, maybe [he] was a burn victim …”

“He does not have testicles, and it appears that he has a vagina,” she claimed, saying she had oral sex with Weinstein.

As Mann claimed that he had deformed genitals, Weinstein dropped his head.


“He also peed on me once,” she said.

Prosecutor Joan Illuzzi asked Mann to describe Weinstein’s hygiene.

“It was very bad,” she said. “He smelled like shit — excuse me, sorry, like poop. He just was dirty.”


Mann entered the courtroom at 10:06 a.m. Weinstein eyed her as she walked to the witness stand. Illuzzi’s initial questioning was clearly meant to establish both Mann’s naïveté and vulnerability.

Mann testified that she grew up in a Washington State dairy community, that she had a turbulent family life, and was raised in a strict Christian tradition.

“It was a lot of cows, it smelled like poop,” she said. “There wasn’t a lot of culture.”

Asked about her religious upbringing, Mann said, “I would describe how I grew up [as] a cult. It was extremely religious, Evangelical.”

Mann moved to Los Angeles with dreams of becoming an actress at age 25. She met Weinstein at a party around early 2013, introducing herself when she saw him talking to her roommate. Later that evening, Weinstein found Mann and got her phone number. Someone reached out and he took her to Book Soup, a bookstore on Sunset Boulevard.

“He had told me that it’s important for me to understand film history if I wanted to be an actress,” she said. “He wanted to give me some books on the film industry.”

They met there and he bought her four books and one was on Alfred Hitchcock, she said. She described him as normal and he was “very normal and very engaging.”

“There were a few moments where he made like a grunting sound, and he would look at me, but I didn’t know if it was a personality, or sort of an autistic-like trait,” she said.

At a subsequent meeting at a hotel bar, Weinstein claimed he was annoyed by people coming up to him, and asked the restaurant to bring their orders to his hotel suite. The staff brought everything upstairs, but “he was not interested in finishing our food.”

“I was hungry,” she said.

“He started to like, undress himself a little, but you know, I just thought he was just getting comfortable, but he continued, and he walked into his bedroom, and he wanted me to go in there, and I was hesitating and he said, ‘Let me give you a massage, take off your shirt … just relax.’”

“I was like no, that’s okay. I don’t want a massage and this went on for a good moment and um, he made me feel stupid, like, why did I think it was such a big deal, and he said, ‘Well if you’re not going to let me give you a massage, give me a massage,’” she alleged.

“At that point, he had his shirt off and he had lotion. I started putting the lotion on his back … just like very awkwardly … with flat palm, stiff fingers, and smeared it around,” she said.

“He had a lot of blackheads, and the texture of that was uncomfortable,” she also said.


While Mann didn’t have sexual interest in him, Weinstein reached out to her and she did see him socially after the massage incident.

At one party, Mann and Talita, an aspiring actress and her roommate, saw Weinstein; he asked to meet them in the hotel bar to talk about acting.

“It started with him saying I reminded him of his wife because I was clumsy, and she was clumsy, and he told me I was prettier than Natalie Portman,” she said. “He gave us criticism on both our images. He said that I needed to clear my skin up. He told Talita she needed to lose weight. He goes, ‘You guys are perfect for this film that I’m producing. It’s a vampire film, and you both made perfect leads.’”

The bar was closing and he urged them to join him upstairs.

“I said, ‘Ha, ha, ha, oh no, I know what that means,” she recalled, saying that Weinstein laughed at her and responded, “I am a harmless old man.”

Weinstein was pacing. Mann and her friend are sitting on the sofa and he walked back into his room, she said.

“He called my name,” she said, crying. Talita urged her to see what Weinstein wanted.

“I leaned in and I said, ‘What do you want?’” she said. “And then he grabbed my arm, and he pulls me around, and as he’s pulling me around, he closes the door and he says to Talita, ‘We’ll just be a minute.’”

“The more I fought, the angrier he got,” she alleged. Weinstein then said, “Let me do something for you. I’m not letting you leave until I do something for you.”

“He wouldn’t tell me,” she claimed. “He told me to sit on the bed, and that’s when he went down on me.”

“I started to fake an orgasm to get out of it,” she said. “He asked me how it was, if I liked it. And uhm, I was nervous, so I told him, ‘Oh, it was the best I ever had.’”

“I got out of there as fast as I could,” she testified, saying Talita was asking, “What happened? I said, ‘We just gotta go’ and um, we left.”

“I made the decision to be in a relationship with him,” she later said. “And part of that was because I was sexual with very few people. I entered into what I thought was going to be a real relationship with him — and it was extremely degrading from that point on.”

Mann said she was worried about breaking off a relationship with him.

“I thought he was gonna hurt my father,” she said, explaining, “he said to me that he has guys with bats …”


Mann was in New York with a friend who was on a business trip not long after these alleged encounters. Mann, her friend, and Talita were going to meet with Weinstein at the Doubletree Hotel on 51st Street and Lexington Avenue for a breakfast meeting. Mann was staying with her friend at this hotel. When Mann got downstairs, Weinstein was checking into the hotel. She confronted him to ask what he was doing.

“He pulled me aside, to the corner, and he told me not to embarrass him,” she said. After Weinstein was checked in, he put his arm on her and started leading her upstairs. They started to argue in his room. He demanded that Mann get undressed. Mann tried to leave twice but he blocked the door, she alleged.

Left without options, Mann said, “I gave up at that point, and I undressed, and he stood over me until I was completely naked, and then he told me to lay on the bed, and once he was naked and laying on the bed, he walked into the bathroom and sort of closed the door behind him,” she said. “And then he came out naked and he was … he got on top of me, and that’s when he put himself inside of me, his penis inside of me.”

After the alleged rape, Mann said she went to the bathroom.

“I’m just trying to collect myself for a minute, and I see a needle in the trash can, and I flip out, and I grab it, and I look at it, and I remember the name, because I wanted to Google it, and I was …” Mann started to weep at this point. “It was the realization that he stabbed himself with a needle, and there has to be blood because he was inside of me … I was in shock over that.”

Asked whether Weinstein used a condom, Mann said, “No.”

She was asked about the needle.

“I do not remember the medical term, but when I Googled it, it basically implied dead-penis-type thing,” she said.


They walked downstairs shortly thereafter. She did not tell her friend or Talita what allegedly had happened. At breakfast, Weinstein mentioned a movie premiere; Talita and her friend urged Mann to stay another day.

They went to the premiere.

“He wanted me to have tea with him and his daughter right after,” she said. “I did not do that. He was mad.”

As Mann testified, several people in the courtroom rows reserved for Weinstein’s team laughed.

Mann returns to the witness stand this afternoon.

That's some crazy claims she made there, yet his response in the courtroom was to just "drop his head"?

It's time to revive the Satanic Hollywood and Satanic Inversion threads.
IIRC Caverject is the name of the drug old fat guys inject into their penises to get wood.
 

griffinmill

Kingfisher
david.garrett84 said:
2. Attention-seeking crowds of people, led by desperate and irrelevant “celebrities” like Rosanna Arquette, are milling around outside the court precinct in search of a media spotlight.
Never ever forget that these celebrities kept their fucking mouths about Weinstein when it mattered most to speak up. They stayed silent, praised him at awards ceremonies, and were flattered to work with him - despite knowing full well what he was getting up to. Never ever forget that.

His sociopathic behaviour was a matter of fact, on the record, and had been detailed in many books. I had also heard rumours about his sexual proclivities going back a decade (and me, nowhere near Los Angeles). I have serious doubts whether he was actually "raping" anyone - but he was most certainly an aggressive bully whose level of violence and revenge meted out for any number of petty reasons to victims all across Hollywood and beyond was never disputed.

Meryl Streep called him God.
 
Top