The month of June

[Towgunner]

Over the past couple of years I have grown to despise June. I now regard this month with dread. Out of nowhere some unelected self aggrandizing liberals have expropriated June and declared it, arbitrarily, as the month to celebrate homosexuals. And this seems to be growing. Worse still, they say its "pride"? Pride for what? Having sex, and not only that, but, depraved forms of sex? And, what of pride in general? Western canon has a lot to say about pride, which I'm not prepared to discuss, but, nonetheless the wisdom of the ages is quite clear that this thing, pride, left unchecked is generally a character flaw.

Before it was "trendy" to support gays, I was very open to gays. No, I'm not gay and never have been. I used to go to provincetown with one of my ex-girlfriends. I found myself experiencing the sort of self aggrandizing emotion that I think has been mass produced today. A sort of, I'm more open than you are.

But here is the thing. Both my girlfriend and I could only endure p-town for so long. No matter how "open minded" we tried to be this community was, simply, too much. Sex is in everything and everywhere. drag queen shows are as common as rainbow flags second only to advertisements for authentic fudge with signs reading "get your fudge packed here". And a drag show is a foul mouthed exposition of bad dirty jokes invariably discussing sodomy. A simple coffee wasn't immune from this either. p-town is a tragedy as it is a very lovely place. Its a town where you just find a quaint coffee shop by accident. The only thing is, you get your coffee and the entire establishment is literally decorated with enormous chocolate phalluses.

This is the homosexual community. And I know it because I went there and I experienced it. I recall a gaggle of children that were among another gaggle of butch lesbians . These children appeared as though they were lobotomized. Whereas any other child would be running wild, these kids seemed to be in a malaise. What ever passed as their "parents", displayed an unmistakable bitterness that was palatable. As such, the stereotypical lesbian. And than there were the teenagers. Boys who had no place to stay basically prostituted themselves every night to find a place to sleep. There was something off in the air in that place. Everything was a show. Bombastic drag queens produced an air of levity but there was something very sinister lurking there just underneath the surface. Indeed, this is a land of costumes.

I outgrew this stage and realized that these people were not the open minded folks that had a zest for life. I attribute my change in attitude having nothing to do with a phobia or any of that, rather, to the gays themselves. Over the years I have witnessed their behavior their political demands and most of all their lies. I have come to see the truth. As an overarching description I'd say homosexuals by default have some significant character flaws. Generalization? No, I'll stick by it. Moreover, homosexuality is not a ideal condition. No person should ever want to be a homosexual. That's why rights are one thing, but, celebrating is another.

Fundamentally, there is an a-priori of reproduction not just for humans but the entire animal kingdom that says, pardon, enshrines heterosexuality as normal. After all, without heterosexuality the species literally dies. homosexuality, by contrast, is obviously a perversion by the simple fact that reproduction is impossible with such combinations, not to mention that the actual sexual acts are wrong as evidence by God's design - penis to vagina. I suspect this is where the personal imbalance begin. And I further suspect that homosexuals, no matter what the prevailing culture says, are always conflicted. Conflicted with themselves, which they compensate with nihilism, sex and drugs, which only further conflict them all the more. Its a cycle. Again, why would anyone find this condition desirable?

Next to that I'd say homosexuals are very selfish people. An entire month dedicated to just them? Oh by the way, in June we have 1. D-Day 2. Father's Day and 3. Lots of graduations. Thanksgiving is only one day, right? Memorial Day...one day. But a whole month? And let's look at these other days...on Thanksgiving we give thanks, to God for sure, but, basically for just being alive. Memorial Day is for our Veterans who served and died in wars i.e. sacrificing their youth and life. But, what does this month celebrate? homosexuality? Um, you mean what occurs in places like provincetown? Sex? And not only that but gratuitous unhindered sex?

I moved back to the town I grew up in. It's a small conservative town in Massachusetts that is straight out of Normal Rockwell. A few upstarts on a local FaceBook group has roused many residents to adorn their homes with rainbows.

Witnessing this has struck many cords in me. I see a celebration of depravity. I see a massive deception played out in front of me. I see the systematic narcissism and ego and it is sickening. We don't have a very large homosexual population in this town, so, why all the flags? Its the soccer moms showing off just how open they are and trying to out do the next with their openness. These people have families, they have kids. And here they are affirming something that is not appropriate for children.

Worse still is that the homosexual community is a hateful group of people. They are deceivers. The common rebuttal I hear from pro-gay non-gay people is "well I have a friend that is gay and...". Note, the viciousness you'll get from these non-gay "allies". What's happening here? The gays have gotten these otherwise apple pie making house wives to fight their battles for them! That's a character flaw! And if any of these soccer mom's ever wanted to see just how fabulous these people truly are...all they have to do is disagree with them. BAM! gays have literally much of our society tethered to a sadomasochists whip attached to a nose ring leading these people like animals on all fours.

And what kind of a "friend" makes you fight their fights for them?

Again, you wonder what is this all for? On a liberal church I've seen "open and affirming"? So, its about affirming these people? Why? No one else is asking all of society to affirm them? Why just these people? Once again, you see this consistent strain of selfishness.

They will be very nice to you up front, but, as mentioned cross them and watch that gentle or nice lesbian morph into a vicious animal. Gnashing teeth, spitting, profanities and, as we've seen over and over again, violence. Why? Why this reaction? Are they literally so consumed by their carnal desires this is what happens? I think so. Its why a virtuous person learns to control themselves. homosexuals have become everything they accused straight society of being.

They're full of lies. There is absolutely NO evidence for homosexuality to be genetic. None! Zero. And we know they've tried. Yet, in today's "free society" we cannot utter the fact that homosexuality is NOT born in. And so this lie persists. But, so do many other lies, such as "gender" or latent homosexuality and as follows homo"phobia". They lied about their intentions too. I just want to be left alone. No, you have demanded everyone celebrate you and your personal excesses for an entire month. I only wish you would be left alone so you would simply leave me alone.

Lastly, what hurts the most is that my town is family orientated. Unlike the rest of the west this town is a baby machine. When I see these flags I think, that's a flag and people with children that support pedophilia. Their retort...after all the spitting, screaming and profanities is a deflection usually referencing some obscure stat that most straight men are the majority predators etc. I think about Yuri Bezmenov describing people who were showed the gulags and the starvation and the death caused by communism but yet they remained ardently communistic. Here, we have evidence that grows by the day that not only is pedophilia inherent to homosexuality it is something they want to "normalize". This is a "community" of people that say its not only okay but brave and stunning for an 11 year old boy to be dressed in drag and to do sex dances to adult homosexual men that drool over him. I shutter. Will these soccer mom's one day hand off their infant children to these homosexuals they admire so much so they can be enriched but their sodomy. Not to get all technical, but, these people do and will sodomize young children. How...how can that NOT destroy a young child's digestive track?

All for sex. All for the moment. And the moment never lasts.

Alas, our country is on fire. Many things are changing. Last year, in Massachusetts of all places, there was a straight pride parade. Massachusetts is the state of revolutions and as a resident here I can tell you we're not all like these monsters. And in my little town there are plenty of people just like me.

I think about standing up and engaging these people in Facebook, incognito, of course. All I want to do is say, hey you can fly any flag you want but don't avert your eyes to this 11 year old boy doing a sex dance for adult homosexual men at 2 in the morning...because that's what is flying on the flag pole lady.

 

[DanielH]

And what kind of a "friend" makes you fight their fights for them?

A good friend doesn't lead their friend into sin/temptation, which is exactly what LGBTQ and pride is.

My company is having a virtual pride rally since the normal parades are canceled due to covid. First time a disease ever stopped them.

 

[Towgunner]

A good friend doesn't lead their friend into sin/temptation, which is exactly what LGBTQ and pride is.

My company is having a virtual pride rally since the normal parades are canceled due to covid. First time a disease ever stopped them.

Thank you for sharing. I don't think we've ever seen a "political movement" insist as one of their chief demands that we all celebrate and praise them. I can't help it...its really a mark of very deep character flaws. And worse still, if you object and, thereby, exercise your rights they attack you.

Trump declaring antifa a domestic terrorist group, although not directly related, is promising. In that, political ideologies will be put on notice if they start to use coercion to get people to act a certain way. And, there's yet another telltale item from this "community", they depend on coercion to get their "agenda" through.

Honestly, I have absolutely no issue that homosexuals have the same rights as me. But they must, and they will, respect that my rights must be recognized too, not just theirs.

 

[RWIsrael]

My company has changed its logo on LinkedIn to rainbow colors, so anyone looking at my profile will think I'm celebrating gayness...
Absolutely disgusted that my professional profile is being tainted this way, it's not like Facebook where you can select your own background but this is not the kind of change you can make noise about at your company and stay employed.

I ask any RVF people to look kindly upon your contacts who have the rainbow on our profile and not be quick to judge - We have no say in it and it doesn't reflect our views, please don't write us off as SJW based on the profile logo alone.

Edit - surprised those f*ckers didn't change it to a BLM flag after the recent protests.

 

[Galaxy_Traveler]

It makes sense that companies promote homosexuality, because it is profitable. If you would have to imagine the perfect consumer, it would be a homosexual: They have the earning power of men combined with the spending habits of women. You can market more things to them that were normally for women only, such as designer clothing and fashion items. They don't have wives and children and can spend more money in the short term because they don't have to worry about saving up for children's education etc.

There is also another aspect to it, maybe a lesser known one: More than a decade ago when I started job hunting, I went on to interview with some financial institutions. On one of the hiring events open to the general public, I was surprised to hear that some large financial institutions had exclusive job-hunting events and dinners for homosexuals only.
Back then the culture was not yet invested with gayness to the degree it is now, and I was baffled as to why some of those financial institutions seemingly wanted to recruit gay people specifically. After some research, a veteran in the financial field told me the following: Many companies in finance like homosexuals working for them because they are potentially cheaper and more effective in the long run. In a field like investment banking, with 80-hour workweeks and a stressful life that leaves little room for a private life, gays are more effective. They do not have a nagging wife and children at home that might distract them from their job, they are cheaper and easier to relocate overseas because the company doesn't have to provide schooling for the children, they are content with staying in the office for longer hours than many of their non-gay co-workers who have to spend more time with women in order to bond with them.

I also hope gay month gets shut down due to coronavirus.

 

[RWIsrael]

It makes sense that companies promote homosexuality, because it is profitable. If you would have to imagine the perfect consumer, it would be a homosexual: They have the earning power of men combined with the spending habits of women. You can market more things to them that were normally for women only, such as designer clothing and fashion items. They don't have wives and children and can spend more money in the short term because they don't have to worry about saving up for children's education etc.

There is also another aspect to it, maybe a lesser known one: More than a decade ago when I started job hunting, I went on to interview with some financial institutions. Back then, I was surprised to hear that some large financial institutions had exclusive job-hunting events and dinners for homosexuals only.
Back then the culture was not yet invested with gayness to the degree it is now, and I was baffled as to why some of those financial institutions seemingly wanted to recruit gay people specifically. After some research, a veteran in the financial field told me the following: Many companies in finance like homosexuals working for them because they are potentially cheaper and more effective in the long run. In a field like investment banking, with 80-hour workweeks and a stressful life that leaves little room for a private life, gays are more effective. They do not have a nagging wife and children at home that might distract them from their job, they are cheaper and easier to relocate overseas because the company doesn't have to provide schooling for the children, they are content with staying in the office for longer hours than many of their non-gay co-workers who have to spend more time with women in order to bond with them.

I also hope gay month gets shut down due to coronavirus.

I also used to think corporations were about making money and were pushing this shit as some kind of marketing campaign.
I've found that it is just propaganda, bowing to the current political climate and postulating in the desperate hope of keeping the rabid activists from calling you out in the media.
This applies to LGBT, female empowerment, diversity hiring etc.

You'll find that in most large corporations the diversity officer, who is the modern incarnation of the commissar / politruk, can get the CEO fired, but not the other way around.

 

[Towgunner]

My company has changed its logo on LinkedIn to rainbow colors, so anyone looking at my profile will think I'm celebrating gayness...
Absolutely disgusted that my professional profile is being tainted this way, it's not like Facebook where you can select your own background but this is not the kind of change you can make noise about at your company and stay employed.

I ask any RVF people to look kindly upon your contacts who have the rainbow on our profile and not be quick to judge - We have no say in it and it doesn't reflect our views, please don't write us off as SJW based on the profile logo alone.

Edit - surprised those f*ckers didn't change it to a BLM flag after the recent protests.

But that's the issue, isn't it. What of your values? Companies, for the moment, are making a very big mistake involving themselves in politics. They are imposing their values onto other people.

The thing about not only homosexuals but leftists in general is they speak up. They spoke up before and said they weren't being recognized and, just like that, you have what you described above.

Sooner or later, we'll speak up and if they honor homosexuals they have to honor us, otherwise, they're failing to recognize the sensibilities of their employees, thus marginalizing them and excluding them and contributing to a hostile work environment. More importantly they're doing this to their customers as well.

Its a matter of using the same, for lack of better word, leftist "values" or standards the same way they did. Think about it. It does apply both ways. For if it doesn't than they are exactly the thing they say they're against.

The true compromise here is for all people to have their values respected. I regard the rainbow flag as a symbol of hate, degeneracy and tyranny. I'm not suggesting to force people not to use this flag, but, then again they are forcing us to do this, which is the point I'm making. That is an untenable position as it results in injustice and oppression.

The better future will be here when the gays realize they're not the center of the universe and that people are and will be free to disagree with them and regard them however they wish free from their oppression. And if they insisted on removing a 10 Commandants from a public court because such a thing was offensive to them, than that same applies to their cultural icons too, which are equally offensive to us and, therefore, subject to removal on the same grounds.

 

[Towgunner]

It makes sense that companies promote homosexuality, because it is profitable. If you would have to imagine the perfect consumer, it would be a homosexual: They have the earning power of men combined with the spending habits of women. You can market more things to them that were normally for women only, such as designer clothing and fashion items. They don't have wives and children and can spend more money in the short term because they don't have to worry about saving up for children's education etc.

There is also another aspect to it, maybe a lesser known one: More than a decade ago when I started job hunting, I went on to interview with some financial institutions. On one of the hiring events open to the general public, I was surprised to hear that some large financial institutions had exclusive job-hunting events and dinners for homosexuals only.
Back then the culture was not yet invested with gayness to the degree it is now, and I was baffled as to why some of those financial institutions seemingly wanted to recruit gay people specifically. After some research, a veteran in the financial field told me the following: Many companies in finance like homosexuals working for them because they are potentially cheaper and more effective in the long run. In a field like investment banking, with 80-hour workweeks and a stressful life that leaves little room for a private life, gays are more effective. They do not have a nagging wife and children at home that might distract them from their job, they are cheaper and easier to relocate overseas because the company doesn't have to provide schooling for the children, they are content with staying in the office for longer hours than many of their non-gay co-workers who have to spend more time with women in order to bond with them.

I also hope gay month gets shut down due to coronavirus.

I disagree. homosexuals are ~ 1-2 % of the population, no matter how much they spend they're never going to make a meaningful difference. For instance there is a likely a much larger percentage of people in this country that are not pro-homosexual. Btw, a family spends a ton of money. I've heard the argument that because homosexuals are not hindered by kids they can therefore spend more on a discretionary basis. Perhaps true, but, having kids is VERY expensive, so, believe me we outspend homosexuals by a large margin.

This is, honestly, a cultural issue. Someone below outlined it very well. With the installment of chief diversity officers, this is where all the pressure is coming from. The net effect is that, as stated, they are imposing themselves onto us.

 

[Doubting Thomas]

I guess it's only June 2, but I feel I've seen less of the Pride stuff so far than I remember seeing last year. Not sure if it's the COVID stuff, the racial unrest, or the combination of the two. Last year, the one place I remember in particular seeing decorated in rainbows was my bank, which really turned my stomach. I had thought of all the institutions to be taking up social causes, a bank should be the last of them. I was so disappointed by it that I actually considered looking for other banks to switch to, but every single one of them had Pride decorations and the same sort of crap. Michael Jordan is reported to have famously said, "Republicans buy sneakers, too," as a reason for not publicly supporting political causes. I would have thought that the same logic would apply to banks as well. But honestly the American Right seems to have just completely and totally surrendered to the gay agenda that it's not even considered a political issue these days.

 

[kel]

It's definitely the more interesting and acute riots that are happening now, today being the instagram blackout thing every corporation is doing. Don't worry, though, pride month virtue signaling is coming. They'll push it back, announce that July is substitute pride month this year, if necessary.

See @WokeCapital

 

[Aboulia]

But that's the issue, isn't it. What of your values? Companies, for the moment, are making a very big mistake involving themselves in politics. They are imposing their values onto other people.

What do you think advertising is? Every advertisement is a company imposing it's values onto another.

The thing about not only homosexuals but leftists in general is they speak up. They spoke up before and said they weren't being recognized and, just like that, you have what you described above.

Sooner or later, we'll speak up and if they honor homosexuals they have to honor us, otherwise, they're failing to recognize the sensibilities of their employees, thus marginalizing them and excluding them and contributing to a hostile work environment. More importantly they're doing this to their customers as well.

Its a matter of using the same, for lack of better word, leftist "values" or standards the same way they did. Think about it. It does apply both ways. For if it doesn't than they are exactly the thing they say they're against.

You're assuming logic, fairness and justice truly matter to dishonest people. Honesty and openness aren't left hand traits, there's a reason the right hand is what we shake hands with, the left hand is the dagger hand.

The true compromise here is for all people to have their values respected. I regard the rainbow flag as a symbol of hate, degeneracy and tyranny. I'm not suggesting to force people not to use this flag, but, then again they are forcing us to do this, which is the point I'm making. That is an untenable position as it results in injustice and oppression.

Perversions don't have a limit. If they only wanted to be left alone, it never would have metastasized into "bake the cake or else bigot", which will eventually lead to forced participation.

The better future will be here when the gays realize they're not the center of the universe and that people are and will be free to disagree with them and regard them however they wish free from their oppression. And if they insisted on removing a 10 Commandants from a public court because such a thing was offensive to them, than that same applies to their cultural icons too, which are equally offensive to us and, therefore, subject to removal on the same grounds.

Banks are inherently homosexual because money doesn't reproduce. Interest is a form of vampirism. The "interest" comes from the sweat of another's labor. In like manner, homosexuals don't reproduce, they benefit from the labor that others spend building society, but don't contribute to it's continuity, they may labor in that society, but the social costs (promiscuity, disease, vice) far outweigh any material benefit.

For anyone offended, some people may not be able to control what they're attracted to, but they can control how they behave, and if you don't believe that people can and should control how they behave, if you disagree I'll have to put in your mind that the exact same argument can be used to support pedophilia.

As Galaxy_Traveler pointed out, homosexuality is promoted solely for short sighted economic reasons. Social trust and cohesion cannot be quantified and assigned a dollar value to and therefore, doesn't exist in the modern mind. It's not for the money gays spend, it's for the reduced labour costs to remain "competitive". The manufacturing jobs weren't the only thing the West sent overseas, we outsourced the cost of raising children, and now import them fully grown.

 

[Replicant_Gyr]

Month long celebrations dilute the importance of whatever it is that is being recognized. The most important events and honors in history have a specific day assigned to them. For example: June is also National Accordion Awareness Month. Diluted.

 

[Parabola]

In the UK the rainbow has been used recently as a symbol to support the healthcare services during the virus, lots of pro gay groups have been agitating and saying that the symbol has been 'stolen' from them and that it is insensitive during 'pride month' to use that symbol to celebrate anything else.

I thought the rainbow was used in the Bible as a symbol of the covenant between God and mankind, so who stole it first?

 

[Towgunner]

In the UK the rainbow has been used recently as a symbol to support the healthcare services during the virus, lots of pro gay groups have been agitating and saying that the symbol has been 'stolen' from them and that it is insensitive during 'pride month' to use that symbol to celebrate anything else.

I thought the rainbow was used in the Bible as a symbol of the covenant between God and mankind, so who stole it first?

Same here. Its a great thing. Let it happen. I think homosexuals just take what they want from society, so, now they can experience what that's like.

 

[budoslavic]

Edit - surprised those f*ckers didn't change it to a BLM flag after the recent protests.

Speaking of BLM, I just found this out from my manager today.



Meanwhile, the gayness propaganda has a new target: Sesame Street.

 

[kel]

I've already told my boss that I'm assuming Juneteenth is a company holiday.

 

[Galaxy_Traveler]

Given the recent developments, there is a chance that this gay promotion month will be upgraded to some sort of national holiday. Wait for it.

It is fitting that whenever there are promotions for this sort of perversion, Satanic symbolism, such as the number of the beast, 666 appears. The stonewalls riots happened in 1969, the first Gay pride month was declared by Bill Clinton in 1999, and June is the the 6th month of the year.
I feel hesitant to refer to such Symbols, as part of me thinks that this is irrelevant, coincidental, and paranoid. Yet to me there is a persistent impression that often times, Satanic movements and symbolism tend to coincide.

In our time, rebellion against the natural order is one of the main mass movements. Pit the woman against the man through radical Feminism, pit families against the state through family courts that favour the break up of the traditional family, pit humans against their own nature by promoting homosexuality and transexuality to the point of ultimate rebellion against the godly order, by changing human nature from woman to man and man to woman. The motive of Satanism is rebellion against god's natural order, as Lucifer was a rebel against god, and the promotion of sexual deviancy fits into that category.