Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="stugatz" data-source="post: 1486636" data-attributes="member: 11515">I must have something wrong with me.&nbsp; I consistently find Blade Runner very overrated, and actually don&#039;t see why the various cuts are so talked about (there&#039;s really not a whole lot of difference between them).&nbsp; Impressive world building and special effects, great atmosphere. It seems that it did have a mixed reception when it came out, which makes me feel a little better (Leonard Maltin gave it a 1 1/2 out of 4 and hasn&#039;t changed it.&nbsp; He since has with other movies he got backlash against, mainly Alien - which he originally gave a 2 out of 4 and basically said it was an unpleasant monster movie.)I actually liked the sequel slightly better.&nbsp; Not by much.&nbsp; I thought Blade Runner 2049 was very well done, but underrated and overlooked.&nbsp; Comparatively, I thought Blade Runner was very well done, but overrated and talked about too much.&nbsp; So they&#039;re about even.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="stugatz, post: 1486636, member: 11515"] I must have something wrong with me. I consistently find Blade Runner very overrated, and actually don't see why the various cuts are so talked about (there's really not a whole lot of difference between them). Impressive world building and special effects, great atmosphere. It seems that it did have a mixed reception when it came out, which makes me feel a little better (Leonard Maltin gave it a 1 1/2 out of 4 and hasn't changed it. He since has with other movies he got backlash against, mainly Alien - which he originally gave a 2 out of 4 and basically said it was an unpleasant monster movie.) I actually liked the sequel slightly better. Not by much. I thought Blade Runner 2049 was very well done, but underrated and overlooked. Comparatively, I thought Blade Runner was very well done, but overrated and talked about too much. So they're about even. [/QUOTE]

Verification