I've asked this on other threads, so let's try again. If you had to guess, what will the population reduction be in country X (you choose) or the world by 2025? By 2030?
The mRNA injections are a mass extinction event
- Thread starter ph80
- Start date
I'll take a guess. By 2030, world population will be about 6 billion. Trajectory of births will eventually bring it down to 4 billion by 2050.
In the West, if we're talking native populations, I anticipate around an 8% decline, best case scenario. I base this around the observed birth rates having already fallen between 15-25% in the most vaxxed regions, the aging population, and my doubt that these populations will reverse course by becoming anti-vaxx en masse, repenting, and having a baby boom.
That 8% decline could easily be worse depending on food supplies and the state of the economy. Gen Z and millennials seem to be fair weather procreators, so you could easily see a further 25% reduction in already low birth rates just due to socioeconomic factors.
Since I asked, I'll answer too: I say 33% to 50% world population decline by 2030-32. At current world population estimates, that is about 4-5 billion people remaining.
edit: upon reviewing the term "mass extinction" it seems it refers to more of more general, far spanning anti-biotic event that kills 20-50% of all families, 50% of all genera, and up to 70% of all species. But in terms of humans, hmm, I may be overshooting a bit. It's quite possible that @DanielH is closer, that it'll be a large increase in mortality for modern humans, huge by modern standards, but overall it would have to combine with war to get to my numbers. Note that war will likely be convergent with this demographic world reality and famine. So it's possible, but it really would be a big confluence of factors all coming together at once.
edit: upon reviewing the term "mass extinction" it seems it refers to more of more general, far spanning anti-biotic event that kills 20-50% of all families, 50% of all genera, and up to 70% of all species. But in terms of humans, hmm, I may be overshooting a bit. It's quite possible that @DanielH is closer, that it'll be a large increase in mortality for modern humans, huge by modern standards, but overall it would have to combine with war to get to my numbers. Note that war will likely be convergent with this demographic world reality and famine. So it's possible, but it really would be a big confluence of factors all coming together at once.
Last edited:
Thank God for everything good that happens. Savor them. This will help you.
Thank you for that.
The OP is giving his confession, and you're judging him? Not very helpful or Christlike. Also nothing wrong with the term whore, it's a completely biblical term. You have no right to judge the OP because you don't know if he's justified in his knowledge of her whoredom or not; the OP could very well know for a fact she is indeed a whore in which case there is no judgement to call a duck a duck.
This article is from MSN - the "MS" stands for Microsoft meaning it's the propaganda wing of Little Bill Shill's empire of cheap and crummy computing products for the masses. It's a real doozy. It claims that the heart damage comes from the spike protein yet it argues that injections which cause the body's cells to produce said protein in massive numbers for a long period of time somehow reduce the risk of heart damage. At no point do they attempt to describe how this feat might be possible or address this obvious contradiction which a small child should be able to recognize.
This is especially absurd given the recent admissions and observable fact that these injections don't prevent the "disease."
You can't make this stuff up, and yet the credulous programmable gullible masses will read this and say "vaccine reduces heart damage. Stand by for further commands"
You read my mind...a comment on there mentioned the same spike protein with the vaccine too...
Yes, just totally bizarre, schizophrenic, and illogical. And that commenter on the side claimed it made sense and was "intelligible."
The spike causes the problems, so we inject ... the spike? WTF! We've said this is insanity from day 1.
Do people still see this happening? "Mass extinction"? or just slow burn, autoimmune to cancer to excess mortality rates going up, but normie vision style
All the electric vehicle targets for 2030/2035 are clearly ridiculous.
They must have massively miscalculated...
Unless...
Wait...
Unless there's A LOT less demand anyway.
But then, what would they do with all the bodies?
Billions of corpses?
It does make more sense that they'd reduce life expectancy to around 60, make.everyone infertile, kill off about 10% and sit back.
They believe in karmic retribution don't they... you show people what you're gonna do, and if they're stupid enough to let you do it, they kinda deserve it...
They must have massively miscalculated...
Unless...
Wait...
Unless there's A LOT less demand anyway.
But then, what would they do with all the bodies?
Billions of corpses?
It does make more sense that they'd reduce life expectancy to around 60, make.everyone infertile, kill off about 10% and sit back.
They believe in karmic retribution don't they... you show people what you're gonna do, and if they're stupid enough to let you do it, they kinda deserve it...
I see it as a slow burn. People who think there will be some big happening need to get off the internet for a bit.
Yes, the jabs are trash and clearly killing people, but a mass extinction event?
I am very much open to being proven wrong.
If the jab kills off it's recipients over 20 years, that's still a slow burn mass extinction event. No reason to think mass extinction and slow burn are mutually exclusive.
it will look like a slow burn to us because our concept of time is based on our limited lifetime. ''it should happen within a few years'' But in the big picture of history it could be categorized as a mass extinction event even if it happens over the span of a few decades
I think the use of the word extinction is not appropriate.
I believe culling is more appropriate.
They have told you that there are billions more humans on Earth than what is sustainable.
The injections are but one avenue that is being used of many to achieve their goals.
Their end game is 500 million people or so humans living on the Earth.
After decades of programming and soft measures to achieve their goals I believe we have entered a new phase which will accelerate their plans.
Pestilence, war, famine, and death will be the means used. It could all happen quite quickly in my opinion within the decade, or not. Some would say we are already experiencing the birth pangs of what is coming.
I believe culling is more appropriate.
They have told you that there are billions more humans on Earth than what is sustainable.
The injections are but one avenue that is being used of many to achieve their goals.
Their end game is 500 million people or so humans living on the Earth.
After decades of programming and soft measures to achieve their goals I believe we have entered a new phase which will accelerate their plans.
Pestilence, war, famine, and death will be the means used. It could all happen quite quickly in my opinion within the decade, or not. Some would say we are already experiencing the birth pangs of what is coming.
Birth rates have plummeted and the excess deaths all over the (western) world have skyrocketed. This is in excess of the already awful birthrate. Don't kid yourselves, it won't take decades, we're only two to three years in to this cull. Question is what are the plans for the ones who didn't abide?
Do you all still think this is just knocking on the door, and will be accelerated in the next 2-3 years?