The New Irish PM is an Indian Faggot

rw95

Woodpecker
Honestly, if I had to choose between India or China becoming the dominant power in the world, I'd feel more comfortable if it were India.

With that in mind, Kaotic for POTUS.
 

rw95

Woodpecker
Zelcorpion said:
Better Indian than Muslim - also he is half-Indian, so high-IQ Indian with high-IQ white.

The only unfortunate thing about him is that he is gay, but if he is more conservative than the leftists than so be it. Though I think that he will be just the same kind of traitor that a white minister would be.

Also it is logical that some Indians will get good positions due to the fact that Indian immigrants to the West have a reported IQ of 112-114. There are hundreds of millions below 90 on the continent, but they are not coming over to the West.

India by the way is still off a few centuries from becoming the dominating civilization on Earth, but I can see the signs that it will happen someday. Year 2500 - a country of highly k-selected high-IQ industrious people who have long since left the negative restrictive caste thinking and other limitations behind.

I don't think it was coincidental that the "Golden Age of India" took place when much of the subcontinent was Buddhist, a philosophy which rejects the Caste system.

Of course, that was lost long ago, thanks to the Religion of Peace.
 
Zelcorpion said:
Also it is logical that some Indians will get good positions due to the fact that Indian immigrants to the West have a reported IQ of 112-114. There are hundreds of millions below 90 on the continent, but they are not coming over to the West.

There's a lot of low IQ Indians coming to western countries - where do you think the cab drivers, the guys in 7/11s and gas stations come from?

I myself come from a background where if you go back 2 generations everybody is illiterate. I have a first cousin who is illiterate.

Indians who move to the west want to make the best of their opportunities.

My grandmother was illiterate, but I have a master's degree and most of my brothers have college degrees.

I know somebody who married in a village in India aged 15; grew up in a housing project in California and her daughter is now a judge in the US. Her sister's son is now a doctor in the US.

A late uncle of mine was born in India and illiterate, he moved to California, got a job in a factory and invested in his money in real estate. He owned over 50 properties when he passed away. He was worth millions and he told me that he never made more than $36K a year on his job.

The way I was raised was - Go to School, Get a Job, or Get the Fuck out of the House; No other options allowed. This is the same for a lot of Indians.

My late father was born in a house made out of mud and straw, and he knew that if you don't work for a living then you would starve to death. In Indian culture it is considered a disgrace to be on welfare.

The children of the cab drivers and 7/11 or gas station guys never work in their father's trades - they go to med school, law school, or finance or some other kind of professional work.
 

911

Peacock
Catholic
Gold Member
rw95 said:
Honestly, if I had to choose between India or China becoming the dominant power in the world, I'd feel more comfortable if it were India.

With that in mind, Kaotic for POTUS.

1-China is going to be the largest Christian country in the world.

2-The two countries will keep each other honest. China beat up on India back when Mao encroached into the Himalayas for a land grab in the 60s, some bad blood there, or at least some mistrust.



WalterBlack said:
My late father was born in a house made out of mud and straw, and he knew that if you don't work for a living then you would starve to death. In Indian culture it is considered a disgrace to be on welfare.

The children of the cab drivers and 7/11 or gas station guys never work in their father's trades - they go to med school, law school, or finance or some other kind of professional work.

Over here, only rich hippies can afford building houses made out of mud and straw.

Yeah Walter I think culture is the main driver for success among immigrants. The Patels haven't cornered the motel market in America by being brainiacs, (1) they have strong family bonds and (2) they hustle. Just like immigrants from many other parts of Asia. they come from a hungry and overcrowded culture and are more driven than the satiated locals.

The communities that do best are those that come from a traditionally mercantile culture: Jews, overseas Chinese, Lebanese, etc., and/or those that push their children the hardest (tiger moms and paddle dads). It's more about culture than sheer individual IQ.
 

Steve McQueen

 
Banned
The mans track record here is not so good with positions he has held in government, there is a lot of virtue signalling in the media about him being gay and I think a lot of his political support comes from there.

Personally I think we should have an election but there is absolutely no way that will be happening.

Aside from the fact we are now being ruled over by an unelected leader who sucks dick in his spare time, you can be sure he will tow the line for the EU and it will be business as usual.

We are not a big country so nobody really gives a shit what we have to say, if we piss off Brussels we will be bent over, we are not the UK, we dont have an army or our own currency, in short were fucked barring a collapse of the EU at a higher level.
 
WalterBlack said:
Zelcorpion said:
Also it is logical that some Indians will get good positions due to the fact that Indian immigrants to the West have a reported IQ of 112-114. There are hundreds of millions below 90 on the continent, but they are not coming over to the West.

There's a lot of low IQ Indians coming to western countries - where do you think the cab drivers, the guys in 7/11s and gas stations come from?

I myself come from a background where if you go back 2 generations everybody is illiterate. I have a first cousin who is illiterate.

Indians who move to the west want to make the best of their opportunities.

My grandmother was illiterate, but I have a master's degree and most of my brothers have college degrees.

I know somebody who married in a village in India aged 15; grew up in a housing project in California and her daughter is now a judge in the US. Her sister's son is now a doctor in the US.

A late uncle of mine was born in India and illiterate, he moved to California, got a job in a factory and invested in his money in real estate. He owned over 50 properties when he passed away. He was worth millions and he told me that he never made more than $36K a year on his job.

The way I was raised was - Go to School, Get a Job, or Get the Fuck out of the House; No other options allowed. This is the same for a lot of Indians.

My late father was born in a house made out of mud and straw, and he knew that if you don't work for a living then you would starve to death. In Indian culture it is considered a disgrace to be on welfare.

The children of the cab drivers and 7/11 or gas station guys never work in their father's trades - they go to med school, law school, or finance or some other kind of professional work.

That's what I meant - also illiterate does not mean low IQ and neither does coming from a mudhut. Polish IQs in the 1910s on Ellis Island were measured around 89. They are now 106 for the new generation. That is what happens with improved food, supplements during pregnancy, no inbreeding (stop of Hajnal line crap). No tribe is special - any can improve.

Indians also have a very good work ethic.

Either way - I expect IQs of avg. Indians even in the motherland to be way over 100 in the recent generations. If Poles can go from 89 to 106 in 100 years, then Indians can do so too. Who knows what is the limit with good tech and more k-selected breeding.
 

Kabal

Pelican
Gold Member
Zelcorpion said:
...Polish IQs in the 1910s on Ellis Island were measured around 89. They are now 106 for the new generation...

...

Either way - I expect IQs of avg. Indians even in the motherland to be way over 100 in the recent generations. If Poles can go from 89 to 106 in 100 years...

The 106 estimate for Poland does not pass the "smell test." The 106 estimate for Poland appears to come from various online sources plagiarizing each other from an alleged citation of one of Richard Lynn's works.

From some Googling, the Poland 106 estimate appears to come from a study (or is supposed to come from a study) where Germany is also estimated to be 107, but France is at 94. Romania is at 94, as well.

These numbers look incredibly problematic--does not make any sense at all ex-ante that Germany would be almost an entire standard deviation higher in average IQ than France, and Poland likewise over Romania--and are at odds with other IQ reports.
 
Kabal said:
Zelcorpion said:
...Polish IQs in the 1910s on Ellis Island were measured around 89. They are now 106 for the new generation...

...

Either way - I expect IQs of avg. Indians even in the motherland to be way over 100 in the recent generations. If Poles can go from 89 to 106 in 100 years...

The 106 estimate for Poland does not pass the "smell test." The 106 estimate for Poland appears to come from various online sources plagiarizing each other from an alleged citation of one of Richard Lynn's works.

From some Googling, the Poland 106 estimate appears to come from a study (or is supposed to come from a study) where Germany is also estimated to be 107, but France is at 94. Romania is at 94, as well.

These numbers look incredibly problematic--does not make any sense at all ex-ante that Germany would be almost an entire standard deviation higher in average IQ than France, and Poland likewise over Romania--and are at odds with other IQ reports.

They picked the young, also in some of those countries they managed to pick only the Caucasian sample while in others like in France they added the Arabs. The White French certainly are over 102.

My guess is that the new generation under 40 in most Western European countries if you count only Whites is above 100. Romania also isn't that low - what pulls them down are the gypsies. It is hard to find studies done by ethnicity, even harder by religion.

I am sure that the globalists have them, but they are not going to release them. Every independent scientist who would publish it would also get his career destroyed.
 

Kabal

Pelican
Gold Member
Zelcorpion said:
They picked the young, also in some of those countries they managed to pick only the Caucasian sample while in others like in France they added the Arabs. The White French certainly are over 102.

My guess is that the new generation under 40 in most Western European countries if you count only Whites is above 100. Romania also isn't that low - what pulls them down are the gypsies. It is hard to find studies done by ethnicity, even harder by religion.

I am sure that the globalists have them, but they are not going to release them. Every independent scientist who would publish it would also get his career destroyed.

Considering the population sizes of Arabs and Gypsies in France and Romania, respectively, sampling bias is not nearly enough to explain the differences vis a vis their neighbors Germany and Poland.

There's more awry in the alleged results of that study than could be explained by sampling bias with respect to our Arab and Gypsy colleagues adding some... cognitive diversity.

Yes, French whites and German whites should be similar. Most intuitively and in line with other data, Poles then slightly lower, and Romanians slightly lower than Poles.*

Hence why one shouldn't put too much stock in comparing differences in absolute IQ estimates across different studies, methodologies, and/or measurements, e.g. 89 to 106 IQs for Poles over a century.

What is considered the mean may be different across studies/methodologies/measurements, which will result in different IQ estimates--as well as potential sampling bias, what was used as the "IQ test," random noise, and other factors.

* However, one can readily note relative differences between groups observed over different studies/methodologies/measurements, hence my characterization above.
 

HOD

Woodpecker
Gold Member
He is openly-gay. Check

He is a future european childless leader, i.e. Merkel, he likes cock. Merkel prefers Sausage, instead of men.

He is a minority. Check

He is only half-minority, i.e. The Irish Barack Obama

He is pro-SJW. Check

Therefore he is probably groom and developed by the CIA, from day one, i.e. Barack Obama 3.0, accept with lighter skin, and no affirmative action needed.

He will carefully weaken the Catholic Church, since he pretends to be Catholic.

The Deep State now has full control of Ireland.
 

amity

Pelican
Gold Member
I can tell you that Varadkar is not an ideal candidate by any means but he is certainly preferable to the alternative, Coveney, who is an outright Globalist, has links to Peter Sutherland, has spoken of ramping up mass immigration, and wants to get in bed with the Greens, whose ridiculously uneconomic and massively expensive policy ideas would crucify the productive hard working middle classes, who have carried Ireland through the recession.
 

Araveug

Robin
HOD said:
He is openly-gay. Check

He is a future european childless leader, i.e. Merkel, he likes cock. Merkel prefers Sausage, instead of men.

He is a minority. Check

He is only half-minority, i.e. The Irish Barack Obama

He is pro-SJW. Check

Therefore he is probably groom and developed by the CIA, from day one, i.e. Barack Obama 3.0, accept with lighter skin, and no affirmative action needed.

He will carefully weaken the Catholic Church, since he pretends to be Catholic.

The Deep State now has full control of Ireland.

Perfectly stated. The modern world hates families/children.
 

kaotic

Owl
Gold Member
WalterBlack said:
kaotic said:
Is it safe to say his thirsty IRT followers will be saying "How I find white boy ?" :laugh:

Here's a clip from a comedy show. I can't get the metacafe tag to work

BAHHAHAHAHAHA !! I'm fucking dying.

"But Simon, you couldn't of found a nice indian boy ?"

Typical Indian parents

:laugh:

The indian son reminds me of me, not in a gay way, bomber jacket, buzzed, head, doc marten boots, the good old punk Oi! Skinhead scene.

How have I never head about this show !
 

davyjose

Robin
HOD said:
He will carefully weaken the Catholic Church, since he pretends to be Catholic.

And this is a bad thing? Fuck the Catholic Church - they made our country into a Catholic version of Saudi Arabia until the Irish people told them to go fuck themselves in the 90's.

Look - I certainly am not a fan of the leftist bullshit that has become pervasive in Ireland at the moment, but a return to the bad old days of Catholic Ireland isn't the answer. I exprienced it as a young lad - and it was hell.
 

Arado

Pelican
Gold Member
Zelcorpion said:
That's what I meant - also illiterate does not mean low IQ and neither does coming from a mudhut. Polish IQs in the 1910s on Ellis Island were measured around 89. They are now 106 for the new generation. That is what happens with improved food, supplements during pregnancy, no inbreeding (stop of Hajnal line crap). No tribe is special - any can improve.

Indians also have a very good work ethic.

Either way - I expect IQs of avg. Indians even in the motherland to be way over 100 in the recent generations. If Poles can go from 89 to 106 in 100 years, then Indians can do so too. Who knows what is the limit with good tech and more k-selected breeding.

This is certainly quite the statement! Would you say the same of Pakistan and Bangladesh? After all, they are genetically indistinguishable from Indians.

IQ testing has come a LONG way since 1910. I'm sure the jump wasn't just due to better food and supplements and no inbreeding. Instead, the test was probably testing them with questions that were more culturally focused or literacy based, rather than g-loaded. The people that constitute the population of Poland in 1910 were not lagging that far behind in terms of modernization and cultural output compared to their other European counterparts.

I highly doubt that India will have this IQ jump from mid 80's to over 100. That would be a colossal geopolitical earthquake in terms of changing the balance of power in the world 20 years from now.
 
amity said:
I can tell you that Varadkar is not an ideal candidate by any means but he is certainly preferable to the alternative, Coveney, who is an outright Globalist, has links to Peter Sutherland, has spoken of ramping up mass immigration, and wants to get in bed with the Greens, whose ridiculously uneconomic and massively expensive policy ideas would crucify the productive hard working middle classes, who have carried Ireland through the recession.

So you mean to tell us that the mainstream candidate pushed by all media outlets is indeed a globalist traitor to the common man?

tenor.gif


I would be shocked if he decided one day: "Fuck it, I am going with the truth and what is right now."

Then the headline one week later:

"The Irish PM of Indian descent has been diagnosed with AIDS."
 
Arado said:
I highly doubt that India will have this IQ jump from mid 80's to over 100. That would be a colossal geopolitical earthquake in terms of changing the balance of power in the world 20 years from now.

I never meant 20 years. I meant hundreds of years. 100 years would require massive directed eugenics measures and they won't be happening.

The IQ tests were rather correct because Swedes with zero English language skills came in higher. The Hajnal line was real - I am myself of German-Austrian and Polish descent.

They burned the last witch in Poland in the year 1810. There was a major discrepancy between the educated city dwellers, the large partly inbred nobility and the rural population who too often married their cousins - even first ones. The country was pretty backwards despite having millions of high-IQ intellectuals living in the cities.

Of course India is more backwards than Poland was in the last 200 years, so it will take longer to get out of this, but it will happen. They are fiercely k-selected, if they can get rid of the caste thinking, then this will become reality for the whole continent. And if it takes 200-300 years for the whole continent, then so be it.

Bangladesh by the way has another problem - Islam. That is such a civilization destroyer which automatically lowers IQ and destroys work ethic, that I have little hope for that place.
 
Top