Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
The Official Roosh/RVF/ROK media mention thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Days of Broken Arrows" data-source="post: 933228" data-attributes="member: 4258"><p><strong>RE: Roosh features (finally) in The Economist</strong></p><p></p><p>The subhead headline presents a perfect example of media bias. It reads "The rebalancing of the sexes has spawned 21st-century <strong>misogyny."</strong></p><p></p><p>But that word never appears in the story itself, which is reasonably even-handed. Since headline writing is a separate job from article writing at almost all media outlets, this makes me think someone in a position of power deliberately wrote that headline to cast a negative light on subject.</p><p></p><p>The article, by the way, contains no byline -- which is also pretty odd.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Days of Broken Arrows, post: 933228, member: 4258"] [b]RE: Roosh features (finally) in The Economist[/b] The subhead headline presents a perfect example of media bias. It reads "The rebalancing of the sexes has spawned 21st-century [b]misogyny."[/b] But that word never appears in the story itself, which is reasonably even-handed. Since headline writing is a separate job from article writing at almost all media outlets, this makes me think someone in a position of power deliberately wrote that headline to cast a negative light on subject. The article, by the way, contains no byline -- which is also pretty odd. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
The Official Roosh/RVF/ROK media mention thread
Top
