BoiBoi said:Every man over forty is responsible for his face.
Abraham Lincoln
MajorStyles said:Fox Sports...finding non-Jewish men that look more Jewish than Jews. But what a Cohencidence...Nic Wright (who is Greek) still has the trademark hatred for all the white goyim. Here he tells people to hate Grayson Allen because...well...you know...he's white and plays for Duke (which is like totally racist and stuff).
(((Fox))) really works hard at the physiognomy misdirection hustle.
![]()
In a classic study, researchers Betty Grayson and Morris I. Stein asked convicted criminals to view a video of pedestrians walking down a busy New York City sidewalk, unaware they were being taped. The convicts had been to prison for violent offenses such as armed robbery, rape, and murder.
Within a few seconds, the convicts identified which pedestrians they would have been likely to target. What startled the researchers was that there was a clear consensus among the criminals about whom they would have picked as victims—and their choices were not based on gender, race, or age. Some petite, physically slight women were not selected as potential victims, while some large men were.
The researchers realized the criminals were assessing the ease with which they could overpower the targets based on several nonverbal signals—posture, body language, pace of walking, length of stride, and awareness of environment. Neither criminals nor victims were consciously aware of these cues. They are what psychologists call "precipitators," personal attributes that increase a person's likelihood of being criminally victimized.
la bodhisattva said:MajorStyles said:The corporate media and vocal minority consumers of athletics cannot stomach the reality that white boys are capable of dominating a sport or position historically dominated by minorities. Whites are given the place of unathletic jump shooters and quarterbacks. Out hit, out jump, out jook, out run, out shake, out spin, and out talk and you'll be the target of hate your entire career.
Somehow what you've said reminds me of this explanation of minority sports capability.
[attachment=42837]
Jones said:Read "Vaught's Practical Character Reader" (1902) if you are interested in this topic. It is in the public domain: it can be read for free.
rotekz said:Jones said:Read "Vaught's Practical Character Reader" (1902) if you are interested in this topic. It is in the public domain: it can be read for free.
I flicked though that book and it looks like a load of old tosh. For starters the 'honest' face immediately reminded me of Egg McMuffin, the crooked CIA spook that tried to run against Trump in the primaries.
![]()
![]()
And we are supposed to believe that Dr. Spock is deceitful?
![]()
debeguiled said:Check out the mugshot website for your county and see if you can tell the difference between habitual criminals and non criminals getting a DUI just by how they look.
And also, the criminals are using this kind of analysis to choose victims.
In a classic study, researchers Betty Grayson and Morris I. Stein asked convicted criminals to view a video of pedestrians walking down a busy New York City sidewalk, unaware they were being taped. The convicts had been to prison for violent offenses such as armed robbery, rape, and murder.
Within a few seconds, the convicts identified which pedestrians they would have been likely to target. What startled the researchers was that there was a clear consensus among the criminals about whom they would have picked as victims—and their choices were not based on gender, race, or age. Some petite, physically slight women were not selected as potential victims, while some large men were.
The researchers realized the criminals were assessing the ease with which they could overpower the targets based on several nonverbal signals—posture, body language, pace of walking, length of stride, and awareness of environment. Neither criminals nor victims were consciously aware of these cues. They are what psychologists call "precipitators," personal attributes that increase a person's likelihood of being criminally victimized.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/200901/marked-mayhem
"If I had the slightest inkling that a woman wasn't someone I could easily handle, then I would pass right on by. Or if I thought I couldn't control the situation, then I wouldn't even mess with the house, much less attempt a rape there," says Brad Morrison, a convicted sex offender who raped 75 women in 11 states and who's quoted in Predators: Who They Are and How to Stop Them, by Gregory M. Cooper, Michael R. King, and Thomas McHoes.
"Like, if they had a dog, then forget it. Even a small one makes too much noise. If I saw a pair of construction boots, for example, out on the porch or on the landing, I walked right on by. In fact, I think if women who live alone would put a pair of old construction boots—or something that makes it look like a physically fit manly-type of guy lives with them—out in front of their door, most rapists or even burglars wouldn't even think about trying to get into their home."
nomadbrah said:911 said:Tribute to Heartiste, here is the physiognomy thread.
I'll start things off with this phenomenon of a creature:
[img=620x400]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ELoYwrbXUAE1BSp.jpg:large[/img]
This one has too much amphibian DNA. I bet his wife feeds him assorted bugs when he gets home. He positions himself in a low squat and the wife releases a fly one at the time.
![]()