durangotang
Ostrich
It would be great to see Paul win Maine and have vote fraud exposed.
The Republican Primary is a Sham!?
- Thread starter thegmanifesto
- Start date
- Status
defguy said:
More fucking stinkin' horseshit.
That's right, let's count the counties where GORE might pick up votes, but not the counties where BUSH might pick up votes.
That's fucking fair. Let's do that.
By the way, how can anybody be a Gamer and be shitty pansy leftist? The answer?
You can't be. Because leftists are fucking pussies.
MikeCF said:
Really? How about these constitutional scholars?
http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=MjUyMDk0Y2Y5M2VkODk0YjBkZDE0MjRmZDViODg4NjE=
Really, watch this and THEN get back to me.
tenderman100 said:
Yet by self-admission you rank yourself as a Beginner when it comes to game level. What do you know about the game, Master? Or the personalities that dwell in the field?
Hilarious.
Keep drinkin' the Fox News Kool-Aid, Bubba, you'll be fine...
Didn't momma ever tell you curse-words was for people who didn't know no better?
MSW2007 said:
Really? I can rank myself? Didn't know that. In my user profile it seems unchangeable.
Here's the logic.
Anybody who expects government to solve their problems are pussies.
Leftists expect government to solve problems.
Ergo, leftists are pussies.
All or Nothing
Pelican
tenderman100 said:
So my desire to have police protect me, firemen to save me, lawyers to defend me, the roads to be well paved, free education, and a hell of a lot of other things makes me a pussy?
All or Nothing said:
Problem is, the government is going deeper into debt (dangerous levels) and you're receiving fewer and fewer of those services. And btw, most of those services are provided by the state, not the federal government.
Nearly $2trillion of your tax money in the U.S. every year is spent just on defense, senior citizens and poor people. Good luck getting free education or health care. The government simply cannot afford to pay for all those things you want.
I believe it would shock people if they actually did the simple math of the federal government: tax revenues collected - spending = ??? and then look at the future deficit and debt projections. There is simply no way the U.S. does not collapse under the weight of it's own debt in the next decade. This spending is unsustainable and U.S. citizens are arguably getting less bang for the government buck today than ever before.
Go look a the numbers.
This threat is very real.
tenderman100 said:
Maybe.
But right wingers are dorks and pussies.
Notice above the use of the word "Gamer".
So you are a dork.
And you constantly act like a pussy on here.
So you are pretty much a great example of that.
ccurtis189
Woodpecker
tenderman100 said:
Oh my, that was one of the worst examples of logic I've ever seen.
Gerald Celente's predictions for 2012. Interesting.
tenderman100 said:
This old man should not be allowed to participate in any political threads.
It sounds like he's really angry.
tenderman100 said:
Grandpa, the National Review is the conservative pro-Bush magazine. They endorsed George W both times. Of course, they will tell you a million reasons why Al Gore is the devil.
Tenderman100, I know that sitting there watching Glenn Whateverthefuck and reading the National Review will make you paranoid. Just trust me when I say this though: Even though the President is darker than you, he's not coming to your house to take your gun and give it to other darkies so they can shoot god. Enjoy your golden years.
Or, I bet you got whippersnappers on your lawn. Take our anger out on them.
Aloha!
Enfant_Terrible
Kingfisher
Hencredible Casanova said:
Very interesting. Good analysis even though some of the things have yet to come, but I believe they're strong possibilities. This is one of those things that I like about that channel (RT)
[/quote]
Guys who throw around, "Left wingers must be a pussies" crack me up.
I've boxed in a ring, fought MMA, had nose broken in fights. What about you "alpha male Republicans"? When's the last time you got into a fight on the street, or entered a ring or cage for the fun of it?
Al Franken challenged National Review editor Rich Lowry to a fight after Lowry called liberals pansies. Lowry punked out like a little bitch.
Jeff Monson is a radical left winger.
If you need to show how tough you are by associating with a political party, I have bad news for you, Nancy.
I've boxed in a ring, fought MMA, had nose broken in fights. What about you "alpha male Republicans"? When's the last time you got into a fight on the street, or entered a ring or cage for the fun of it?
Al Franken challenged National Review editor Rich Lowry to a fight after Lowry called liberals pansies. Lowry punked out like a little bitch.
Jeff Monson is a radical left winger.
If you need to show how tough you are by associating with a political party, I have bad news for you, Nancy.
I have a question. When is the last time any of you changed anybody's mind about anything talking politics? If any of you really want anything to change you would be advised to support a 3rd party whether that be the tea party, occupy movement, or something in between.
MikeCF said:
That one is easy. While Ron Paul is not a threat in terms of winning the nomination, he could cause Mitt Romney to lose the nomination.
In the most recent case, Maine, screwing Ron Paul was meant to prevent Mitt from losing all momentum. If Paul been announced the winner in Maine, that would have been 4 straight defeats form Mitt Romney. It would motivate his opponents to stay in the race longer, More importantly, guys like Santorum and Gingrich (though, mostly Santorum) would get more money into their campaigns, perhaps even money that would have gone to Romney, because Romney no longer looks like "Mr. Inevitable".
As it stands now, if/when Ron Paul is announced to be the ACTUAL winner of Maine, the announcement will be drowned out because of the Arizona and Michigan primary results. It will be an afterthought, the way Rick Santorum being announced as the actual winner of Iowa didn't have a huge impact.
The ideal situation for Romney would have been to have vanquished all serious candidates by Super Tuesday or earlier. That isn't going to happen. There is a VERY strong chance that this could go on to June, or even not be settled until the convention in August.
This would be HORRIBLE for Romney. As we have seen, since Romney really has no stated vision for improving America, his only defense when faced with serious challengers (e.g. Santorum and Gingrich) is to flood the airwaves with negative ads. Because he has so much money, it works.
However, it also leads to his own approval numbers and likability numbers dropping. In addition, this moderate Republican has to continuously project this image of being a hard right winger to win the nomination. The longer he has to project that image in the primary, the less likely independent voters will forget it in the general election.
If you would have asked me this time last year whether I thought President Obama would be re-elected, I would have said no with a strong degree of confidence. At this point, I think that it is HIGHLY likely that he will win re-election. Short of a MAJOR dip in the economy this summer (still possible), I can't see any of the republican candidates recovering.
I am actually more concerned about the fact that Fidel Castro called the Republican primaries "the [greatest competition of idocy] and biggest collection of stupidity and ignorance that I have ever seen". When a senile communist dictator is criticizing you for being stupid, then you know things have REALLY gone downhill.
MikeCF said:
I believe if you polled every ron paul supporter and told them they had to choose either democrat or republican, 50% + 1 would choose republicans. I cannot agree with your statement that being a Ron Paul guy makes others perceive you as left wing. I'm a Ron Paul guy too and nobody would consider me left wing.
- Status