@BillboardChris' full text
The RFK Jr. Thread
- Thread starter Thomas More
- Start date
@BillboardChris' full text
Yeah he's flamed out the last few days. But, he would still be great if as the head of HHS or NIH or whatever federal agency that shouldn't exist. Thing is, if Trump is nominee he would never appoint him. Trump will not execute a full accounting of Covid as he would be implicated; it's in his best interest to just move along. The only candidates who would bring accountability is Desantis and RFJ Jr.
RFK jr has his strengths, but based on the past two days, Trump would do as badly giving him a goverment post as he did putting Wray in for FBI.
The thing is, at least RFK has enough respect for Republicans that he tries to persuade his point. He's not just stating his view is superior and that anyone who disagrees is a deplorable abomination. He treats Republicans with respect and tries to convince us to join him, at least to some degree.
That is a world above what current Democrats do.
Furthermore, RFK seems like a reasonable man. Maybe he would compromise where Affirmative-Action doesn't look at race, but instead just looks at family tax-returns to see how far the student is below the poverty level?
Even if he did agree to that, I'd still have reservations about what kind of judges he would pick. Never seen a good Democrat judge. Trump's latest three justices are amazing and so many terrible rulings of the 1960's have been trashcanned. God bless Trump for those three justices (although they could have been better!). I fear with a Democrat president we could lose that, but still, RFK leading the Democrat party wouldn't be excruciating torture like current Democrat leadership is.
Barring a mostly peaceful leftist bombing, I don’t think there is any imminent retirements on the horizon, so it could be a while before we get movement of judges. That’s why the left is so pissed about the whole thing, and why Garland was chosen to take revenge on cons via the Justice Department. Blocking Garland’s nomination via Obama may have literally saved America (for the time being). If it weren’t for the current makeup of the court, we’d have a deluge of delusional woke law interpretations approved by a leftist activist court. That move, combined with Trump’s election in 2016, were MASSIVE setbacks to the Democrat takeover of America. If I were any of these conservative judges I’d have real reservations about my security. Not only are leftist freaks a constant threat, but even foreign (and possibly domestic) state actors as well.
Great answer. As a political figure he's very polished.
I like RJK Jr as a person. Huge policy disagreements on abortion, "climate change", and affirmative action.
I think he's 1000x better than Biden.
Like Trump he is authentic. Even where I disagree with him, I think he altruistically believes in what he promotes. This is why I am more inclined to vote for him than other Republicans.
RFK is an environmentalist, not a cow fart zealot.
Are there any statements from him advocating for carbon dioxide reduction or other fake environmental positions?
His life's work was about removing chemicals from our air and water.
This lead him to discover some of the same dangerous pollutants (intentionally inserted) in vaccines, which lead to his Children's Health movement.
He says every abortion is "a tragedy." Can't say I've heard many politicians condemn it that harshly. And it's not like Republicans have stopped abortion (limited surgical abortions in some states but done nothing for the pill that is used in 80% of abortions now). I guess Rick Santorum is a politician opposed to abortion but I really can't name another one.
The affirmative action position is just a bad solution to a real problem.
A bad idea, but we are still waiting on a better solution from someone.
By far the most scary stuff I've heard from him is his pro-Zionist position, which basically negates whatever position you have, because your administration will be subverted by Jews if you are not J woke and your intentions and personal thoughts won't matter. But it's not like Mel Gibson is running so I'll take my chances that he is hiding his power level on that one...
He's actually one of the only politicians with a common sense observation about immigration, namely that the GAE is making other countries unpleasant places, which drives immigration. That, of course, is the jewish plan for world diversity, which maybe he doesn't get, but as long as he understands the problem, that's a good start.
Stopping immigration demand overseas is far more viable than trying to physically plug a border.
Make Iran, Venezuela, Mexico*, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc. nice places to live, as they were decades before, and you don't have to deal with thousands of them streaming here (Mexico's decline was arguably not America's fault though we certainly could and probably should have intervened to help it).
Last edited:
Sonia sotomayor has type 1 diabetes and is 68 years old. Clarence Thomas is 74 and Alito 72. They are not super old but should we have active judges in their 80s? My parents are in their 80s and still mostly lucid but I’ve seen mental decline set in on relatives in their 80s
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reaffirms support for abortion
Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has reiterated his support for abortion rights, despite his belief that “every abortion is a tragedy.” During a town hall event in New Hampshire, Kennedy argued that the government should not be involved in decisions that belong to women and advocated for medical freedom and bodily autonomy. He acknowledged that he finds third-term abortions appalling and expressed a desire to end them in other ways, although he did not specify his stance on government intervention at various stages of pregnancy.Full article
I suppose he can't say anything else, if he wants to run as a Democrat.
Well, at least he's made his position clear. He is not a valid option anymore. His climate crisis shtick was bad enough. And considering Trump STILL pushes the "amazing vaccines" and has never apologized or backed down from that, he is not an option, either. Plus, both he and DeSantis are Zionist shills, so it looks like I will sit this election out.
True. They are all bloodthirsty baby killers, and anyone who doesn't worship Moloch will go nowhere with them.
I agree. People who want to fence-sit or equivocate, instead of taking a hard moral Christian stance, are ultimately dancing with the devil.
This being said, both RFK and Trump would stave off nuclear war, or at the very least avoid a hot war with Russia, and that's a big plus. RFK warts and all looks like the best Democrat prospect in a long time, maybe since Gary Hart.
It's a moot point though, he's definitely not going to beat the establishment candidate, be it Biden or whoever replaces him, the Dem machine will make sure of this.
It's a moot point though, he's definitely not going to beat the establishment candidate, be it Biden or whoever replaces him, the Dem machine will make sure of this.
Full text
The @nypost story is mistaken. I have never, ever suggested that the COVID-19 virus was targeted to spare Jews. I accurately pointed out — during an off-the-record conversation — that the U.S. and other governments are developing ethnically targeted bioweapons and that a 2021 study of the COVID-19 virus shows that COVID-19 appears to disproportionately affect certain races since the furin cleave docking site is most compatible with Blacks and Caucasians and least compatible with ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews. In that sense, it serves as a kind of proof of concept for ethnically targeted bioweapons. I do not believe and never implied that the ethnic effect was deliberately engineered. That study is here:
New insights into genetic susceptibility of COVID-19: an ACE2 and TMPRSS2 polymorphism analysis - PubMed
This study suggested that ACE2 or TMPRSS2 DNA polymorphisms were likely associated with genetic susceptibility of COVID-19, which calls for a human genetics initiative for fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Yes and no. A flu like covid will disproportionally affect people with co morbidities. And if blacks and Hispanics have more obesity and diabetes in their population then they will have higher covid cases. If Chinese and Jews have less comorbidities then they get relatively spared .
That said if Rfk Jr flat out said “I blame ashkenazi Jews for covid “ I’d respect him .
That said if Rfk Jr flat out said “I blame ashkenazi Jews for covid “ I’d respect him .
Kind of. Ashkenazis are among the kings of congenital comorbidities. With blacks (Western Bantu) dying from spike proteins, it's that blacks' greatest weakness, from a medical perspective, is their cardiovascular system and their blood. It's widely known that they have a higher tendency towards diabetes than whites, but they are also very susceptible to heart disease and coagulation issues, because of sickle cell prevalence but also other factors. They have a more intense stress response, because they are wired differently on an endocrine level, higher testosterone levels in both sexes, slightly different cortisol interactions (which, weirdly enough, actually seems to be directly connected to their skin color: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01969.x)
There are lot of stories about relatively young black men suddenly having heart attacks and strokes, and I'd say among the prominent people I read about who died or became disabled from the jab, a good third of them are black. Kevin Samuels and Jamie Foxx come to mind.
I think talking about the virus itself is kinda lame now, because it's less of a politicum than the jab campaign, which still hasn't entirely died down. Covid, whatever it was, was never all that deadly to begin with. RFK should just really push for strict punishments for the figureheads of the jab campaign instead of opening some intersectional can of worms about who was and wasn't affected by the flu.
Last edited: