Haha when they're going for the "foreign agent" angle on Dr. Jones, you know they're at a loss with what to do with him. Clearly a scholarly debate on the merit of his rhetoric is out of the question. He's not beyond criticism, and yet they don't. Why don't they critique him along the merits of his thoughts, rather than assassinate his character? It's questions like that which help me to sleep soundly at night.
Just got to learn to be more subtle. Maybe post in code, half-farsi, or some other disguise trick. I'm betting the algo picks up the violations, and even if a human checked they would be too lazy to click on any links and read the hidden content.