I don't know which is worse. The obviously mentally ill tranny freak or the stupid women who invite him to their party and expect normal behavior.Hilarious phenomenon, straight out of Saul Alinsky's 10 rules for radicals book.
Fight them with their own weapons, according to their own 'logic'. The exposed, defensive position has been tried and failed. You don't own the institutions and therefor the language and therefor you will never hold your ground. Millions of heads have proverbially exploded in the last couple of days.
Having said that the tranny problem is a much bigger problem than previously assumed. I thought that they were a bunch of sad mentally ill freaks online but turns out plenty of people get harassed by them
SPOILER ALERT: LANGUAGE
View attachment 29648View attachment 29649View attachment 29650View attachment 29651View attachment 29652View attachment 29653
That is the fatal flaw of women: as socializers, they are made to socialize and make people feel "welcome". This helps them protect society by disarming the losers of society (omega males) by making them feel like they're at least still a part of society so they don't go postal, and it also serves as a matchmaking function.I don't know which is worse. The obviously mentally ill tranny freak or the stupid women who invite him to their party and expect normal behavior.
The trick is to remember that they describe themselves according to what they want to become. Or mnemonically, the end, not the start. So that's a dude pretending to be a chick.Am I the only one who get majorly confused when I hear the phrase 'trans girl'?
Like is that a dude who became a chick. Or a chick who became a dude?
In the 1970's homosexuals were classified as mentally ill. Then they were normalized. Today trannies are going from mentally ill to 'normal'. So it's funny to see the people who think it's normal to be 'gay' but transgenders are a step too far. It's the same timeline, generations apart.
If you really want to infuriate the leftist then identify as normal. There will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Darwinism has, as an intellectual framework, been dead to me for many years. And I don't mean that I believed in it, I mean dead to me as in anybody still holding to it I literally regard as retarded. Atheists these days hold to Darwinian beliefs more out of necessity, because it's the only thing that really gives the appearance of justifying an atheistic worldview, but it has been shredded to pieces so badly over the past two decades that I can't imagine any serious thinker ever taking it seriously anymore.Darwin. Science.
Think about it. Why would evolution cause homosexuality or transsexualism. From the Darwinian perspective, its not "normal". Suboptimal.
While I can see this "Super straight" is just a piss take and a massive troll I have to say I've never been comfortable with being called "straight" and certainly not "cis".
I actually see the term "straight" as being mildly offensive, like you are boring, somehow "stiff" ( not in that sense!), stuffy and not at all fun. You are also making the mistake of falling into the perverts frame by calling yourself "straight" or even "super straight". And I bet it was one of those perverts that invented all this stuff also coined the mildly offensive term "straight". No thank you, I reject that fagot labelling.