The Super Straight Movement

LeoniusD

Pelican
In the 1970's homosexuals were classified as mentally ill. Then they were normalized. Today trannies are going from mentally ill to 'normal'. So it's funny to see the people who think it's normal to be 'gay' but transgenders are a step too far. It's the same timeline, generations apart.
Wait a few years when they normalized transgenders and then push the boundaries more with pedosexuals being the vanguard of the LGBTQXP movement. Then you will think that the bathroom issue and the aggro transgenders were such a minor problem as they push a 52 year old Floyd with his 4 year old fiancee Susie in Hollywood and the new Republicans declare pounding their proud chests that they stand behind the values of freedom for Susie and Floyd to find their love regardless of age - otherwise you are just a transgenerational ageist bigot and racist!

4bEjbgCbFMvA8T33kKpp3RsBvZue1Hns5Cwuz57pgmmNsNpBYiv4RePxLaSWDW64wYQSTzMH1m1nBVLKsnxyed1v6u9vcy...jpg

 

andy dufresne

Kingfisher
Wait a few years when they normalized transgenders and then push the boundaries more with pedosexuals being the vanguard of the LGBTQXP movement. Then you will think that the bathroom issue and the aggro transgenders were such a minor problem as they push a 52 year old Floyd with his 4 year old fiancee Susie in Hollywood and the new Republicans declare pounding their proud chests that they stand behind the values of freedom for Susie and Floyd to find their love regardless of age - otherwise you are just a transgenerational ageist bigot and racist!

View attachment 29736
And this is why everyday I prepare to move to a cabin in the deep woods. 'They're all dead Jim.....all Dead.'
 

Elipe

Pelican
Wait a few years when they normalized transgenders and then push the boundaries more with pedosexuals being the vanguard of the LGBTQXP movement. Then you will think that the bathroom issue and the aggro transgenders were such a minor problem as they push a 52 year old Floyd with his 4 year old fiancee Susie in Hollywood and the new Republicans declare pounding their proud chests that they stand behind the values of freedom for Susie and Floyd to find their love regardless of age - otherwise you are just a transgenerational ageist bigot and racist!
Sometimes I wonder if God is holding back Yellowstone from blowing until America has hit rock bottom. We're clearly not there yet, because they still find more ways to go lower.
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
One thing that keeps getting to me are all the lies that comes from this "community". And its kind of beyond lying, they're deceivers. The term, homophobia is a great example. Because this term is an outright lie. People are no afraid of homosexuals. There is no irrational fear at work here, rather, if there's fear at all its well grounded. They are, after all, trying to legalize pedophilia. To continue on, this is a disingenuous term and its built upon several underlying presuppositions that are not fact based, in fact, they're cloistered from any kind of criticism. homophobia is designed to throw people off and for that reason its not a "word" rather a deflection or, at the very least, an instrument. An instrument with very specific purposes and uses. Any person critical of homosexuals are immediately branded with this. The subject must now defend their own sexuality which by way of the implication "phobia" embedded into this term suggest that said subject is in fact reacting against their own personal latent homosexuality. Accordingly, this is why they're critical. It gets people off balance and makes an otherwise clear and cogent argument messier because the subject has to now explain why they're not gay. And, as he or she is doing this they are engaging in meaningless dialogue because they need not explain why they're not gay. For it stands that if they're critical of homosexuality, the odds are this person is not gay in the least. But, this term creates this unnecessary loop, because the more the subject argues against homosexuals the more they prove they're gay? But, then again, the more one argues against anything the more they are legitimately against said thing, otherwise they wouldn't argue at all. This is the sort of twisted contortions we can expect from this "community" and it speaks volumes of their collective character. Because it also operates on the ascertain that other people can read another person's mind. There is no way to prove whether a subject harbors latent homosexuality. This is ipso facto because there is no way to read another person's mind. homosexuals contend latent homosexuality is real, but, we must consider the source. Since homosexuality is not born-in and is some kind of condition engendered by environmental factors then a person will experience homosexual feelings as a result of the environmental exposure. That will likely appear to be latent to this person because it will be novel and they'll understandably feel uncertain about it. Though this may prove latent homosexuality we must further qualify this with the fact that its obviously very common within the homosexual community. This is water is wet territory. So, its a moot point. Sure, a gay person probably felt latent feelings at first, but, that does not mean that every person critical of homosexuality also shares in this latent condition. Its lies, its deception.
 

shahmark

Chicken
127653547_10225960703789622_3586310483143450285_n.png
 

The 1 Duke

Sparrow
a considerable number - scratch that - all of them are mentally ill. That's the problem in the first place. That, and instead of truly trying to help them globalists and nation wreckers use them to tear at the fabric of

Exactly what we need. The number of categories should be constantly multiplied, just like we see with the hundreds of gender identities. Even if the mob bans Super Straight on Twitter and other platforms, other movements can be created all the time, so it's impossible to moderate.

And if Super Straight does get banned, people should turn around and use the rhetoric of the left - "Super Straight people are being discriminated against on the basis of their gender identity! Do you realise how many lives this will affect?! Do you realise that you are enabling hate speech against the Super Straight community?!11"

The irony is, straight people actually ARE being genuinely discriminated against nowadays - probably more so than someone who identifies as an asexual pony or whatever.
No, please keep it simple. Just "Super Straight" and the flag.
These two things alone will cause the left to blow a blood vessel in their brain, and you don't have to say a word.
Whoever coined the label Super Straight is a genius!
I can not stop laughing!
 
This doesn't work for us. They do this because they control worldly institutions, like the media and the government. It also works for them because they are not concerned with God's prohibition on lying.

And even if it did work in one instance (which it will not) it would unwind one little tentacle of their 1000 tentacle monster.

We have to reject their framing totally. We need to build a society around a godly world view that doesn't include this divide and conquer identity politics catty little game they play.

We must build a logos based subculture, focused on absolute purity. This subculture is very small now, but it is very powerful, and will grow and succeed. As their culture fails and people want to join the culture of life they will need to put aside all their satanic framing.

Those that don't should not be engaged ideologically, where we discuss anything with them.
Amen brotha
 

Max Roscoe

Pelican
Orthodox Inquirer
The trick is to remember that they describe themselves according to what they want to become. Or mnemonically, the end, not the start. So that's a dude pretending to be a chick.
I disagree. They should always be described as MTF or FTM. I refuse to learn some arbitrary word phrasing that I can't keep straight.. Anyway.. a trans "man" is actually a woman so trans woman would make more sense.

I could see calling them "fakeman" or "fakewoman" though.
 

Elipe

Pelican
I disagree. They should always be described as MTF or FTM. I refuse to learn some arbitrary word phrasing that I can't keep straight.. Anyway.. a trans "man" is actually a woman so trans woman would make more sense.

I could see calling them "fakeman" or "fakewoman" though.
It's not about what we should call them, I was pointing out that is how they use the term, and that is what was confusing andy.
 
One thing that keeps getting to me are all the lies that comes from this "community". And its kind of beyond lying, they're deceivers. The term, homophobia is a great example. Because this term is an outright lie. People are no afraid of homosexuals. There is no irrational fear at work here, rather, if there's fear at all its well grounded. They are, after all, trying to legalize pedophilia. To continue on, this is a disingenuous term and its built upon several underlying presuppositions that are not fact based, in fact, they're cloistered from any kind of criticism. homophobia is designed to throw people off and for that reason its not a "word" rather a deflection or, at the very least, an instrument. An instrument with very specific purposes and uses. Any person critical of homosexuals are immediately branded with this. The subject must now defend their own sexuality which by way of the implication "phobia" embedded into this term suggest that said subject is in fact reacting against their own personal latent homosexuality. Accordingly, this is why they're critical. It gets people off balance and makes an otherwise clear and cogent argument messier because the subject has to now explain why they're not gay. And, as he or she is doing this they are engaging in meaningless dialogue because they need not explain why they're not gay. For it stands that if they're critical of homosexuality, the odds are this person is not gay in the least. But, this term creates this unnecessary loop, because the more the subject argues against homosexuals the more they prove they're gay? But, then again, the more one argues against anything the more they are legitimately against said thing, otherwise they wouldn't argue at all. This is the sort of twisted contortions we can expect from this "community" and it speaks volumes of their collective character. Because it also operates on the ascertain that other people can read another person's mind. There is no way to prove whether a subject harbors latent homosexuality. This is ipso facto because there is no way to read another person's mind. homosexuals contend latent homosexuality is real, but, we must consider the source. Since homosexuality is not born-in and is some kind of condition engendered by environmental factors then a person will experience homosexual feelings as a result of the environmental exposure. That will likely appear to be latent to this person because it will be novel and they'll understandably feel uncertain about it. Though this may prove latent homosexuality we must further qualify this with the fact that its obviously very common within the homosexual community. This is water is wet territory. So, its a moot point. Sure, a gay person probably felt latent feelings at first, but, that does not mean that every person critical of homosexuality also shares in this latent condition. Its lies, its deception.
And that lie will be applied to any other sexual perversion.
 

Aubert

Chicken
Straight men-trans couples
Will become the norm in a few years. They will make it a staple in the media and make movies about it, mark my words.
 
Last edited:

911

Peacock
Gold Member
They can always try, that faggotry is not gonna fly with the majority of people in the West, and it's CERTAINLY not going to fly in the rest of the world, where the anti-degeneracy international coalition is growing richer and more powerful every day.

That's the aspect that a lot of China/Russia haters don't see. This whole Clown World empire is built on the US Dollar and the MIC. If you take that away, which those darned ChiCom will, before the end of this decade, the dystopian house of cards will collapse, along with the other ideological rot from the Greta Cult of Gaia to the Klaus Schwab "own nothing" techno commie farm, to the fruity 45 intersectional gender flavors.
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
They can always try, that faggotry is not gonna fly with the majority of people in the West, and it's CERTAINLY not going to fly in the rest of the world, where the anti-degeneracy international coalition is growing richer and more powerful every day.

That's the aspect that a lot of China/Russia haters don't see. This whole Clown World empire is built on the US Dollar and the MIC. If you take that away, which those darned ChiCom will, before the end of this decade, the dystopian house of cards will collapse, along with the other ideological rot from the Greta Cult of Gaia to the Klaus Schwab "own nothing" techno commie farm, to the fruity 45 intersectional gender flavors.
I love this! Bam! Well said.
 
Top