The terrain theory

LeoniusD

Pelican
The germ-theory makes less sense the more deeply I think about it.
Try to visualize how it is supposed to work, according to mainstream narrative:
The world has been on unprecedented lockdowns for the last 1,5 years. Without possibility of spreading from person to person, those "viruses" should be pretty much extinct by now. Yet, we are made to believe, that all it takes to re-spawn the "pandemic" is a couple of "viral particles" that survived on random doorknobs, entered some lungs and reproduced in the trillions. It's just silly if you have the imagination how this would go about.
The theory of sickness being a detoxing process is much more sound and universal. Infections are real, though. You can get "infected" from SOMEONE WHO HAS SYPTOMS. This is not contradictory to terrain theory: If cells can communicate with each other within your own body, there may exist ways of communicationsbetween cells of seperate bodies.
Exosomes are real and they cause you to become sick if you have a toxin in you that needs to get rid off by your body or you have a similar underlying issue. That is real.

And it all makes sense in that respect - thus their long-touted infection studies were inconclusive, because some people got sick from others while others - the wider majority - did not regardless of the strength of the supposed pathogen. It goes back 100 years when Pasteur faked the results as he could not prove transmission.

It does however make sense when some people get sick from others - they do so by getting the same exosomes. Funnily enough - those that live or work together have a closer interaction, eat similar things, are exposed to similar toxins, so they may in fact get sick more often than for example a group of random test subjects that you try to infect with a symptomatic sick person. But that also is explained by the terrain plus exosome theory.

I found the explanations of Dr. Kaufmann the most telling frankly.

Plus we have to realize - no one here incl. Dr. Kaufmann knows everything about our immune system and how it works. The reason being that we would have to reboot medical science, question and then ultimately throw away the germ theory, throw away vaccination science (they know that antibodies make up 10-20% of our immune system at best), then rebuild everything from scratch with everything we know doing constant studies and observations.

Only then could we come up with a theory or factual observation of how our immune system works. I believe what we would find out is that it will be terrain, exosomes plus various added factors on top of it. But the ruling elite will never ever allow this to happen. Not only would they have to throw away their for-profit petrol-based allopathic medical model, they would have to throw away their population contorl tool of vaccines, the peasants would begin to live longer, be smarter, be more alive, be stronger. There are essentially only downsides to that - the entire covid Great Reset could not even be done, the peasants would never fear any 'pandemic' and would never allow themselves to be injected with toxins. Heck - the peasants would demand less toxins in food and the environment as a real solution to better health - the peasants would live to be 100 for real. I can see a hundred Rockefellers and Gates screaming at the mere thought of such a system.
 

GuitarVH

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
Exosomes are real and they cause you to become sick if you have a toxin in you that needs to get rid off by your body or you have a similar underlying issue. That is real.

And it all makes sense in that respect - thus their long-touted infection studies were inconclusive, because some people got sick from others while others - the wider majority - did not regardless of the strength of the supposed pathogen. It goes back 100 years when Pasteur faked the results as he could not prove transmission.

It does however make sense when some people get sick from others - they do so by getting the same exosomes. Funnily enough - those that live or work together have a closer interaction, eat similar things, are exposed to similar toxins, so they may in fact get sick more often than for example a group of random test subjects that you try to infect with a symptomatic sick person. But that also is explained by the terrain plus exosome theory.

I found the explanations of Dr. Kaufmann the most telling frankly.

Plus we have to realize - no one here incl. Dr. Kaufmann knows everything about our immune system and how it works. The reason being that we would have to reboot medical science, question and then ultimately throw away the germ theory, throw away vaccination science (they know that antibodies make up 10-20% of our immune system at best), then rebuild everything from scratch with everything we know doing constant studies and observations.

Only then could we come up with a theory or factual observation of how our immune system works. I believe what we would find out is that it will be terrain, exosomes plus various added factors on top of it. But the ruling elite will never ever allow this to happen. Not only would they have to throw away their for-profit petrol-based allopathic medical model, they would have to throw away their population contorl tool of vaccines, the peasants would begin to live longer, be smarter, be more alive, be stronger. There are essentially only downsides to that - the entire covid Great Reset could not even be done, the peasants would never fear any 'pandemic' and would never allow themselves to be injected with toxins. Heck - the peasants would demand less toxins in food and the environment as a real solution to better health - the peasants would live to be 100 for real. I can see a hundred Rockefellers and Gates screaming at the mere thought of such a system.

The belief in the germ theory is at the core of this psychological operation scamdemic making it a cornerstone necessity for implementing worldwide totalitarianism.
 

Redcrosse

Woodpecker
Thanks for those links doctorweedmd. Most people think Lanka is crazy and way too out there, but I think he’s on the right track. Everything he says makes perfect sense to me — and a properly conducted experiment has to be addressed no matter how much it goes against the grain of what germ theory claims is true. There’s already lots of evidence he’s essentially correct.

What history teaches us though is that scientists in an established field will fight tooth and nail to prevent paradigm shifts from happening. They aren’t open-minded, and they aren’t driven by logic and reason, they aren’t these dispassionate neutral observers like they pretend to be. They have their turf and they don’t let anyone challenge it. Turf wars, financial stakes and ego will ensure they won’t allow Lanka to get a fair hearing anytime soon.
 

doodydota

Pigeon
Thanks for those links doctorweedmd. Most people think Lanka is crazy and way too out there, but I think he’s on the right track. Everything he says makes perfect sense to me — and a properly conducted experiment has to be addressed no matter how much it goes against the grain of what germ theory claims is true. There’s already lots of evidence he’s essentially correct.

What history teaches us though is that scientists in an established field will fight tooth and nail to prevent paradigm shifts from happening. They aren’t open-minded, and they aren’t driven by logic and reason, they aren’t these dispassionate neutral observers like they pretend to be. They have their turf and they don’t let anyone challenge it. Turf wars, financial stakes and ego will ensure they won’t allow Lanka to get a fair hearing anytime soon.
This makes all sense.
But how to reconcile terrain theory with "the virus is man-made". If the terrain theory holds true then the question arrises what are they working on in the bio-labs (see attached Fauci e-mail)?
 

Attachments

  • PHOTO-Anthony-Fauci-Ignored-Email-About-How-The-Virus-Was-Created.jpg
    PHOTO-Anthony-Fauci-Ignored-Email-About-How-The-Virus-Was-Created.jpg
    137.5 KB · Views: 1

Redcrosse

Woodpecker
This makes all sense.
But how to reconcile terrain theory with "the virus is man-made". If the terrain theory holds true then the question arrises what are they working on in the bio-labs (see attached Fauci e-mail)?
Well, it’s not a problem for me personally. I don’t have anything to reconcile because I don’t think there ever was a coronavirus. The pandemic wasn’t real: it was an illusion created by the worthless PCR test, the fake science of asymptomatic illness and asymptomatic spread, the social distancing and the masks. Take all that theater away and no pandemic even occurred. (Keep in mind there’s never been a global pandemic before; even the Black Death was not a worldwide phenomenon - nor are viruses even needed to explain why the Black Death occurred when it did.)

As to why homicidal elites and warmongers would fund viral research and try to create modified artificial viruses in a lab to kill their enemies - simple. Because they’re not aware of what scientists like Lanka have learned, or if they have heard of it they dismiss it as crazy talk just like 99 percent of his scientific peers. Viruses may not be capable of doing all the horrible things attributed to them, but the psychopaths and warmongers don’t know that.

The best explanation for what diseases really are that I’ve read, and what’s really happening when we get sick, can be found here:


Specifically, read this part:


And then read this part:


The reason this particular version of terrain theory can’t be dismissed is that it can be tested countless times and always provide an accurate result, whereas germ theory is full of holes that simply can’t be explained away.
 

Padouk

Robin
This makes all sense.
But how to reconcile terrain theory with "the virus is man-made". If the terrain theory holds true then the question arrises what are they working on in the bio-labs (see attached Fauci e-mail)?

The story about Fauci involvement with bio-labs was another misdirection. It is part of the depopulation hoax based on the false premises that there are too many people and growing.

When you investigate a crime, the first thing you look for is the motive, the end goal.

The ultimate goal for this hoax is to connect humans to a global network system and control every activity. Why do they need to do that? It is because the current economic model based on over consumption no longer works. The problem started in 2008, they have been able to kick the can down the road until recently. The new economic model is similar to the feudal system where the peasants have no rights and live basic lives. No social mobility.

So the goal is this biotech ID. So how do they do that? They need an agent inside people's bodies to connect to the gtid. The only plausible explanation, so far, is the use of graphene oxide and 5/6G. It might be true, it might false but it fits with the agenda.
 
This makes all sense.
But how to reconcile terrain theory with "the virus is man-made". If the terrain theory holds true then the question arrises what are they working on in the bio-labs (see attached Fauci e-mail)?
The "biolab" theory is controlled opposition. Especially now since Fauci is even suggesting it's man made. A bioweapon so deadly it has a 99.9% survival rate and makes all other respiratory illnesses vanish at the same time?

It's an interesting question to ask though, what exactly is going on in the Wuhan lab. I would counter the question with asking what exactly are all the people at NASA doing if we never went to the moon? I just think the powers at be are keeping these "experts" distracted with busy work.
 

typtre

Woodpecker
In case this hasn't been posted here, Peter Mcullough is well worth watching the whole hour, perhaps someone can write a summary of points

The last few minutes the 58 minute mark is the most interesting because he basically alludes to The Great Reset happening without mentioning it directly

He says there is a concerted effort to "hunt down" and target the ~500 or so brave doctors who are advocating for early treatment (e.g. Ivermectin)

Cross-quoting from the vaccine thread.

This concerted effort to target 'early treatment' is starting to make a lot more sense outside of the vaccine narrative.
Germ theory did not just pave the way for a new industry, but an infinite industry. Since germ theory is a part of our early education (anchoring effect), the general public will have a hard time connecting the dots - that (((they))) create posions (from diffrerent vectors) and offer the solution: pharmaceuticals.

While Ivermectin, vitamins, etc. seem to work as an accelerant for the body to help cleanse itself and thus enable it to tackle the task at hand i.e fight an illness naturally.

The potential here is people starting this treatment for 'the common cold', other ailments, and eventually figure out they are poisoned by the system which could collapse the infinite industry.

I think this is the threat of the whole Ivermectin/HCQ/'early treatment'.

 
Last edited:
Cross-quoting from the vaccine thread.

This concerted effort to target 'early treatment' is starting to make a lot more sense outside of the vaccine narrative.
Germ theory did not just pave the way for a new industry, but an infinite industry. Since germ theory is a part of our early education (anchoring effect), the general public will have a hard time connecting the dots - that (((they))) create posions (from diffrerent vectors) and offer the solution: pharmaceuticals.

While Ivermectin, vitamins, etc. seem to work as an accelerant for the body to help cleanse itself and thus enable it to tackle the task at hand i.e fight an illness naturally.

The potential here is people starting this treatment for 'the common cold', other ailments, and eventually figure out they are poisoned by the system which could collapse the infinite industry.

I think this is the threat of the whole Ivermectin/HCQ/'early treatment'.



Cross-quoting from the vaccine thread.

This concerted effort to target 'early treatment' is starting to make a lot more sense outside of the vaccine narrative.
Germ theory did not just pave the way for a new industry, but an infinite industry. Since germ theory is a part of our early education (anchoring effect), the general public will have a hard time connecting the dots - that (((they))) create posions (from diffrerent vectors) and offer the solution: pharmaceuticals.

While Ivermectin, vitamins, etc. seem to work as an accelerant for the body to help cleanse itself and thus enable it to tackle the task at hand i.e fight an illness naturally.

The potential here is people starting this treatment for 'the common cold', other ailments, and eventually figure out they are poisoned by the system which could collapse the infinite industry.

I think this is the threat of the whole Ivermectin/HCQ/'early treatment'.

Ivermectin and HCQ don't fit in with the terrain framework. You're still in the germ framework if you think so. However cheap and relatively harmless they may be, they are still synthetic pharma pills. Both have been shown in studies to cause diarrhea among patients, suggesting they are toxic to body.
 

Padouk

Robin

Covid-19 - Lack of zinc, selenium ... Is food an aggravating factor? Belgian researchers make a shattering discovery


Scientists at the University of Ghent in Belgium have published a study indicating that people who have fallen seriously ill from Covid-19 have one thing in common, namely a nutritional deficiency.

"Almost all of the patients who ended up getting seriously ill or even dying in hospital had severe selenium and zinc deficiency in their blood on admission . " These are the unusual results of a study carried out by scientists at the University of Ghent. To arrive at such results, they studied the blood of 138 patients of the virus who were admitted last year to two hospitals. " We wanted to check the level of certain nutrients in the blood of patients ", explains Professor Gijs Du Laing . "We knew from previous studies that people with deficiencies in certain nutrients are much more seriously affected by certain viral infections. We wanted to know if the same was true for the Covid-19 ", indicates the researcher.

Professor Du Laing and his colleagues are not the only ones who share this theory. A similar study was published in Germany.

Finally, for the researcher, it is urgent to work on food in healthcare centers such as nursing homes. Hence the hypothesis put forward: " If you know that there are a lot of vulnerable people, special attention should be paid to selenium and zinc in the diet. A large number of elderly people hardly eat meat any more. , because they have problems with chewing and therefore leave it out, for example. Currently, elderly people living in residential care centers mainly receive iron or vitamin D supplements in addition to their diet food, while many also need selenium and zinc for the proper functioning of their immune system ".
 

doodydota

Pigeon
Ivermectin and HCQ are indeed toxic when overdosed. That's why early in the pandemic so many Italians got killed by protocols due to overmedication. As a result those drugs got a bad reputation.

Dr. Robert Young in explains in an interview with Ramola D. that Ivermectin and HCQ work because those drugs alter the PH of the cells. They are not "anti-virals" per se. Unfortunatly, I don't have the timestamp when he sais it. The interview is interesting in its whole anyway.
 

Roosh

Cardinal
Orthodox
Ivermectin and HCQ are indeed toxic when overdosed. That's why early in the pandemic so many Italians got killed by protocols due to overmedication. As a result those drugs got a bad reputation.

Dr. Robert Young in explains in an interview with Ramola D. that Ivermectin and HCQ work because those drugs alter the PH of the cells. They are not "anti-virals" per se. Unfortunatly, I don't have the timestamp when he sais it. The interview is interesting in its whole anyway.
Italians got killed from overdosing on Ivermectin and HCQ? Provide a source on that.
 

get2choppaaa

Ostrich
Ivermectin and HCQ are indeed toxic when overdosed. That's why early in the pandemic so many Italians got killed by protocols due to overmedication. As a result those drugs got a bad reputation.

Dr. Robert Young in explains in an interview with Ramola D. that Ivermectin and HCQ work because those drugs alter the PH of the cells. They are not "anti-virals" per se. Unfortunatly, I don't have the timestamp when he sais it. The interview is interesting in its whole anyway.
The LD50 of ivermectin is something like 15mg per kg.

The treatment dose is between .4 and .6mg per kg.

The pills are commonly in 3 mg and 12 mg.

So a 80 kg man would have to take 1200 mg of IVM. (That's literally 100 pills)

Doesn't pass the sniff test... I'd like to see the source also.

In Brazil they killed people giving them something like double the LD50 of HCQ. That's the only such thing I've heard of where there people were being killed.
 

typtre

Woodpecker
Ivermectin and HCQ don't fit in with the terrain framework. You're still in the germ framework if you think so. However cheap and relatively harmless they may be, they are still synthetic pharma pills. Both have been shown in studies to cause diarrhea among patients, suggesting they are toxic to body.
Well not in the sense they are there killing germs and whatnot. But in the sense they are a catalyst for something else in the body that allows it to jump start its healing process. In line with a natural remedy. If you eat a lot of coconut oil you will get the runs too. Pardon my skepticism of studies, and especially on pharmaceuticals, these days.

I am not saying they are not posion, but there may be a reason the big bad evil pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Merck now want to create a 'Covid pill' what appears to be just like Ivermectin. What is the motivation there? Just profit? Control of their domain? Something more sinister?

Going far, faaaar out the speculative curve - maybe Joe Rogan took the cure for cancer and now they need to cover the opening.
 

Padouk

Robin
Covid is an environmental disease: a combination of graphene oxide (other metals too) and electromagnetic radiation from cell towers. The severity of it depends on the nutritional deficiencies per individual (usually zinc and selenium, see my post above).

Any treatment with synthetic drugs does not address these issues. They might work temporarily by numbing the body but in the long terms the negative effects get multiplied. I understand why people would want ivermectin and HCQ to be the magic pills as we have all been conditioned to look at pills as the remedy.
 
Last edited:
Italians got killed from overdosing on Ivermectin and HCQ? Provide a source on that.
I don't have a primary source, but it's mentioned at the end of the "Germs Debunk Corona" video by Spacebusters. Also Remington Nevin blew the whistle on HCQ early on, and was a featured guest on the "Infectious Myth" podcast

 
Top