The Theory Of Evolution Is Incompatible With Christianity
- Thread starter Roosh
- Start date
Mac is gay? It’s been a long time since I’ve seen that show. A lot of it was vulgar but they had some hilarious episodes.
Yes. They did an episode where he got shredded and super fit on season 10, then he did a ballet thing and tells his dad who's just gotten out of prison he's gay.
Haven't watched it since then.
"The theory of evolution is incompatible with Christianity" something something "Mac from Sunny has always had gay undertones..."
My bad.
"Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?"
That's proof that over time things tend to get worse, rather than improve. A refutation of evolution if you will"The theory of evolution is incompatible with Christianity" something something "Mac from Sunny has always had gay undertones..."
I think we've beat that to death so much what's the point?
Transitioning to it's always sunny was just a natural point of profession...
Sorry in advance.
Rob McElhenney, who plays Mac, was raised by two lesbians. I used to love Always Sunny - and it does have some great bits - but eventually realized that Mac's portrayal of Christians as stupid, primitive, and backwards was always an attack on normal morality and family formation. It wasn't just a "funny gay character that always talked about the Bible and pretended to be straight;" there was a more vitriolic undertone to the whole thing because I suspect it was personal for him.
Why? Because you said so? If you had to go by empirical evidence that is on hand alone, atheism is perfectly rational. And many, if not most scientists are atheists - far from imbeciles.
“Everything is a random and meaningless accident” is not “perfectly rational.” It takes Faith to believe in the Holy Trinity, but even intelligent non-Christians have to concede that logically “something” must have caused the Universe and govern its laws.
Atheism is the quintessence of imbecility. Plato & Aristotle philosophically proved that God exists more than 23 centuries ago. These renowned "scientists" you write of are mere contemptible paid stooges of (((them))). (((They))) find it very convenient to have their slaves believe that they are nothing more than trousered apes as this makes the slaves discard troublesome ideas such as being possessed of a certain inherent dignity & honour due to being made in God's Image, having an eternal destiny & so on; those who hold these ideas are much more likely to resent & resist being treated like human cattle. The bribes (((they))) use to soothe the public work well because the public is largely comprised of infidels. Can you imagine what the Crusaders would have thought of an offer made by heathen or Mahometan enemies that they would hand over their women so that they might be used for immoral purposes if the Soldiers of Christ would leave them be? Your average pig---- atheist on the other hand is overjoyed when (((they))) offer him endless porno & the "freedom" to be as depraved a pervert as he would like to be. In return for being allowed to keep this dubious bounty he'll quietly do whatever he's told no matter how demeaning, immoral or dishonourable it is; he's worthless & deserving of the contempt (((they))) heap upon him. As Mazzini, one of (((their))) Masonic agentur so well put it: "we corrupt in order to rule."
Last edited:
I don't understand why you think that "something" must be sentient and not just a process like all the other natural processes we observe. Your leap of faith isn't just to "something caused the Universe", it's to "something caused the Universe and it was a personal God". Another problem is that religious people go from "everything must have an origin" to "everything must have an origin and therefore everything in my religion is correct".
Going back to rationality, surely you can see the reason in "X did Y!" "Oh yeah? Prove it."
@Solitarius, not going to dignify that non-sequitur ramble with a response.
Last edited:
Does every effect have a cause, or do things occur randomly with no preceding chain of actions that lead to them?
Effects have causes, but why do you claim to know what the original cause was? Also, it's not that simple, the universe does not appear to be purely mechanically deterministic (quantum uncertainty principle, in b4 you try to shove God in there).
Last edited:
Ha ha, all right infidel, I hope your television set never gives out, after all if it did how would you know what to think?
Believing in science takes as much faith as it does to believe any religion. Other than testing the basic laws of Newtonian physics or the validity of chemical reactions, there is no possibility for an individual to verify the claims of scientists. Other than believing there is no way to personally prove there is evolution, the age of the Earth or Universe, the Big Bang Theory etc.
The original cause MUST be a person, because the first act requires WILL. An impersonal process always requires another cause to have preceeded it.
There is no other logical explanation.
“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.”
- Romans 1:20