We should start taking bets on starting a thread on a public figure about how long it takes someone to declare that the person is really "controlled opposition" and/or a spy for Israel.
So you can wear any t-shirt you want, but you can't comment on a message board. Thanks for defending my rights, Tucker.
I disagree harshly with your sentiment about Neff. He believed he was being anonymous and this is just what people do on the Internet. He didn't harm a soul. And if we cannot say what we want anonymously without fear of losing our jobs, *we are not free people*.
What good is working in dissident media if you can't, you know, be dissident in your daily life?
You can go through my posts on this thread last year. I loved Tucker. Watched his show nightly. I watched FOX News on election night and saw what happened. And Tucker, who makes such a big fuss about having integrity, did as little as possible to look into anything.
Tucker Carlsons "Americans are being paid not to work by Joe Biden!" segment is nothing more than a more articulate version of "SOCIALISM SUCKS!"
Job growth in April was about 1/5th what Wall Street projected. White people are being fired for political crimes or even merely existing by the thousands. Where are people supposed to work?
I like Tucker, but its moments like these that you see the schizophrenia and shallowness of "new right" populism. It's never going anywhere.
Has Tucker ever worked a worthless $9 an hour job? He would know that the less you're paid the harder they work you.
What if tomorrow he got fired from Fox, would he reject unemployment benefits to get up and spend about 2 hours worth of his daily wages on just gas to commute back and forth to a shitty Walgreens job?
The answer is no. So why demand anyone else do it?
Businesses' have used right to work laws and illegal immigration to keep wages artificially low since the 1970s.
Now that some workers have some leverage over capital in some places, the GOP -- including its fake "populists"-- suddenly comes alive to white knight for private equity and Wal Mart.
Fuck them all.
I believe some MSM people really don't like him. But what about Rachel Maddow? You would think Tucker and Rachel would be seething at each other, yet they both go out of their way to praise each other when they have the opportunity. Tucker would say things like, "Maddow isn't bad, she just has a different opinion." They worked together when he was at MSNBC and they like each other, but Maddow has had so many indefensible segments on her show over the last 5 years that it's interesting Tucker doesn't touch her.Fox could have kept going with the adult diaper wearing set and eventually faded away into AM radio, but they took a chance with Tucker. Is he perfect? Hell no, but he is different and dissident enough that the rest of major media hates him - that's good enough for me.
I understand what you're saying and agree with you in practicality. However the US is supposed to be the place where you have free speech and can say what you like. In the here and now you are correct -- it's a naive assumption. It wasn't so much 30 years ago. Why has it changed and who helped usher the change in, and why are those who aren't already the enemy allowing the left to take scalps without a fight?As for keeping a secret life on the Internet, nobody here of all places should ever believe that lie.
Listen to last night's FTN. Republicans constantly *appear* to push back against trannies and critical race theory, but when it comes down to policy that actually gets passed into law, it's all a show. Tucker is pointing this out, but the Republicans will cow-tow and water it down and then say they won.Tonight he's calling out Republican legislators in Texas holding up a bill to prevent chemical castration. Which channel should I turn to for that story instead? Which one is "less evil"?
Hard disagreement here, Slicky. Anyone *in media* who has applied to the CIA should be suspect, *especially* if he appears to be on our side. I'm being very specific.As for the "he applied to the CIA" bit, remember, they hire everyone from spies to bureaucrats to administrative clerks, and even people who work in the Starbucks in their facilities (yes, they have some - nice, clean ones, actually). That Tucker may have applied somewhere doesn't therefore mean he's some kind of government controlled opposition.
I think we all know there are obvious limits of what you can and cannot say on TV. No one here is asking Tucker to do a roman salute on TV.A lot of people have trouble with Tucka not naming the jew and therefore he must just be controlled opposition. I honestly have to ask though : all of you who take issue with that, how often do you spout off about them in your own jobs and work life? Don't expect more of him than you would yourself.
We're all basically insurgents in a rhetorical war. They're the occupying force. If any of us pop our heads too high up (him included) we'll get them taken off.
Hannity.. Kind of a well-lubricated weather vane who follows the conservative winds. He was your typical neo-con journalist and got a little better with Trump. I still get annoyed looking at most of these FOX news anchors who mistreated Ron Paul in 2008 and 2012.
I am glad he is publicly stating what Bannon and crew exposed over a year ago.Holy shizzle sticks.... Tucker came out and directly , openly connected Fauci and the gain of function research at rhe Wuhan lab. Im on a new iPad and cant link the video. This is huge
Is Tucker losing his mind? First time in a few weeks I tuned in and saw this
-Edit, my fault, I haven't been watching the media in this country for awhile and didn't know this subject (UFOs) was being covered by other outlets