I don't think the replacement is real as a goal, it's a means to an end. For a different reason than I normally hear.
The end goal is internationalism , the breaking of the nationstate under international control. The politicians and bureaucracy have been easily convinced. For national politicians it is a guaranteed income and a great international job after a few years of public service. Also for bureaucrats it's perfect you get all the laws, the ideas, the regulations and just translate them. No self thinking needed, today being a public servant means a part time job translating EU regulations for an amazing pay and pension.
The population is the problem. When stuff doesn't work in society we look up. Which puts the internationalists and bureaucrats at risk.
It's about channeling the frustration and energy of the population. To look at each other instead of looking up. I think we need to see all societal conflict in this perspective. It is an engineered game. "Bread and games" as a roman poet said.
- BLM was supported by the internationalists because it sparked racial divide. Those blacks vs those whites.
- The same for men vs women. The goal is us looking at and hating eachother; Look at this crazy liberal girl teaching tranny stuff and them looking at this brute redneck man burping with his gun.
- The same for sports; Madrid vs Napoli, it's to channel energy. All those football teams have +70% non-local players, if you support Paris St Germain, you're supporting a team of Africans.
- The import of immigrants is another great divide; the supporters vs the people that are against it.
- Corona was a great divide
- Now they are attacking big "greedy" companies that are stealing your money
The internationalists especially love conflicts which are really divisive. And they ideally want us to go on twitter and fight eachother. As if it is about opinions and voting. They want us to believe if we can convince the other, we can win the elections and create a better world. We need to believe in democracy.
They want us fighting among ourselves. Whites vs Blacks. Women vs Men. Muslims vs Christians. Instead of going after them in Washington or Brussels. And going to their houses and look them up. I think this Jan 6 insurrection hoax is to show, you can challenge all and everything but not the system.
"Go home redneck and fight the blacks, fights the trannies, fight the women, fight the muslims, fight the immigrants, but not us because we are sacred. We are the democracy."
Strong monocultures are dangerous, e.g. a 95% Christian country with clear male/female roles and little immigrants, blacks and sportsball. In these countries it's a matter of time before they challenge the internationalists. As we see in Iran now, the Jews are supporting the Kurds in the Iranian conflict, they promise the Kurds democracy, power and influence if the government topples.
Concluding the goal is maximum internal conflict to stabilize the international leadership, especially in harsh economic times and large theft as now. I mean if you have criminal migrants in your village you won't go to Brussels to revolt. If your wife is telling your son he should be a girl, the internationalists are not your worry. If blacks are lotting your inner city, you won't look to Washington.
I think the internationalist mafia is really fearful. For that reason they import so many blacks, criminals, derange the women, spread porn.
Please don't look at us. We just try to help you.
I think the mission is not to be divided, the muslims, blacks, women, liberals are not the real enemy as obnoxious as they are. Blacks have been made this way by the Jews. Same for women.
1 Eye on God, 1 Eye on the enemy.