Two illegal Latinos rape 14-year-old girl in Maryland high school

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

So basically some people are considered Hispanic for the purpose of government and corporate quotas, getting into colleges, housing assistance and hate crime laws... but at the same time they're considered White for the purposes of tracking crimes committed by them.

Makes sense.

 

[MMX2010]

The strongest piece of rhetoric came from a Periscope by Nick Desenso.

The parents of the Rockville Rape paid taxes so that their daughter would get raped.

The Rockville Rape also highlights why school choice (and Betsy DeVos) are hated by liberals.

 

[Geomann180]

The strongest piece of rhetoric came from a Periscope by Nick Desenso.

The parents of the Rockville Rape paid taxes so that their daughter would get raped.

The Rockville Rape also highlights why school choice (and Betsy DeVos) are hated by liberals.

Ahhhhh, sweet sweeeeet privilege.

G

 

[BrewDog]

I had thought that this was not a forum where language policing and lists of "forbidden words" was really something we did here.

I've discovered that sometimes the use of the words "Douchebag" and "Asshole" are not well received if used in the wrong context.

 

[Brian Shima]

Never met a man who regularly gets laid and is obsessed with race..

 

[anthony]

http://thefederalist.com/2017/03/22...r-old-now-democrats-want-protect-deportation/

Last week, two male high school students at Rockville High School in Maryland allegedly raped a 14-year-old girl in the bathroom. One of the two suspects is an undocumented immigrant from Guatemala, but Maryland Democrats want to protect him from getting deported.

The Democratic-controlled Maryland legislature voted in favor of a bill to make their state the first “sanctuary state” in the country. If the bill becomes law, it would protect illegal immigrants like 18-year-old Henry Sanchez-Milian, who was arrested last week along with 17-year-old Jose Montano.

The two students, who were enrolled as freshmen due to their limited English skills, have been charged with first-degree rape and two counts of first-degree sexual offenses, according to Fox 5 DC.

After Sanchez-Milian’s arrest, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement issued an immigration detainer, ordering local law enforcement to help detain him until his immigration case is reviewed.

If enacted, the Maryland Law Enforcement and Trust Act, which passed the Maryland House of Delegates on Monday with a vote of 83-55, would prohibit local and state law enforcement from cooperating with federal authorities to find and deport undocumented immigrants, effectively making the state a “sanctuary state.”

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican, threatened to veto the bill if it made it past the state senate and called on Montgomery County officials to comply with federal authorities throughout the rape investigation.

I am curious if MD Democrats are trying their best to turn their state into a rock-ribbed Trump Red state....similar to West Virginia.

 

[Pete]

delete

 

[CJ_W]

I think ElFlaco is triggered because he's Mexican and feels some sort of ethnic guilt/shame.

Im going to be harsh, because frankly Im tired of this shit.

YOU need to stop being so fucking triggered. It was ALREADY stated the a Mod changed the title, and the Mod himself posted, so TALK TO HIM PRIVATELY. You keep going on and on about it, it makes you look like some wanna be Sharblue Psy-Ops wannabe. Youve made your point, you got your answer, man up and talk to the people responsible. No one here really cares if you got triggered. They are just humoring you.

Stop being a pussy and do what you need to do (talk to Roosh privately instead of vomiting reddit-esque diarrhea all over the thread.)

 

[BrewDog]

I'm not an SJW. I don't think any word could/should be banned. I believe and I love the First Amendment and the Constitution.

I'm not butthurt that people say bad stuff about latinos. What does bother me is that I'm often included in that group just because we have a language in common. Nothing else.

This argument seems a bit SJW, though, doesn't it? This entire thread hasn't been filled with the outrage over two illegal aliens raping a minor. Someone said the word "Latino" and NOW here comes the outrage.

Our society has our priorities fucked up, and if there's finally a bit of community backlash against political correctness, then I'm fine with it. You say you appreciate the First Amendment, then the truth is they were two Latino rapists. You also say you're not Latino, so I don't understand why you're so incensed.

Should the outrage be about two illegal aliens raping a minor, or should it be because someone truthfully pointed out the criminals' ethnicity?

 

[Pete]

I'm not an SJW. I don't think any word could/should be banned. I believe and I love the First Amendment and the Constitution.

I'm not butthurt that people say bad stuff about latinos. What does bother me is that I'm often included in that group just because we have a language in common. Nothing else.

This argument seems a bit SJW, though, doesn't it? This entire thread hasn't been filled with the outrage over two illegal aliens raping a minor. Someone said the word "Latino" and NOW here comes the outrage.

Our society has our priorities fucked up, and if there's finally a bit of community backlash against political correctness, then I'm fine with it. You say you appreciate the First Amendment, then the truth is they were two Latino rapists. You also say you're not Latino, so I don't understand why you're so incensed.

Should the outrage be about two illegal aliens raping a minor, or should it be because someone truthfully pointed out the criminals' ethnicity?

Of course that is a disgusting crime. But if you think about it a bit more, I think The outrage should be with whoever lets people sneak inside the US illegally, otherwise it would not have happened.

Since when is sharing my opinion the same as asking to ban something? I don't remember ever calling for that in my previous post.

I actually love the US. It's one of the only places where you can also be recognized for your work, instead of only by the relationships/connections/plugs/money you have.

I ain't gon say no' mo'.

 

[MMX2010]

You should watch the entire interview with Tucker Carlson, but the defense attorney is going to argue that the encounter was consensual.

-----

The most intense (but, strangely, not heated intense - more like exceptionally coldly intense) was an ad-libbed question by Tucker.

The defense attorney David Moyse said, "Questions could be raised" about the victim.

Tucker asked what questions could be raised about the victim, and then added (after his reply), "Has it dawned on you that, by God, you had better be right about this? That if you're going to malign the character of a 14 year old rape victim's character, you'd better be right about this, for the sake of your soul?"

Here's video.

 

[Jaydublin]

Title: Two Latinos rape 14-year-old girl in Maryland high school

The large majority of latinos in the US are not illegal immigrants, so why focus on this pair's ethnicity rather than on their status as illegal immigrants?

But a large majority of illegals are Latino.

A large majority of illegal immigrants committing crimes are also Latino.

Lets not hide from the facts like Europe.

 

[spokepoker]

Not everyone who speaks spanish is a "latino" and not everyone who speaks spanish is an immigrant. You would not call spaniards latinos would you?

I'm a US citizen born on a US territory, yet because of me speaking spanish, people in the US always assume I'm mexican or from central america and they like to put all these people in the "latino" category.

It bothers me because I do not consider myself a latino. I know how to write and speak the english language better than many people who have it as their native tongue, and I'm also a US citizen by birth.

The correct title should be "Two Illegal Immigrants Rape 14 year old in Maryland high school".

Because being considered latino does not automatically make you an illegal alien, crossing the border illegally does.


**end of rant**

 

[Mufasa]

...
For a forum of players, there's a lot of weird rage and negativity around here. I honestly wonder how many teenagers are posting, especially in politics.

You're ruining my life.

I don't have to listen to you.

You can't tell me what to do.

You're not my real dad.

 

[MMX2010]

 

[Merenguero]

There is something here that a lot of the internet commenters (outside of the forum) and this Cucker guy apparently fail to understand. The way Maryland law is written, as long as the sex is consensual, it is not per se illegal for a seventeen year old or many eighteen year olds to have sex with a fourteen year old. If the alleged victim is under fourteen years old, and the Defendant is at least four years older than the alleged victim, age then comes into play. Sixteen is always legal in Maryland. Fourteen or fifteen is legal unless the Defendant is at least four years older than the alleged victim (fourth degree sex offense-misdemeanor) or the Defendant is at least 21 (third degree sex offense-felony). That type of third degree sex offense obviously does not apply here, as both Defendants are below the age of 21. The type of fourth degree sex offense I mentioned definitely does not apply to one of the Defendants, as that Defendant is seventeen and is therefore fewer than four years older than the alleged victim. If Sanchez is not a full four years older than the alleged victim (I do not believe he is as he is not being charged with a third degree sex offense), than absolutely no age-related sex offenses are being charged or are at all relevant in this case. There is a high probability that prior to April 14, 2017 (the date of Sanchez's Preliminary Hearing), the Grand Jury will indict both Defendants. If the grand jury finds probable cause that Sanchez was four years older than the alleged victim, they can add the charge of third degree sex offense and any other charged for which probable cause exists, to Sanchez's indictment. Basically Cucker (never even studied law) and the people who keep posting bollocks online like "statutory rape" and "fourteen is too young to consent" need to read the fucking code. Their ignorance isn't even funny.

The burden is on the state to prove lack of consent and use of force and I believe they will have an uphill battle. Due to all of the exposure in the press and the relative conservative nature of jurors (especially compared to P.G. and Baltimore City) in the jurisdiction where this case where will be tried, it may make sense to just have a court trial. The criminal trial will be difficult for the state. Gettting these guys removed from the country might not be as difficult.

Beyond that, I think I need to stay out of this thread and may be willing to answer questions in private.

 

[Samseau]

This case would take a turn for crazy if it turns out the girl had prior sexual relations with at least one of the guys.

But Merenguero, I don't think it will be very difficult to show a lack of consent in this case. How can it reasonably be shown that this girl wanted to fuck in the boys bathroom right in the middle of a school day? These guys are looking at 10-20 years in the slammer or a deportation.

 

[BrewDog]

This case would take a turn for crazy if it turns out the girl had prior sexual relations with at least one of the guys.

But Merenguero, I don't think it will be very difficult to show a lack of consent in this case. How can it reasonably be shown that this girl wanted to fuck in the boys bathroom right in the middle of a school day? These guys are looking at 10-20 years in the slammer or a deportation.

Tucker was saying that the kids in the next classroom could hear her screaming.

And I don't know about them getting time in prison; the jury will decide. But they'll definitely get deported. I can't imagine an immigration judge letting them off with this charge even if found not guilty.

 

[Merenguero]

This case would take a turn for crazy if it turns out the girl had prior sexual relations with at least one of the guys.

But Merenguero, I don't think it will be very difficult to show a lack of consent in this case. How can it reasonably be shown that this girl wanted to fuck in the boys bathroom right in the middle of a school day? These guys are looking at 10-20 years in the slammer or a deportation.

You seem to already know this, but the defense need not prove consent. The state needs to prove lack of consent. If you listen to Andy's comments at the early part of the video, it should start to make sense. Where are the wounds on the Defendants or on her? Would a fourteen year old girl not fight back? If so and there are no wounds on anybody, the state may have a serious problem. All you need is reasonable doubt as to any one element. I don't know all the facts, but I don't think it will be easy for the state to prove.

 

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Rape, gang rape even is a fluke when an illegal immigrant or a Muslim does it.

But woe a white man pulls out his penis 5 seconds too late after a girl told him to stop while in the act - that is true and brutal rape. It is also rape if a rich black man gets drunk with a girl and both have sex while drunk - that girl can regret it and call it rape retroactively. Ay - Whites can be dirt poor and living in a trailer to profit from white privilege and enjoy their fake rape allegations. US blacks also get the pleasure of this when they are Mike-Tyson or Bill-Cosby rich.

Illegal immigrants however can do no wrong - they are traumatized and so are the Muslim immigrants and Somalis who are currently raping their way through the US and Europe.

The flow of immigration must not stop - diversity is our strength.